ObjectiveTo compare the effects of piriformis muscle release versus preservation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach on muscle injury. MethodsForty-nine patients undergoing initial THA via SuperPATH approach between June 2022 and June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups, with 24 patients in trial group and 25 patients in control group. The trial group received piriformis muscle release intraoperatively, whereas the control group underwent muscle preservation. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, and preoperative muscle infiltration, muscle atrophy, muscle injury serological indicators, Harris score, etc. (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative 1-day muscle injury serological indicators [including creatine kinase (CK) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)], and incidence of complications between two groups were recorded. Harris score was used to evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. MRI was used to evaluate the extent of hip muscle injuries (gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, piriformis, obturator internus, quadratus femoris), including tendon integrity, degree of muscle fat infiltration, and degree of muscle atrophy preoperative and 1 year postoperatively. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and total blood loss in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incision length and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in serum CK and LDH levels on postoperative day 1 compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up, the follow-up time for the trial group and the control group was (14.8±2.8) and (15.1±3.0) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.400, P=0.691). Incisions healed by first intention in both groups, with 1 case in the trial group and 2 cases in the control group experiencing venous thrombosis in the calf muscle space. There was no complication such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hip dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic infection in the lower limbs. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of patients showed a significant increase in Harris scores compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative results, both groups showed significant fat infiltration in the piriformis and obturator muscles at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant fat infiltration in the gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, and quadratus femoris muscles (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, except for the higher incidence of piriformis muscle fat infiltration in the control group compared to the trial group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the incidence of other muscle infiltrations between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of piriformis and obturator muscles showed significant muscle atrophy compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05). The gluteus minimus and gluteus medius showed mild atrophy compared to preoperative levels, while the maximum transverse diameter of the quadriceps muscle slightly increased, but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the maximum cross-sectional diameter or cross-sectional area changes of each muscle between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, the continuity of the gluteus medius and quadratus femoris muscles in both groups was intact. Both groups had some patients with incomplete continuity of the piriformis muscle, obturator internus, and gluteus minimus, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionThe SuperPATH approach THA may cause injury to the piriformis, gluteus minimus, and obturator internus. The piriformis muscle release does not increase muscle injury, but it can shorten the operation time and reduce bleeding.
Objective To systematically evaluate the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) between robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional THA. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to collect cohort studies of robot-assisted and traditional THAs from inception to August 11th, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 10 high-quality cohort studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional THA, LLD after robot-assisted THA was smaller [MD=−1.64, 95%CI (−2.25, −1.04), P<0.001], Harris scores at 3 and 12 months after operation were higher [MD=1.50, 95%CI (0.44, 2.57), P=0.006; MD=7.60, 95%CI (2.51, 12.68), P=0.003]. However, the operative time was longer [MD=8.36, 95%CI (4.56, 12.17), P<0.000 1], and the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was larger [MD=1.91, 95%CI (1.43, 2.40), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in Harris score at 6 months, amnesia index (Forgotten joint score, FJS), postoperative acetabular abduction angle, and incidence of complication between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Robot-assisted THA is superior to traditional THA in postoperative LLD.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of using smartphone to measure the angle of acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsBetween June 2012 and September 2015, the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles were measured in 50 patients undergoing THA. There were 24 males and 26 females, aged 37 to 83 years (mean, 71 years). The left hip was involved in 22 cases and the right hip in 28 cases. Of 50 patients, 34 suffered from fracture of the femoral neck, and 16 suffered from avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Acetabular dysplasia was excluded in all cases. A smartphone was used to measure the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles during operation; standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) was used to measured the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles on the X-ray film at 1 week after operation. It was defined as positive that the component angle values by PACS measurement were greater than those by the smartphone measurement, whereas as negative. The two measurement methods were compared, and intra-observer variability was assessed by analyzing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze difference. ResultsThe ICC was 0.84 in the acetabular component angles by smartphone and PACS measurement methods. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.02±1.33)° and the anteversion angle was (17.62±2.20)° by smartphone measurement. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.74±4.05)° and the anteversion angle was (17.22±5.57)° by PACS measurement. There was no significant difference between two measurement methods (Z=-1.977, P=0.482; Z=-0.368, P=0.713). The acetabular component angle was in the safe zone in 44 cases; and the acetabular component anteversion angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 5°, and the abduction angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 3° in 6 cases. Intra-measurement variability was -21 to +10° for the anteversion angle and -10 to + 9° for the abduction angle, indicating that the acetabular component anteversion angle by smartphone measurement was greater than that by the PACS measurement, and the abduction angle was less than that by PACS measurement. ConclusionSmartphone is a convenient tool to measure the acetabular component angle in THA.
