目的:探讨后路椎弓根螺钉固定在地震伤胸腰椎骨折中的应用及优点。方法:对19例胸腰椎骨折的地震伤患者行后路椎弓根螺钉内固定术。结果:本组病例的手术时间70～115分钟,平均出血量约280mL,两例病员术中出血超过400mL进行输血,复位椎体前缘高度由术前平均57.5%恢复到术后平均93.6%,后突角由术前平均21°矫正到术后平均3°,术后3～7天转往外地继续治疗,Frankel分级平均提高0.4。结论:后路椎弓根螺钉固定具有省时、节约医疗资源、提高救治效率、减轻患者痛苦的优点,尤其适用于大批伤病员的紧急救治。
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and effectiveness of unilateral pedicle screw rod and single poly (ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) Cage for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. MethodsA total of 126 cases of single segment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion between January 2006 and June 2012 were divided into 2 groups in the randomized clinical trial. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage was used in 63 cases (research group), and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage in 63 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, side, and affected segment between 2 groups (P>0.05). Schulte evaluation criterion was used to assess bone graft fusion, Oswestry disability index (ODI) to estimate the quality of life situation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the improvements of lower back pain. Macnab standards was applied to assess postoperative effectiveness, and Emery ways to measure the height of intervertebral space. ResultsThe incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and hospitalization fee in research group were significantly less than those in control group (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 12-79 months (mean, 21.3 months) in research group, and 15-73 months (mean, 22.6 months) in control group. The postoperative lordosis was recovered well, and the height of intervertebral space was increased. No loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The time of bone graft fusion was (6.8±1.3) months in research group and was (7.1±1.2) months in control group, showing no significant difference (t=1.153, P=0.110). The height of intervertebral space, ODI score, and VAS score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at preoperation and last follow-up (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation, postoperative effectiveness was assessed according to Macnab criterion, the excellent and good rate was 95.23% in research group (excellent in 13 cases, good in 47 cases, and fair in 3 cases) and was 71.42% in control group (excellent in 7 cases, good in 38 cases, fair in 15 cases, and poor in 3 cases); the research group was significantly superior to control group (χ2=6.110, P=0.006). ConclusionUnilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage has the advantages of small trauma, reliable fixation, shorter operation time, less bleeding, less economic cost, and early off-bed activity time. It can provide a simple and reliable choice in single segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion.
Objective To assess the possibility of placing the posterior pedicle screw on atlas. Methods Twenty human cadaver specimens were used to insert pedicle screws in atlas, through the posterior arch or the pedicle of C1 into the lateral mass. The screw entry point was on the posterior surface of C1 posterior arch and at the intersection of the vertical line through the center of C2 inferior articular process and the horizontal line at least 3 mm below the superior rim of the C1 lamina. The screw of 3.5 mm in diameter was placed in a direction of 10° medial angle and 5° upwardangle. After placement of C1 pedicle screw, the distance from C1 screw entry point to the mediallateral midpoint of C1 pedicle, the maximum length of screw trajectory and the actual screw trajectory angles were measured. The direction of screw penetrating through the cortical of C1 pedicle or lateral mass and the injuries to the vertebral artery and spinal cord were observed.Results Forty pedicle screws were placed on atlas, the mean distance from C1 screw entry point to the medial-lateral midpoint of C1 pedicle was (2.20±0.42)mm, the maximum length of screw trajectory averaged (30.51±1.59)mm, and the actual screw trajectory angle measured (9.7±0.67)° in a medial direction and (4.6±0.59) ° in a upward direction. Only 1 screw penetrated the upper cortical bone of the atlas pedicle because the upward angle was too large, and 8 screws were inserted so deep that the inferior cortical bone of the C1 lateral mass was penetrated. But no injuries to the vertebral artery and spinal cord wereobserved. Conclusion C1 posterior pedicle screw fixation is quite accessible and safe, but the su
To evaluate the cl inical effect of pedical screw systems fixed between lumbar and il ium for treatment of sacral fractures. Methods From June 2003 to June 2009, 21 cases of sacral fracture (29 sides including monolateral 13 cases and bilateral 8 cases) were treated with pedical screw systems to have reduction and fixation. There were 12 males and 9 females, aging 23-59 years (38.2 years on average). Fractue was caused by traffic accident in 12 cases, by fall ingfrom height in 7 cases, and by crash in 2 cases. Screws were inserted into lumbar pedicles and il iac crests. Decompression was used in 4 cases compl icated by sacral nerves injury, and reductions and fixations were used in 12 cases compl icated anterior pelvic or acetabulum injury. The preoperative proximal displacement at the injured side of the pelvis was (16.29 ± 6.47) mm compared with contralateral pelvis. Results All incisions healed primarily with no compl ication of infection. Twentyone patients were followed up 6 months to 6 years. Cl inical heal ing time of fracture was 6-9 weeks. In 4 cases compl icated by S1 or S2,3 nerves injury, the function recovered completely after 4-9 weeks. In other 17 patients, no compl ication of intraoperative nerve injury occurred. All patients could walk and squat after 6-12 weeks of operation. No breakage or displacement of implant occurred. The postoperative proximal displacement at the injured side of the pelvis was (3.51 ± 0.68) mm compared with contralateral pelvis, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.01) when compared with preoperative one. Conclusion It is a novel choice to have reduction and internal fixation for sacral fracture with pedical screw systems fixed between lumbar and il ium. The strict regulation of indication and skill is the key to prevent compl ication.
