目的评价喉罩或单腔气管内插管在胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的应用效果。 方法选择80例行胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的手汗症患者，采用计算机随机法将患者分为A、B两组，每组各40例。其中A组男20例、女20例，平均年龄24岁；B组男21例、女19例，平均年龄23岁。A组使用喉罩通气，B组使用单腔气管内导管，均应用小潮气量较快频率正压通气及间歇人工气胸。观察两组麻醉期间各时点心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）、呼气末二氧化碳分压（PetCO2）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、心电图（ECG）的变化。同时记录喉罩/单腔导管置入时间、CO2充气时间、手术时间、术中术后不良反应和并发症。 结果两组患者手术顺利，无并发症。A组喉罩/插管置入时间和喉罩/单腔管呛咳、术后咽喉疼痛发生率低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。B组MAP、HR水平在T2（喉罩/单腔管置入后）和T7（苏醒后拨喉罩/单腔管时）明显高于T1（麻醉诱导完成），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组MAP、HR水平在T2和T7时亦明显低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。所有患者术中ECG、SpO2和PetCO2无明显变化。 结论喉罩或单腔气管内插管结合间歇的人工气胸都能满足胸交感神经切断术的操作需要，喉罩具有更稳定的血流动力学状态和更高的安全性。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
目的 评价喉罩联合T型密封接头通气在新生儿无痛纤维支气管镜（纤支镜）诊治中的临床效果。 方法 对2010年3月－2012年10月收治的33例拟行纤支镜诊治的新生患儿，分为喉罩组（Ⅰ组）和常规组（Ⅱ组），两组患儿在术前半小时均静脉注射咪唑安定0.2～0.3 mg/kg基础上，Ⅰ组静脉注射枸橼酸芬太尼3～5 μg/kg，置入喉罩联合T型密封接头通气下行纤支镜诊治；Ⅱ组常规表面麻醉下行纤支镜诊治。分析术前（T1）、通过声门（T2）、诊治中（T3）、检查后（T4），脉搏血氧饱和度（SpO2）、心率（HR）的变化情况、纤支镜从T型密封接头入口或鼻孔到通过声门的时间、镜检时间、支气管肺泡灌洗次数、镜检期间不良反应（呛咳、憋气、肢体运动、呼吸道损伤）及麻醉满意度（由内镜医师评价）。 结果 Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组比较，T1、T4时间点SpO2、HR差异无统计学意义，T2、T3时间点SpO2＜85%、HR＜100次/min的发生率Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；纤支镜从T型密封接头入口或鼻孔到通过声门时间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；Ⅱ组镜检时间短于Ⅰ组，支气管肺泡灌洗次数少于Ⅰ组；Ⅰ组不良反应低于Ⅱ组，麻醉满意度高于Ⅱ组（P＜0.05）。 结论 喉罩联合T型密封接头通气在新生儿无痛纤支镜诊治气道管理安全有效可行，医师能从容操作。
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) for airway management in pediatric general anesthesia. Methods Randomized controlled trials were collected through electronic searches of the PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI from the date of establishment to November 2010. All the related data that matched the standards were abstracted by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analysis of the complications, success of insertion on the first attempt and hemodynamic changes. Results A total of 39 trials involving 2 612 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that LMA was superior to ETT in terms of less cough (RR=0.21, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.28, Plt;0.000 01), laryngospasm or bronchospasm (RR=0.37, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.77, P=0.008) and agitation (RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.22, Plt;0.000 01) during emergency. The incidence of postoperative sore throat (RR=0.32, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), hoarse voice (RR=0.09, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.27, Plt;0.000 1), nausea and vomiting (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.80, P=0.006) was significantly lower in the LMA group. The hemodynamic changes during insertion and extraction of LMA were more stable than ETT, such as the heart rate changes in insertion, extraction and post-extraction period (SMD= –1.18, 95%CI –1.59 to –0.77, Plt;0.000 01; SMD= –1.29 95%CI –1.72 to –0.86, Plt;0.000 01; and SMD= –1.51 95%CI –2.15 to –0.87, Plt;0.000 01, respectively) and the MAP changes in insertion, extraction and post-extraction period (SMD= –1.21, 95%CI –1.39 to –1.02, Plt;0.000 01; SMD= –1.31, 95%CI –1.77 to –0.85, Plt;0.000 01; and SMD= –0.85, 95%CI –1.24 to –0.46, Plt;0.000 1, respectively); but no significant differences in postoperative regurgitation and aspiration (RR=3.00, 95%CI 0.62 to 14.61, P=0.17) and successful insertion on the first attempt (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.05, P=0.84) were found between the LMA and ETT groups. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that the laryngeal mask airway is superior to endotracheal tube in terms of fewer complications during emergency and after operation as well as stable hemodynamic changes. So, it is a selective, safe and effective airway management for children.
