ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal methotrexate treatment in patients with primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL). MethodsRetrospective non-comparative interventional case series. Fourteen patients (26 eyes) with biopsy-proven PVRL were included in the study. All patients received examination of Snellen chart visual acuity, fundus color photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Among the 24 eyes with recordable visual acuity, 17 eyes has initial visual acuity≥0.1 (0.45±0.20) and 7 eyes with initial visual acuity ranged from light perception to hand movement. The vitreous opacities and (or) subretinal yellowish-white lesions and retinal pigment epitheliumuplift were observed in all eyes. All eyes were treated with intravitreal methotrexate (4000 μg/ml, 0.1 ml) injections according to a induction-consolidation-maintenance regimen. For 26 treated eyes, each received an average of (11.5±6.3) injections. Twenty eyes had finished theintraocular chemotherapy, while 6 eyes had not. Eight of 20 eyes were clinically confirmed free of tumor cells by diagnostic vitrectomy, 12 eyes were still with tumor cell involvement.The follow-up was ranged from 2 to 48 months, the mean time was 18 months. The examination of BCVA, fundus color photography and OCT were performed. No tumor cell was defined as clinical remission. Visual acuity was scored as improved or declined obviously (improved or declined 2 lines) or mild improved or declined (changed within 2 lines). ResultsTwenty eyes achieved clinical remission after (3.5±3.6) injections, 12 eyes of 20 eyes with tumor cell involvement before chemotherapy achieved clinical remission after (5.8±3.0) injections. The mean visual acuity of seventeen eyes with initial visual acuity 0.1 in induction phase and at the end of treatment were 0.36±0.23 and 0.56±0.20, respectively. Compared with before treatment, the visual acuity was mild declined in induction phase (t=1.541, P>0.05), but mild improved at the end of treatment (t=2.639, P<0.05). The visual acuity at the end of treatment in 7 eyes with initial visual acuity<0.1 was ranged from no light perception to 0.1. Of 14 patients, 2 patients have been fatal because of brain lesions progression at 42 and 48 months after diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma. No ocular recurrence was noted during the follow-up in 20 eyes who finished intraocular chemotherapy. ConclusionsPVRL patients can achieve clinical remission after (3.5±3.6) injections by intravitreal chemotherapy of methotrexate, and the visual acuity improved mildly. No ocular recurrence was found during follow-up.
ObjectivesTo analyze patients’ values and preferences on individualized medication of high-dose methotrexate so as to support the development of the practice guideline for clinical medication of high-dose methotrexate.MethodsA multicenter cross-sectional study involving patients with osteosarcoma or hematological malignancy in 7 hospitals was conducted by questionnaires to evaluate the perception and willingness on detection of gene polymorphisms (MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, ABCB1 C3435T and RFC1 G80A) related to methotrexate (MTX) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MTX. SPSS24.0 software was used to analyze the data.ResultsA total of 124 patients were involved, including 40 (32.26%) with osteosarcoma and 84 (67.74%) with hematological malignancy. 106 (85.48%) and 117 (94.35%) patients agreed on detection of gene polymorphisms and TDM, respectively. There was a significant difference on preference towards TDM between patients with risk factors for MTX and patients in which risk factors for MTX were not discovered (76.19% vs. 95.08%, P=0.003). The ranking of factors that contributed to the two decision-making was consistent (P<0.01), and specific orders of factors were identical. The clinical efficacy was the primary factor (mean rank 3.45 for detection of genetic polymorphisms and 3.52 for TDM), followed by safety (mean rank 3.01 and 3.16, respectively) and comfort (mean rank 1.73 and 1.79, respectively). Cost (mean rank 1.39 and 1.31, respectively) was the least important factor.ConclusionsThe preferences of patients toward detection of gene polymorphisms and TDM were generally similar, with well acceptance. No significant differences were found on the preferences toward detection of gene polymorphisms. However, patients with or without risk factors for MTX may differ significantly when making decisions on TDM, which may impact on clinical decision-making of clinicians and clinical pharmacists. The perception and willingness of patients should be considered adequately during the development of clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis from inception to June 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 970 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no statistical difference between iguratimod and methotrexate in ACR20 (RR=1.06, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.23, P=0.49), ACR50 (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.19, P=0.55), ACR70 (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.39, P=0.70), morning stiffness time (MD=0.45, 95%CI –0.26 to 1.16, P=0.22), tender joint count (MD=0.07, 95%CI –2.31 to 2.45, P=0.95), swollen joint count (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –1.44 to 0.84, P=0.61), health assessment questionnaire (MD=0.01, 95%CI –0.05 to 0.07, P=0.73) and the rate of adverse effects (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.07, P=0.09). Meta-analysis of 2 RCTs using double-blind method showed that, iguratimod was superior to methotrexat in the patient (MD=4.11, 95%CI 0.11 to 8.10, P=0.04) and physician (MD=4.81, 95%CI 0.93 to 8.69, P=0.01) global assessment of disease activities.