ObjectiveTo investigate the reason, prevention, and treatment measures of gastrointestinal unplanned reoperation. MethodsClinical data of 21 patients who carried out gastrointestinal unplanned reoperation for various reasons from Jun. 2012 to Jun. 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsTwenty-one of 2 492 patients with gastrointestinal tract surgery carried out gastrointestinal unplanned reoperation, and the incidence of reoperation was 0.8%. The causes of reoperation were intra-abdominal hemorrhage in 10 cases, gastrointestinal fistula in 7 cases, inflammatory intestinal obstruction with peritonitis in 1 case, and incision dehiscence in 3 cases. After undergoing suture hemostasis, colostomy, anastomotic fistula repair, debridement, and suture,20 cases were cured or improved, and 1 case died. The median of hospitalization expense was 76 000 yuan(46 000-116 000 yuan), and the median of hospital stay was 25-day(16-49 days). ConclusionsGastrointestinal unplanned reoperation can cause more serious economic and emotional burden to patients, standardizing surgical procedure and enhancing perioperative monitoring can reduce the incidence of unplanned reoperation. In addition, grasp legitimately the indications of reoperation, implement timely, and effective reoperation can avoid further deterioration of the disease.
【摘要】 目的 探讨颅脑损伤(BI)死亡的法医病理学特点,以及继发性脑干损伤、并发症的发生与死亡之间的因果关系。方法 从性别、年龄、致伤方式、损伤类型、生存时间、死亡原因等方面,对四川大学华西法医学鉴定中心1998年1月-2008年12月127例BI死亡尸检案例进行回顾性统计研究分析。结果 127例法医病理学检案中,原发性BI死亡51例(402%),继发性脑干损伤死亡61例(480%),并发症死亡15例(118%),其中伤后12 h内死亡者直接死因均为严重原发性脑损伤,存活12 h～1周者直接死因以继发性脑干损伤居多,生存时间超过1周者约半数死于并发症。结论 在BI案例的死亡原因确定时,应在全面系统的病理学检验基础上,结合案情及临床资料进行综合分析。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the characteristics of forensic pathology in traumatic brain injury and the relationships between secondary brainstem damage, complications and the causes of death. Methods 127 cases were reviewed from gender, age, manner of injury, survival time and the direct causes of death from January 1998 to December 2008. Results Of the 127 cases, the key direct cause of death was secondary brainstem damage, followed by severe primarily brain injury and complications. For those who died within 12 hours after injury, the direct cause was severe primarily brain injury; for those who survived between 12 hours to one week, secondary brainstem damage was in the majority of the causes and for those who survive more than one week time, complication was an important cause. Conclusion In the cases of traumatic brain injury, we should take comprehensive and systematic examination of forensic pathology, and refer to clinical data at the same time to determine the direct cause of death.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of bile duct injury due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the preventive methods. MethodsA total of 18 patients with bile duct injury (with the occurrence rate of 0.4%) after LC between January 2003 and December 2012 were included. The patients included 5 males and 13 females with the age of 29-63 years old[averaging (42.3±3.6) years old]. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the 18 cases of bile duct injury, 5 cases occur in emergency operation, 13 cases in selective operation. The operators were attending physician in 13 cases, and senior position in the other 5 cases. The reasons of the injury included misjudgment of the cystic duct in 9, duct aberrance in 3, excessive stretch of cystic duct in 2, 2 Mirizzi syndrome withⅠ-type surgical injury in 2, and right liver duct injury because of inappropriate stripping of gallbladder in 1. ConclusionThe operator's experience, severe conglutination and the bile duct aberrance are the chief causes. Preventive methods include strict system of operation accession, careful selection of candidates, timely laparotomy, and paying attention to the accumulation of operation experience and skills.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility. Methods The databases such as CNKI (1994 to June 2011), WanFang Data (1982 to June 2011), PubMed (1966 to June 2011) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) for the comparison between aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and clomiphene citrate (CC). The quality of the retrieved trials was critically appraised and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0.1 software. Results Nine studies were included; all of them were published in English. The results of meta-analyses showed there were no significant differences between AIs and CC in the pregnancy rate (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.47), miscarriage rate (RR=1.00 95%CI 0.61 to 1.63), multiple pregnancy rate (RD= –0.02, 95%CI –0.07 to 0.03), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.01 to 0.01); there were still no significant differences between the AIs+gonadotropin (Gn) group and the CC+Gn group in the pregnancy rate (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.42), miscarriage rate (RR=1.23, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.15), multiple pregnancy rate (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.10), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.01). Conclusion Whether aromatase inhibitors can replace clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility is still an issue that has to be identified by performing well-designed large scale RCTs with longer follow-up duration.