Objective To explore the feasibilities, methods, outcomes and indications of atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion for the treatment of upper cervical diseases. Methods From October 2004 to January 2006, 17 patients with upper cervical diseases were treated with atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion. There were 13 males and 4 females, ageing 19 to 52 years. Of 17 cases, there were 14 cases of atlantoaxial dislocation(including 3 cases of congenital odontoid disconnection，4 cases of old odontoid fracture，2 cases of new odontoid fracture(typeⅡC), 3 cases of rupture of the transverse ligament, and 2 cases of atlas fracture； 2 cases of tumor of C2; 1case of giant neurilemoma of C2,3 with instability after the resection oftumors. JOA score before operation was 8.3±3.0. Results The mean operative time and bleeding amount were 2.7 hours (2.1-3.4 hours) and 490 ml (300-750 ml) respectively. No injuries to the vertebral artery and spinal cord were observed. The medial-superior cortex of lateral mass was penetrated by 1 C1 screw approximately 3 mmwithout affecting occipito-atlantal motions. All patients were followed up 3-18 months. The clinical symptoms were improved in some extents and the screws were verified to be in a proper position, no breakage or loosening of screw and rob occurred. All patients achieved a solid bone fusion after 3-6 months. JOA score 3 months after operation was14.6±2.2. JOA improvement rates were 73%-91%(mean 82%). Conclusion The atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion is feasible for the treatment of upper cervical diseases and has betteroutcomes, wider indications if conducted properly.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Methods Between February 2008 and December 2011, 33 patients with degenerative lumbar instability were treated with posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion, including 14 cases of lumbar disc protrusion with instability, 15 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis with instability, 3 recurrent cases of lumbar disc protrusion at 1 year after discectomy, and 1 case of extreme lateral lumbar disc protrusion. There were 20 males and 13 females with an average age of 47.2 years (range, 39-75 years). The average disease duration was 12.8 months (range, 6-25 months). Single-segment-fixation was performed in 28 cases (L4, 5 in 21 cases, L5, S1 in 6 cases, and L5, 6 in 1 case), and double-segment-fixation was performed in 5 cases (L3, 4 and L4, 5). The clinical results were evaluated by using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for low back pain. Results Infection occurred in 1 case, and was cured after dressing change; primary healing was obtained in the other patients. Thirty-one patients were followed up 32.3 months on average (range, 15-53 months). Cage displacement occurred in 1 case who received bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion; no screw breaking, Cage displacement, or pseudoarthrosis was observed in the others. X-ray films showed bone fusion in the other patients except 1 case of bone fusion failure. ODI and JOA score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with the ones before operation and at 2 weeks after operation (P lt; 0.05); the improvement rates were 74.0% ± 10.1% and 83.6% ± 9.4%, respectively. Conclusion Posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion is an effective and reliable method for patients with degenerative lumbar instability because it has the advantages of simple operation and less trauma.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) through mild side and severe side approaches in the treatment of elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with OVCF with symptoms on one side who were admitted between June 2020 and June 2021 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the severe side approach group (group A) and the mild side approach group (group B) according to the cement puncture access during PVP, with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general information such as gender composition, age, body mass index, bone density, damaged segments, disease duration, and chronic comorbidities (P>0.05). The lateral margin height of the vertebral body on the operated side in group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.001). The pain level and spinal motor function were evaluated using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before operation, at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after operation in both groups, respectively. Results No intraoperative or postoperative complications such as bone cement allergy, fever, incision infection, and transient hypotension occurred in both groups. Four cases of bone cement leakage occurred in group A (3 cases of intervertebral leakage and 1 case of paravertebral leakage), and 6 cases of bone cement leakage occurred in group B (4 cases of intervertebral leakage, 1 case of paravertebral leakage, and 1 case of spinal canal leakage), and none of them had neurological symptoms. