Objective To systematically review the angiographic predictors of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect observational studies on the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI from inception to December 18, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 36 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI included calcification (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.47, P<0.01), occlusion length≥20mm (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.26 to 2.57, P<0.01), bending>45° (OR=2.19, 95%CI 1.56 to 3.08, P<0.01), blunt stump (OR=1.53, 95%CI 1.08 to 2.16, P<0.01), ostial lesions (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.34 to 3.85, P<0.01), proximal cap ambiguity (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.40 to 3.68, P<0.01), side branch at proximal cap (OR=1.65, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.16, P<0.01), and J-CTO score≥3 (OR=2.53, 95%CI 1.53 to 4.16, P<0.01). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that calcification, occlusion length ≥20mm, bending>45°, blunt stump, ostial lesions, proximal cap ambiguity, side branch at proximal cap, and J-CTO score≥3 are the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combining with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has a long-term patency of left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery (LIMA-LAD) grafting, and the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a minimal invasiveness. It provides an alternative revascularization for patients with coronary heart disease. For patients who meet the HCR indications, most studies suggest that HCR can significantly reduce perioperative trauma, and offer favorable mid- and long-term prognosis, which is comparable with traditional revascularization strategies. Based on the major research results in this field in the past 10 years, we review the current application status and discuss the potential future direction of HCR in this paper.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the surgical treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting, and to explore the surgical techniques and surgical indications. MethodsClinical data of 1 246 consecutive patients who underwent operations on Stanford type A aortic dissection from April 2016 to July 2019 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting were enrolled. ResultsFinally 19 patients were collected, including 16 males and 3 females with an average age of 54±7 years ranging from 35 to 66 years. There were 11 patients in acute phase, 15 patients with AC (DeBakey Ⅰ) type and 4 patients with AS (DeBakey Ⅱ) type. In AC type, there were 10 patients receiving Sun's surgery and 5 patients partial arch replacement. Meanwhile, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 7 patients and mitral valve replacement in 1 patient. Stents were removed from the right coronary artery in 4 patients. In this group, 1 patient died of multiple organ failure in hospital after operation combined with malperfusion of viscera. Eighteen patients recovered after treatment and were discharged from hospital. The patients were followed up for 30 (18-56) months. One patient underwent aortic pseudoaneurysm resection, one thoracic endovascular aortic repair, one emergency percutaneous coronary intervention due to left main artery stent occlusion, and one underwent femoral artery bypass due to iliac artery occlusion. ConclusionIatrogenic aortic dissection has a high probability of coronary artery bypass grafting at the same time in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting. Complicated type A aortic dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention should be treated with surgery aggressively.
New functional evaluation methods for coronary artery lesions have received widespread attention at home and abroad. As a new functional evaluation technique, the clinical value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in the accuracy and feasibility of diagnosing myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis has been confirmed in many clinical trials. Compared with the traditional gold standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis, QFR has the advantages of simple operation, time-saving and low cost. This article reviews the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of FFR and QFR and the progress of clinical research, aiming to explore whether QFR may replace FFR as a functional evaluation method of coronary artery disease and guide clinical blood circulation reconstruction.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2009), PubMed (1966 to 2009), EMbase (1974 to 2009), CNKI (1994 to 2009), CBM (1978 to Feb. 2009), VIP (1989 to Feb. 2009), and CMD Digital Periodicals (1998 to 2009). Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2 348 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter (MD=0.31, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.51) and decrease restenosis rate (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.65). In addition, it could decrease death rate (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.88), but it could not change target-vessel revascularization, stroke rate, palpitation rate, and the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events and major adverse cardiac events. Conclusion Evidence shows that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter and decrease restenosis rate and death rate. Their clinical application is worthy to be advocated.
目的总结分析经左胸微创冠状动脉旁路移植术（MIDCAB）与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）联合应用治疗冠状动脉多支血管病变的初步临床经验。 方法回顾性分析郑州市第七人民医院2013年1月至2014年11月共16例多支冠状动脉病变冠心病患者的临床资料，其中男10例、女6例，年龄46～73（58.4±9.7）岁，采用“分站式”复合技术（Hybrid）进行心肌再血管化。 结果16例患者手术均顺利完成，无围手术期死亡，PCI时行冠状动脉造影提示冠状动脉吻合口通畅，随访3～22（14.0±8.6）个月，临床症状缓解，恢复正常工作及生活。 结论“分站式”复合技术治疗冠状动脉多支血管病变近期效果满意，长期效果有待进一步随访。
Objective To explore the effects of aggressive lipid lowering therapy and its influence on cardiovascular events using lipitor (20 mg daily) for Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We did a double-blind and randomized controlled trial. From July 2005 to June 2006, 120 patients with PCI procedure who were discharged from the Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly divided into aggressive lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 20 mg daily, n=60) and an ordinary lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 10 mg daily, n=60). The trial treatment was administered from the day of PCI to the third month after PCI. Atorvastatin at 10 mg daily was then used until one year after PCI. Blood biochemistry, cardiovascular events and drug adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results Among the 120 patients, 5 discontinued treatment and 4 more withdrew from the study. Therefore 115 and 111 were included in our main analyses [Comment from Mike: it is not ITT if the 5 who discontinued treatment are excluded] and a per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The reduction in TG and the increase in HDL-C were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05), but the reductions in LDL-C and TC were significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05). This was observed from the beginning of follow-up to the third month after PCI. In the PP analysis, the percentage of patients whose LDL-C met the predefined requirement at the third month in the 20 mg group was significantly higher than in the group receiving the lower dose (87.03% vs. 70.17%, P=0.031). A similar result was also obtained if the patients who withdrew were retained in the analysis (P=0.044). The change in C reaction protein (CRP) from baseline at the first and the third month was significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05), but become relatively stable at the sixth month (Pgt;0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.5±3.0 months in the higher dose group, with 1 case of recurring angina pectoris and 1 case of revascularization were identified. It was 7.2±3.6 months in the 10 mg daily group, with 3 cases of recurring angina pectoris, 1 case of nonfatal myocardial infarction, 2 cases of revascularization and 1 case of sudden cardiogenic death. The difference in the Kaplan-Meier event curves was of borderline statistical significance from the fourth month (P=0.048). Drug adverse reactions were mild and myopathy was not identified in any patients. Conclusions After PCI procedure, the use of atorvastatin 20 mg daily for aggressive lipid lowering was safe and effective.