ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of Cross-Union surgery for the treatment of pseudarthrosis of the tibia (PT) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). MethodsThe clinical data of 8 children of PT with NF1 who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 boys and 3 girls, and the operative age ranged from 1.8 to 13.3 years with a median age of 3.5 years. According to Paley classification, there were 2 cases of type 2a, 2 cases of type 3, 2 cases of type 4a, and 2 cases of type 4c. There were 5 cases of first operation and 3 cases of re-fracture after previous operation. Six cases had leg length discrepancy before operation, and 2 of them had shortening over 2.0 cm. Except for 1 case of ankle fusion, the other 7 cases had ankle valgus. Preoperative coronal/sagittal angulation was recorded. Postoperative pseudarthrosis healing and refracture were observed. Leg length discrepancy and tibiotalar angle were measured and recorded before operation and at last follow-up. Inan imaging evaluation criteria was used to evaluate the imaging effect. ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-37 months (mean, 23.5 months). One pseudarthrosis failed to heal at 12 months after operation and healed at 3 months after reoperation, while the other pseudarthrosis healed with a healing rate of 87.5% and a healing time of 4-8 months (mean, 5.3 months). No refracture occurred during the follow-up. At last follow-up, there were 2 new cases with leg length discrepancy, which were 0.7 cm and 1.3 cm, respectively. In 2 cases with the leg length discrepancy more than 2.0 cm before operation, the improvement was from 4.1 cm and 12.6 cm to 2.1 cm and 9.0 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in leg length discrepancy between pre- and post-operation in 8 cases (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 6 patients still had ankle valgus, and there was no significant difference in the tibiotalar angle between pre- and post-operation (P>0.05); the tibial coronal/sagittal angulation significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05). According to Inan imaging evaluation criteria, 1 case was good, 6 cases were fair, and 1 case was poor. Conclusion Cross-Union surgery is an effective method for the treatment of PT with NF1 in children, can achieve good bone healing results with a low risk of re-fracture. The surgery may not have significant effects on leg length discrepancy and ankle valgus, and further treatment may be required.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant neoplastic disease caused by mutations in the NF1 gene and one of the most challenging diseases to treat. Patients have a characteristic phenotype with neurofibromas as the main features in different forms, including numerous cutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas involving the primary nerves, or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with a very short survival period after malignant transformation. NF1 patients also suffer from multi-system involvement, with a high rate of deformity and disability, making complete surgical resection more difficult. Currently, there is no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of NF1 in China, and different disciplines have different understandings of NF1. Multidisciplinary systematic evaluations and cooperative treatments are the keys to improve the treatment, quality of life, and prognosis of NF1 patients. In 2020, the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Ninth People’s Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine led the establishment of the first multi-center collaboration group for NF1 in China. Furthermore, the group had worked with renowned experts from the various departments including surgical oncology, medical oncology, dermatology, reproductive medicine, et al. in China to formulate the “Expert consensus on diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1 (2021 edition)”, aiming to promote standardized and homogeneous treatment covering the whole life cycle of NF1 patients and improve the treatment level and outcome of NF1 patients in China.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by the mutations in the NF1 gene, with an incidence of approximately 1/3 000. Affecting multiple organs and systems throughout the body, NF1 caused a wide variety of clinical symptoms. A comprehensive multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment model is needed to meet the diverse needs of NF1 patients and improve their quality of life. In recent years, the emergence of targeted therapies has further benefited NF1 patients, and the number of clinical consultations has increased dramatically. However, due to the rarity of the disease itself and insufficient attention previously, the standardized, systematic, and precise diagnosis and treatment model of NF1 still needs to be further improved. In this paper, we reviewed the current status of comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of NF1 in China, combine with our long-term experiences in diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Meanwhile, we propose future directions and several suggestions for the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment model for Chinese NF1 patients.
Objective To comprehend the concept， pathology， molecular mechanisms， diagnosis， and treatmentof aggressive fibromatosis （AF）， and to find a novel way to cure aggressive fibromatosis. Method The literatures about the definition， molecular mechanisms， and clinical research of AF were reviewed and analized. Results AF is rare and benign fibromatous lesion that is the result of abnormal proliferation of myofibroblasts. The pathologic features of AF isa benign disease， but it has “malignant” biological behavior. The tumor often involved the surrounding organs and bloodvessels， and caused death of patients. For patients with clinical symptoms or complications， complete excision of thetumor is the treatment of choice. Even if the operation to ensure the negative margin also has a higher recurrence rate， soits treatment requires multidisciplinary treatment. Conclusions The mechanism of AF is very complex， and it’s mecha-nism is still unclear. Clinical management of patients with AF is difficult and controversial， at present， the most effective treatment for AF is operation resection. The effects of adjuvant radiotherapy， chemotherapy， and other treatment after operation for AF still need further study.
