目的:观察等效剂量瑞芬太尼和芬太尼诱导气管插管对小儿血流动力学的影响。方法:40例择期行全麻患儿随机分为瑞芬太尼组和芬太尼组,麻醉诱导使用咪唑安定0.15mg/kg、丙泊酚2.5mg/kg、芬太尼2.5μg/kg或瑞芬太尼2μg/kg和维库溴铵0.1mg/kg。分别于麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后2min(T1)、插管后1、2min(T2、T3)记录心率、收缩压和舒张压。结果:两组诱导前血流动力学指标相似。与T0时比较,两组患儿T1时收缩压、舒张压均降低(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01),心率均减慢(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01);瑞芬太尼组T2.T3时收缩压、舒张压降低(Plt;0.05或Plt;0.01),心率减慢(Plt;0.05);芬太尼组T2、T3时收缩压、舒张压升高(Plt;0.05),心率增快(Plt;0.05)。与芬太尼组比较,瑞芬太尼组T1、T2和T3时收缩压、舒张压均降低(Plt;0.05),心率减慢(Plt;0.05)。结论:瑞芬太尼比等效剂量芬太尼能更好地抑制小儿全麻诱导气管插管时的心血管反应。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the difference between the tracheal intubation connected to conventional ventilation (TI-CV) and rigid bronchoscopy connected to high frequency ventilation (RB-HFV) under general anesthesia on patients with transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB).MethodA prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in interstitial lung disease patients with TBCB from August 2018 to February 2019 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. According to the different methods of intubation, the patients were divided to a TI-CV group and a RB-HFV group randomly. The operating duration, extubation duration, total anesthesia time, heart rate, blood pressure and arterial blood gas analysis were collected and analyzed.ResultsSixty-five patients were enrolled. There were 33 patients with an average age of (48.0±15.0) years in TI-CV group and 32 patients with an average age of (48.8±10.8) years in RB-HFV group. The basic line of body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC and DLCO), arterial blood gas (pH, PaO2 and PaCO2) and heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) had no significant differences between two groups. At the first 5 minutes of operation, the pH was (7.34±0.06) and (7.26±0.06), and the PaCO2 was (48.82±9.53) and (62.76±9.80) mm Hg in TI-CV group and RB-HFV group respectively, with significant differences (P=0.000). At the end of operation, the pH was (7.33±0.06) and (7.21±0.08), the PaCO2 was (48.91±10.49) and (70.93±14.83) mm Hg, the HR were (79.6±21.1) and (93.8±18.7) bpm, the MAP were (72.15±13.03) and (82.63±15.65) mm Hg in TI-CV group and RB-HFV group respectively, with significant differences (P<0.05). There were no differences in the operating duration and extubation duration between two groups. The total anesthesia time was (47.4±8.8) and (53.3±11.6) min with significant difference (P=0.017). Five minutes after the extubation, there were no significant difference in the pH, PaO2, PaCO2, HR and MAP between two groups. No serious complications occurred in either group.ConclusionsCompared with rigid bronchoscopy, TI-CV under general anesthesia is more conducive to maintain effective ventilation, and maintain the HR and MAP stable during the TBCB procedure. TBCB procedure should be performed by TI-CV under general anesthesia in patients with poor cardiopulmonary function.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
The effects of preoperative selective arterial perfusion chemotherapy (PSAPC) in the treatment of 20 cases of histologically confirmed gastric cancers is reported in which 12 patients were operated on, and a comparison with that of general chemotherapy in 10 cases of gastric cancers (as controls) was made. In the PSAPC group, besides the improvement of clinical symptoms and singns, the cancer cells of lesions in situ and metastatic lymph nodes have different degrees of degeneration and necrosis. This result show significant differences in two group comparison (Plt;O.01). We conclude that the PSAPC has good short-term effect and little side-effect. It can improve the resection rate and radical resection rate, and prevent the iatrogenic metastasis and implantation during operation, and decrease the postoperative recurrence of the patients with gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of non-intubation anesthesia in thoracic surgery.MethodsFrom September 2017 to December 2019, 296 patients were operated at department of thoracic surgery in our hospital. There were 167 males and 129 females with an average age of 50.69±12.95 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were intubated: 150 patients were in a non-intubation group, including 83 males and 67 females with an average age of 49.91±13.59 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years, and 146 patients were in an intubation group including 84 males and 62 females with an average age of 51.49±12.26 years, ranging from 16 to 74 years. Intraoperative data, postoperative recovery, inflammatory response of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in operation time, blood loss, the lowest oxygen saturation or other indicators (P>0.05). But the highest partial pressure of carbon dioxide of the non-intubation group was higher than that of the intubation group (P=0.012). The non-intubation group was superior to the intubation group in postoperative recovery and inflammatory response (P<0.05).ConclusionThe non-intubation anesthesia is safe and maneuverable in thoracic surgery, and it has some advantages in accelerating postoperative rehabilitation.
Objective To evaluate and summarize the relevant evidence of oxygenation strategies with tracheal intubation after extubation for adult in intensive care unit (ICU), and to provide evidence-based practice for the development of scientific and effective strategies tracheal intubation after extubation for ICU adult patients. Methods Evidence-based databases, related guideline websites, association websites and original databases were searched by computer for literature about oxygenation strategies with tracheal intubation after extubation for ICU adults patients was extracted. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to May 2023. Two researchers trained in evidence-based practice evaluated the quality of the included literature and extracted evidence from the literature that met the quality evaluation criteria. Results A total of 18 articles were included, including 7 guidelines, 4 clinical decisions, 2 expert consensus, 4 systematic reviews and 1 randomized controlled trial. A total of 22 pieces of best evidence were formed, including 7 aspects of basic principles, evaluation, selection, parameter setting, withdrawal, effect evaluation and precautions. ConclusionThe medical staff should select the best evidence based on the actual clinical situation and the patient’s own needs, and adjust the oxygenation strategies to reduce the rate of tracheal intubation and improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the methods to improve the success rate of intubation and reduce the intubation time consuming in emergency orotracheal intubation by improving the method of holding laryngoscope. MethodsA total of 146 patients needed orotracheal intubation were randomly divided into a traditional group who was intubated with traditional method of holding laryngoscope and an improved group who was intubated with improved method of holding laryngoscope. The success rate of intubation for the first time, success rate in difficult intubation, intubation time consuming, the incidence of complications by mechanical injury between two groups were compared. ResultsSixty-nine petients received traditional method of holding laryngoscope and 77 petients received improvement method of holding laryngoscope. The success rate for the first time intubation [71(92.2%) vs. 56(81.2%)] and success rate in difficult intubation [13(72.2%) vs. 3(23.1%)] of the improved group were higher than those of the traditional group. The differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The intubation time consuming [(28.3±3.5)s vs. (35.6±4.1)s] and the incidence of complications by mechanical injury [1(1.3%) vs. 6(8.7%)] of the improved group were lower than those of the traditional group with statistical significance (all P < 0.05). ConclusionThe success rate of intubation for the first time and the difficult intubation can be improved effectively, and the intubation time consuming and the incidence of complications by mechanical injury can be reduced effectively by improving the method of holding laryngoscope.