GAN Mao 1,2 , ZHANG Wei 1,2 , WANG Zhe 1,2 , HE Linxiang 1,2 , YE Xiaoping 3 , ZHAO Yu 1,2 , LIU Hong 1,2
  • 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China;
  • 2. Day Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China;
LIU Hong, Email: liuhong6261@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To compare the efficacy of varicose great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment alone versus combined treatment with iliac vein compression (IVC) intervention in improving lower extremity symptoms and prognosis among the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC. Methods Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC treated at the Day Service Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2022 to January 2025 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the treatment strategies: the varicose GSV treatment alone group (control group) and the combined treatment group for varicose GSV and IVC (observation group). The primary endpoints included the closure rate of the GSV trunk, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study quality of life/symptom (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The significance level was set at α=0.05. Results A total of 264 patients with left lower extremity varicose GSV complicated by IVC were included. The observation group comprised 32 patients, while the remaining 232 patients underwent 1∶3 propensity score-matching, resulting in 96 matched patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics, including gender, age, and comorbidities, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the GSV trunk closure rate was 100% in both groups. Within-group comparisons revealed significant improvements in the VCSS and VEINES-QOL/Sym points at 6 and 12 months as compared with preoperative (on admission) values (P<0.05). Between-group comparisons showed that the observation group had greater improvement in the VEINES-QOL/Sym score at 6 months (P=0.028), but no significant difference in the VCSS (P=0.775); At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated significantly better the VCSS (P<0.001) and VEINES-QOL/Sym points (P<0.001) as compared with the control group. Conclusions For patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC, both treatment strategies significantly improve symptoms. Results of short-term follow-up (6 months) demonstrate early advantages in quality of life improvement with concurrent IVC intervention, while results of 12-month follow-up indicate superior efficacy in both symptom relief and quality of life enhancement. Therefore, concurrent IVC intervention may provide greater clinical benefits for mid- to long-term prognosis for patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC.

Citation: GAN Mao, ZHANG Wei, WANG Zhe, HE Linxiang, YE Xiaoping, ZHAO Yu, LIU Hong. Impact of concurrent iliac vein compression relief on surgical outcomes for great saphenous vein varicosities: A propensity score-matched study. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2025, 32(4): 422-427. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.202504015 Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Emergency medical response strategy for the 2025 Dingri, Tibet Earthquake
  • Next Article

    Expert consensus on the selection of postoperative recovery evaluation scale for cardiac surgery patients based on patient-reported outcomes