Objective To explore the effectiveness of the arthroscopic separate double-layer suture bridge technique in treatment of the delaminated rotator cuff tear. Methods Between May 2013 and May 2015, 54 patients with the delaminated rotator cuff tears were recruited in the study. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive repair either using arthroscopic separate double-layer suture bridge technique (trial group, n=28) or using arthroscopic whole-layer suture bridge technique (control group, n=26). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, tear type, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constants score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and the range of motion of shoulder joint between 2 groups (P>0.05). Postoperative functional scores, range of motion, and recurrence rate of tear in 2 groups were observed and compared. Results The operation time was significant longer in trial group than in control group (t=8.383, P=0.000). All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ without postoperative complication. All the patients were followed up 12 months. At 12 months postoperatively, the UCLA score, ASES score, VAS score, Constant score, and the range of motion were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative values in 2 groups (P<0.05). However there was no significant difference in above indexes between 2 groups (P>0.05). Four cases (14.3%) of rotator cuff tear recurred in trial group while 5 cases (19.2%) in control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.237, P=0.626). Conclusion Compared with the arthroscopic whole-layer suture bridge technique, arthroscopic separate double-layer suture bridge technique presents no significant difference in the shoulder function score, the range of motion, and recurrence of rotator cuff tear, while having a longer operation time.
目的 观察运用两种不同缝线固定修补材料对疝修补术后的复发、切口感染、慢性疼痛等并发症发生情况。方法 对2008年4月至2010年4月期间笔者所在科室收治的250例腹股沟疝患者行无张力疝修补手术时，采用多股丝线或可吸收合成缝线固定修补材料进行前瞻性对比研究。结果 2组患者术后疝复发、切口感染和切口疼痛（包括慢性疼痛）发生率间的差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后的复发、切口感染、慢性疼痛等并发症的发生与缝线选择无关。术者的操作技巧、严格的无菌操作原则、彻底止血以及组织损伤小才是防止术后感染、慢性疼痛等并发症发生的重要因素。
Objective A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled noninferiority study was used to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) suture anchor for rotator cuff repair by comparing with the imported PEEK suture anchor commonly used in clinical practice. Methods A total of 59 patients with rotator cuff tears who were admitted between May 2019 and October 2019 were selected as the research objects. Among them, 3 patients were excluded because they did not meet the selection criteria, and 1 patient withdrew from the study because of serious adverse events. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. They were randomly divided into trial group (n=27) and control group (n=28). The trial group used PEEK suture anchors produced from REJOIN Company, and the control group used PEEK suture anchors from American Arthrex Company. Two patients in control group were lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven patients in trial group and 26 patients in control group were included in the final quantitative analysis. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, side and sizes of rotator cuff tears, composition ratio of patients with type 2 diabetes, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The patients were followed up regularly after operation. The postoperative follow-up included safety evaluation (complications, anchor position, and anchor bone reaction) and effectiveness evaluation (shoulder joint function and pain scores, rotator cuff integrity based on Sugaya classification criteria). Results The operations in both groups were successfully completed, and there was no complication related to the operation and suture anchor. All incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between trial group [(5.85±0.77) months] and control group [(5.96±0.72) months] (t=0.535, P=0.595). MRI examination indicated that the repaired tendons were fixed and the anchors did not get loose or torn. At 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, there was no patient with grade 3-4 anchor bone reaction in the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the bone reaction grading between groups (P>0.05). After operation, the VAS scores of the two groups gradually decreased, and the ASES scores, Constant-Murley scores, and UCLA scores gradually increased, and there were significant differences between groups at each time point (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups at different time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Sugaya classification of rotator cuff integrity at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic PEEK suture anchors in rotator cuff tear repair are not significant different from those of imported PEEK suture anchors commonly used in clinical practice.