【摘要】 目的 分析国内布地奈德、地塞米松吸入治疗小儿急性喉炎的疗效。 方法 系统检索中国生物医学文献数字库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普、万方数据库,检索时间为各个数据库建库至2010年7月。纳入布地奈德对比地塞米松吸入治疗小儿急性喉炎的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),对纳入研究进行质量评价和Meta分析。 结果 共纳入11个RCT,分析结果提示两组声嘶、犬吠样咳嗽、呼吸困难、喉喘鸣症状消失时间差异均存在统计学意义,其MD及95%CI分为:-0.88 (-1.10,-0.65),-1.43 (-2.01,-0.84),-0.48 (-0.63,-0.32),-0.59 (-0.78,-0.41)。 结论 基于当前国内证据,布地奈德改善小儿急性喉炎梗阻症状疗效优于地塞米松吸入治疗。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of budesonide versus dexamethasone for the treatment of acute laryngitis in children of china. Methods Literatures in CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang databases were searched from the time of establishment of these databases till July 2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of budesonide versus dexamethasone for the treatment of acute laryngitis in children were gathered, and quality was evaluated and meta-analysis was carried out. Results Eleven RCTs were identified, and meta-analysis indicated that there were significant differences between the two groups in the disappearing time of hoarseness, barking cough, dyspnea and laryngeal stridor. The MD values and their 95% CI were respectively -0.88 (-1.10, -0.65), -1.43 (-2.01, -0.84), -0.48 (-0.63, -0.32), and -0.59 (-0.78, -0.41). Conclusion Based on current evidence in China, budesonide is better than dexamethasone for the improvement of acute laryngitis in children.
目的 比较电脑遥控灌肠整复仪与简易空气灌肠器对小儿肠套叠的整复效果,探讨更有效安全的空气灌肠设备。 方法 2002年11月-2011年11月对确诊的425例小儿肠套叠应用空气灌肠整复,其中198例采用简易空气灌肠器整复,227例用电脑遥控灌肠整复仪进行空气灌肠整复,并对不同病程时间、套叠部位与两种空气灌肠设备整复结果进行回顾性分析。 结果 198例患儿采用简易空气灌肠器整复成功率为71.2%,227例患儿采用电脑遥控灌肠整复仪的方式整复成功率为83.3%,后者成功率明显高于前者(P<0.005),尤其是病程时间在24 h内,套叠部位位于升结肠或横结肠的后者整复成功率更高(P<0.05)。 结论 电脑遥控灌肠整复仪比简易空气灌肠器更有效、安全。脉冲式空气灌肠能减轻套叠部位的痉挛与水肿,提高肠套叠的整复成功率。
The clinical practice guideline on traditional Chinese medicine alone or combined with antibiotics for patients with acute upper respiratory infection in children was issued by China Association of Chinese Medicine in June 2017. Base on the evidence, consensus and experience, five manage groups, steering committee, consensus expert group, systematic review group, drafting group and secretary group, have promoted the project. The main work process refers to up-to-date clinical practice guideline definitions of institute of medicine and quick recommendations guide of guidelines international network and WHO. In order to provide readers with a better understanding of the guideline, the drafting process of guideline principle, main work process, and basis policy were described in detail in this paper. The guidelines’ scientific characteristics, accuracy and practicability were better exhibited in attempt to enhance its promotion and application.