Objective To investigate the method and the effectiveness of open pelvic fractures associated with perineal injury. Methods Between August 2000 and July 2010, 16 cases of open pelvic fractures associated with perineal injury weretreated. There were 12 males and 4 females with an average age of 41 years (range, 17-69 years). Injury was caused by traffic accidents in 9 cases, by falling from height in 6 cases, and by crushing in 1 case. The mean time between injury and admission was 8 minutes (range, 5-20 minutes). According to Tile classification, 2 cases were rated as type A, 6 as type B, and 8 as type C. The wound size ranged from 5 cm × 3 cm to 15 cm × 12 cm. The perineal injured location included intraperitoneal rectal injury in 2 cases and extraperitoneal anorectal injury in 14 cases. The average injury severity score (ISS) was 29 (range, 25-48). The main treatments included emergency resuscitation, colostomy, external fixation of fractures, repeated debridement with pulsatile irrigation followed by intravenous antibiotics, and vacuum seal ing drainage (VSD). Results In 5 deaths, 3 cases died of hemorrhagic shock and 2 cases died of multi ple system organ failure within 4 days of admission. The other 11 cases were followed up 6-46 months (mean, 14 months). The X-ray films showed that bone union was achieved after 2-4 months of operation. Infection in varying degree occurred at perineal wounds; second stage healing of wounds was achieved in 10 cases after debridement and VSD treatment, and wound healed in 1 case after gracil is muscle flap repair. No anal incontinence occurred in the patients having anorectal injury during follow-up. Conclusion For patients with perineal injury and open pelvic fractures, the following treatments should be carried out so as to obtain good effectiveness: early anti-shock, protection of important organ function, treatment of complications, late resistance to infection and stabil ity restoration of the pelvic ring, functional repair and reconstruction of rectum and anal canal and urinary tract.
ObjectiveTo explore the therapeutic effect of using locking compression plate (LCP) as an external fixator and using an external fixator on open fractures of the tibia. MethodsBetween September 2010 and December 2012, 56 patients with the open tibia fractures underwent external fixation using LCP as an external fixator (LCP group, n=22) or external fixator (external fixator group, n=34). We compared the healing time, the rate of postoperative complication and the postoperative function between two groups. ResultsThe mean healing time was 11 weeks (8-28 weeks) and there was 1 case of delayed healing in the LCP group. The mean healing time was 14 weeks and there was 4 cases of delayed healing in the external fixator group. We found significant difference in the healing time (t=2.740, P=0.008) and the infection rate of pin track (13.6% vs 32.4%; χ2=2.496, P=0.114) between the LCP and external fixator group. ConclusionFor open fractures of the tibia, using LCP as an external fixator may increase the healing time and decrease the rate of postoperative complications.
Objective To retrospectively analyze and classify 23 open fractures that resulted in severe infection, in order to provide evidence that can be used in future disaster scenarios. Methods Based on medical records of 23 cases of open fracture and subsequent bacterial infection, we analyzed the clinical diagnosis, treatment, laboratory tests, bacterial smear of wound secretion, and the bacterial culture of the wound secretion. We then analyzed which antimicrobial agents were used and how they were applied, and the subsequent effect on controlling the serious infection.? Results All cases were related to seismic injury and belonged to class VI open fracture. Eight cases were male and 15 were female. All cases had similar symptoms such as chills, fever, large scale muscle necrosis, and severe infection. A direct smear of the wound showed that the number of cases with one bacterial infection was 6 (26.09%), the number that had double bacterial infections was 12 (52.18%), and the number with multiple bacterial infections was 5 (21.74%).There were 18 strains of 11 types of bacteria recovered from wound samples. Conclusion Early treatment with the joint application of multiple antibacterial agents, early debridement, and adequate drainage all helped to control the infection and avoid nosocomial infection. Employing these strategies in the future will control infection in disaster situations.