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic screw and suture fixations in treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tibial eminence avulsion fractures. Methods Between January 2002 and January 2009, 43 patients with freshanterior cruciate ligament tibial eminence avulsion fracture were treated, which were rated as types II and III according to Meyers- McKeever-Zaricznyj classification. Fractures were fixed with either screw (screw group, n=21) or nonabsorbable suture (suture group, n=22). There was no significant difference in sex, age, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The range of motion (ROM) and Lysholm score were compared between 2 groups, and the knee stabil ity was evaluated based on the Lachman test and KT-2000 measurement. Results The operation time was 48-60 minutes (mean, 51.6 minutes) in the screw group, and 55-68 minutes (mean, 63.2 minutes) in the suture group, showing significant difference (t=4.645, P=0.032). Incisions healed by first intention and no compl ication occurred in 2 groups. All patients were followed up (5.7 ± 0.6) years in the screw group and (5.3 ± 0.5) years in the suture group. The fracture healed completely in both groups; the heal ing time was (3.3 ± 0.6) months in the screw group and (3.2 ± 0.4) months in the suture group, showing significant difference (t=3.723, P=0.019). Between the screw group and the suture group, no significant difference was found in ROM [(128.6 ± 10.1)° vs. (130.2 ± 14.1)°, P gt; 0.05] and Lysholm score (94.6 ± 14.5 vs. 95.1 ± 17.2, P gt; 0.05). The stabil ities based on KT-2000 measurement were also similar between 2 groups at last follow-up [(0.9 ± 0.3) mm vs. (1.0 ± 0.4) mm, P gt; 0.05]. Lachman test of 2 groups were negative. Conclusion Boththe screw and nonabsorbable suture fixation techniques for anterior cruciate l igament tibial eminence avulsion fracture (type II or III) have good results in terms of functional outcome and stabil ity. However, some patients show flexion contractures of 5° or 10°.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic suture and absorbable screw double fixation for both anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of tibial insertions. MethodsBetween June 2006 and September 2013, 8 patients with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibial eminence underwent arthroscopic treatment with suture and absorbable screw double fixation. There were 5 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 28.9 years (range, 18-43 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident in 5 cases and falling from height in 3 cases. The time from injury to operation was 3-10 days (mean, 6.2 days). The Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Tegner rating scales were used to evaluated the knee function. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained, without infection or deep vein thrombosis. The mean follow-up period was 42.4 months (range, 24 to 65 months). At 3 months after operation, X-ray films showed good reduction and healing of fracture. The anterior and posterior drawer tests were negative. The knee range of motion was normal (0-125°), and it recovered to preoperative level in 7 cases. The IKDC score, Tegner score, and Lysholm score were significantly improved to 90.4±5.2, 7.5±1.6, and 89.2±3.5 from preoperative 52.1±3.3, 3.3±1.0, and 51.9±3.5 respectively (t=-38.680, P=0.000; t=-39.520, P=0.000; t=-41.150, P=0.000). ConclusionA combined injury of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of tibial insertions is rare. Arthroscopic treatment with suture and absorbable screw double fixation is a useful technique to restore tibial avulsion injuries with well-documented radiographic healing, good clinical outcomes, and low complication rates.
Objective To evaluate the effect of releasable sutures on shallow anterior chamber, filtering bleb and long-term intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods We searched MEDLINE (1971 to 2007), OVID (1971 to 2007) and National Science and Technology Library (1971 to 2007). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effect of releasable sutures on trabeculectomy were collected. Study selection and assessment, data collection and analyses were undertaken and cross-checked by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results Six RCTs involving 341 eyes were included. Significant differences were observed in the reduction of postoperative shallow anterior chamber (RD –0.23, 95%CI –0.31 to –0.14, Plt;0.000 01) and functional filtering blebs (RD –0.15, 95%CI –0.27 to –0.02, P=0.02). But, no differences were observed for the control of long-term IOP (SMD –0.13, 95%CI –0.37 to 0.10, P=0.27). Conclusion The evidence currently available showed that releasable sutures could reduce the incidence of shallow anterior chamber and has no beneficial effect in controlling long-term IOP. The current evidence is insufficient to define the efficacy of maintaining functional filtering blebs. Further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.
Objective To introduce the arthroscopic technique of figure-of-eight suture fixation for tibial eminence fracture, and to report its clinical results. Methods From January 1998 to June 2001, 21 cases of tibial eminence fracture were treated arthroscopically with figure-of-eight suture fixation technique. Active rehabilitation began one week after operation. The patients were followed up 6-24 months. The reduction and union of fracture, knee laxity, range ofmotion, and total knee function were evaluated. Results All fracture healed without displacement six weeks after operation. Three months postoperatively, no knee laxity or instability was detected in all patients; full range of motion of the affected knee returned in all patients when compared with the normal side. Six months postoperatively, the Lysholm knee score was 93.4±2.7. Conclusion Arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fracture with figure-of-eight suture fixation technique is reliable for fracture reduction , fixation and early mobilization. Arthroscopy is conducive to diagnoses and treatment of associated knee arthropathy, reduces the morbidity associated with arthrotomy, and restores knee function to the greatest extent when combined with figure-of-eight suture fixationtechniques.