Methods of evidence-based medicine were used to discuss the drug treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. After clinical problems were put forward, we searched for and assessed the evidence. A rational treatment plan for osteoporosis patients with fractures was developed according to the results of systematic reviews and Meta-analysis.
Objective To review the systemat ic reviews/meta-analyses involving Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM ) therapy for menopausal syndrome, so as to offer clinical evidence about the safety and efficacy of TCM. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1991 to 2006), Ovid (1990 to 2006), CBM(1990 to 2006), CNKI(1989 to 2006) and VIP(1979 to 2006). The search terms of "menopause OR climacteric" and "traditional Chinese medicine OR herb OR plant" and "systematic review OR evidence-based medicine OR Meta-analysis OR Meta-analysis" were used to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses on TCM for menopause syndrome. Results A total of 6 systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified. Two of these were in Chinese databases and four were in the foreign language databases. The 6 articles were reviewed and summarized. Conclusion TCM has a effect in the treatment of menopausal syndrome with a good safety profile. However, due to the generally low quality of included studies, the evidence available is not b enough to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM for menopausal syndrome.More rigorously designed and strictly executed trials are needed.
Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a type of osteoporosis with high bone transformation rate, caused by a decrease of estrogen in the body, which is a systemic bone disease characterized by decreased bone mass and increased risk of fracture. In recent years, as a kind of non-pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis, defined by whole-body vibration less than 1 g (g = 9.81 m/s2), low magnitude whole-body vibration is widely concerned, mainly because of its small side effects, simple operation and relative safety. Studies have shown that low magnitude whole-body vibration can improve bone strength, bone volume and bone density. But a lot of research found that, the therapeutic effects of low magnitude whole-body vibration are different depending on ages and hormone levels of subjects for animal models or human patients. There has been no definite vibration therapy can be applied to each subject so far. Studies of whole-body and cellular level suggest that low magnitude whole-body vibration stimulation is likely to be associated with changes of hormone levels and directed differentiation of stem cells. Based on the analysis of related literature in recent years, this paper made a review from vibration parameters, vibration effects and the mechanisms, to provide scientific basis and clinical guidance for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with low magnitude whole-body vibration.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of flibanserin for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2014), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from their inception to August 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness and safety of flibanserin for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. And then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 3 881 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the placebo group, the flibanserin group was superior in increasing the number of satisfying sexual events (SSE) (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.92, P<0.000 01), improving the eDiary desire score (MD=2.21, 95%CI 1.45 to 2.97, P<0.000 01), FSFI domain score (MD=0.29, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.35, P<0.01) and FSFI total score (MD=1.82, 95%CI 1.47 to 2.17, P<0.000 01), and decreasing the FSDS-R item 13 score (MD=-0.24, 95%CI -0.31 to -0.17, P<0.000 01) and FSDS-R total score (MD=-2.70, 95%CI -3.43 to -1.96, P<0.000 01). However, the incidence of adverse events in the flibanserin group was higher than that of the placebo group (OR=1.31, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.54, P=0.001). ConclusionThe current evidence suggests that, in premenopausal women with HSDD, flibanserin treatment is effective but may increase the incidence of adverse events.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone for perimenopause dysfunctional uterine bleeding (PDUB). Methods Such databases as VIP, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM were retrieved for collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mifepristone for PDUB. The quality of included studies was evaluated and Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane methods. Results Forty RCTs involving 3 850 PDUB patients were included. The control group was divided into two sub-groups according to the features of intervention drugs: the sub-group of diagnostic curettage plus progestational hormone, and the sub-group of diagnostic curettage plus antiestrogenic drugs. The Meta-analysis indicated that compared with the sub-group of diagnostic curettage plus progestational hormone, the diagnostic curettage plus mifepristone group was more effective to increase the total effective rate, such as improving symptoms and signs of PDUB (RR=1.11, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.16, Plt;0.000 01), and to reduce recurrence (RR=0.44, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.52, Plt;0.000 01). But no differences were found between the two groups in the change of endometrial thickness, contents of hemoglobin, and serum level of FSH, LH, E2 and P hormone. Both the intervention and control groups appeared mild adverse reactions, such as rashes, tidal fever, nausea, anorexia, vomiting and breast distending, but with no liver and kidney damages. The long-term safety failed to be evaluated due to short follow-up time. Conclusion Based on this review, diagnostic curettage plus mifepristone shows certain advantage in the treatment of PDUB including the total effective rate and reducing recurrence. But there is no difference in regulating sex hormone level, inhibiting endometrial proliferation and improving anemia compared with the group of diagnostic curettage plus progestational hormone. However, this evidence is not b enough due to the low quality of included trials, possible bias risk, and failure of evaluating its long-term safety.
