Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute cholecystitis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Three guidelines were included (two foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; two based on evidence, one based on expert consensus). (2) Results of two RCTs (n=200, low quality) and two CCTs (n=230, low quality) indicated efficiencies of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin combined with metronidazole, and ceftazidime combined with metronidazole were 92.5%, 92.6%, 92.5% and 91.3%. A result of three RCTs (n=661, low quality) indicated that lavofloxacin had efficiencies of 82.2% to 95.8% which were 84.4% to 94.7% when combined with metronidazole. A result of three RCTs (n=553, low quality) indicated that for acute cholecystitis, ceftriaxone had an efficiency of 90.0%, cefuroxime 73.7% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 95.6% (Efficiency: ceftriaxone 93.3%, cefuroxime 82.5% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 92.3%, when combined with metronidazole). A result of one RCT (n=72, low quality) indicated that cephazoline had an efficiency of 70.9% with bacteria resistance rates of 70% for G+ and 87% for G. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). We offer a b recommendation for meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin and metronidazole as alternatives for severe acute cholecystitis. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for ceftazidime and cefepime used in the treatment of severe acute cholecystitis and a weak recommendation for cefotiam, ampicillin/sulbactam and cefuroxime used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and moderate). We offer a weak recommendation for lavofloxacin and ciprofloxacin used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and severe) and a weak recommendation for ceftriaxone used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). (3) We make a recommendation against cephazoline as routine use. (4) More large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded RCTs are needed in clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies of acute cholecystitis and outcome indicator should be improved in order to produce high-quality local evidence.
ObjectiveTo explore the optimal surgical timing of sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in the patients with acute cholecystitis, so as to provide a clinical reference. MethodsThe patients who underwent PC and then sequential LC in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from March 2021 to July 2023 were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, who were categorized into 3 groups: the short interval group (3–4 weeks), the intermediate interval group (5–8 weeks), and the long interval group (>8 weeks) based on the time interval between the PC and LC. The gallbladder wall thickness before LC, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, time and cases of drainage tube placement, admission to intensive care unit, conversion to open surgery, occurrence of complications, and total hospitalization costs were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsA total of 99 patients were enrolled, including 25 in the short interval group, 41 in the intermediate interval group, and 33 in the long interval group. The data of patients among the 3 groups including demographic characteristics, blood routine, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, international standardized ratio, liver function indicators, and comorbidities had no statistical differences (P>0.05). The gallbladder wall thickness before LC and the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, time and cases of drainage tube placement, admission to intensive care unit, conversion to open surgery, occurrence of complications, and total hospitalization costs during and after LC had statistical differences among the 3 groups (P<0.05). These indicators of the intermediate interval group were better than those of the other two groups by the multiple comparisons (P<0.05), but which had no statistical differences except total hospitalization costs (P=0.019) between the short interval group and the long interval group (P>0.05). ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, the optimal surgical timing of sequential LC following PC is 5–8 weeks, however, which needs to be further validated by large sample size and multicenter data.
【摘要】 目的 总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy，LC）治疗结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎的疗效。 方法 2001年8月-2009年11月，采用LC治疗187例结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎。 结果 179例顺利完成 L C手术；8例术中改为开腹手术。其中3例术后发生胆瘘，均经乳胶管引流胆汁，7～14 d后拔管；其余患者均痊愈出院。 结论 LC治疗结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎安全可行，但应遵循个体化原则，熟练镜下操作技巧及正确处理方法是获得满意疗效关键。
Four hundred and twenty six laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)were peformed on patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis,including ①emergency LC(59 patients),②selected LC(215 patients following administration of antibiotic and antispasmotic drugs for 10-15days),and ③selected LC(152 patients with mild biliary colic without any medication).Operative findings were ①congestion and edema of the gallbladder(208cases,11 of them were achieved laparocystectomy),②impaction of stones in the cystic infundibulum or duct with hydrops of gallbladder(142 cases,14 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy),and ③gangrene or empyema of gallbladder(76 patients,20 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy).LC was done successfully on 377 cases,conversion to open surgery was 45 cases (10.6%),severe complication occured on 4 patients for LC(reoperation,0.9%).The quthors believe that LC for patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis issafe and suitable,but LC cannot replace the classical laparocystectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) combined with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis.MethodsThe clinical data of 128 elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in Dazhou Central Hospital from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 62 patients underwent PTGBD combined with early LC treatment (PTGBD+early LC group), 66 patients underwent PTGBD combined with delayed LC treatment (PTGBD+delayed LC group). Comparison was performed on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative indwelling time, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, and complication.ResultsPTGBD was successfully performed in all patients, and the symptoms were relieved within 72 hours. There was no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative indwelling time, postoperative hospitalization time, and total complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05), but the total hospitalization time of the PTGBD+early LC group was shorter than that of the PTGBD+delayed LC group (P<0.001). There was no second operation and death in both two groups. The 128 patients were followed-up for 2–50 months with a average of 19 months. Results of follow-up after operation showed that the patients did not complain of obvious abdominal