ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of preoperative biliary drainage, the timing of preoperative biliary drainage, and the characteristics of various drainage methods for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsBy reviewing relevant literatures at home and abroad in the past 20 years, the controversies related to the preoperative biliary drainage, surgical biliary drainage, and various drainage methods for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed.ResultsThere is still a great deal of controversy about whether preoperative bile duct drainage is required for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma routinely, but there is a consensus on the timing of preoperative biliary drainage, and various drainage methods have their own characteristics.ConclusionsThe main treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is radical surgical resection, but cholestasis is often caused by malignant biliary obstruction, which makes it difficult to manage perioperatively. A large number of prospective studies are needed to provide more evidence for the need for routine preoperative biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who can undergo resection.
Objective To explore safety and efficacy of total laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods From April 2016 and January 2017, 6 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic radical resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were collected. The intra- and post-operative situation and the postoperative complications were analyzed. Results The radical resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were completed laparoscopically in all the patients. There was no conversion to the laparotomy. The procedure was finished within a time of (231.3±94.5) min and with an intraoperative blood loss of (123.3±46.8) mL. The first postoperative exhausting time and the postoperative hospital stay was (2.7±0.3) d and (11.9±1.7) d, respectively. All the patients had the R0 resection and the numbers of dissected lymph nodes were 9.4±2.7. The postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients, they were all cured spontaneously in one week, and there was no perioperative death. None of patients had a local recurrence and metastasis during an average 8 months of following-up. Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that with suitable case and skillful laparoscopic technique, laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is feasible and safe. Further studies are still needed to confirm benefits of this approach.
ObjectiveTo summarize the surgical treatment and explore factors which influencing prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsClinical data of 189 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma who treated in our hospital from Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2010 and clinicopathological factors that might influence survival were analyzed retrospectively. A multivariate factor analysis was performed through Cox proportional hazard model. ResultsOf 189 cases, 62 cases received radical resection, 54 cases received palliative surgery, and 73 cases received non-resection surgery. Operative procedure (RR=0.165), differentiated degree (RR=2.692), lymph node metastasis (RR=3.014), neural infiltration (RR=2.857), and vascular infiltration (RR=2.365) were found to be the statistically significant factors that influenced survival by multivariate factor analysis through the Cox proportional hazard model. ConclusionsRadical resection is the best treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Skeletonized hepatoduodenal ligament, complete excision of infiltrated nerve and blood vessel are important influence factors to improve the prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
肝门部胆管癌（hilar cholangiocarcinoma），又称Klaskin癌，是指起源于左右肝管、分叉部和肝总管上段胆管上皮的恶性肿瘤，约占胆管癌的60%~70%［1］。由于其临床表现隐匿，早期难以被发现。目前根治性手术是最有效的提高其生存率的治疗方式，随着肝门部胆管癌R0切除率的不断升高，5年生存率不断提高［2，3］，但仍有不少问题有待于解决……