Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using zero-profile anchored cage (ZAC) in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis, by comparing with plate-cage construct (PCC). Methods A clinical data of 65 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. During consecutive three-level ACDF, 35 patients were fixed with ZAC (ZAC group) and 30 patients with PCC (PCC group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), cervical lordosis, and surgical segmental angle. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical indicators (JOA score, NDI, VAS score), and radiological indicators (cervical lordosis, surgical segmental angle, implant subsidence, surgical segment fusion, and adjacent segment degeneration), and the postoperative complications [swelling of the neck (PSTT), dysphagia] were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 24-39 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up duration between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in ZAC group than in PCC group, and the length of hospital stay was longer, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). At each time point after operation, both groups showed significant improvements in JOA score, VAS score, and NDI compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Both groups showed an increase in PSTT at 3 days and 3, 6 months after operation compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but returned to preoperative levels at last follow-up (P>0.05). The PSTT at 3 days and 3 months after operation were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The incidences of dysphagia at 3 days and 3 months were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed at 6 months and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no postoperative complication in both groups including hoarseness, esophageal injury, cough, or hematoma. Both groups showed improvement in cervical lordosis and surgical segmental angle compared to preoperative levels, with a trend of loss during follow-up. The cervical lordosis loss and surgical segmental angle loss were significantly more in the ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). The incidence of implante subsidence was significantly higher in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ZAC group and PCC group in the incidences of surgical segment fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (P>0.05). ConclusionIn consecutive three-level ACDF, both ZAC and PCC can achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, while the latter can better maintain cervical curvature and reduce the incidence of implant subsidence.
To probe the etiopathogenisis of adjacent-segment disease by analyzing the imageology data and cl inical neurological function in patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) harvested by long-term follow-up. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who had undergone ACDF with perfect documents from January 1990 to April 2003. Of the patients, 45 were males and 7 were females with a mean age of 48.5 years (range from 25 to 72 years). There was the fusion of 10 one-levels, 38 two-levels and 4 three-levels. The cervical anterior-posterior and lateral X-ray, CT and MRI examination were performed before the operation. Cl inical neurological function was recorded by the Nurick score, and this score at 6 weeks after the operation was compared with the later follow-up. In the radiological examination, the motion of adjacent vertebrae and osteophyte formation were reviewed on X-ray and CT, and were converted to the semi-quantitative degeneration score according to the Goffin method. The correlation between Nurick score or degeneration score and the age at operation or fusion levels was compared by Spearman correlation coefficients. The cervical canal sizes of adjacent level and remote level on MRI were reviewed and compared with each other by t test. Results The follow-up period was 3 to 10 years, 6.9 years on average. There was difference in the Nurick score between the 6th week after operation (1.07 ± 0.84) and the later follow up (1.92 ± 1.28) by rank test (P lt; 0.05). There was no correlation between the Nurick score change and the age at operation (r = 0.21, P gt; 0.05) or fused levels(r = 0.30, P gt; 0.05) by Spearman correlation coefficients. There was obvious difference in degeneration score between the 6th week after operation (0.73 ± 0.67) and the later follow up (1.58 ± 1.06), (P lt; 0.01). There was no correlation between the degeneration score change and the age at operation (r = 0.35, P gt; 0.05) or fusion levels (r = 0.38, P gt; 0.05) by Spearman correlation coefficients. The cervical canal size reductions were (1.7 ± 1.1) mm at superioradjacent level, (1.2 ± 0.6) mm at inferior adjacent level and (0.30 ± 0.68) mm at remote level. There was obvious difference between superior or inferior and remote level by t test (P lt; 0.01). The adjacent level developed prominent degeneration together with nerve function change after the fusion operation and displayed correlation between degeneration and nerve function change(r = 0.41, P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The adjacent-segment disease after interbody fusion is produced by multiple factors. The natural progression in adjacent disc, biomechanical natural change resulting from interbody fusion, destruction to l igament structure in front of cervical vertebrae by operation, and bone graft model are important factors not to be ignored.