目的 探讨绝经后宫腔积液的病因及诊治方法。 方法 对105例绝经后阴道B型超声（TVS）检查所示宫腔积液的患者进行回顾性分析。 结果 105例患者中，阴道炎患者31例，占29.52%；其余74例患者行宫腔镜检查显示，宫腔点状出血29例，占27.62%，宫腔透明粘液23例，占21.90%，另有22例宫腔镜下未见异常，占20.95%。74例接受宫腔镜检查患者因诊刮未刮出内膜组织，行宫腔细胞学涂片，病理检查结果均未见恶性肿瘤细胞，其中16例患者查见炎性细胞。 结论 绝经后无子宫内膜增厚的宫腔积液多由炎症引起，应及早明确诊断。宫腔镜现已成为宫腔内病变诊断的金标准，其作为绝经后宫腔积液的病因诊断手段具有临床实用价值。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) with oral alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. MethodsFourty patients diagnosed to have postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP) from September 2009 to September 2010 were included in our study. They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. All patients were administered the same basic drugs:Caltrate 600 mg and Alfacalcidol 0.5 μg per day. For the experimental group, PEMFs were offered 6 times per week for 5 weeks (30 times in total), and patients in this group were followed up for 12 weeks. For the control group, alendronate was given at a dose of 70 mg per week for 12 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD), visual analogue scale, and manual muscle testing (MMT) scale were evaluated before, 1 week, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks after intervention. ResultsIncreasing of BMD, pain relieving, and improvement of MMT had a trend of increasing values after 5 weeks of treatment in the experimental group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in patients' lower back muscle strength after treatment (P<0.05). ConclusionPEMFs have the same effect as alendronate in pain relief, and bone mass and muscle strength improvement, and are even advantageous in increasing back muscle strength compared with alendronate.
ObjectiveTo preliminarily explore the effect of Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) on predicting osteoporosis and osteoporosis fracture in postmenopausal patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).MethodsThirty-six postmenopausal patients undergoing MHD from August 2017 to October 2018 in Hemodialysis Center of Nephrology Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected. Relevant data such as age, height, and weight were collected. OSTA index and the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures and 10-year probability of hip fractures of FRAX score were calculated. Bone mineral densities (BMD) of the hip and lumbar spine were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the same time. The value of OSTA index and FRAX scale in evaluating the risk of osteoporosis predicated on T value ≤−2.5 determined by DXA BMD and fracture in postmenopausal patients with MHD were analyzed.ResultsThe DXA BMD of the 36 patients showed that 50.0% (18/36) had a T value≤−2.5, and 30.6% (11/36) had a fracture history. BMD in postmenopausal patients with MHD was negatively correlated with FRAX score (model without BMD values), and positively correlated with OSTA index. The sensitivity and specificity of OSTA in the prediction of osteoporosis were 94.4% and 61.1%, respectively; and the sensitivity and specificity of FRAX (the model without BMD values) in the prediction of osteoporosis were 88.9% and 50.0%, respectively. The FRAX score with or without BMD had the same clinical value in predicting osteoporosis.ConclusionsPostmenopausal MHD patients have a higher risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Both OSTA index and FRAX scale can predict osteoporosis risk among postmenopausal MHD patients, and the FRAX scale with or without BMD has the same clinical value in predicting osteoporosis risk. In clinical work, for primary hospitals and dialysis centers lacking DXA, preliminary screening of osteoporosis in MHD patients can be performed with OSTA and FRAX scales.