Objective To review research advances of revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The recent literature on revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH was reviewed. The reasons for revision surgery were analyzed and the difficulties of revision surgery, the management methods, and the related prosthesis choices were summarized. Results Patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH have small anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum, large variation in acetabular and femoral anteversion angles, severe soft tissue contractures, which make both THA and revision surgery more difficult. There are many reasons for patients undergoing revision surgery after primary THA, mainly due to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is necessary to restore anatomical structures in primary THA, as much as possible and reduce the generation of wear particles to avoid postoperative loosening of the prosthesis. Due to the anatomical characteristics of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH, the patients have acetabular and femoral bone defects, and the repair and reconstruction of bone defects become the key to revision surgery. The acetabular side is usually reconstructed with the appropriate acetabular cup or combined metal block, Cage, or custom component depending on the extent of the bone defect, while the femoral side is preferred to the S-ROM prosthesis. In addition, the prosthetic interface should be ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-highly cross-linked polyethylene wherever possible. Conclusion The reasons leading to revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH and the surgical difficulties have been clarified, and a large number of clinical studies have proposed corresponding revision modalities based on which good early- and mid-term outcomes have been obtained, but further follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term outcomes. With technological advances and the development of new materials, personalized prostheses for these patients are expected to become a reality.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To study the effect of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty in a single procedure. Methods From October 1999 to March 2004, 15 patients (30 hips) underwent simultaneous sequential bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THAs) in a single procedure. Of the 15 patients, 11 were male (22 hips) and 4 were female (8 hips). Their ages ranged from 35 to 70 years. Their courses of disease ranged from 1 year to 50 years (4.8 years on average). The Harris scores of the joint function before the operation ranged from 12 to 45 points (27 points on average). Five were done with Smith-Peterson and 10 were done with Moore. Results The operative time was 3 hours and 25 minutes to 5 hours (4 hours and 10 minutes on average). The volume of blood transfusion during operation was 400 to 2 400 ml (1 160 mlon average). All the 15 patients were followed up for 3 to 35 months (18 monthson average). The Harris scores of the joint function after the operation rangedfrom 70 to 100 points (86 points on average). There was significant difference in the scores between before and after operations (Plt;0.05). There was only 1death within 1 months of the operation and no serious between complications such as infection, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein plug. All the patients were still ambulant in the community and gained significant pain relief. Conclusion Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty in a single procedure is a safe and effective method. However, the decision of performing singlestage bilateral total hip arthroplasty should be carefully made and preoperative preparation should be sufficiently made.
Objective To investigate the impact of joint capsule repair and external rotators suture on the prognosis in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) by posterolateral approach. Methods Between January 2006 and June 2009, 159 patients with femoral neck fracture underwent primary THA by posterolateral approach, and were divided into 4 groups according to different treatments: joint capsule repair and external rotators suture were given in group A (n=38), only joint capsule repair in group B (n=39), only external rotators suture in group C (n=41), and no joint capsule repair or external rotators suture in group D (n=41). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injure, disease duration, type of fracture, combined medical disease, or prosthesis selection among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). The bleeding volume, drainage, postoperative hip dislocation rate, hip Harris score, and the hip range of motion (ROM) in internal rotation and external rotation were compared. Results There was no significant difference in operative time, bleeding volume, or drainage among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative hip dislocation occurred in 0, 0, 4 (9.8%), and 4 (9.8%) cases of groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, showing significant difference in incidence of postoperative hip dislocation among 4 groups (χ2=7.910, P=0.048). The hip Harris scores were significantly improved after operation when compared with preoperative scores in 4 groups (P lt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in hip Harris score at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation among 4 groups (P lt; 0.05); group D was significantly lower than groups A, B, and C, and groups B and C were significantly lower than group A (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the hip ROM in internal rotation among 4 groups at 6 weeks and 6, 12 months after operation (P gt; 0.05); but the hip ROM in external rotation were significantly bigger in groups A and C than in groups B and D at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Joint capsule repair and external rotators suture in primary THA by posterolateral approach do not increase the bleeding volume and drainage, but can reduce the early postoperative hip dislocation risk, increase the Harris score, and recover the external rotation function of involved hip. So joint capsule and external rotators should be repaired in THA by posterolateral approach.
Objective To explore the treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement. Methods From July 1997 to October 2004, 23 casesof dislocation after total hip replacement were treated,including 9 males and 14 females and aging 5379 years. The CT and serial X-ray films were taken to observe the position of prostheses. The strength of their hip abductor was also tested. In the patients without loosening, closed reduction was attempted at first. The stability of hip was tested. If closed reduction failed, the offset or/and parts of the components was adjusted, then the capsular was repaired. If instabilitystill existed, revision was adopted. Results In 23 cases of dislocation, 10 cases were treated successfully by closed reduction. In 12 patients who failed reduction, 5 were given open reduction combined with capsular repairing; the offset was adjusted by lengthening femoral head in 2 cases; rim liners were elevated in 2 cases; and larger offset was used and abnormal liner was adjusted in 1 case. Revision was used in 1 case having loosening and 2 cases having instability. Allpatients were followed up 1 year to 5 years (1.9 years on average). The Harrisscoring was 7294 (87 on average). Conclusion The treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement should use different ways according to the causes of dislocation and the stability of hip.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the shared decision-making scheme in postoperative out-of-hospital extended care for patients with total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Methods Patients who underwent THA/TKA in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between October 2023 and April 2024 were included using convenience sampling. Patients were divided into the control group (odd-numbered dates) and the intervention group (even-numbered dates) based on the surgical dates. The intervention group was received care guided by a shared decision-making protocol, whereas the control group was followed the standard post-arthroplasty follow-up procedures. Differences between the two groups were compared in terms of decision-making capacity, decision satisfaction, and hip/knee function at the following time points: on the day of discharge, 3 weeks after discharge, 2 months after discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results A total of 118 patients were included, with 59 cases in each group. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of decision-making, compared with the control group, the experimental group had stronger decision-making ability, lower decision-making conflict, and more satisfaction with the decision-making process (P<0.05). In terms of joint function, the experimental group showed better joint function than the control group at 3 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain dimension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index between the two groups (P=0.199). Conclusions Compared with the traditional follow-up protocol, the shared decision-making protocol can enhance patient engagement in medical decision-making, reduce decisional conflict, improve satisfaction with the decision-making process, and simultaneously promote joint functional recovery and expedite the rehabilitation process.