目的:观察高龄不稳定型粗隆间骨折人工关节置换术的治疗效果。方法:2005年1月至2008年1月收治高龄不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者56例,行人工关节置换术治疗,按照Harris标准评分分析效果。结果:56例患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间62 min,平均住院17天。随访1～3年,术后14月因突发脑出血死亡1例,其余患者功能恢复良好。按照Harris标准评分优良率为91%。结论:高龄股骨粗隆间骨折采用人工关节置换术治疗安全有效。
Agedness; Intertrochanteric fracture; Replacement of artificial femoral head
Objective To compare the effectiveness between improved anterolateral approach and lateral approach in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 61 patients with senile intertrochanteric fracture treated between February 2008 and February 2010. Of 61 patients, 34 patients underwent improved anterolateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (improved group), and 27 patients underwent conventional lateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, Evans classification, comorbidities, disease duration, or Harris hip scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time, blood loss, perspective frequency during operation, drainage volume, hospitalization days, and out-of-bed time in the improved group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18.7 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was (11.64 ± 1.28) weeks in the improved group and was (12.29 ± 1.12) weeks in the conventional group, showing no significant difference (t=2.15, P=0.15). Harris hip scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), and significant differences were found among different time points after operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), between 2 groups after operation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of incision infection, limb shortening, coax vara, internal fixation loosening, main screw cutting-out from femoral head between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the incidence of total complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional lateral approach, improved anterolateral approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, reducing muscle damage and surgical risk in treating intertrochanteric fracture. Operating treatment of improved anterolateral approach combined with early rehabilitation after surgery can recover hip joint function as quickly as possible.
Objective To study the technique and effect of adjunctive cancellous screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hi p screw (DHS) fixation. Methods Between April 2004 and August 2007, 33 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were treated with DHS fixation and adjunctive cancellous screw. There were 13 males and 20 females, aging 43-82 years with an average age of 67 years. Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 7 patients, by fall ing from height in 11 patients, by sprain in 15 patients. All fractures were closed. The patients were operated 3-12 days after injury. According to Evans classification, there were 12 cases of type II, 15 cases of type III, and 6 cases of type IV. Twenty-twocases had osteoporosis. Weight bear time and compl ication were recorded. Fracture heal ing and neck-shaft angle were observed on radiogram. Hip functions were evaluated using Radford criterion. Results Thirty-three patients had no intraoperative compl ications with incision heal ing by first intension. All patients were followed up from 14 months to 38 months, with an average of 21 months. Fracture heal ing was achieved within 14 weeks to 21 weeks, with an average of 17 weeks after operations. The neck-shaft angles were (134.2 ± 13.7)° 3 days after operation, (128.6 ± 8.9)° 8 weeks after operation, and (128.5 ± 9.3)° after fracture heal ing, showing no significant difference when compared with that of the third day after operation (P gt; 0.05). According to the Radford criterion at last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of hi p function was 93.9% (excellent in 21 cases, good in 10 cases, and poor in 2 cases). Compl ications such as loosening, breakage, or grievous migration of hardware were not observed. Conclusion The adjunctive cancellous screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with DHS fixation can provide counteraction of tension and rotation, promote fixation stabil ity, enhance fracture heal ing and decrease compl ication.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress on the distal interlocking screw of cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric fractures. MethodsRelated literature concerning the distal interlocking screw of cephalomedullary nail was reviewed and analyzed in terms of biomechanics, clinical application, operating difficulties, and complications. ResultsDistal interlocking screw can provide extra torsional stiffness in both short and long cephalomedullary nail. It is applied in most clinical cases. In long cephalomedullary nail, placing the distal interlocking screw increases the operative time for fixation and the amount of radiation exposure notably. In short cephalomedullary nail, placing the distal interlocking screw can cause adjacent vascular injury, stress concentration, and secondary fracture around the screw. ConclusionWhen the fracture is stable (type A1, type A2.1), it can be fixed solidly without the distal interlocking screw, but prefers to use a long nail. In unstable fracture, the distal interlocking screw should be used to prevent rotational displacement of the femur shaft and the failure of the nail.
Objective To investigate the influence of the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation on the effectiveness in the patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2009, 3 873 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur were surgically treated in 56 hospitals. Of them, 1 970 cases were treated with rehabilitation training according to scale of safety assessment of early exercise rehabilitation of patients with fractures (trial group), 1 903 cases were treated with traditional rehabilitation training methods (control group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture type, internal fixation type, or postoperative safety score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All the patients were followed up 13-49 months (mean, 30.5 months). There was no significant difference in the incidences of bone nonunion, delayed union, and systemic complication between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); significant differences were found in the incidences of incision complication, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, and the overall complication between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). At 6 and 12 months after operation, the trial group was significantly better than the control group in the recovery of hip motion, curative effectiveness classification, and the excellent and good rate (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur guided by the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation can apparently improve the prognosis and reduce the incidence of complications.
Objective To identify an evidence-based treatment for an elderly patient with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Clinical problems were presented on the basis of the patient’s conditions, and evidence was collected from the NGC (2000 to 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), TRIP Database, PubMed (1966 to 2009) and CBM (1978 to 2009). Treating strategies were formulated in terms of the three-combination principle (best evidence, the doctor’s professional knowledge and the patient’s desire). Results Three guidelines and sixteen studies were included. The current evidence indicated that surgery was the preferred solution to intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly patient. The sliding hip screw (SHS) appeared superior to others. There was insufficient evidence to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopedic surgeries. Early surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay and improved mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced infections. In order to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism, pharmacological prophylaxis should be carried out when the patient was admitted to hospital and be assisted with mechanical prophylaxis after surgery. Nutritional supplementation was conducive to the recovery of the patient. Rehabilitation ought to be performed as soon as possible. Considering the patient’s condition, the treatment option was established according to the available evidence and guidelines. Short-term follow-up showed a good outcome. Conclusion Through the evidence-based method, an individual treatment plan could obviously improve the treatment effect and prognosis.