Objective To summarize the latest developments in neurosurgical treatments for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explore therapeutic strategies to provide comprehensive treatment guidelines for clinicians. Methods The recent domestic and international literature and clinical cases in the field of NF1 were reviewed. The main types of neurological complications associated with NF1 and their treatments were thorough summarized and the future research directions in neurosurgery was analyzed. Results NF1 frequently results in complex and diverse lesions in the central and peripheral nervous systems, particularly low-grade gliomas in the brain and spinal canal and paraspinal neurofibromas. Treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas and tumors with malignant imaging evidence require neurosurgical intervention. The goals of surgery include reducing tumor size, alleviating pain, and improving appearance. Postoperative functional rehabilitation exercises, long-term multidisciplinary follow-up, and psychosocial interventions are crucial for improving the quality of life for patients. Advanced imaging guidance systems and artificial intelligence technologies can help increase tumor resection rates and reduce recurrence. Conclusion Neurosurgical intervention is the primary treatment for symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors when medical treatment is ineffective and the lesions progress rapidly. Preoperative multidisciplinary assessment, intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, and advanced surgical assistance devices significantly enhance surgical efficacy and safety. Future research should continue to explore new surgical techniques and improve postoperative management strategies to achieve more precise and personalized treatment for NF1 patients.
Objective To summarize application effect and clinical experience of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) technology in the surgery of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) related peripheral nerve tumors. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on NF1 patients, who admitted between January 2019 and December 2023 and treated with peripheral nerve tumor resection surgery assisted by multimodal IONM technology. There were 49 males and 45 females. The age ranged from 5 to 78 years, with an average of 33.7 years. Tumor morphological classification included 71 cases of nodular type, 13 cases of diffuse type, and 10 cases of mixed type. Target tumors were distributed in craniofacial region (47 cases), neck (11 cases), trunk (12 cases), and limbs (24 cases). Preoperatively, 44 cases had no obvious neurological symptoms, while the remaining patients had neurological symptoms, including 15 cases of visual impairment, 5 cases of hearing impairment, 16 cases of somatic movement disorders, and 31 cases of somatic sensory disorders, of which 7 cases had more than one symptom. IONM plans were selected based on the relevant nerves and adjacent important structures of the target tumor, including visual evoked potential (17 cases), somatosensory evoked potential (44 cases), motor evoked potential (88 cases), and electromyogram (94 cases).Results All surgeries were successfully completed. Ninety-three patients underwent total/near total resection and 1 patient underwent palliative resection. Pathological examination showed 80 cases of neurofibroma and 14 cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Complications included 2 cases of hematoma and 3 cases of incision infection. All patients were followed up 3-61 months (median, 15 months). During follow-up, no significant changes in neurological symptoms or tumor recurrence were found. Among the patients with preoperative visual impairment, there were 14 cases with no improvement in symptoms and 1 with improvement after surgery. Among the patients with somatic movement disorders, there were 11 cases with no improvement in symptoms, 3 cases with improvement, 2 cases with aggravation, 4 newly onset cases, and 1 case with significant impact on daily life after surgery. Among the patients with somatic sensory disorders, there were 17 cases with no improvement in symptoms, 14 cases with improvement, and 13 newly onset cases. The patients with hearing impairment showed improvement after surgery. Conclusion The clinical manifestations of NF1 related peripheral nerve tumors are complex. Multimodal IONM technology can provide real-time detection of nerve provocation and damage. Surgical treatment with multimodal IONM technology is safe and can reduce complications.
ObjectiveTo summarize the terms and definitions related to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) with a view to standardizing and unifying the existing terminology system. Methods To review the research literature related to NF1 at home and abroad, and to summarize the expressions of the disease and related terms. Results There are still some limitations in the current knowledge of NF1, especially in the expression of the terminology, and there are discrepancies in the description and naming of NF1-related features in different medical literatures and clinical guides. There are differences in the description and naming of NF1-related features in different medical literature and clinical guidelines. Through a systematic review of the literature, this paper provides a detailed compendium and summary of the terms and definitions of NF1-related clinical manifestations, pathological features, and genetic types, and further standardizes and unifies existing diagnostic criteria and terminology systems. ConclusionThe terms and definitions of NF1-related clinical manifestations are summarized to enhance the knowledge of clinicians and researchers related to NF1.