pain, abdominal distension, chills, fever, jaundice, and other discomforts.ConclusionsFor elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis, early LC is a safe and effective treatment for patients with good overall condition after PTGBD. It can not only shorten the total hospitalization time, but also significantly shorten the time of tube-taking and improve the quality of life of patients. It has important clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo study the efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in the treatment of elderly patients with high risk moderate acute cholecystitis.MethodsThe clinical data of 218 elderly patients with high risk moderate acute cholecystitis admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in Dazhou Central Hospital from January 2015 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 112 cases in the PTGBD combined with early LC sequential treatment group (sequential treatment group) and 106 cases in the emergency LC group. In the sequential treatment group, PTGBD was performed first, and LC was performed 3–5 days later. The emergency LC group was treated with anti infection, antispasmodic, analgesia, and basic disease control immediately after admission, and LC was performed within 24 hours. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative catheter retention time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, incidence of incision infection, and incidence of complications above Dindo-Clavien level 2 were compared between the two groups to evaluate their clinical efficacy and safety.ResultsAll patients in the sequential treatment group were successfully treated with PTGBD, and the symptoms were significantly relieved within 72 hours. There were significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative tube retention time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, incidence of incision infection, and the incidence of complications above Dindo-Clavien level 2 between the two groups (P<0.05), which were all better in the sequential treatment group, but the hospitalization cost of the sequential treatment group was higher than that of the emergency LC group (P<0.05). There were no cases of secondary operation and death in the 2 groups. After symptomatic treatment, the symptoms of all patients were relieved, without severe complications such as biliary injury and obstructive jaundice. All the 218 patients were followed up for 4–61 months, with an average of 35 months. During follow-up period, 7 patients in the sequential treatment group had postoperative complications, and complications were occurred in 13 patients in the emergency LC group.ConclusionPTGBD is the first choice for elderly high risk moderate acute cholecystitis patients with poor systemic condition and high risk of emergency surgery, but it has the disadvantage of relatively high medical cost.
Objective To summarize the clinical therapeutic efficacy of emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC） and emergent open cholecystectomy （OC）. Methods One hundred and thirty-three patients with acute cholecystitis from March 2011 to June 2012 in this hospital were randomly divided into emergent LC （ELC） group and emergent OC （EOC） group. The examination and treatment before and after operation were the same. The clinical data before and during operation， postoperative complications， and recovery conditions were observed and compared. Results There was no obvious difference of the clinical data before operation between the ELC group and EOC group （P＞0.05）. Also， there were no significant differences of the operation time， biliary duct injury rate， postoperative bleeding rate， and reoperation rate in two groups （P＞0.05）. The time of postoperative anal exsufflation， time of out-of-bed activity， and postoperative hospital stay in the ELC group were significantly shorter than those in the EOC group （P＜0.05）， the poor incision healing rate in the ELC group was significantly lower than that in the EOC group （P＜0.05）， and the intraoperative blood loss in the ELC group was significantly less than that in the EOC group （P＜0.05）. Conclusions ELC as compared with EOC， are less intraoperative blood loss， less postoperative complications， more rapid recovery， and do not increase operation time. In a hospital with skilled LC technique， ELC is safe and feasible， has obvious advantages of minimal invasion.
Objective To explore the feasibility of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis, and to provide evidence based medicine for clinical treatment. Methods A total of 160 cases of acute cholecystitis who received treatment in our hospital from Jan. 2012 to Dec. 2015 were randomly divided into single incision group (n=80, received single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and three incisions group (n=80, received three incisions laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The clinical and laboratory indexes were compared between the 2 groups. Results Compared with the three incisions group, there were statistically significant differences in the operation time, incision pain score, and subjective satisfaction, which were better in single incision group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the blood loss, bed time, anal exhaust time, recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, hospitalization time, incidence of complication (including abdominal infection, bile duct injury, biliary fistula, and incision infection), ratios of T cell subsets (including CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cell), levels of immunoglobulin (including IgA, IgG, and IgM), and level of C reactive protein (P>0.05). Conclusions The effectiveness of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as good as three incisions laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but this single incision laparoscopic surgery is difficult, and its indications should be cautious. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more suitable for patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy.
Objective To study the suitable operation method of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods The clinical data of 149 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to the operation: open cholecystectomy group (OC group, n=76) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (LC group, n=73). Some clinical data were compared in this paper such as operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery and complications. Results No marked difference was found between OC group and LC group about basic data except WBC count and examination of gallbladder by B ultrasound（P＞0.05）. But there were significant difference in operation time, blood loss, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery, length of hospital stay and complications between OC group and LC group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion Individualized treatment should be emphasized on elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Selection of OC or LC to these patients should be based on the clinical condition and taken the safety as the first principle.