The results of 2389 patients exmained by colonofiverscope in past nine years are reported. Polyps were found in 561 cases, including 1256 polyps in the large intestine and 82 polyps in the terminal ileum. All 1299 polyps were removed with biopsy forceps. Pathology demonstrated that there were 406 adenomas, including 89 atypical hyperplasia and 23 cases with malignant change and 932 non-canerous polyps with 102 atypical hyperplasia. Since adenoma is seen to be a precancerous change, the polypectomy by colonofiberscope , ecpecially atypical hyperplastic polyps may decrease morbidity of large intestinal cancer. Cancer associated with adenoma may be as high as 51.28%, so the recrudescence of polyps may possibly be found even afer the cancer removal. These data showed that an early discovery of small malignant adenoma is key to improve efficiency.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of computer-aided detection (CADe) and conventional colonoscopy in identifying colorectal adenomas and polyps. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, VIP, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness and safety of CADe assisted colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy in detecting colorectal tumors from 2014 to April 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included literature. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs were included, with a total of 6 393 patients. Compared with conventional colonoscopy, the CADe system significantly improved the adenoma detection rate (ADR) (RR=1.22, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.35, P<0.01) and polyp detection rate (PDR) (RR=1.19, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.36, P=0.01). It also reduced the missed diagnosis rate (AMR) of adenomas (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.67, P<0.01) and the missed diagnosis rate (PMR) of polyps (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.59, P<0.01). The PDR of proximal polyps significantly increased, while the PDR of ≤5 mm polyps slightly increased, but the PDR of >10mm and pedunculated polyps significantly decreased. The AMR of the cecum, transverse colon, descending colon, and sigmoid colon was significantly reduced. There was no statistically significant difference in the withdrawal time between the two groups. Conclusion The CADe system can increase the detection rate of adenomas and polyps, and reduce the missed diagnosis rate. The detection rate of polyps is related to their location, size, and shape, while the missed diagnosis rate of adenomas is related to their location.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of MRCP and (or) MRI on combination of choledochoscopy and duodenoscopy during the course of therapeutic laparoscopy with preoperative or intraoperative help diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones of diameter in the normal range. MethodsThe clinical data of 998 patients with calculus of bile duct with diameter in the normal range of common bile duct (common bile duct diameter of 0.2-0.8 cm) by MRCP and (or) MRI assist in diagnosis and treatment from Oct. 2001 to Dec. 2015 in the Second People's Hospital of Chengdu City were retrospectively analized. ResultsThe 998 cases of common bile duct diameter≤0.8 cm were diagnosed and treated by using MRCP and (or) MRI examination. Choledochoscopy group: There were 399 cases, 352 cases (88.2%) were successful removed the bile duct residual stones through the choledochoscopic procedure, converted to intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in 47 cases (11.8%). The false positive rate of MRCP and (or) MRI was 3.7% (13/352), the false negative rate of color Doppler ultrasound was 79.3% (279/352). Duodenoscopy treatment group: It was performed in 408 cases. The stones of common bile duct removed with duodenoscopic papillo-tomy in 381 cases (93.4%), the stone expulsion after duodenoscopic papillotomy in 18 cases (4.4%), 9 cases (2.2%) were shifted to other operation. False negative rate of color Doppler ultrasound was 79.5% (303/381). Three endoscopy group: There were 191 cases that intraoperative choledochoscopic exploration or intraoperative endoscopic papillotomy. The false positive rate of MRCP and (or) MRI was 2.6% (5/191), the false negative rate of color Doppler ultrasound was 76.4% (146/191). ConclusionsRoutine use of MRCP and MRI, in preoperative or intraoperative help diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones of diameter in the normal range, on combination of choledochoscopy and duodenoscopy during the course of therapeutic laparoscopy. It is necessary, feasible, effective and safe.
