Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of the total mesorectal excision （TME） and intersphincteric resection （ISR） for ultra-low rectal cancer and anal sphincter preservation surgery for anorectal cancer， and to evaluate the short term efficacy and postoperative anal function. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of 86 cases with TME＋ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer from January 2009 to December 2010 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. Results Eighty-six patients were successfully performed the operation， the lower edge of tumor from the anus was 1-5 cm （average 1.63cm）； tumor diameter was 2-7 cm （average 3.4cm）. The tumors were high differentiation in 4 cases， moderately differentiation in 60 cases，and poorly differentiation in 22 cases. The pTNM stages were stageⅠin 12 cases， stageⅡA in 11 cases， stage ⅡB in 15 cases， stage ⅢA in 2 cases， stage ⅢB in 23 cases， stage ⅢC in 16 cases， and stage Ⅳ in 7 cases. There were postoperative anastomotic leakage in 3 cases， perianal infection in 2 cases （1 case received reoperation with permanent colostomy because of pelvic peritoneal infection caused by perianal severe infections）. Anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic stenosis were of 2 cases respectively. Rectovaginal fistula， inflammatory ileus， urinary retention， and abdominal infection were of 1 case respectively. Eighty-six patients were followed-up for 12-24 months， the mean time was 18 months. Liver metastases was found in 1 case in 7 months after operation， 2 cases dead in the 7th month and 12th month after operation respectively. Local recurrence were found in 3 cases （3.5%） in 1 year after operation. The survival rate of 1-year was 97.7% （84/86）. The times of defecation was 1-5 times a day. The Kirwan’s score level on function of control defecation was 1-2 grade. Conclusions TME＋ISR for low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer is a viable， safe， and radical operation type for preservation of anus. The short term efficacy is satisfactory.
目的 探讨肛管拖出式双吻合器在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值。方法 回顾性总结我院23例超低位直肠癌保肛手术的经验。结果 本组病例利用肛管拖出和双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术均获成功，术后发生吻合口漏1例（4.3%），切口感染2例（8.7%），术后局部复发2例（8.7%），无手术死亡。结论 肛管拖出式双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术是安全可靠的，它可以大大提高超低位直肠癌保肛手术的成功率。
Objective To compare the postoperative anorectal pressure after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) in treatment of patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree. Methods In total of 112 patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree who underwent PPH (n=60) or MMH (n=52) in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between March 2014 to March 2015 were prospectively enrolled, the type of surgery was according to patients’ individual choice. In 6 months after operation, all patients under-went the examination of anorectal manometry which including rectal anal inhibitory reflex, rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, maximal anal contractive pressure, and anal canal length of high pressure belt. Results In 6 months after operation, the positive rate of rectal anal inhibitory reflex 〔88.3% (53/60) vs. 61.5% (32/52)〕 , anal resting pressure 〔(56.42± 2.25) mm Hg vs. (46.31±2.58) mm Hg〕, and anal canal length of high pressure belt 〔(3.35±0.12) cm vs. (2.29±0.23) cm〕 of PPH group were all significantly higher than those of MMH group (P＜0.05), but there was no statistical significance between PPH group and MMH group in rectal resting pressure 〔(5.51±1.26) mm Hg vs. (5.39±1.85) mm Hg〕 and maximal anal contractive pressure 〔(156.64±9.78) mm Hg vs. (155.32±8.53) mm Hg〕, P>0.05. Conclusion PPH and MMH are all effective to treat mixed hemorrhoids of Ⅲ-degree, but PPH is more positive in protection of anal function.
