ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine and sodium valproate on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. MethodsA total of 186 postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy during August 2012 to August 2014 in our hospital were divided into levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group (n=98), and sodium valproate group (n=88) based on postoperative different antiepileptic drugs treatment. Antiepileptic treatment were followed up for 12~48 months.Curative effect and adverse reaction were observed. Reservation rates and incidence rates of adverse reaction were calculated in the two groups. ResultsIn levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group, EngelⅠratio was 72.4%(71), EngelⅡratio was 17.3%(17), EngelⅢratio was 7.1%(7), and EngelⅣratio was 3.2%(3);in sodium valproate group, EngelⅠratio was 67.0%(59), EngelⅡratio was 21.6%(19), EngelⅢratio was 9.1%(8), and EngelⅣratio was 2.3%(2), and the difference was not statistically significant in the same grade of two groups (P > 0.05).Reservation rate and incidence rate of adverse reaction in levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group were 90.8%(89) and 15.3%(15) respectively.While those in sodium valproate group were 80.7%(71) and 36.4%(32) respectively.The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLevetiracetam combined with lamotrigine treatment on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy may have better curative effects than sodium valproate treatment, and levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine has its advantage in reservation rate and less adverse reaction.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of valproic acid (VPA) coadministred with lamotrigine (LTG) on epileptic patients' ammonia and evaluate the influencing factors of elevated blood ammonia in epileptic patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical data from 146 patients with epilepsy (including newly diagnosed epilepsy patients) who were admitted to the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from May 2018 to April 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into no antiepileptic drug group (group A), VPA group only (group B) and VPA combined LTG group (group C), and the concentration of the blood ammonia of the patients were analyzed.ResultThe average ammonia levels in groups A, B and C were (18.14±1.19), (25.89±0.87) and (36.60±4.34) μmol/L, and the incidence of blood ammonia higher than normal were 2.77%, 8.89% and 20.0%, respectively.The difference between group B and group A and group C were statistically significant (P<0.05), the difference between group C and group A was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionPatients with epilepsy who use VPA were at increased risk of blood ammonia and LTG can increase ammonia in epileptic patients who were treated with VPA. So when VPA was combined with LTG, more attention should be paid to ammonia of patient to avoid adverse reactions.
Objective Using cortex convulsions threshold detector and electrical stimulation in rats cortex convulsions threshold model, compare the efficacy and aging of domestic lamotrigine (LTG) and imported LTG. Methods Electrical stimulation convulsions threshold model in rats after stability, 40 rats were randomly divided into A、B、C、D groups,AandBgroup were divided into three different dose groups: domestic LTG low dose (12.5 mg/kg/d), middle dose (25 mg/kg·d), high dose group (37.5 mg/kg·d); imported LTG low doses (12.5 mg/kg·d), middle dose (25 mg/kg·d), high dose group (37.5 mg/kg·d); Carbamazepine middle dose group (72 mg/kg·d); the control group (normal saline 2 ml/time). Recording electrical stimulation in rats cortex convulsions threshold model after administration, compare the differences before and after the administration. Results Three different dose groups of domestic LTG and imported LTG all hadahigher level of electrical stimulation cortex convulsions threshold, and showedadose-response relationship. Onset time of LTG after administration was 1 to 2 hours, peak time was 3 to 4 hours, maintaining time was 8 to 10 hours. Conclusion LTG can improve cortex convulsions threshold in the electrical stimulated rats, there was no significant difference with carbamazepine, and showedadose-response relationship; Repeat dosing for 4 days, both domestic and imported LIG can maintain effective anticonvulsive effect, the efficacy and the aging of two groups of LTG have no significant difference (P＞0.05).
ObjectiveTo discuss the risk of abortion related to lamotrigine (LTG) and its safety profile during pregnancy. MethodsRetrospectively studied pregnant women in our epilepsy clinics who took LTG from 2011 to 2015 as monotherapy and experienced embryo damage or abortion. Here, we present an extensive review of related literatures regarding possible mechanisms, clinical features and safty of LTG during pregnancy. ResultsIn our study, fourty-five pregnancies were administered monotherapy LTG, and three of these patients suffered embryo damage. ConclusionsAlthough LTG is considered safe for pregnant women and the embryo or fetus,it also has risk of embryo damage or abortion, which should be carefully considered before prescription. Using monotherapy and the lowest effective drug dose, monitoring LTG serum concentrations during pregnancy, supplementing folate administration before and after conception and conducting regular prenatal diagnostic tests might reduce the risk of abortion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the factors influencing plasma concentration of lamotrigine (LTG) in the treatment of epilepsy in children.Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM were electronically searched to collect clinical studies on the factors influencing plasma concentration of LTG in the treatment of epilepsy in children from database inception to December 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A systematic review was then performed to analyze the factors influencing plasma concentration of LTG in the treatment of epilepsy in children. ResultsA total of 21 studies were included. The results of systematic review suggested that dosage and some combination drugs (valproic acid, carbamazepine, phenytoin sodium, topiramate, ethosuximide, rufinamide, fluoxetine, clonazepam, clobazam and ethinylestradiol) were potential factors influencing LTG concentration. Four gene polymorphisms (UGT1A4 142T>G, UGT1A4 219C>T, UGT1A4 163G>A, and OCT1 M408V A>G), age, weight, sex, and combination drugs (phenobarbital and levetiracetam) might affect the plasma concentration of LTG in children. The effects of oxcarbazepine, 16 gene polymorphisms (UGT1A4 *3 T>G, UGT2B7 211G>T, UGT2B7 372A>G, UGT2B7 735A>G, UGT2B7 801T>A, UGT2B7 802C>T, UGT2B7 161C>T, SCN1A IVS591G>A, SCN2A c.56G>A, SCN2A c.59G>A, MDR1 1236 C>T, MDR1 2677 G>T/A, MDR1 3435 C>T, SLC22A1 1022C>T, ABCB1 3435 C>T and ABCB1 1236C>T), ketogenic diet, and ethnicity (Uygur/Han) on the plasma concentration of LTG in children were not found. Conclusion The plasma concentration of LTG in the treatment of epilepsy in children is affected by many factors, and more high-quality prospective studies should be carried out to further clarify the factors influencing the plasma concentration of LTG in children.