目的:探讨汶川地震伤中开放性骨折原因分析及治疗策略。方法:回顾性分析280例汶川地震中开放性骨折患者病例,总结骨折原因及治疗方法。结果:患者压砸伤266例,占95%,其他受伤方式约占5%。治疗上急诊行内固定手术者88例,占31%,行外支架固定者69例,占24%,单纯石膏外固定者60例,占21%,截肢患者63例,占22%,63例截肢患者中40例为肢端缺血坏死引起,占14%,15例为肢体毁损引起,占5%,8例为气性坏疽引起,占2%。结论:汶川地震伤中开放性骨折原因多为压砸伤,治疗首先考虑全身治疗,抢救生命,骨折治疗根据Gustilo分度及肢体有无气性坏疽或坏死而进行相应的治疗。又因为地震伤有受伤人群多,受伤时间长,感染严重及救治困难等特点,故应根据病情采取相应的特殊救治方法。
Objective To evaluate the safety of conversion from external fixation to internal fixation for open tibia fractures. Methods Between January 2010 and December 2014, 94 patients (98 limbs) with open tibia fractures were initially treated with external fixators at the first stage, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. In 29 cases (31 limbs), the external fixators were changed to internal fixation for discomfort, pin tract response, Schantz pin loosening, delayed union or non-union after complete wound healing and normal or close to normal levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), and the leucocyte count as well as the neutrophil ratio (trial group); in 65 cases (67 limbs), the external fixators were used as the ultimate treatment in the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of the limbs, interval from injury to the first debridement, initial pathogenic bacteria, the limbs that skin grafting or flap transferring for skin and soft tissue defect between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of Gustilo type III fractures in the control group was significantly higher than that in the trial group (P=0.000). The overall incidence of infection was calculated respectively in the two groups. The incidence of infection according to different fracture types and whether skin grafting or flap transferring was compared between the two groups. The information of the pathogenic bacteria was recorded in the infected patients, and it was compared with the results of the initial culture. The incidence of infection in the patients of the trial group using different internal fixation instruments was recorded. Results The overall incidences of infection for the trial and control groups were 9.7% (3/31) and 9.0% (6/67) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.013, P=0.909). No infection occurred in Gustilo type I and type II patients. The incidence of infection for Gustilo type IIIA patients in the trial group and the control group were 14.3% (1/7) and 6.3% (2/32) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.509, P=0.476); the incidence of infection for type IIIB patients in the two groups were 50.0% (2/4) and 14.3% (2/14) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.168, P=0.141); and the incidence of infection for type IIIC patients in the two groups were 0 and 16.7% (2/12) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.361, P=0.548). Of all the infected limbs, only 1 limb in the trial group had the same Staphylococcus Aureus as the result of the initial culture. In the patients who underwent skin grafting or flap transferring, the incidence of infection in the trial and control groups were 33.3% (2/6) and 13.3% (2/15) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.059, P=0.303). After conversion to internal fixation, no infection occurred in the cases that fixed with nails (11 limbs), and infection occurred in 4 of 20 limbs that fixed with plates, with an incidence of infection of 20%. Conclusion Conversion from external fixation to internal fixation for open tibia fractures is safe in most cases. However, for open tibia fractures with extensive and severe soft tissue injury, especially Gustilo type III patients who achieved wound heal after flap transfer or skin grafting, the choice of secondary conversion to internal fixation should carried out cautiously. Careful pre-operative evaluation of soft tissue status, cautious choice of fixation instrument and meticulous intra-operative soft tissue protection are essential for its safety.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary interlocking nails on treating open tibial fractures. Methods From February 2002 to February 2004, 92 cases of open tibial fractures (86 patients) were treated with intramedullary interlocking nails. Of the 86 patients, 65 were male and 21 were female. Their age ranged from 18 to 68 years (36.5 on average). Of the 92 cases, 54 were in the reamed group and 38 in the nonreamed group. Patients moved with the support of crutch after their wounds were healed. Results All patients were followed up regularly for 6 to 24months. Infection rate in the reamed group and nonreamed group was 20.3% and 5.3% respectively, and there was significant difference between them (Ｐlt;0.05). The averagehealing time of the fractures was 22.5 weeks in reamed group and 19 weeks in nonreamed group, and there was no significant difference between them (Ｐ＞0.05). Delayed unions occurred in 8 cases and 3 cases in reamed group and nonreamed group respectively. Conclusion Compared with reamed group, nonreamed intramedullary interlocking nails have lowerinfection rate and fewer delayed unions and ununions.