Objective To preliminarily assess the ameliorative effect of Mom’s Good Mood (MGM) on the prevalence of antenatal depression based on a pilot study, and to provide evidence for a scale-up study. Methods This study was conducted in Ma’anshan Maternal and Child Health Center as a pilot study of an implementation study conducted in China called the Perinatal Depression Screening and Management (PDSM) program. In 2019, 1 189 participants (gestational week ≤14+6 weeks) were included in the implementation group. Females were recruited in the first trimester and followed up in the second and third trimesters. At each time point, the participants’ depression status was screened by the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale (EPDS), and those who were screened as having depression were provided the MGM intervention. In 2020, 1 708 participants who underwent screening with the EPDS in either the first, second or third trimester at Ma’anshan Maternal and Child Health Center were included in the control group. Mann‒Whitney U test, Chi-square, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare the EPDS scores and depression prevalence between the control and implementation groups to assess the ameliorative effect of MGM (screening and intervention) on antenatal depression. Results In the first trimester, there were no statistically significant differences in EPDS scores or depression prevalence between the two groups (P>0.05). In the second and third trimesters, both the EPDS scores and depression prevalence of the implementation group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression analysis showed that the risks of depression in the implementation group in both the second and third trimesters were lower than those in the control group (ORsecond trimester=0.55, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.81, P=0.003; ORthird trimester=0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.74, P<0.001). Conclusion Implementation of the MGM based on the primary care system can effectively reduce the prevalence of antenatal depression, providing evidence for further scale up.
目的 调查抑郁症患者疾病应对方式现状，为心理护理干预提供科学依据。 方法 采用问卷调查方式对四川大学华西医院心身障碍病房2012年4月－10月住院的220例抑郁症患者进行一般资料及疾病应对方式调查，并就调查结果进行分析。 结果 抑郁症患者应对方式平均得分（31.5 ± 6.8）分；生活自理能力、兴趣爱好、健康状况及经济状况与应对方式总分存在相关关系（P值分别为0.007、0.000、0.036、0.028）。 结论 抑郁症患者普遍存在应对不良，其生活自理能力、兴趣爱好、健康及经济状况可能是影响抑郁症发展的相关因素。
目的:探讨氟西汀联合心理干预治疗心血管疾病患者伴焦虑抑郁症状的临床疗效。方法:选择伴有抑郁、焦虑情绪障碍的85例冠心病患者(心功能Ⅱ、Ⅲ级),并将其随机分成研究组和对照组。观察6w,对照组患者仅给予常规的治疗,研究组患者在常规治疗基础上给予氟西汀联合心理干预治疗。观察治疗前后两组患者采用汉密顿焦虑量表( Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA) 评定焦虑症状,汉密顿抑郁量表( Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD) 评定抑郁症状;并对治疗后心功能分级(NYHA)恢复到Ⅰ级的例数及左室射血分数进行分析评价。结果:治疗6 周 后,研究组均较对照组的汉密顿焦虑量表及汉密顿抑郁量表评分下降显著( P lt;0.01),研究组抗焦虑显效率为87.16%、抗抑郁显效率为82.26%,对照组分别为43.75%、45.36%,研究组均显著高于对照组( P lt;0.01);研究组患者的左室射血分数显著高于对照组 ( P lt;0.05),心功能分级(NYHA)恢复到Ⅰ级的例数显著高于对照组 ( P lt;0.05)。结论:氟西汀联合心理干预治疗不仅能改善心血管疾病伴焦虑抑郁患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪障碍,还能改善患者的心功能,疗效显著优于单用心血管药物治疗。
Objective To assess the efficacy of acupuncture versus western medicine in the treatment of depression in China. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving acupuncture versus western medicine in the treatment of depression in China were identified from CNKI (1979 to 2007), VIP (1989 to 2007), WANFANG Database (1998 to 2007) and CBM (1978 to 2007). We also hand searched relevant journals and conference proceedings. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently with a specially designed extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan4.2.8 software was used for data analyses. Results A total of 8 trials involving 619 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that the total effective rate in the acupuncture group was similar when compared with fluoxetine (RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.14), doxepin (RR 1.14, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.43), amitriptyline (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.29) and venlafaxine (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.16). As for the HAMD score at week 2, no significant difference was noted between acupuncture and fluoxetine (WMD 0.03, 95%CI -1.26 to 1.31) or amitriptyline (WMD –?0.33, 95%CI –?1.88 to 1.23); for the HAMD score at week 4, no significant difference was observed between acupuncture and fluoxetine (WMD –?0.24, 95%CI –?1.85 to 1.37) or amitriptyline (WMD –?0.57, 95%CI –?2.02 to 0.88); for the HAMD score at week 6, acupuncture also had similar effects to fluoxetine (WMD –?0.19, 95%CI –?1.51 to 1.13). In terms of the SDS scores at week 2, 4, 6 and 8, no significant differences were noted between acupuncture and fluoxetine. Two trials reported adverse events and these observed no adverse events in the acupuncture group, but 31 and 25 patients experienced adverse events in the western medicine groups of these two trials. Conclusion Acupuncture is not inferior to western medicine, and it is worth noting that acupuncture is associated with few adverse reactions. Further large-scale trials are required to define the role of acupuncture in the treatment of depression.