目的探讨用肛门支撑吻合管支撑捆扎法进行回肠囊袋（Pouch）直肠肌鞘内肛管一期吻合术,并分析该术式对结、直肠息肉病、溃疡性结肠炎治疗的价值。方法对结、直肠息肉病行全结肠及上段直肠切除，保留齿状线上 4～6 cm直肠。距齿状线处 2 cm剥离直肠粘膜。回肠“J”型 、“S”型、“W”型Pouch内置入肛门支撑吻合管 8 cm，结扎、缝扎、固定。距直肠粘膜残端 1 cm处用2号肠线全层内荷包缝合一周，在直肠肌鞘套内回肠Pouch与外科肛管吻合。溃疡性结肠炎直肠肌鞘内与解剖肛管吻合。结果一期完成手术，吻合口愈合良好。无肌间血肿，无吻合口漏及吻合口狭窄。术后6个月排便功能优良率达88.8%，随访1～5年未发现息肉复发。结论全结肠及部分直肠切除后用支撑捆扎法行一期手术即可完成回肠Pouch直肠肌鞘内肛管吻合术。保留肛管直肠移行区的回肠Pouch外科肛管吻合术优于回肠Pouch解剖肛管吻合术。
ObjectiveTo investigate the application value and research progress of PST technique in preventing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. MethodThe related literatures at home and abroad in recent years about the application of left colon artery preservation, suture of anastomotic stoma and closure of pelvic floor peritoneum, and indwelling anal canal （PST technology for short） in rectal cancer surgery were searched and summarized. ResultsPST technology could prevent anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery from many angles, reduce infection and inflammation, promote postoperative rehabilitation and improve the quality of life of patients, and it is simple and easy to do. The great advantages of PST technology are gradually verified and recognized in clinic. ConclusionPST is a safe and feasible method to prevent anastomotic leakage and relieve the symptoms of anastomotic leakage.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
Objective To evaluate the clinical appliance and significance of the technique of anorectal manometry. Methdos Different ways of anorectal manometry, domain of its appliance and its clinical appliance was summarized and reviewed. Results The technique of anorectal manometry not only has important value on the study of analrectal pathology and physiology, but also can be associated with other examinations to manage biofeedback therapy, diagnose all kinds of anorectal diseases and evaluate anorectal function. Conclusion Anorectal manometry is a safe, simple, harmless and impersonal examination technique. It is necessary in the examination of analrectal function, in the diagnosis and treatment of anolrectal diseases.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of preoperative three-dimensional anorectal endosonography (3D-AREUS) in anal fistula surgery.MethodsA total of 100 patients with anal fistula who were admitted to the Chaoyang Central Hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were included prospectively, then were randomly divided into ultrasound group and control group with 50 cases in each group. The preoperative examination was performed by 3D-AREUS in the ultrasound group, and preoperative routine examination, finger examination or probe exploration were performed in the control group. The postoperative recurrence and anal functions were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the gender, age, body mass index, anal surgery history, preoperative anal function, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05). The detection rate of branch fistulas in the ultrasound group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=0.025). For the patients with complex anal fistula, compared with the control group, the location accuracy rate of internal opening was higher (P=0.014), the change value of preoperative and postoperative fecal incontinence score was lower (P=0.039), anorectal pressure status (resting pressure of anal canal, anal systolic pressure, and length of anal high pressure zone) were lower (P<0.05) in the ultrasound group; For the patients with simple anal fistula, which had no significant differences between the ultrasound group and control group (P>0.05). There were 4 cases of recurrence in each group.ConclusionsFor complex anal fistula, preoperative 3D-AREUS could clarify position of internal opening, presence of branching fistula, and the relationship between fistula and sphincter, so as to make accurate surgical plans, reduce secondary injuries, and retain postoperative anal function of patients.
ObjectiveTo study the advance of malignant anorectal melanoma. MethodsThe literature in recent years about risk factors,clinical characteristic,early diagnosis,treatment and the prognosis of the anorectal melanoma were reviewed.ResultsMalignant anorectal melanoma was very rare.The history of pigment naevus,human immunodeficiency virus infection and sunlight exposure might be the risk factors.Clinic characteristics were rectal bleeding,anorectal mass and changing in bowel habits.Early diagnosis mainly depended on performing routine examination on patients between the ages of 45-80 years.The staining for polycolnal CEA in anorectal melanoma has a role on diagnostic pathology.The treatment is controversial and the combined treatments of chemotherapy with radiation therapy and immunotherapy which were based on surgery (abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision) are introduced.Conclusion Early diagnosis of malignant anorectal melanoma is difficult and the prognosis is poor.It is necessary to pay more attention to this disease and the most successful therapeutic approaches need to be developed.