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of treating prolapse of the cervical intervertebral disc by the Solis cage fusion, the titanium cage fusion or the autogenous iliac crest graft combined with the titanium plate fixation. Methods Sixty-four patients with prolapse of the cervical intervertebral discadmitted to hospital from February 2002 to May 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. In Group A, 20 patients (15 males and 5 females, aged 38.76 years, 30 intervertebral spaces) were treated with the Solis cage fusion, and the preoperative JOAscores were 9-16, averaged 11.4; in Group B, 21 patients (15 males and 6 females,aged 37-78 years, 23 intervertebral spaces) were treated with the titanium cagefusion, and the preoperative JOA scores were 8-13, averaged 10.1; in Group C, 23 patients (18 males and 5 females, aged 32-76 years, 28 intervertebral spaces)were treated with the autogenous iliac crest graft combined with the titanium plate fixation, and the preoperative JOA scores were 9-14, averaged 10.6. The comparative analysis was made among the 3 groups in the following aspects: X-ray exposure time, time working on the iliac bone, operation time, hemorrhage amount，complication incidence after operation, cervical vertebral fusion rate, symptom relief rate, and recovery rate of the JOA score. Results According to the follow-upfor 2-15 months averaged 12 months, the time working on the iliac bone was longer in Group C than in Groups A and B (11.5±2.4 vs 4.1±1.7 minand 4.2±1.9 min, P＜0.05); the operation time was longer in Group C than in Groups A and B (98.3±14.7 min vs 55.5±10.3 min and 56.8±12.6 min, P＜0.05); and the X-ray exposure time was longer in Group C than in Groups A and B (7.8±1.8 min vs 4.3±1.2 min and 4.2±1.3 min, P＜0.05). Also, the hemorrhage amount in Group C was much greater than in Groups A and B (145.8±19.3 ml vs 65.8±10.2 ml and 67.2±12.3 ml,P＜0.05). The postoperative complication rate was lower in Groups A and Bthan in Group C (P＜0.05). There was a significant difference in the complication rate in the cervical region between Group A (5.0%±1.8%) and Group B (14.3%±2.6%,Plt;0.05）. The fusion rate in Groups A and B was 100% 3-4 monthsafteroperation, and there was no difference when compared with that in Group C. The recovery rates of the JOA scores in the three groups were 81.9%±3.2%，78.9%±7.3%, and 76.3%±9.4%, respectively, and there was no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion The Solis cage fusion has a better therapeutic effect in treating prolapse of the cervical intervertebral disc than the titanium cage fusion and the autogenous iliac crest graft combined with the titanium plate fixation. The Solis cage fusion also makes the operation easier, with a more rapid recovery rate and fewer postoperative complications in the patient.
Objective To explore the clinical application value of the spinal robot-assisted surgical system in mild to moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis and evaluate the accuracy of its implantation. Methods The clinical data of 56 patients with Meyerding grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 28 cases were preoperatively planned with robotic arm and percutaneous pedicle screw placement according to preoperative planning (group A); the other 28 cases underwent fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, slippage type, Meyerding grade, and surgical segmental distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). The screw insertion angle was measured by CT, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by Neo’s criteria, and the invasion of superior articular process was evaluated by Babu’s method. Results One hundred and twelve screws were implanted in the two groups respectively, 5 screws (4.5%) in group A and 26 screws (23.2%) in group B penetrated the lateral wall of pedicle, and the difference was significant (χ2=9.157, P=0.002); the accuracy of nail implantation was assessed according to Neo’s criteria, the results were 107 screws of degree 0, 3 of degree 1, 2 of degree 2 in group A, and 86 screws of degree 0, 16 of degree 1, 6 of degree 2, 4 of degree 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (Z=4.915, P=0.031). In group B, 20 (17.9%) screws penetrated the superior articular process, while in group A, 80 screws were removed from the decompression side, and only 3 (3.8%) screws penetrated the superior articular process. According to Babu’s method, the degree of screw penetration into the facet joint was assessed. The results were 77 screws of grade 0, 2 of grade 1, 1 of grade 2 in group A, and 92 screws of grade 0, 13 of grade 1, 4 of grade 2, 3 of grade 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (Z=7.814, P=0.029). The screw insertion angles of groups A and B were (23.5±6.6)° and (18.1±7.5)° respectively, showing significant difference (t=3.100, P=0.003). Conclusion Compared to fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement has the advantages such as greater accuracy, lower incidence of screw penetration of the pedicle wall and invasion of the facet joints, and has a better screw insertion angle. Combined with MIS-TLIF, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement is an effective minimally invasive treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical differences between the kidney-shaped nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) Cage and the bullet-shaped n-HA/PA66 Cage. MethodsL2-L5 spinal specimens were selected from 10 adult male pigs. L2, L3 and L4, L5 served as a motor unit respectively, 20 motor units altogether. They were divided into 4 groups (n=5):no treatment was given as control group (group A); nucleus pulposus resection was performed (group B); bullet-shaped Cage (group C), and kidney-shaped Cage (group D) were used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) through left intervertebral foramen and supplemented by posterior pedicle screw fixation. The intervertebral height (IH) and the position of Cages were observed on the X-ray films. The range of motion (ROM) was measured. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the preoperative IH among 4 groups (F=0.166, P=0.917). No significant change was found in IH between at pre- and post-operation in group B (P>0.05); it increased after operation in groups C and D, but difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative IH among groups B, C, and D (P>0.05). The distance from Cage to the left margin was (3.06±0.51) mm in group C (close to the left) and (5.68±0.69) mm in group D (close to the middle), showing significant difference (t=6.787, P=0.000). The ROM in all directions were significantly lower in groups C and D than in groups A and B (P<0.05), and in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The right bending and compression ROM of group C were significantly higher than those of group D (P<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found in the other direction ROM (P>0.05). ConclusionThe bullet-shaped and kidney-shaped Cages have similar results in restoring IH and maintaining the stability of the spine assisted by internal fixation. Kidney-shaped Cage is more stable than bullet-shaped Cage in the axial compression and the bending load opposite implant, it can be placed in the middle and back of the vertebral body more ideally.
