Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the main treatment for elderly patients with middle and high risk aortic stenosis. However, coronary artery occlusion (CAO) related to TAVI is a very serious complication, which often leads to poor prognosis. Therefore, active preoperative prevention is particularly important. Preoperative computed tomography evaluation, bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration and chimney stent implantation technology can prevent TAVI-related coronary orifice obstruction. Ensuring commissural alignment during operation can reduce the occurrence of coronary occlusion, but its long-term prognosis needs further study. In addition, percutaneous coronary intervention is the main treatment, but there are problems such as difficult coronary access after TAVI. This article summarized the research progress in the mechanism, prevention and treatment of CAO related to TAVI.
Objective To discuss the key points of anesthesia for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) surgery. Methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 70 patients who underwent TAVI in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital from March 2014 to October 2015. There were 39 males and 31 females with an average age of 73.7±4.5 years. The perioperative preparation and anesthesia points of TAVI were summarized. Results All of the 70 included patients were aged and at high risk severe comorbidities such as ischemic heart disease and stroke. The aortic stenosis and regurgitation occurred in 39 and 31 patients respectively. No patients died during the surgery. The total success rate was 95.7%. Conclusion TAVI is a complex procedure for high risk patients and need more attention during anesthesia. The successful conduction of the procedure requires the whole team to prepare carefully and cooperate closely.
ObjectiveTo compare the early clinical efficacy and safety of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with severe AS admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from January 2020 to March 2024. According to the surgical method, patients were divided into a SAVR group and a TA-TAVI group, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 71 patients were included, with 45 in the SAVR group, including 33 males and 12 females, aged 16-75 (60.89±10.88) years; 26 in the TA-TAVI group, including 15 males and 11 females, aged 61-83 (72.85±5.53) years. The results showed that postoperative aortic valve transvalvular flow velocity (2.31±0.38 m/s vs. 2.60±0.50 m/s, P=0.019) and transvalvular pressure gradient (21.09±6.03 mm Hg vs. 28.20±10.79 mm Hg, P=0.001) in the TA-TAVI group were lower than those in the SAVR group. In terms of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, both preoperative (56.73±7.74 mm vs. 52.36±7.00 mm, P=0.017) and postoperative (52.61±7.18 mm vs. 48.04±4.78 mm, P=0.010) values in the TA-TAVI group were larger than those in the SAVR group. In terms of left ventricular ejection fraction, the preoperative value in the TA-TAVI group was lower than that in the SAVR group (58.00%±13.84% vs. 64.87%±7.63%, P=0.026), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups after surgery (P=0.670). The operation time and drainage volume on the first day after surgery in the TA-TAVI group were shorter or lower than those in the SAVR group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the postoperative hospital stay, ICU stay, or postoperative mechanical ventilation time (P>0.05). In addition, no serious complications occurred in patients after SAVR, while perivalvular leakage (2 patients), third-degree atrioventricular block (1 patient), and death (3 patients) occurred in the TA-TAVI group. ConclusionFor elderly patients with severe AS and poor cardiac function, TA-TAVI technology has minimal surgical trauma, high safety and effectiveness, and is a safe and effective treatment option besides traditional surgical operations.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors and potential mechanisms of hypertension events on the same day after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. MethodsClinical data of patients who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at Department of Structural Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital from December 2023 to February 2024 were retrospectively collected. According to the peak systolic blood pressure on the same day after surgery, patients were divided into a hypertension group (≥140 mm Hg) and a normal blood pressure group (<140 mm Hg). Logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for hypertension on the same day after TAVI. ResultsA total of 54 patients after TAVI were included, with 41 patients in the hypertension group, including 18 males and 23 females, with an average age of (72.83±6.78) years; 13 patients in the normal blood pressure group, including 9 males and 4 females, with an average age of (70.00±7.57) years. Univariate analysis found that there were statistical differences in interventricular septal thickness [(13.71±1.98) mm vs. (12.23±1.59) mm, P=0.018], preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)>55% [33 (80.5%) vs. 6 (46.2%), P=0.040], and postoperative same-day LVEF>55% [33 (80.5%) vs. 4 (30.8%), P=0.003]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that postoperative same-day LVEF>55% [OR=10.173, 95%CI (1.044, 99.115), P=0.046] was an independent risk factor for hypertension on the same day after TAVI. ConclusionMyocardial contractility mainly participates in the occurrence of hypertension on the same day after TAVI. This study can not only improve our understanding of early hemodynamic changes after TAVI, but also provide a basis for the formulation of early hypertension treatment plans after TAVI to improve the short- and long-term prognosis of patients.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for native aortic valve regurgitation. MethodsLiterature from The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and China Biomedical Literature Database from January 2002 to May 2021 were searched by computer. The literature on TAVI or transcatheter aortic valve replacement treatment for simple aortic reflux were collected. