Infective endocarditis (IE) is a disease with severe complications and high mortality. It is heterogeneous in etiology, clinical manifestations, and course. At the same time, there are many disputes on the clinical practice of antibiotic treatment, surgical indications and timing. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of IE, especially the latest advances in surgical treatment after the release of European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines in 2015.
ObjectiveTo study the relationship between the timing of surgery and one-year outcome in patients with infective endocarditis. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 97 patients suffered from leftside native valve infective endocarditis with neoplasm, admitted in Shanghai First People's Hospital between January 2000 and December 2011. There were 65 males and 32 females with mean age of 55.2±16.3 years (ranged 29 to 75 years). They were divided into two groups according to whether the surgery was performed within a week after diagnosis. The in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality, embolism and re-infection were calculated and compared between the two groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality between the early surgery group and the conventional surgery group (1.9% versus 6.7%, P=0.241). While there was a significant difference in the rate of inhospital embolism related complications (1.9% versus 13.3%, P=0.030) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality between the two groups (1.9% versus 8.9%, P=0.122). The incidence rate of embolism related complication was 5.8% in the early surgery group and 20.0% in the conventional surgery group with a statistical difference (P=0.034). There was one patient with recurrent cerebral infarction among the 11 patients of cerebral infarction in the early surgery group,while 6 recurrent patients in the 9 patients with cerebral infarction in the conventional surgery group (9.1% versus 66.7%, P<0.005). ConclusionsEarly surgery in patients with left-side native valve infective endocarditis can't reduce the in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality but does decrease embolic events significantly. Early surgery is feasible in the patients with cerebral infarction.
【摘要】 目的 探讨活动期感染性心内膜炎(infectiue endocarditis,IE)患者心脏手术的最佳时期。 方法 回顾分析1999年9月-2009年9月行外科治疗的92例IE患者的临床资料。IE诊断标准为修订的Duke标准。采用SPSS 12.0软件包,分析了年龄、性别、是否是院内感染IE、合并症(糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肿疾病、癌症)、病原菌、手术时间等因素与手术并发症及6个月病死率的关系。 结果 56例患者在确诊为IE后7 d内手术,36例患者在确诊7 d后,并抗生素治疗完成后手术。葡萄球菌为主要感染菌株,与栓塞、脓肿及感染性休克显著相关。最常见的手术指征是重度的瓣膜关闭不全合并心功能不全。6个月的病死率为12%。早期手术与晚期手术比较,病死率增高。单因素分析显示,与6个月病死率相关的因素包括葡萄球菌感染和感染性休克。多因素分析显示感染性休克为6个月内死亡的预测因子。感染性休克的患者尽管行了早期手术,病死率仍为67%。严重瓣膜关闭不全的患者,若未出现心衰,无手术(早期或晚期)死亡。 结论 手术患者的预后由是否发生过感染性休克决定。晚期手术组患者结果好于早期手术组,但结果的差异可能并不是手术的时期不同,而是感染性心内膜炎的严重程度不同造成的。对于有重度瓣膜返流但无心衰的患者,早期手术可能在缩短住院时间,预防心衰发生上有帮助。【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the optimal time of cardiac operations in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Methods We analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with IE diagnosed by the modified Duke criteria between September 1999 and September 2009. SPSS 12.0 was used to analyze predictors of 6-month mortality, including age, sex, nosocomial origin of infection, comorbid conditions (diabetes, chromic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer), the causative microorganisms, the timing of cardiac operation, and the complications. Results Fifty-six patients underwent operation within the first 7 days after diagnosis of infective endocarditis, and 36 received operation at the completion of antibiotic treatment 7 days after the diagnosis. Staphylococci predominated and were significantly associated with embolism, abscess, and septic shock. The most frequent indication for operation was severe regurgitation with heart failure. The 6-month mortality was 12%. Early operation showed an increased mortality compared with late operation. Univariate analysis showed that factors associated with 6-month mortality included staphylococci infection and septic shock. Multivariate analysis revealed that septic shock was a predictor of 6-month mortality. Despite early operation for patients with septic shock, 67% of them died. No death occurred to patients with severe regurgitation but without heart failure after undergoing (early or late) operations. Conclusions The prognosis for surgically treated patients is determined by the occurrence of septic shock. The outcome in patients undergoing late operations is favorable compared with patients undergoing early operations. This difference is probably not due to the timing of the surgical intervention but to the severity of infective endocarditis. In patients with severe regurgitation without heart failure, early operation may offer benefits in shortening the length of hospitalization and preventing development of heart failure.