Objective To explore the occurrence condition of the neck axial symptom (AS) after cervical Bryan artificial disc replacement combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (Hybrid surgery) and traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF surgery) to treat the two-level cervical disease, and to do contrastive analysis. Methods Between August 2006 and March 2010, 18 patients underwent Hybrid surgery (group A) and 30 patients underwent two-level ACDF surgery (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, disease duration, type, and operated segment between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI) score, cervical curvature of the operated segment, total range of motion (ROM) of C2-7, ROM of the adjacent segment, and incidence of neck AS were recorded and compared between before operation and at last follow-up. Results All the patients were followed up 18-34 months (24.1 months on average). In both groups, the JOA and NDI scores at last follow-up had significantly improvement when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.01), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups at preoperation and last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The kyphosis incidence of the operated segment in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (χ2=5.333, P=0.021). There was no significant difference in the total ROM of C2-7 between at preoperation and last follow-up in group A (t=0.410, P=0.685); the total ROM of C2-7 at last follow-up was significantly lower than that at preoperation in group B (t=3.007, P=0.006); and significant difference was found between 2 groups at last follow-up (t=2.664, P=0.013). At last follow-up, ROM of the superior and inferior adjacent segments in group B increased obviously (P lt; 0.05) and was significantly higher than that in group A (t=2.252, P=0.033; t=2.203, P=0.037). The incidence of neck AS were 16.7% in group A and 46.7% in group B, showing significant difference at last follow-up (χ2=4.427, P=0.035). Conclusion Compared with two-level ACDF surgery, Hybrid surgery has good outcomes. At the same time, it can maintain the curvature of operated segments and total ROM, avoid excessive increased ROM of the adjacent segments, and reduce the incidence of neck AS.
Objective To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) and minimally invasive tubular TLIF (MT-TLIF) in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods A clinical data of 75 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, who met the selection criteria between August 2019 and August 2020, was retrospectively analyzed, including 35 patients in the UBE- TLIF group and 40 patients in the MT-TLIF group. There was no significant difference in general data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease type and duration, and surgical segment between the two groups (P>0.05), which was comparable. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin (Hb) before operation and at 1 day after operation, the length of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 Health Survey Scale (SF-36 scale), intervertebral disc height (IDH), sagittal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL), and the intervertebral fusion were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with MT-TLIF group, UBE-TLIF group had significantly longer operation time but less intraoperative blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay (P<0.05). The Hb levels in both groups decreased at 1 day after operation, but there was no significant difference in the difference before and after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up, and the follow-up time was (14.7±2.5) months in the UBE-TLIF group and (15.0±3.4) months in the MT-TLIF group, with no significant difference (t=0.406, P=0.686). In both groups, the VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, SF-36 scale, and ODI after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between 1 month after operation and last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, and SF-36 scale between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the ODI in the UBE-TLIF group was significantly better than that in the MT-TLIF group (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, IDH, Cobb angle, and LL in both groups recovered when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and were maintained until last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the IDH, Cobb angle, and LL between the two groups at each time point (P>0.05). Thirty-three cases (89.2%) in the UBE-TLIF group and 35 cases (87.5%) in the MT-TLIF group achieved fusion, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.015, P=0.901). In the UBE-TLIF group, 1 case of intraoperative dural tear and 1 case of postoperative epidural hematoma occurred, with an incidence of 5.7%. In the MT-TLIF group, 1 case of intraoperative dural tear, 1 case of postoperative epidural hematoma, and 1 case of superficial infection of the surgical incision occurred, with an incidence of 7.5%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=1.234, P=1.000). Conclusion Compared with MT-TLIF, UBE-TILF can achieve similar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, and has the advantages of smaller incision, less bleeding, and shorter length of hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo investigate the early effctiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2016, 21 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with OLIF and pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach. There were 9 males and 12 females, aged 57-73 years, with an average age of 64.5 years. The disease duration was 24-60 months, with an average of 34.6 months. All cases were spondylolisthesis at L4 (15 cases of degreeⅠ, 6 cases of degreeⅡ); 1 case had vertebral arch isthmus, and 20 cases had spinal stenosis. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation and at last follow-up. Before operation and at 2 days after operation, anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were taken to measure the sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, and calculate the intervertebral height and degree of spondylolisthesis. At 6 months after operation, the intervertebral fusion was evaluated by CT.ResultsThe operation time was 120-180 minutes, with an average of 155 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 100-340 mL, with an average of 225.5 mL. One patient had slight injury of lower endplate, 1 patient had numbness of thigh and weakness of hip flexion after operation, 1 patient had sympathetic nerve trunk injury. All the cases were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.3 months. The symptoms of low back pain, leg pain, and numbness of lower limbs significantly relieved after operation, and there was no complication such as protrusion of fusion cage, screw breakage, and endplate collapse. At 2 days after operation, the intervertebral height, degree of spondylolisthesis, sagittal diameter of spinal canal, and cross-sectional area of spinal canal significantly improved compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, CT showed that 1 patient had poor interbody fusion (grade Ⅲ), the other 20 patients had good interbody fusion (grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ), and the interbody fusion rate was 95.2%. At last follow-up, JOA score of lumbar spine significantly increased compared with that before operation (t=24.980, P=0.000).ConclusionOLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the lumbar spondylolisthesis has minimally invasive features, such as less trauma, fewer complications, and higher intervertebral fusion rate. It is a safe and effective method.
Objective To summarize the physicochemical properties, manufacturing technique, and biological characteristics of porous tantalum and its application progress and related problems in spinal surgery. Methods The domestic and foreign related literature about porous tantalum was summarized and analyzed. Results Porous tantalum is characterized by high porosity, high coefficient of friction, low elastic modulus, good biocompatibility, and superior osseointegration capability. Its manufacture methods include chemical vapor deposition and infiltration technique, foam impregnation and powder metallurgy technique, and heat treatment method. Good clinical efficacy has achieved in the application of porous tantalum interbody fusion Cage in cervical and lumbar fusion surgery, but there is controversy in spinal fusion rate, especially in cervical fusion rate. Surface modification can increase the osseointegration capability of porous tantalum and intervertebral bony fusion. Conclusion Good clinical efficacy has achieved in the application of porous tantalum interbody fusion Cage in lumbar fusion surgery, while there is a dispute in cervical fusion surgery. In order to further observation, studies with more patients and longer follow-up would be needed.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and effectiveness of unilateral pedicle screw rod and single poly (ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) Cage for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. MethodsA total of 126 cases of single segment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion between January 2006 and June 2012 were divided into 2 groups in the randomized clinical trial. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage was used in 63 cases (research group), and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage in 63 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, side, and affected segment between 2 groups (P>0.05). Schulte evaluation criterion was used to assess bone graft fusion, Oswestry disability index (ODI) to estimate the quality of life situation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the improvements of lower back pain. Macnab standards was applied to assess postoperative effectiveness, and Emery ways to measure the height of intervertebral space. ResultsThe incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and hospitalization fee in research group were significantly less than those in control group (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 12-79 months (mean, 21.3 months) in research group, and 15-73 months (mean, 22.6 months) in control group. The postoperative lordosis was recovered well, and the height of intervertebral space was increased. No loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The time of bone graft fusion was (6.8±1.3) months in research group and was (7.1±1.2) months in control group, showing no significant difference (t=1.153, P=0.110). The height of intervertebral space, ODI score, and VAS score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at preoperation and last follow-up (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation, postoperative effectiveness was assessed according to Macnab criterion, the excellent and good rate was 95.23% in research group (excellent in 13 cases, good in 47 cases, and fair in 3 cases) and was 71.42% in control group (excellent in 7 cases, good in 38 cases, fair in 15 cases, and poor in 3 cases); the research group was significantly superior to control group (χ2=6.110, P=0.006). ConclusionUnilateral pedicle screw fixation and single PEEK Cage has the advantages of small trauma, reliable fixation, shorter operation time, less bleeding, less economic cost, and early off-bed activity time. It can provide a simple and reliable choice in single segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion.