ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical value of internal radiation therapy with hepatic intraarterial iodine131 labeled material for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThis summarized paper was made on literature review. ResultsIodine131lipiodol and several reported iodine131labeled antibodies to HCC associated antigens were concentrated in the foci of HCC with a high tumortonormaltissue absorbed dose ratios. No severe side effects occurred. It was used in various kinds of HCC patients, and mostly showed a significant tumor response. Survival rate of HCC patients was raised in several clinical trials.Conclusion Internal radiotherapy with hepatic intraarterial iodine131 labeled material may be considered as an effective method to treat HCC.
In 2014, the new concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) was first proposed by cryptogenic stroke/ESUS International Working Group. In the past 5 years, related clinical researches of ESUS have been deepened, and the results of many large clinical studies have been published. However, the guiding significance of this new concept to clinical practice is still controversial. By reviewing the background, diagnostic criteria, assessment, common emboli sources, anticoagulant therapy research advances and related limitations of ESUS, and analyzing the possible causes of negative anticoagulant therapy results, we explored the clinical value of this new classification.
Aortic intramural hematoma and pulmonary embolism are two rapidly progressive and life-threatening diseases. A 65-year-old male patient with descending aortic intramural hematoma and pulmonary embolism underwent pulmonary embolectomy and descending aortic stent-graft placement, with good postoperative results.
ObjectiveTo study the correlation between international normalized ratio (INR) and coagulation factor Ⅱ and Ⅹ in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism treated with warfarin at moderate and low intensity anticoagulation.MethodsFifty-one patients with pulmonary thromboembolism treated with warfarin orally were divided into low-intensity anticoagulation group (INR from 1.6 to 2.0) and standard-intensity anticoagulation group (INR form 2.0 to 3.0) according to their monitoring INR indices. The levels of coagulation factor Ⅱ and Ⅹ were measured, and the correlation between INR level and coagulation factor activity was compared.ResultsThe INR of the low intensity anticoagulation group was 1.69±0.2 and the standard intensity anticoagulation group was 2.55±0.46. The corresponding activity of coagulation factor Ⅱ was (48.3±28.0)% and (24.0±8.0)% respectively. The activity of coagulation factor Ⅹ was (32.8±24.0)% and (16.7±6.0)%. There was a negative correlation between the activity of INR and coagulation factor Ⅱ and Ⅹ, with correlation coefficients of –0.903 and –0.459, respectively. Coagulation factor Ⅱ activity < 40%, coagulation factor Ⅹ activity inhibitory level < 25% is defined as anticoagulation effect. When coagulation factor Ⅱ activity level reaches anticoagulation effect, the corresponding minimum INR value was 1.56 and as to coagulation factor Ⅹ, the corresponding minimum INR value was 1.66.ConclusionsINR is negatively correlated with the activity of coagulation factor Ⅱ and coagulation factor Ⅹ. With the increase of INR, the activity of coagulation factor Ⅱ and coagulation factor Ⅹ decrease. Low intensity anticoagulation could not effectively inhibit the activity of coagulation factor.