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-16 months, with a mean of 13.3 months. All fractures healed and the healing time ranged from 2 to 4 months, with a mean of 2.9 months. The patients had no complication related to infection, adjacent vertebral fracture, or vascular embolism during follow-up. At 3 months postoperatively, the lateral margin height of the vertebral body on the operated side in groups A and B were improved when compared with preoperative ones, and the difference between pre- and post-operative lateral margin height of the vertebral body in group A was higher than that in group B, all showing significant differences (P<0.001). The VAS scores and ODI in both groups improved significantly at all postoperative time points when compared with those before operation, and further improved with time after operation (P<0.05). The differences in VAS scores and ODI between the two groups before operation were not significant (P>0.05); VAS scores and ODI in group A were significantly better than those in group B at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Patients with OVCF have more severe compression on the more symptomatic side of the vertebral body, and patients with PVP have better pain relief and better functional recovery when cement is injected through the severe symptomatic side.
Objective To explore and evaluate the accuracy and feasibil ity of individual rapid prototype (RP) drill templates for atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation. Methods Volumetric CT scanning was performed in 8 adult cadaveric atlas and axis to collect Dicom format datas. Then three-dimensional (3D) images of atlas and axis were reconstructed and the parameters of pedicles of 3D model were measured by using software Mimics 10.01. The 3D model was saved by STLformat in Mimics. The scattered point cloud data of 3D model were processed and the 3D coordinate system was located in software Imageware 12.1. The curves and surfaces of 3D model were processed in software Geomagic Studio 10. The optimal trajectory of pedicle screw was designed and a template was constructed which accorded with the anatomical morphology of posterior arch of atlas and lamina of axis by using software Pro/Engineer 4.0. The optimal trajectory of pedicle screw and the template were integrated into a drill template finally. The drill template and physical models of atlas and axis were manufactured by RP (3D print technology). The accuracy of pilot holes of drill templates was assessed by visually inspecting and CT scanning. Results The individual drill template was used conveniently and each template could closely fit the anatomical morphology of posterior arch of atlas and lamina of axis. Template loosening and shifting were not found in the process of screw implantation. Thirty-two pedicle screws were inserted. Imaging and visual inspection revealed that the majority of trajectories did not penetrate the pedicle cortex, only 1 cortical penetration was judged as noncritical and did not injury the adjacent spinal cord, nerve roots, and vertebral arteries. The accuracy of atlas pedicle screw was grade 0 in 15 screws and grade I in 1 screw, and the accuracy of axis pedicle screw was grade 0 in 16 screws. Conclusion The potential of individual drill templates to aid implantation of atlantoaxial pedicle screw is promising because of its high accuracy.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screw (CBTS) and conventional pedicle screw for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single segment lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Between May 2013 and May 2016, a total of 97 patients with single segment lumbar degenerative disease were treated with PLIF. Fifty-one patients were fixed with CBTS in PLIF (trajectory screw group) and 46 with pedicle screw (pedicle screw group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, lesion segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, bed rest time, length of hospital stay, serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration, total amount of diclofenac sodium, perioperative complications, ODI, VAS score, and interbody fusion rate were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Results All patients were followed up 12 months. The patients in trajectory screw group had a significantly less operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and serum CK concentration when compared with the patients in pedicle screw group (P<0.05). Thirty-five patients (68.6%) in trajectory screw group and 46 patients (100%) in pedicle screw group were given diclofenac sodium within 48 hours after operation, showing significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=89.334, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between trajectory screw group and pedicle screw group (3.9% vs. 8.7%, P=0.418). There was no significant difference in the VAS score, ODI, and interbody fusion rate at 12 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For the single segment degenerative lumbar disease, the use of CBTS or conventional pedicle screw for PLIF can obtain satisfactory clinical function and interbody fusion rate. But the former has the advantages of less blood loss, less intraoperative muscle damage, less perioperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay and bed rest time.