Objective To identify an evidence-based treatment for an elderly patient with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Clinical problems were presented on the basis of the patient’s conditions, and evidence was collected from the NGC (2000 to 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), TRIP Database, PubMed (1966 to 2009) and CBM (1978 to 2009). Treating strategies were formulated in terms of the three-combination principle (best evidence, the doctor’s professional knowledge and the patient’s desire). Results Three guidelines and sixteen studies were included. The current evidence indicated that surgery was the preferred solution to intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly patient. The sliding hip screw (SHS) appeared superior to others. There was insufficient evidence to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopedic surgeries. Early surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay and improved mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced infections. In order to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism, pharmacological prophylaxis should be carried out when the patient was admitted to hospital and be assisted with mechanical prophylaxis after surgery. Nutritional supplementation was conducive to the recovery of the patient. Rehabilitation ought to be performed as soon as possible. Considering the patient’s condition, the treatment option was established according to the available evidence and guidelines. Short-term follow-up showed a good outcome. Conclusion Through the evidence-based method, an individual treatment plan could obviously improve the treatment effect and prognosis.
:目的:探讨DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:回顾分析2001年1月～2006年4月48例70岁以上老年股骨粗隆间骨折病例的临床资料,对其骨折类型、骨质疏松程度、合并症及临床疗效进行分析。结果:本组术后32例获得1～4年随访,无螺钉松动、髋内翻、感染或骨折延期愈合,髋关节功能评价优良率93％。结论:DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折具有手术时间短、创伤小、内固定牢靠、符合生物力学分配、能早期得到功能锻炼、减少术后并发症等优点;适合各种类型老年股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗。
Forty cases of intertrochanteric fractures of femur were treated with percutaneous nonmetallic external fixator. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 3 years, and the fractures were all united without coxa vara or shirtening deformities. There was no mortality in this series. This method had the advantages ofbeing simple, save time and effort, less traumatic and early ambulation. The design of the apparatus tallied with the biomechanics of the neck and shaft of the femur.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between May 2007 and May 2010, 63 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated, and fractures were fixed with PFNA in 31 patients (PFNA group) and with DHS in 32 patients (DHS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. The incision length, operation time, and blood loss in PFNA group were significantly less than those in DHS group (P lt; 0.05). The averagefollow-up time was 13.6 months in PFNA group and was 13.8 months in DHS group. The fracture heal ing time was (11.80 ± 1.32) weeks in PFNA group and was (12.21 ± 1.26) weeks in DHS group, showing no significant difference (t=1.23, P=0.29). The complication rate was 0 in PFNA group and was 12.5% (4/32) in DHS group, showing no significant difference (P=0.06). After 1 year, Harris hip score of PFNA group (86.55 ± 10.32) was higher than that of DHS group (80.36 ±11.18) (t=2.28, P=0.03). Conclusion There are two surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient: PFNA and DHS, and each has advantages; for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA treatment is the first choice.
Agedness; Intertrochanteric fracture; Replacement of artificial femoral head
Objective To investigate the treatment method of senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures and its cl inical outcomes. Methods From January 2005 to December 2007, 192 senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated, including 85 males and 107 females aged 65-92 years old (average 75 years old). The injury was causedby fall on walking in 106 cases, fall when riding a bicycle in 55 cases, and traffic accidents in 31 cases. According to Evans classification, there were 12 cases of type I A, 43 cases of type I B, 29 cases of type II, 24 cases of type III A, 23 cases of type III B, 26 cases of type IV, and 35 cases of type V. One hundred and fifty patients were associated with cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, 120 patients were compl icated with chronicle hypertension, 90 cases were associated with bronchitis, and 75 cases were compl icated with diabetes. The time from injury to hospital admission was 1 hour to 14 days. Among those patients, 108 were treated with conservative treatment, 68 received dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, and 16 underwent proximal femoral Gamma nail fixation. Results All the patients were followed up for 12-36 months (average 18 months). The fracture all reached bone union without occurrence of nonunion and delayed union. Patients could take care of themselves, and there were no occurrences of serious pains and dysfunctions. The therapeutic effect was satisfactory. The conservative treatment group: the average hospital stay length was 48 days; the average bone heal ing time was 14 weeks; 23 cases had different degrees of coxa adducta; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate hip joint function, 45 cases were graded as excellent, 31 as good, 10 as fair, and 22 as poor, and the excellent and good rate was 70.4%. DHS internal fixation group: the average operation time was 60 minutes; the average bleeding volume during operation was 200 mL, the average hospital stay length was 24 days; the average bone heal ing time after operation was 12 weeks; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate the injured hip joint function, 38 cases were graded as excellent, 21 as good, 8 as fair, and 1 as poor, and the excellent and good rate was 86.8%. Gamma nailfixation group: the average operation time was 70 minutes; the average bleeding volume during operation was 200 mL, the average hospital stay length was 14 days; the average bone heal ing time after operation was 12 weeks; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate the injured hip joint function, 11 cases were graded as excellent, 4 as good, 1 as fair, and the excellent and good rate was 93.8%. Conclusion For geriatric femoral intertrochanteric fractures, operative treatment should be performed, the preoperative preparation should be sufficient, and individual-oriented treatment method should be selected on the basis of physical conditions of patients and the types of fractures.
Objective To study the technique and effect of adjunctive cancellous screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hi p screw (DHS) fixation. Methods Between April 2004 and August 2007, 33 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were treated with DHS fixation and adjunctive cancellous screw. There were 13 males and 20 females, aging 43-82 years with an average age of 67 years. Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 7 patients, by fall ing from height in 11 patients, by sprain in 15 patients. All fractures were closed. The patients were operated 3-12 days after injury. According to Evans classification, there were 12 cases of type II, 15 cases of type III, and 6 cases of type IV. Twenty-twocases had osteoporosis. Weight bear time and compl ication were recorded. Fracture heal ing and neck-shaft angle were observed on radiogram. Hip functions were evaluated using Radford criterion. Results Thirty-three patients had no intraoperative compl ications with incision heal ing by first intension. All patients were followed up from 14 months to 38 months, with an average of 21 months. Fracture heal ing was achieved within 14 weeks to 21 weeks, with an average of 17 weeks after operations. The neck-shaft angles were (134.2 ± 13.7)° 3 days after operation, (128.6 ± 8.9)° 8 weeks after operation, and (128.5 ± 9.3)° after fracture heal ing, showing no significant difference when compared with that of the third day after operation (P gt; 0.05). According to the Radford criterion at last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of hi p function was 93.9% (excellent in 21 cases, good in 10 cases, and poor in 2 cases). Compl ications such as loosening, breakage, or grievous migration of hardware were not observed. Conclusion The adjunctive cancellous screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with DHS fixation can provide counteraction of tension and rotation, promote fixation stabil ity, enhance fracture heal ing and decrease compl ication.