As subjects in drug clinical trials and participants in medical practice, patients can best understand their own conditions and needs. With this in mind, the FDA proposed "patient-centered drug discovery" and issued a set of guidelines to incorporate patient experiences, perspectives, needs, and preferences into the drug development and evaluation process. Guideline (2), methods for identifying important patient information, mainly describes methods and precautions for collecting and extracting patient experience data. This paper will focus on the characteristics, common methods and precautions of qualitative, quantitative and mixed research methods in the collection of patient experience data, in order to provide help for the comprehensive collection of patient experience data.
ObjectiveTo explore the psychological process and needs of the second victims of medical adverse events after the occurrence of adverse events, so as to provide reference for the psychological intervention strategies of medical institutions for the second victims of medical adverse events.MethodsThe second victims of medical adverse events in the First People’s Hospital of Ziyang were selected from April to July 2019. Qualitative research method was used to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with the second victims. Colaizzi method was used to analyze the transcripts through reading and rereading, coding, and thematizing. ResultsA total of 22 second victims of medical adverse events were interviewed. The second victims of medical adverse events experienced negative emotional experience, and the desire to seek emotional support was urgent. The psychological process of the second victims of medical adverse events mainly involved five stages: fear, anxiety, depression, guilt and recovery. Emotional support hada positive effect on regression. Conversely, negative or lack of emotional support had a negative effect on regression. ConclusionsThe emotional experience of the second victims of medical adverse events is relatively staged, and the recovery and regression are greatly affected by internal and external factors. Hospital administrators should take active measures and establish an emotional support mechanism for adverse events in order to reduce psychosomatic injuries and improve medical quality and efficiency.
The patient, as the person who experiences the disease first-hand, has the most direct and accurate experience of the pain of the disease and the most accurate need for health products. Although there is a vast array of technological means to combat disease and maintain health, the human burden of disease has not been reduced and the health needs of patients have not been fully met. Therefore, "patient-focused drug development" is imperative. Gathering comprehensive information from patients through multiple channels and incorporating this information into the entire drug development process can help ensure that patients’ experiences, perspectives, needs and priorities are taken into account and valued. This article will introduce the concept, development process and the specific problems it faces in patient-focused drug development.
Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) is a leading diagnosis and treatment model widely respected in modern international medical field, which plays an important role in clarifying disease diagnosis, determining treatment direction, and reducing patient time and labor cost. In recent years, China has issued relevant policies to encourage hospitals to vigorously develop MDT. West China Hospital of Sichuan University established a MDT clinic in 2013. Through continuous innovation and bold breakthrough in terms of experience accumulation, clinical resource integration, disciplinary collaboration and other aspects, the hospital breaks the barriers of MDT, timely helps complex severe diseases patients to solve the diagnosis and treatment needs, provides patients with the best personalized treatment plan, and continuously improves the medical experience of patients. Therefore, this article introduces and summarizes the implementation process and experience of MDT outpatient clinic in West China Hospital of Sichuan University.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of situational experiential teaching mode in emergency internship teaching. Methods Interns from the Department of Emergency, Jiangyou Fifth People’s Hospital from July 2022 to May 2023 were selected as the research subjects. The interns were randomly divided into a trial group and a control group using a random number table method. The trial group adopted a situational experiential teaching mode, while the control group adopted a traditional teaching mode. Theoretical knowledge testing, clinical comprehensive ability assessment, and clinical information feedback were used to evaluate the effectiveness of different teaching methods. Results A total of 90 interns were included, with 45 people in each group, aged 18-23 years old. Both groups consist of 18 clinical medicine students and 27 clinical nursing students. There was no statistically significant difference in academic performance in school between the two groups of interns (P>0.05). The theoretical knowledge test score (92.98±2.71 vs. 85.29±6.24), clinical comprehensive ability assessment score (90.52±2.58 vs. 83.35±5.25) and clinical feedback (44 excellent and 1 fine in the trial group vs. 25 excellent, 5 fine, and 15 poor in the control group) of the trial group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions The situational experiential teaching mode can enhance interns’ learning interest, improve memory effectiveness, help students master theoretical knowledge, and enhance their comprehensive abilities in clinical evaluation and decision-making. It is worth promoting in clinical practice.
Objective To systematically evaluate the qualitative research on disease experience of breast cancer patients. Methods China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and Web of Science were searched for qualitative research on disease experience of breast cancer patients till April 15, 2022. JBI was used to evaluate the quality of the literatures, and meta-integration was used to systematic evaluation. Results A total of 36 literatures were included. Among them, there were 177 clear research results, and a total of 14 complete research results were extracted, including positive experience and negative experience, which were summarized into 7 categories. 7 categories included physical experience, psychological experience, family and social support, disease knowledge needs, medical humanistic care, medical treatment process, coping. Two integrated results were synthesized, including disease experience and medical treatment experience. Conclusions In the whole process of breast cancer patients’ illness and medical treatment, they need not only guidance and support, but also medical humanistic care to help them respond to their own changes in a timely manner. The quality of life of patients can be improved by providing them with sufficient disease related information, striving to improve the medical treatment process, establishing and improving their all-round support system.