目的 探讨丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼在患者清醒状态下实施无痛肠镜法的可行性。 方法 2011年7月－2012年7月，将160例行无痛肠镜检查的患者随机分为两组: A组用芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉,其中男38例，女42例，平均年龄（48 ± 16）岁，平均体重（53.37 ± 9.5）kg；B组以阿托品0.25～0.5 mg缓慢静脉注射，继而以瑞芬太尼+丙泊酚复合液缓慢静脉滴注，使患者保持清醒状态，其中男43例，女37例，平均年龄（49 ± 15）岁，平均体重（54.26 ± 8.3）kg。观察两组患者检查中血压、心率、呼吸、血氧饱和度变化，检查中体动反应，检查后苏醒时间、定向力恢复、行走时间、离室时间，以及对检查过程的记忆情况。 结果 两组患者均能顺利完成检查，术中记忆率均低，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。A组患者循环改变、心动过缓、低氧血症、以及体动反应明显高于B组（P＜0.05），B组患者苏醒时间、定向力恢复、行走时间、离室时间，明显短于A组（P＜0.05）。 结论 瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚复合液伍用阿托品能够安全应用于患者清醒状态下实施的无痛肠镜检查，具有良好的临床推广价值。
ObjectiveTo investigate the importance of nursing observation and intervention for extrahepatic bile duct stones with gallbladder stones treated by electronic duodenoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsFrom July 2011 to February 2014, 157 patients with extrahepatic bile duct stones with gallbladder stones underwent EST and LC at the same time in our department. Combined with the surgery characteristics, we focused on the close observation and nursing of postoperative complications and drainage tubes for patients' timely recovery. ResultsOne patient with duodenal diverticulum papilla did not complete EST and LC surgery, which was then transformed to LC, bile duct incision and choledochoscopy with T tube drainage. All the remaining 156 patients completed endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and LC with a completion rate of 99.36%. Under close observation and careful nursing care, this group of patients did not have duodenum perforation, bile leakage or other complications. No patient died. Seven to thirteen days after hospitalization, all the patients were cured and discharged from the hospital. ConclusionFor patients undergoing EST and LC at the same time, observation and timely intervention are very important in reducing serious complications, improving the quality of surgery, enhancing patients' comfort, and promoting postoperative recovery.
Objective To investigate the method of the treatment on cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of common bile duct (CBD) by laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope and its significances. Methods Forty-two patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD were treated by laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope from Jan. 2007 to Dec. 2008 in this hospital. Under general anesthesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed first, then the anterior wall of CBD was opened, calculus of CBD was treated by choledochoscope and duodenoscope intraoperatively. Then primary suture of the CBD was performed under laparoscope and nasobiliary drainage duct was placed. Results One case was converted to laparotomy, 41 cases succeeded and left hospital after being taken off the nasobiliary drainage duct in 5-7 d. No case died, no bile leakage, no bleeding or perforation of upper digestive tract, and no acute pancreatitis happened after operation. Conclusion Laparoscopy with combination of choledochoscope and duodenoscope treating cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD is a safe, effective and quickly recovering method with less sufferings and trauma.
Objective To evaluate the effect of visual and audiovisual distraction on anxiety and acceptance levels among patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods A total of 180 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly divided into three groups: group A received visual distraction; group B received audiovisual distraction; and group C received routine care alone. Levels of anxiety and willingness to accept the same intervention if the procedure needed to be repeated were compared among the three groups. Results The reduction of anxiety score after colonoscopy in group A and group B was greater than that in group C, but the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of willingness to accept the same intervention if the procedure needed to be repeated was significantly different among the three groups: the rates for group A and group B were higher than for group C (Plt;0.05). Conclusions Both visual distraction and audiovisual distraction can significantly improve patients’ acceptance of colonoscopy. Visual distraction and audiovisual distraction have no significant effect on reducing anxiety.
目的 探讨经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)治疗直肠肿瘤的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2009年1~12月期间我院行TEM治疗7例直肠腺瘤患者的临床资料。结果 7例直肠肿瘤均获完整切除，切缘均阴性。手术时间55～240 min，平均110 min; 术中出血量5～100 ml,平均45 ml。术后病理诊断: 直肠绒毛状腺瘤4例，绒毛管状腺瘤2例，直肠腺癌1例。手术并发症: 术中直肠穿孔1例，肺部感染1例，尿潴留1例。 7例随访6~13个月,平均8个月，肿瘤无复发。结论 TEM治疗直肠肿瘤安全、有效。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia and sedation (PCAS) with propofol and remifentanil for colonoscopy in elderly patients. MethodsSixty elderly patients preparing for painless colonoscopy between May and September 2015 were randomly allocated into PCAS group and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group with 30 patients in each. In the PCAS group, the mixture of remifentanil and propofol at 0.6 mL/(kg·h) was pumped continuously after an initial bolus of 0.05 mL/kg mixture. The examination began three minutes after the infusion was finished. Patients could press the self-control button. Each bolus delivered 1 mL and the lockout time was 1 minute. In the TIVA group, patients received fentanyl at 1 μg/kg and midazolam at 0.02 mg/kg intravenously, and accepted intravenous propofol at 0.8-1.0 mg/kg two minutes later. The examination began when the patients lost consciousness. ResultsA significant decline of mean arterial blood pressure was detected within each group after anesthesia (P < 0.05). The decrease of mean blood pressure in the TIVA group was more significant than that in the PCAS group (P < 0.05). The heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation and respiratory rate decreased significantly after anesthesia in both the two groups (P < 0.05), while end-tidal CO2 increased after anesthesia without any significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The induction time, time to insert the colonoscope to ileocecus, and total examination time were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). As for the time from the end of examination to OAA/S score of 5 and to Aldrete score of 9, the PCAS group was significantly shorter than the TIVA group (P < 0.05). ConclusionPCAS with remifentanil and propofol can provide sufficient analgesia, better hemodynamic stability, lighter sedation, and faster recovery compared with TIVA.