目的 探讨双管喉罩与气管插管用于全身麻醉妇科腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。 方法 2009年1月-5月择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者60例，ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级，随机分为喉罩组（P组）和气管插管组（T组）。记录入室基础值（T0），置罩（管）前（T1），置罩（管）后即刻（T2），置罩（管）后5 min（T3 ），拔除罩（管）即刻（T4），拔除罩（管）后5 min（T5）的收缩压（systolic pressure, SBP），舒张压（diastolic pressure, DBP），心率（heart rate, HR）和脉搏血氧饱和度（pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2），喉罩和气管插管控制呼吸时气腹前后不同时段的气道峰压（airway. maximum pressure, Pmax），潮气量（vital volume, VT）和呼气末二氧化碳分压（end tidal CO2, PETCO2）。记录插罩（管）成功率，及相关并发症。 结果 T2时T组SBP，DBP和HR显著高于P组（P＜0.05），两组术中通气均满意；Pmax，VT和PETCO2组间比较各时点无差异（P＞0.05）。气腹后Pmax和PETCO2组内比较均高于气腹前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。置罩（管）成功率组间比较差异无统计学意义，拔罩（管）期及术后24 h并发症，喉罩组明显低于气管导管组，差异显著（P＜0.05）。 结论 双管喉罩用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术通气效果满意，安全可行。
摘要:目的:评价II代引流型喉管(LTS II)和Proseal喉罩(PLMA)在择期手术中应用效果。方法:检索了Cochrane图书馆(2009年第3期)、Pubmed(1950～2009)、EMBase(1989～2009)、CNKI(1979～2009)、VIP(1989～2009)、CBM(1978～2009)中相关II代引流型喉管(LTS II)和Proseal喉罩在择期手术中应用的随机对照试验(RCT),同时筛检纳入文献的参考文献。由2名研究者对文献质量进行严格评价和资料提取,根据指标相应异质性进行描述性分析或Meta分析(RevMan 5.0)。结果:共纳入3个RCT,共244例研究对象,文献质量均为B级。3个RCT的结果显示与PLMA相比,LTS II具有相似的首次置入成功率(P=0.45)、术毕即刻上呼吸道损伤发生率(P=1.00)、术后24 h咽痛发生率(P=0.81)、术后24 h吞咽困难发生率(P=0.12)。2个RCT的结果显示两组引流管置入均较容易。1个RCT的结果显示两组的操作者主观评价相近(OR=1.86,95%CI 0.39～ 8.99)。气道封闭效果由于采用方法学差异性较大,指标也不尽相同,尚不能得出准确结果。结论:LTS II在择期手术中用于气道管理具有较好的前景。但是现时仍不宜用于需在择期术中进行控制通气的病人。关于气道封闭效果,尚需采用更合理规范的指标、更高质量的研究设计进一步研究。Abstract: Objective: To assess the efficacy of laryngeal tube suction II (LTS II) and LMAProseal (PLMA) for airway management in elective surgery. Methods:We searched Cochrane Library (2009),Pubmed (19502009)、EMBase (19892009),CNKI (19792009),VIP (19892009),CBM (19782009). The quality of the trials was assessed by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.0 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for statistical analysis. Results:Three studies involving 244 participants were included. Same rates of fist successful attempt (P=0.45),upper airway trauma (P=1.00),sore throat (P=0.81) and dysphagia (P=0.12) were observed in LTS II and PLMA in all studies. Two studies indicated that the insertion of gastric tube was easy in both groups. The similarity of subjective maneuverability in two groups was reported in one study (OR=1.86, 95%CI 0.39 to 8.99). The correct result of effectiveness of airway seal could not be made because of various methods and measurements. Conclusion:LTS II have a good perspective in the airway management. Otherwise, it is not safe for patient required control ventilation because of lack of evidence on the effectiveness of airway seal. More RCTs of high quality need to be undertaken in the future.
摘要:目的:定量测定50 %小儿在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度。方法:25例择期行四肢及体表手术的患儿,高流量吸入七氟烷诱导并以七氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉,不使用肌肉松弛剂及静脉麻醉药物,手术结束后停止吸入氧化亚氮,并维持设定的七氟烷浓度10min后拔除喉罩。根据Dixon序贯法确定喉罩拔除时的七氟烷浓度,每0.1 Vol%七氟烷为1个增减单位。患儿未出现咳嗽、牙关紧闭、体动、屏气及喉痉挛则认为拔除喉罩平稳。结果:50 %小儿平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度(EC50)为1.22 Vol%(95 %的置信区间分别为0.99 Vol%～1.49 Vol%)。结论:在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下,3～8岁患儿喉罩满意拔除时呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.22 Vol%。Abstract: Objective: To determine the concentration of sevoflurane where 50%( EC50 ) of the attempts to remove the laryngeal mask airway (LMA ) with the Teracainum Gel would be successful in children. Methods: Twentyfive nonpremedicated children, aged 38 years old, ASA physical status I, scheduled for extremities or peripherical surgery were enrolled in this study. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After the surgery, the target concentration was maintained for at least 10 min, and then the LMA was removed. Each target concentration was predetermined by the Dixon’s upanddown method (with 0.1 Vol% as a step size), starting at 1.20 Vol% concentration of sevoflurane. A removal accomplished without coughing, teeth clenching, gross purposeful movement, breath holding or laryngospasm, during or within 1 min after removal was considered to be successful. Results:The concentration of sevoflurane to achieve successful LMA removal in 50% of children was 1.22 Vol% (95%CL, 0.99 Vol%1.49 Vol%). Conclusion: The EC50 value of sevoflurane for LMA smooth extubation in children aged 38 years old with teracainum gel was 1.22 Vol%.