The applied anatomy and clinical application were described in this paper. The blood supply of this flap was based on the second dorsal metacarpal artery. It gave some advantages of as easy of application, safe and reliable. Since November 1990, we had successfully used six such flaps in covering the soft tissue defects of the hand.
Objective To provide the anatomic bases for clinical application of the second dorsal metacarpal artery(SDMA) island flap with double pivot points. Methods The origin,branches and distribution of the recurrent cutaneous branch of the SDMA were observed in 30 adult fresh cadaver specimens, which were illustrated with special dye.Eighteen cases of skin defets of the thumb were repaired with the SDMA island flap. The defect locations were the dorsal part in 11 cases and palmar part in 7 cases, including 3 cases of defect in association with long pollical extensor defect and 2 cases of defect in association with dorsal skin defect of proximal finger. The flap area ranged from 2 cm×3 cmto 3 cm×5 cm. Results The appearance of therecurrent cutaneous branch of the SDMA was observed in all cases(100%), which originated 0.5±0.2 cm distant from the distal intersectiones between the SDMA and the index extensor and disappeared 1.2±0.5 cm distant from the proximal metacarpophalangeal joint. The branches of 1.7±0.7 were seen with a longitudinal fan-like distributionforward proximal part on the deep surface of the dorsal superficial vein. The exradius and the length of the recurrent cutaneous branch of the SDMA were 0.3±0.1 mm and 6.5±0.8 mm, respectively. The transplanted flaps survived in all cases and 16 cases were followed up for 8-14 months. The colour and appearance of the skin were satisfactory. The two-point discriminations were 0.9 mm in 3 cases by bridging digital nerve and 1.1 mm in 9 cases by anastomosing dorsal digital nerve; while the two-point discrimination was 13-15 mm in 4 cases without anastomosing nerve. Conclusion The origin,branches and distribution of the recurrent cutaneous branch of the SDMA is constant, which provide a potentially longer pedicle and increase the possibility to rotate the flap and also avoid the donor skin defect of rotation of the flap.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of modified dorsal metacarpal artery reverse island flap based on two adjacent recurrent branches of dorsal metacarpal arteries in repairing large skin defect of the hand. Methods Between September 2017 and March 2021, 15 cases of large skin defect of the hand were treated. There were 11 males and 4 females with an average age of 42 years (range, 24-66 years). The injury causes included machine twist injury in 6 cases, pound injury in 5 cases, and crush injury in 4 cases. The injured parts included 6 cases of finger skin defect and 9 cases of distal skin defect of palm and dorsum of hand, all of which had tendon, joint, and bone exposure. The interval from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 6 hours (mean, 4 hours). The defect sizes after thorough debridement ranged from 3.5 cm×3.0 cm to 8.0 cm×4.5 cm. The modified dorsal metacarpal artery reverse island flap with a range of 3.8 cm×3.3 cm to 9.0 cm×5.0 cm was used to repair the defect, and the flap donor site was repaired with full-thickness skin graft. ResultsAll the flaps survived successfully after operation, and the wounds in the recipient site and the skin grafts in the donor site healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 9-24 months, with an average of 14 months. The appearance of the flap was good, and its texture and color were similar to those of the surrounding normal tissue. There was no obvious scar contracture, depression, and pigmentation in the donor site. At last follow-up, the static two-point discrimination of the flap was 8-20 mm, with an average of 13.6 mm. According to the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, 5 patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the flap, and 10 patients were satisfied. Conclusion The modified dorsal metacarpal artery reverse island flap based on two adjacent recurrent branches of dorsal metacarpal arteries has reliable blood supply, larger harvested area, simple procedure, and minimal donor site damage, which is suitable for emergency repair of large skin defect of the hand.
Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of various types of the second dorsal metacarpal artery (SDMA) flap for hand reconstruction. Methods From 1988 to 2003, 139 SDMA flaps were transferred for hand injuries. The flaps were used in 5 types according to vascularization and technique in transplantation:orthograde pedicled island SDMA flaps in 37 cases (cutaneous in 24and teno-cutaneous in 13), retrograde pedicled island SDMA flaps in 25 cases(cutaneous in 19 and teno-cutaneous in 6),double pivot SDMA flaps in 36 cases(cutaneous in 28 and teno-cutaneous in 8), distal perforator branch pedicledflaps in 19cases (cutaneous in 16 and composite in 3), free SDMA flaps in 22 cases (cutaneous in 15 and composite in 7). The skin islands were 3.0 cm×1.5 cm to 6.3 cm×5.0 cm in size. Results Of the 139 flaps, 135 flaps survived completely, 3 survived partially, and1 failed in the operation because of intractable vascular spasm. Follow-up wasdone in 116 cases for 12 to 57 months. The flap had good texture and color match. The twopoint discrimination was 5 to 9 mm in 78 sensate flaps, while it was 10 to 15 mm in 38 nonsensate flaps. In 21 tenocutaneous flaps, the TAM score of range of motion was 60% to 70% of the healthy side. Conclusion The SDMA flap has a constant and reliable vessel and a thin, pliable, and good-quality skin. It is versatile in creatingcomposite flaps. It is a good flap resource for hand and finger reconstruction.
Objective To investigate the operative procedure and the cl inical results of the modified island flap based on the reversed dorsal metacarpal artery for repairing finger tissue defect. Methods From January 2004 to March 2009, 38 patients (43 fingers) with finger tissue defect were treated with the modified island flaps based on the reversed dorsal metacarpal artery. The deverting point was altered from the dorsal point to the palm. There were 27 males (31 fingers) and 11 females (12 fingers) with an average age of 43.6 years (range, 12-67 years). Defect was caused by crash injury in 18 cases, crush injury in 14 cases, and cutting injury in 6 cases. Of them, 11 index fingers, 23 middle fingers, 7 ring fingers, and 2 l ittle fingers were involved. The area of the defect ranged from 1.0 cm × 0.7 cm to 3.2 cm × 2.5 cm. The area of flaps ranged from 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm to 3.5 cm × 2.8 cm. The donor sites were sutured directly. Results Tension vesicular scabbing occurred in distal part of flap, and was cured after dressing change in 3 cases. The other flaps survived and incision healed primarily. All incision at donor sites healed primarily. Thirty-one patients (35 fingers) were followed up 6-29 months (15.3 months on average). All flaps survived with satisfactory appearance, sensation, and function. Two-point discrimination was 6-9 mm (7.9 mm on average). The results were excellent in 20 fingers, good in 13 fingers, and fair in 2 fingers according to the total active movement (TAM) standards; the excellent and good rate was 94.3%. Conclusion The treatment of finger tissue defect with the modified island flap based on the reversed dorsal metacarpal artery is recommendable. The deverting point was altered from the dorsal point to the palm. The vessel pedicle is extended. It can be easily and conveniently performed for more cases.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the perforator-based propeller flaps (PPFs) based on digital artery (DA) and dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) in repairing hand wounds. Methods The clinical data of 45 patients with hand wounds between January 2018 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 27 males and 18 females with an average age of 41.2 years (range, 14-72 years). The causes of injury included twist injury in 15 cases, crush injury in 19 cases, and cut injury in 11 cases. The injured parts included 32 cases of digits, 10 cases of dorsal hand, and 3 cases of palmar hand, all of which had tendon, joint, and bone exposure. The time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 8 hours (mean, 4.3 hours). The wound sizes after debridement ranged from 1.8 cm×1.0 cm to 5.0 cm×3.5 cm. Twenty-eight cases were repaired by the PPFs based on DA and 17 cases were repaired by the PPFs based on DMA. The flap size ranged from 2.5 cm×1.1 cm to 8.5 cm×4.0 cm. The defects of the donor sites in 14 patients were closed directly and the defects in the left 31 patients were resurfaced with free full-thickness skin graft from the proximal medial forearm.Results All the flaps survived after operation. Two cases of the PPF based on DA and 1 case of the PPF based on DMA underwent partially blisters at the distal end and healed after dressing change. The incisions in the donor site healed by first intention and the skin grafts survived. All patients were followed up 10-33 months, with a mean of 15.4 months. At last follow-up, the static two-point discrimination of the PPFs based on DA and DMA were 4-14 mm and 8-20 mm with the averages of 8.1 mm and 13.3 mm, respectively. According to the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, 20 patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the PPF based on DA and 8 patients were satisfied; 8 patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the PPF based on DMA and 9 patients were satisfied. Based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the appearance scores of the donor site of the PPFs based on DA and DMA were 2-7 and 4-9, with the averages of 4.2 and 6.1, respectively. ConclusionThe two kinds of PPFs are reliable in blood supply and easy to harvest, which provide a good method for emergency repair of small and medium area wounds in the hand.