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 studies including 1 394 patients were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scales of the studies were≥6 points. The success rate of prosthetic valve implantation was 72.0%-100.0%, and there was no report of serious complications such as surgical death, myocardial infarction, and valve annulus rupture. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 6.3% [95%CI (3.4%, 9.1%)]. The incidence of stroke within 30 days and the rate of postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation were 2.0% [95%CI (1.0%, 4.0%)] and 6.0% [95%CI (4.0%, 10.0%)], respectively, and were both within acceptable limits. ConclusionFor patients with simple high-risk aortic regurgitation, TAVI can obtain satisfactory treatment effects and has low postoperative complications rate, and it may be a potential treatment option for such patients.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is effective in the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and its applicable population is also gradually expanding, but it carries risk of ischemic and bleeding events, which underscores the importance of optimizing adjuvant antithrombotic regimens. The release of the 2022 version of Chinese expert consensus on antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation has promoted the standardized and safe development of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR in China. Combined with the latest progress of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, from emphasizing ischemia and bleeding risk assessment, single-agent antiplatelet therapy for patients without anticoagulation indications, the selection of antithrombotic strategies for patients with other antithrombotic indications, antithrombotic strategy changes in postoperative valve thrombosis and bleeding events, this article interprets this consensus.
ObjectiveTo study the nursing methods for patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). MethodsFrom April 2012 to August 2013, 25 patients undergoing TAVI before returning to the coronary care unit (CCU) were included in this study. We reviewed the clinical nursing methods and summarized the clinical nursing experiences. ResultsAmong the 25 patients, there were 1 case complicated with retroperitoneal hematoma, 1 case with hemorrhage of upper digestive tract, 1 case with severe hemorrhage of femoral artery incision site, 1 case with mild hemorrhage of femoral artery puncture site, 1 case with catheter-related infections of right external jugular vein, and 2 cases with hemorrhage related to the loosening of radial artery invasive blood pressure monitoring. All the complications were controlled by reasonable treatments and all the patients were transferred out from CCU with stable vital signs. The mean time of CCU stay was 29 hours ranging from 14 hours to 243 hours. ConclusionDue to special characteristics of patients after TAVI, we should observe carefully, follow the nursing operation rules strictly, discover complications timely, give treatment correctly, and finally ensure the safety of patients during the high risk period.
As technology advances, current evidence supports the use of devices for valvular heart disease interventions, including transcatheter aortic valve implantation, transcatheter mitral or tricuspid valve repair, and transcatheter mitral valve implantation. These procedures require antithrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolic events during the perioperative period, and these therapies are associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. To date, there are challenges and controversies regarding how to balance the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in these patients, and therefore the optimal antithrombotic regimen remains unclear. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter intervention in patients with valvular heart disease and highlight the importance of an individualized approach in targeting these patients.
Objective To analyze the clinical intervention effect of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) nursing mode on patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods A total of 89 patients who were admitted to our hospital and underwent TAVI surgery from April to December 2021 were selected, including 64 males and 25 females, with an average age of 64.7±11.8 years. The subjects were divided into a MDT intervention group (n=42) and a control group (n=47) according to different postoperative nursing intervention methods. Clinical effectivenesses were compared between the two groups. Results The left ventricular ejection fraction in the two groups significantly increased on the 7th day after the operation, and the increase in the MDT intervention group was more obvious, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.14). On the 7th day after surgery, forced vital capacity/predicated value and forced expiratory volume in one second/predicated value significantly decreased, and decreased more significantly in the control group than those in the MDT intervention group with statistical differences (P=0.01). The ICU stay time (P=0.01), hospital stay time (P<0.01) and total postoperative pulmonary complications rate (P=0.03) in the MDT intervention group were significantly shorter or lower than those in the control group The evaluation results of the anxiety and depression status of the patients before and after nursing intervention showed that the scores of anxiety and depression in the two groups were significantly lower than before, and the scores of each scale in the MDT intervention group were lower. The score of quality of life of the two groups significantly improved at the end of 6 months after surgery, and in the MDT intervention group it was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=0.02). Conclusion MDT intervention mode can promote the rapid recovery of patients after TAVI, effectively reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, and improve the postoperative quality of life.