ObjectiveTo investigate the application value of the intravenous indwelling needle in radionuclide imaging examination. MethodsA total of 120 patients underwent single photon emission computed tomography for bone and kidney dynamic imaging between October 2012 and April 2013 were randomly divided into group injected by venous indwelling needle (observagtion group) and group injected by traditional steel needle (control group), with 60 cases in each. We calculated the one-time success rate of venipuncture, the leakage rate of intravenous injection, residual radioactive dosage within the syringe and average exposure time of medical staff to radionuclide in the two groups of patients. ResultsThe one-time success rate of venipuncture in observation group was similar to that in the control group (P > 0.05). During the injection, no leakage was found in observation group, while 4 leakage in 37 patients underwent bone imaging and 3 leakage in 23 patients underwent kidney dynamic imaging in the control group were found; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The residual radioactive dosage within the syringe in observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the exposure time of medical staff to radionuclide in observation group was also lower than that in the control group (P < 0.01). ConclusionsIntravenous indwelling needle for venous puncture can avoid leakage of radioactive imaging agent, reduce the residual radiological dosage within the syrings, increase the one-time puncture success rate and imaging resolution of dynamic scan, and improve the diagnostic accuracy and work efficiency effectively. Besides, the intravenous indwelling needle technique can reduce average exposure time of medical staff to radionuclide, acheaving the goal of optimized protection.
目的：通过经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管（PICC）或锁骨下静脉置管与前臂静脉留置针在血液病患者并发深部真菌感染时应用两性霉素B中的比较，探讨如何减少患者静脉炎及并发症发生率和再次静脉穿刺的发生率，从而提高患者生活质量。方法：80例血液病患者分为两组，40例PICC置管或锁骨下静脉置管组为A组，40例前臂静脉留置针为B组，记录静脉炎、疼痛发生情况、留置时间。结果：A组留置时间30～68天，B组留置时间1～5天；A组静脉炎率5%，B组静脉炎率45%；A组疼痛率5%，B组疼痛率35%；结论：在血液病患者并发深部真菌感染时应用两性霉素B治疗中，选用PICC置管或锁骨下静脉置管效果明显优于前臂静脉留置针，值得临床推广。
Objective To evaluate the effects of peripheral venous remaining needle sealing with heparin vs. saline in China. Methods A comprehensive, systematic bibliographic search of medical literature from databases of CNKI (1994 to December, 2009) and Wanfang (1990 to December, 2009) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to catheter sealing with saline vs. heparin. The remaining time of venous needle, the incidence of phlebitis and the catheter blockage were compared, and the quality of RCTs was assessed and meta-analyses were conducted by RevMan 5.0 software. Results Nine RCTs involving 1 770 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) There was a significant difference between heparin sealing and saline sealing in catheter blockage (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.62, Plt;0.05). The heparin sealing was much better to prevent catheter blockage; b) There was no significant difference between saline sealing and heparin sealing in the incidence of phlebitis (OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.64 to 2.50, Pgt;0.05); and c) The average remaining time of venous catheter between saline sealing and heparin sealing had significant difference (WMD=0.24, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.43, Plt;0.05). Heparin sealing had better effect than saline sealing. Conclusion The meta-analyses of current medical literature in China show that heparin sealing can reduce the incidence of catheter blockage and prolong the remaining time of catheter, although there is no significant effect in the aspect of the incidence of phlebitis.