Objectives To train postgraduate medical students the ability of effectively using network resources and independently studying, and to explore new model of clinical liver cancer teaching. Methods The teaching model of problembased learning (PBL) to clinical liver cancer teaching was applied. Results The teaching model of PBL changed graduate student the status of passive acceptance to active participation. The teaching process was full of livingness, and the teaching quality was improved.Conclusion The teaching model of PBL can break through the limitations of passive acceptance of book knowledge in traditional teaching model and improve the ability to handle the comprehensive clinical knowledge of liver cancer, which provides a new model to the teaching of liver cancer to graduate medical students in clinic.
目的 促进医学生化检验课程理论与实验的结合，提高学生学习实验兴趣，增强学生临床对话的能力。 方法 通过创建问题情景和病例，在医学检验专业本科班中应用以问题为导向教学法（PBL），结合病例教学方法进行临床生化检验实验教学改革。 结果 问卷调查显示，学生在教学内容掌握、学习的主动性、综合分析能力、创新能力、团队协作等方面均得到明显提高。92.6%的学生认为PBL结合病例教学法优于传统实验教学法。 结论 PBL结合病例教学法值得在生化检验实验教学中加以推广。
ObjectiveTo discuss the application of Miller pyramid teaching method in the competency training of new nurses in hemodialysis room and evaluate the effect.MethodsFourteen new nurses in hemodialysis room adopting conventional teaching method from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively selected as the control group; from January to December 2019, another 14 new nurses in hemodialysis room were prospectively selected as the trial group and Miller pyramid teaching method was adopted. After three months of training, the theory and operation of the two groups of new nurses were assessed, and the post competency was assessed by using the Competency Inventory for Registered Nurse, and the teaching satisfaction was assessed by using the self-designed questionnaire on the teaching effect satisfaction of new nurses in hemodialysis room. The data of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe theoretical examination score (91.54±5.89 vs. 83.86±6.45), operational examination score (96.89±3.65 vs. 90.58±5.15), score of Competency Inventory for Registered Nurse (186.66±4.89 vs. 163.76±6.89), and teaching satisfaction (4.56±0.72 vs. 3.56±0.97) in the trial group were all higher than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionMiller pyramid teaching method is feasible to train the post competency of new nurses in hemodialysis room, which is helpful to improve the theoretical basis, operational skills, post competency, and teaching satisfaction of new nurses in hemodialysis room.
ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of BOPPPS method in teaching of evidence-based medicine for undergraduates.MethodsTwo classes from the first and second clinical medical college of Lanzhou University were randomly selected as BOPPPS group and traditional teaching group, respectively. The examination scores and questionnaire were used in combination to evaluate the teaching effectiveness. EpiData 3.1 software was used for data entry. SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 25 students were in BOPPPS group and 26 in traditional teaching group. Baseline characteristics such as gender, age, participation in scientific researches, publication of articles were balanced between two groups. The score of the BOPPPS group was higher than that of the traditional teaching group, and there was a significant difference between two groups in evidence searching, evidence evaluation and total score (P<0.05). Compared with traditional teaching group, more students from BOPPPS group deem that study interest, learning initiative, problem analysis and solving capability, self-study capability, communication between teachers and students, information acquisition capability, information analysis and utilization capability, speech capability and so on are improved, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe BOPPPS teaching mode is beneficial for undergraduates to improve innovative and practical capability, and improve quality and effectiveness of evidence-based medicine teaching.
Objective To evaluate the effect of clinical pathway (CP) teaching methods versus traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. Methods The following electronic databases as PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI were retrieved on computer from their establishment to April 2011 to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing CP with traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed by two reviewers independently according to the scale of criteria for methodological quality developed by Smits PB, and the meta-analysis was conducted by using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan5.1 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 1 269 participants were included, and nine of them were of high quality. The meta-analyses showed that compared with the traditional teaching method, the CP teaching tended to be superior (Plt;0.05) in improving nursing students’ objective knowledge, nursing operating skills, professional ability and satisfaction with teaching methods, and in improving patients’ satisfaction as well. Conclusion The clinical pathway teaching method is a scientific teaching model in nursing clinical teaching; it standardizes the teaching procedure, promotes students’ active learning and further enhances the teaching effect. But it is necessary to unify the method of assessment with more researches. In addition, researchers should pay more attention to improving the comprehensive quality of nursing students.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional teaching method (lecture-based learning) on clinical practical teaching of orthopedic surgery. MethodsBetween May 2012 and December 2013, 55 orthopedic interns were chosen to be divided into two groups: PBL group (n=29) and traditional lecture group (control group, n=26). Case report and examination on a completion of orthopedic surgery were used to assess the teaching outcomes. ResultsPerformance differences in content of presentation and capability of answers to questions were significant between PBL group and the traditional group in the report test (P<0.05). The test scores of case analysis examination in PBL group were significantly higher than those in the traditional lecture group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other types of questions (P>0.05). ConclusionThe participants in PBL group have performed significantly better in culturing clinical thinking and comprehensive analysis, competence and in no circumstance did they perform worse than traditional lecture method.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of case-based learning combined with scenario exercise on nosocomial infection prevention and control training.MethodsClinical nursing students who entered the Department of Western & Traditional Chinese Medicine between September 2018 and November 2019 were selected. These students entered in groups. According to the entry number, the groups were divided into trial group and control group by odd or even numbers. The two groups of nursing students were trained by the infection prevention and control nursing group of the department to prevent nosocomial infection on the first day of entering the department. The trial group adopted case-based learning combined with scenario exercise, while the control group adopted traditional lecture-based learning. The two groups were compared by hand hygiene compliance rate, hand hygiene accuracy rate, clinical waste classification and disposal accuracy rate, occupational exposure, nosocomial infection prevention and control assessment scores, and teaching method satisfaction.ResultsA total of 63 nursing students from 10 groups were enrolled. There were 32 students from 5 groups in the control group and 31 students from 5 groups in the trial group. The hand hygiene compliance rate (χ2=8.434, P=0.004), clinical waste classification and disposal accuracy rate (χ2=4.196, P=0.041), nosocomial infection prevention and control assessment scores (t=3.145, P=0.003) and satisfaction scores of teaching methods (t=2.446, P=0.017) in the trial group were all higher than those in the control group. There was no occupational exposure in the trial group, but 1 case in the control group. The correct hand hygiene rates of the two groups were both 100%.ConclusionCase-based learning combined with scenario exercise can effectively improve the awareness of nosocomial infection prevention and control, improve the knowledge and skills of nosocomial infection prevention and control, improve the effectiveness of nosocomial infection prevention and control training, and increase the satisfaction of clinical teaching.