ObjectiveTo compare the analgesic effect of different treatment for herpes zoster neuralgia, and optimize herpetic neuralgia treatment. MethodsWe collected hospital inpatient data with herpes zoster by the First Military Medical Case Management System between January 1st, 2009 and December 20th, 2013. All the patients were divided into five groups according to different treatments. Patients in group A accepted valaciclovir capsules and doxepin hydrochloride tablets; patients in group B accepted valaciclovir capsules; patients in group C accepted valaciclovir capsule, nefopam hydrochloride tablets and doxepin hydrochloride tablets; patients in group D accepted valaciclovir capsules and nefopam hydrochloride tablets; patients in group E accepted valaciclovir capsules and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including nimesulide capsules and ibuprofen sustained-release capsules). We collected such statistic data as sex, age, time of onset, time of pain disappearing after treatment. Then, we analyzed the difference among the groups on the time of pain disappearing. ResultsThere were 336 cases compliant with the standard in all the 898 cases of medical record data. The number of the patients was 72, 86, 66, 60 and 52; while the pain disappearing time after treatment was (5.94±2.54), (8.60±3.09), (5.77±1.85), (5.80±1.96) and (6.86±2.18) days, respectively in group A, B, C, D and E. Pain disappearing time after treatment of group B was significantly different from groups A, C, D, and E (P<0.05); group E was significantly different from groups A, C, and D (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between group A and groups C and D, and between group C and D (P>0.05). ConclusionThe combination of nefopam hydrochloride tablets, doxepin hydrochloride tablets, nimesulide capsules, and ibuprofen sustained-release capsules is effective in the treatment of herpes zoster neuralgia. The use of nefopam hydrochloride tablets with doxepin hydrochloride tablets is more effective than the combination of nimesulide capsules and ibuprofen sustained-release capsules. Doxepin hydrochloride tablets are not significantly different from nefopam hydrochloride tablets. Nefopam hydrochloride tablets and doxepin hydrochloride tablets are not associated with increased efficacy.
Background Hepatitis B is one of the major infectious diseases of mankind, and up to now, there is no effective way to handle it. Recent clinical trials have shown the potential advantages of Kurorinone an extract of Chinese herb, in treament of chronic HBV infection. Objectives Systermically review the safety and efficacy of Kurorinone in treatment of chronic HBV infection. Search strategy With the searching terms including Kurorinone, its products’ name, hepatitis B and chronic carrier status, the trials registers of the Cochrane Hepato- Biliary Group, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, and the central database of the Cochrane Library as well as MEDILINE, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical CD Database were searched from their date of inception onward. 20 Chinese medical journals and relevant academic conference proceedings have been searched by hand. The reference lists of identified documents were checked as the complementary search. Inclusion Criteria All RCTs that tested Kurorinone for chronic HBV infection were included in this review. Method of the review According the demand of Cochrane systematic review, selection of trial for inclusion, assessment of methodological quality, data extraction and data syntheses would be conducted for each included trial.
Objective To assess the quality reports on acupuncture in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Methods MEDLINE, CBM, CMCC and CNKI from 1994 to 2006 were searched electronically. Handsearching was also done. The retrieved articles were assessed in terms of several factors, including the type of clinical research, methodology, diagnostic criteria, inclusion/exclusion criteria, effectiveness measurements, calculation of sample size, follow-up, etc. Results Among the 109 included articles, only 6 were true randomized controlled trials. There were 17 quasi-randomized controlled trials, 13 non-randomized concurrent controlled trials, 1 case-control study and 63 narrative studies. 29 of the reports clearly described the diagnostic criteria, 14 mentioned the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 79 reported the effectiveness measurements, none mentioned the calculation of sample size, 24 reported the follow-up outcomes, and only 1 mentioned adverse reactions. Conclusion More prospective, multicenter, large-scale, high-quality randomised trials are needed, and recommendations should also be made for future evaluations of methodological quality.