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of psychological intervention on post-stoke depression. Methods Such databases as the JBI Database of Systematic Review (1980 to June, 2010), The Cochrane Library (1980 to June, 2010), PubMed (1966 to 2010), CINAHL(1982 to May, 2000), CBM (1978 to 2010), and CNKI (1979 to 2010) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In accordance with the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality of included studies was evaluated, and then meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 33 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analyses showed: (1) Compared with the control group, the short-term effect of psychological intervention was more effective in decreasing depression score. The subgroup analysis showed that the intervention effects at the time of four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks, and 12 weeks were better than those of the control group. (2) The long-term effect of psychological intervention was more effective in decreasing depression score. The subgroup analyses showed that the intervention effects at the interval of eight weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks were better than those of the control group. (3) The combined or single application of either cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy or supportive psychotherapy was more effective in decreasing depression score than the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the general psychological treatment group and the control group. (4) The subgroup analyses showed that the different qualities of the included studies were more effective than those of the control group. Conclusion Various psychological intervention is effective in decreasing the patient’s depression score, and cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive psychotherapy, especially, can significantly improve the depression state and promote recovery.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression in older patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1990 to August 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2007), EMbase (1980 to August 2007), and CMB-disk (1990 to August 2007) to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which psychotherapy was used to treat depression in older patients. We screened the retrieved studies according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of included studies, and performed meta-analyses by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2 software. Results Ten RCTs were included. Compared with placebo, psychotherapy was more effective in decreasing depression score (SMD 0.63, 95%CI – 0.84 to – 0.42). Subgroup analysis showed that cognitive-behavioral therapy, reminiscence therapy, and general psychological therapy were more effective than placebo (SMD – 0.70, 95%CI – 1.12 to – 0.27; SMD – 0.54, 95%CI – 0.81 to – 0.26; SMD – 0.84, 95%CI – 1.34 to – 0.34, respectively). However, psychotherapy as an adjunct treatment could not significantly improve the effectiveness of antidepressant medication (SMD – 0.35, 95%CI – 0.74 to 0.05). There was no significant difference between cognitive-behavioral therapy and reminiscence therapy in improving depression symptoms (SMD 0.13, 95%CI – 0.30 to 0.56). The dropout rate was similar between patients treated with or without psychotherapy (RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.94). Conclusion Various kinds of psychotherapy are effective for depression in older patients. But psychotherapy as an adjunct treatment could not significantly improve the effectiveness of antidepressant medication.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both olanzapine combined with fluoxetine (combination therapy) and fluoxetine (monotherapy) for refractory depression. Methods According to the computer retrieval from PubMed (1966 to September 2009), Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), EMbase (1974 to September 2009), SCI (1974 to September 2009), CNKI (1994 to September 2009), CBM (1978 to September 2009), CSJD (1989 to September 2009) and Wanfang Database (1997 to September 2009), and the manual retrieval from related journals and conference proceedings were conducted, to include randomized controlled trials of comparison in between olanzapine combined with fluoxetine and fluoxetine in treating refractory depression. We collected the valid data after assessing the methodology quality of included studies on the basis of Jadad scoring standard, and conducted meta-analysis with RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 7 studies with 1 230 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that, there was no significant difference between two groups about the scores of HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Scale) at the end of the 1st week, but the olanzapine combined with fluoxetine in trial group was much better for relieving anxiety situation compared to fluoxetine in control group at the end of the 2nd, 4th, 8th and 12th week. In accordance with the scores of CGI (Clinical Global Impression Scale), there was no significant difference at the end of 2nd and 4th week after treatment, but there was a significant difference at the end of 8th and 12th week. As to the changes of MADRS (Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale), the trial group was much distinct than control group at the end of the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 8th week. In summary, the clinical effect of trial group was superior to that of control group, and there was no significant difference in adverse reactions between two groups (RR=1.10, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.23). Conclusion Current evidence shows that, the clinical effect and safety of olanzapine combined with fluoxetine in treating refractory depression is obviously superior to that of fluoxetine.
Anxiety is a strong behavioral and psychological reaction with fear components, while depression is a mental disorder dominated by high or low mood, both of which are accompanied by cognitive and behavioral changes, and are common comorbidities in patients with heart disease. Cardiac surgery is one of the important factors which trigger specific emotional and physiological reactions of patients. Persistent or initial depression and anxiety after surgery will not only increase surgical complications, short- or long-term mortality and medical costs, but also seriously affect patients' social function and quality of life. With the transformation of bio-psycho-social medical model, it is necessary to evaluate the perioperative psychological state and biological risk of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This article reviews the characteristics, related mechanisms and therapeutic interventions of anxiety and depression in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.