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are similar to methotrexate. And iguratimod is superior in global assessment of disease activities by patients and doctors. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of conservative medical treatments for ectopic pregnancy (EP): methotrexate (MTX) + mifepristone + Ectopic Pregnancy II decoction (EP-II) vs. methotrexate + mifepristone. Methods A total of 95 patients with EP in Shenzhen Shajing Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2009 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups: 45 patients in the experimental group were treated with MTX, mifepristone and EP II decoction, while the other 50 patients in the control group were treated with MTX and mifepristone. The effectiveness of the two groups was analyzed with SPSS 13.0 software. Results There were significant differences in the time of serum β-HCG return to normal (16.13±8.13 ds vs. 22.05±7.15 ds, Plt;0.05), time of EP mass absorption (30.46±7.56 ds vs. 39.99±18.26 ds, Plt;0.05) and tubal patency rate (80% vs. 75%, Plt;0.05) between the two groups. But there were no significant differences in effective rate (95.56%, 43/45 vs. 94%, 47/50, χ2=0.0809, Pgt;0.05) and side effects. Conclusion The combination of methotrexate, mifepristone and EP II decoction for ectopic pregnancy is more effective than mifepristone and methotrexate in coordinately killing the embryo, shortening the time of serum β-HCG return to normal and the time of EP mass absorption, and improving the function of oviducts.
【摘要】 目的 探讨甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合米非司酮治疗早期异位妊娠(EP)的临床效果。 方法 收集2006年2月-2010年2月收治的早期未破裂型EP患者126例，随机分为MTX联合米非司酮组62例，单独应用MTX组64例， MTX治疗采用小剂量分次肌肉注射给药进行。 结果 126例患者中，MTX联合米非司酮组和单独应用MTX治疗组的成功率为分别为88%和65%，两组差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。 结论 MTX小剂量分次给药联合米非司酮治疗早期未破裂型EP效果优于MTX的单独使用。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of methotrexate (MTX) combined with mifepristone on early ectopic pregnancy. Methods A total of 126 patients with early ectopic pregnancy diagnosed from February 2006 to Febrary 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. In 126 patients, 62 treated with MTX combined with mifepristone were in the treatment group,and 64 treated independently with MTX were in the control group. MTX was administrated at a low dose in several times. Results In 126 patients,the success ratio of the treatment was 88% in treatment group groups and 65% in the control group; the difference between the two groups was significant (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Low-dose MTX in separate times combined with mifepriston is effective on the early ectopic pregnancy, and the therapeutic effect of the combined administration of MTX and mifepriston is better than that of the single administration with MTX.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of methotrexate perfusion combined with interventional treatment and the traditional treatment with methotrexate and mifepristone for cesarean scar pregnancy. MethodA total of 589 patients diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancy after surgery between January 2012 and March 2015 in our hospital were selected to be our study subjects. The patients were informed of the two kinds of treatment, and based on their own will, they were arranged into corresponding groups. Group A had 234 patients who were willing to undergo the conventional therapy:intramuscular injection of methotrexate (20 mg, once per day for 5 days); oral mifepristone (50 mg once per day for 3 to 5 days); and the continuation of drugs was determined by local pregnancy tissue blood flow on B ultrasound and liver function of the patients. Group B had 255 patients who selected uterine artery perfusion and arterial embolism. There was no significant difference in terms of age, serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and uterine incision gestation sac size between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Then we compared the treatment effect between the two groups. ResultsThe differences in the amount of bleeding, the time of blood HCG dropped to normal, and hospitalization duration between the two groups were significant (P<0.05), while in the rate of hysterectomy, drug-induced liver injury were not (P<0.05). ConclusionsMethotrexate perfusion combined with interventional treatment is better than the traditional treatment with methotrexate and mifepristone for cesarean scar pregnancy in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.
ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of etanercept combined with methotrexate to methotrexate plus placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to provide references for clinical practice.MethodsDecision tree model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the health care system by TreeAge Pro 2016 software. The cost-effectiveness of the two treatments were compared by incremental analysis, and the robustness of the results were analyzed by sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe cost of etanercept combined methotrexate group in one year duration was ¥212 692, the effective rate (ACR50) was 66.4%; the cost of methotrexate combined with placebo group in one year duration was ¥572, the effective rate (ACR50) was 40.6%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of two groups was ¥818 000/person, and the sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.ConclusionEtanercept combined methotrexate is significant more effective than methotrexat. But the cost of etanercept combined methotrexate is too high to afford and is not economical compared to methotrexate.
We reported one case of MTX-induced aplastic anemia and reviewed related literature to investigate the mechanism of action of MTX, and summarize the clinical feature, diagnostic criteria, risk factor, and interventions. These were hoped to arouse the attention of clinicians and clinical pharmacists, in order to effectively prevent, diagnose, and treat MTX-induced aplastic anemia.
目的 为红皮病型银屑病患者制定循证治疗方案。 方法 2012年3月收治1例红皮病型银屑病患者，充分评估患者情况后，提出临床问题，计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、 Medline、中文全文期刊医学数据库中相关研究，根据检索结果结合患者实际情况，制定治疗方案。 结果 共检索到相关文献3篇。通过对检索结果进行分析，并结合患者意愿，为患者制定了采用甲氨喋呤的治疗方案。经过6个月的治疗随访，证实该方案适合该患者。 结论 采用循证医学的方法，为红皮病型银屑病患者制定合理的治疗方案，可提高疗效。
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) plus methotrexate (MTX) for active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CZP plus MTX vs. MTX plus placebo for active rheumatoid arthritis from inception to May, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, data were analyzed by using Stata 11.0 software. Results Seven RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed the CZP plus MTX group was superior to MTX plus placebo group in ACR20 (CZP400 mg: RR=2.86, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.79, P<0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=3.76, 95%CI 2.59, 5.46, P<0.001), ACR50 (CZP400 mg: RR=3.91, 95%CI 2.10 to 7.27, P<0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=4.86, 95%CI 3.20 to 7.39, P<0.001), and ACR70 (CZP400 mg: RR=5.65, 95%CI 1.99 to 16.06, P=0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=10.08, 95%CI 5.11 to 19.89, P<0.001). The CZP plus MTX group was also superior to MTX plus placebo group in swollen joint counts (SMD=–12.72, 95%CI –15.39 to –10.06,P<0.001), tender joint counts (SMD=–11.54, 95%CI –13.97 to –9.11,P<0.001), doctor's global assessment of disease activity (SMD=–11.78, 95%CI –13.81 to –9.75,P<0.001), patient's global assessment of disease activity (SMD=–9.62, 95%CI –11.09 to –8.15,P<0.001), and patient's assessment of pain (SMD=–9.10, 95%CI –10.91 to –7.30,P<0.001) and HAQ (SMD=–7.74, 95%CI –8.99, –6.49,P<0.001), respectively. However, the incidence of adverse events in CZP plus MTX group was higher than that in MTX plus placebo group. Conclusions CZP plus MTX is superior to MTX plus placebo for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis but with higher adverse events. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are still needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.