目的 探讨吉西他滨+米托蒽醌+足叶乙甙（GME）方案诱导化学疗法（化疗）治疗复发难治性急性白血病的疗效。 方法 2010年5月－2011年4月对20例复发难治性急性白血病应用GME方案化疗，以了解其有效性、毒副反应。 结果 随访7个月20例复发难治性白血病经过GME方案诱导化疗1个疗程后总反应率为50%，其中5例完全缓解，4例部分缓解，1例形态学完全缓解而血细胞计数未完全缓解，均无早期死亡患者。 结论 GME方案可作为复发难治性急性髓系白血病的一种安全、有效的诱导化疗方案，值得临床尝试。
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 80% of lung cancer. Nowadays, gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination have been adopted as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC. This study aimed to monitor early response to combined chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in a mouse model of NSCLC by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorothymidine small animal positron emission tomography (PET). Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin or saline. Small animal PET with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT was performed before (baseline) and after treatment (on Day 3), respectively. Imaging results were confirmed by histopathological studies (hematoxylin and eosin staining, Ki67 staining). Compared to the results in the control group, gemcitabine-cisplatin in the treated group significantly inhibited tumor growth (P<0.05). In the treated group, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-FLT decreased significantly from 0.59±0.05 (baseline) to 0.28±0.05 (Day 3) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between baseline (4.35±0.46) and that on Day 3 (4.02±0.47) on 18F-FDG SUVmax (P>0.05). The proliferation of tumor assessed by Ki67 staining decreased significantly after treatment of one dose of gemicitabine-cisplatin (P<0.05). The staining of HE showed an increase in necrotic and inflam- matory cells after the treatment. This study demonstrated that the uptake of 18F-FLT reduced more rapidly and signi-ficantly than that of 18F-FDG and was less disturbed by the increase of inflammatory cells after chemotherapy.
Objective To introduce the research progress in the effect of chemotherapeutic resistance of metabolic enzymes of gemcitabine to pancreatic cancer.Methods Recent literatures about metabolic enzymes that played key roles in mediating gemcitabine chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed. Results The metabolic enzymes of gemcitabine, such as hENT1, dCK, RRM1 and CDA, were closely related to chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer. The relationship between the single nucleotide polymorphism of metabolic enzymes and the resistance to gemcitabine remained to be clarified. Conclusion Multiple factors are involved in the mechanism of chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine, which needs further research.
目的:评价国产吉西他滨(泽菲)联合顺铂二线治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效和不良反应。方法:34例晚期乳腺癌患者采用国产吉西他滨1000mg/m2,静脉滴注30min,第1、8天;顺铂25mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1～3天。21d为一个周期,至少完成两周期后评价疗效。结果:完全缓解2例(588%),部分缓解16例(4706%),总有效率为5294%。中位疾病进展时间为65月,中位生存期为114月;主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应,所有不良反应在停药后或对症处理后均可恢复正常。结论:国产吉西他滨联合顺铂二线治疗晚期乳腺癌疗效较好,毒副反应可耐受,值得进一步研究。
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the possible mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer chemotherapy. Methods Recent literatures about the genes and signal pathways those play key roles in mediating gemcitabine chemotherapy resistance of pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed.Results Oncogenes like c-Src and bcl-XL, inflammation pathway of NF-κB, cytokines like IL-1β and NO are closely related with the chemoresistance； the relationship between multiple drug resistance relevant genes like MDR1/P-gP and the resistance to gemcitabine remains to be clarified. Conclusion Genes and pathways like c-Src, bcl-XL, NF-κB, etc. might become new targets to increase the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of pancreatic cancer, however, the mechanism of pancreatic cancer chemotherapy resistance still needs further to be studied.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the economic efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (NAB-P) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) versus GEM alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in China.MethodsA Markov model simulating the costs and health outcomes was developed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The impact of parameter uncertainty on the model was assessed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.ResultsNAB-P combined with GEM was shown superior efficacy compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, however with higher costs. The ICER between the two groups was 964 780.79￥/QALY.ConclusionsCompared with gemcitabine monotherapy, NAB-P combined with GEM is not cost-effective. The conclusion is confirmed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, paclitaxel plus cisplatin (GTP) chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in China. MethodsTen patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who underwent GTP chemotherapy regimens were collected from February to July 2014 in our hospital. According to solid tumor curative effect evaluation standard 1.1, we evaluated the clinical effcacy and collected the adverse reactions. ResultsTen patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma accepted first-line chemotherapy using GTP chemotherapy regimens. There was 1 case of complete remission, 4 cases of partial response, 3 stable cases, and 2 progressive cases. Adverse reactions of degree Ⅲ were mainly of hematology toxicity, including 5 cases of leukocytes and neutrophils reduction, and 1 case of anemia. The remaining adverse reactions included gastrointestinal reaction, hair loss, and abnormal renal function. ConclusionGTP chemotherapy regimen is a promising treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma.
摘要:目的:观察吉西他滨(GEM)联合长春瑞滨(NVB)对老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(N SCLC)患者的疗效和毒副反应。方法:36例经病理组织学或细胞学确诊的晚期NSCLC患者给予吉西他滨1000 mg/m2,第1、 8 天;长春瑞滨25 mg/m2,加入100 m l生理盐水中静脉冲注,第1、 8 天。每21天为一周期,每月CT扫描,观察疗效,有效者共用四周期后停药,按照WHO疗效评价标准评价疗效,并定期复查随访。结果:36例入选患者中,可评价疗效者31例,完全缓解(CR)0例,部分缓解(PR)7例,稳定(NC)13例,病情进展(PD)11例。有效率(RR)为22.58%(7/31),疾病控制脊髓(CR+PR+NC)为64.52%(20/31),中位肿瘤进展时间为5.8个月,1年生存率42%。最常见的毒副反应为Ⅱ―Ⅲ度抑制。结论:对于失去手术或放疗治疗的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(N SCLC)患者,吉西他滨(GEM)联合长春瑞滨(NVB)是有效的姑息治疗方案之一,值得临床进一步研究。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Kanglaite combined with gemcitabine in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Kanglaite ombined with gemcitabine treating advanced NSCLC was retrieved in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 9, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from the dates of their establishment to September 2013. Literature screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and methodological quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was then conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of seven RCTs involving 506 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that:a) Kanglaite injection combined with gemcitabine chemotherapy increased short-term effectiveness (OR=1.85, 95%CI 1.29 to 2.65, P=0.000 8), patients' quality of life (OR=3.02, 95%CI 1.90 to 4.78, P < 0.000 1), and immune function (MD=0.64, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.97, P=0.000 1); and reduced the incidences of leukopenia decrease (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.47, P < 0.000 01), nausea and vomiting (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.73, P=0.000 3), bone marrow suppression (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.45, P < 0.000 01), and liver and renal impairments (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.68, P=0.000 3), all with significant differences. b) Both groups were alike in reducing thrombocytopenia (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.14, P=0.14) without significant differences. ConclusionApplying Kanglaite injection combined with gemcitabine in treating patients with advanced NSCLC could increase short-term effectiveness, improve patients' quality of life and immune function; and reduce the incidences of adverse reaction caused by chemotherapy. However, it has no obvious advantage in reducing thrombocytopenia. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more larger sample size, multicenter, high quality RCT are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine compared with cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and China General Library of Biomedical Literature were searched. Literatures related to the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine (nedaplatin group) versus cisplatin combined with gemcitabine (cisplatin group) in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma published from the inception to October 2021 were searched. The quality of included studies was assessed by Cochrane bias assessing tool and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4. Results A total of 10 articles were included covering 914 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the objective remission rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.01, P=0.005), disease control rate (OR=1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.15, P=0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR=2.29, 95%CI 1.25-4.18, P=0.007) of the nedaplatin group were better than those of the cisplatin group. In terms of side effects, the incidence of white blood cell and hemoglobin decline, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea in the nedaplatin group was lower than that in the cisplatin group (P≤0.05). The differences in the platelet decline and liver and kidney damage between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, the short-term efficacy of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine may be better than cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, and the incidence of adverse reactions is lower.