Open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screw is one of the most widely used surgical methods in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. In recent years, more and more studies have shown that it is very important to strengthen the medial column support of the proximal humerus during the surgery. At present, orthopedists often use bone graft, bone cement, medial support screw and medial support plate to strengthen the support of the medial column of the proximal humerus when applying open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screw to treat proximal humeral fractures. Therefore, the methods of strengthening medial column support for proximal humerus fractures and their effects on maintaining fracture reduction, reducing postoperative complications and improving functional activities of shoulder joints after operation are reviewed in this paper. It aims to provide a certain reference for the individualized selection of medial support methods according to the fracture situation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of simultaneous and delayed repair of combined full-thickness rotator cuff rupture in proximal humerus fracture. Methods Between January 2015 and January 2017, 44 patients with proximal humerus fractures complicated with full-thickness rotator cuff injuries were included. Twenty-four patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and rotator cuff repair simultaneously (simultaneous operation group), and 20 patients underwent delayed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair more than 90 days after ORIF (delayed operation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, and side of injury between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture healing was observed by X-ray films. The shoulder function was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation by using the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17 months). Fractures all healed at 3 months after operation in simultaneous operation group. According to UCLA score, the patients had achieved significantly better outcomes in function, active forward flexion, strength of forward flexion, and subjective satisfaction in simultaneous operation group than in delayed operation group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in pain between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with proximal humerus fracture complicated with full-thickness rotator cuff rupture, performing ORIF and simultaneous repair of rotator cuff can improve shoulder function and achieve better effectiveness when compared with delayed repair of rotator cuff.
Objective To review the biomechanics of internal fixators for proximal humeral fractures, and to compare the mechanical stabil ity of various internal fixators. Methods The l iterature concerning the biomechanics of internal fixators for proximal humeral fractures was extensively analyzed. Results The most important things for best shoulder functional results are optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation. At present, there are a lot of methods to treat proximal humeral fractures. Locking-plate exhibites significant mechanical stabil ity and has many advantages over other internal fixators by biomechanical comparison. Conclusion Locking-plate has better fixation stabil ity than other internal fixators and is the first choice to treat proximal humeral fractures.
ObjectiveTo summarize the effectiveness of two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture.MethodsBetween June 2014 and January 2018, 17 patients with deep infection and humeral head necrosis or bone nonunion after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures were treated. There were 8 males and 9 females, aged from 52 to 78 years (mean, 63.8 years). The infection occurred at 19-66 months after the initial internal fixation (mean, 34.8 months). Microbial culture of joint fluid was positive in 14 cases and negative in 3 cases. The preoperative Constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 36.41±8.65, 31.06±7.43, and 7.29±0.99, respectively. The preoperative ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation were (45.88±12.46), (42.18±12.31), and (16.76±4.92)°, respectively. The preoperative range of internal rotation was buttock in 9 cases, lumbosacral joint in 3 cases, L3 in 5 cases. At the first-stage surgery, the thorough debridement was done and the antibiotic-impregnated bone cement spacer was placed after the removal of internal fixation. After the infections disappeared, the two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The mean interval between the two procedures was 4.2 months (range, 3.0-6.5 months).ResultsAll the incisions healed primarily and no complications such as recurrent infection or vascular nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 22.0 months). At last follow-up, the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were (109.00±23.66), (98.53±16.92), (41.41±6.82)°, respectively; and the range of internal rotation was lumbosacral joint in 5 cases, L3 in 8 cases, T12 in 4 cases. The range of motion of shoulder joints at last follow-up was significant improved when compared with the preoperative range of motion (P<0.05). The Constant score (64.88±8.70), ASES score (65.18±8.10), and VAS score (2.94±1.25) were significantly superior to the preoperative scores (P<0.05). X-ray films showed that no prosthesis loosening occurred.ConclusionTwo-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for the postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture, which has advantages of low risk of infection recurrence, good shoulder function, and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical results of locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation. MethodsBetween January 2011 and August 2012, 16 patients with proximal humeral fractures (AO type C2) were treated by locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft. The clinical data were retrospectively analysed. There were 5 males and 11 females with an average age of 64 years (range, 55-70 years). The injury causes were falling injury in 12 cases, traffic accident injury in 3 cases, and sports injury in 1 case. The duration between injury and operation ranged from 2 to 6 days (mean, 4.5 days). The imaging data were used to judge the fracture healing, and to measure the neck-shaft angle and the height of humeral head; the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), and Neer score were used to evaluate the function of the shoulder after surgery. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all patients; no complication of vascular and nerve injury occurred. Sixteen cases were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All fractures healed at 18-24 weeks (mean, 20 weeks). No complication occurred as follows:re-displacement, necrosis, rejection reaction, and loosening or extraction of screws. At last follow-up, the neck-shaft angle was 126.6-136.9° (mean, 132.5°), showing a little lost when compared with intraoperative angle (130.5-138.0°, 134.0° on average). At 12 months after surgery, the height loss of humeral head was 1.8-4.6 mm (mean, 2.0 mm); the passive anteflexion of the shoulder was 130-160° (mean, 148°); the active anteflexion was 120-145° (mean, 136°); the external rotation was 30-65° (mean, 56°); the internal rotation was 15-25° (mean, 19°). And the DASH score was 2-53 (mean, 12); the SF-36 score was 50-95 (mean, 89). According to Neer score for shoulder function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 87.5%. ConclusionLocking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation has satisfactory clinical results because of stable fixation, high clinical outcome scores, and low internal fixation failure.
Objective To compare the efficacy and indication of the three different surgical methods in the treatment of the senile osteoporotic comminuted proximal humerus fracture. Methods From January 2006 to April 2008, 70 senile patients with osteoporotic comminuted proximal humerus fracture were randomly divided into three groups to receive different surgical methods. There were 21 patients in the group A receiving Kirschner tension band or screw internal fixation, 37 patients in group B receiving internal fixation of locking proximal humeral plate, and 12 patients in group C receiving humeral head replacement. There were 36 males and 34 females aged 53-76 years old (average 61.9 years old). All the fractureswere closed, osteoporotic, and III and IV-part according to Neer classification. The disease course was 1-8 days (average 2.8 days). There was no significant difference among three groups in terms of basel ine information (P gt; 0.05). The effective antiosteoporosis therapy was given during perioperative period. Results All the incision healed by first intention. All patients reached anatomical or almost anatomical reduction without compl ications such as postoperative infection, neurovascular injury, and nonunion of bone. Seventy patients were followed up for 9-20 months (average 11.5 months). The heal ing time of the fracture was 8-12 weeks in group A and group B, the average heal ing time was 10.5 weeks in group A and 10 weeks in group B, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05). Group C presented with no sign of prosthesis loosening or shoulder dislocation. Six cases in group A suffered from frozen shoulder, pain or acromion impingement syndrome 6 months after operation and obtained various degrees of improvement via functional exercises. One of them had humeral head avascular necrosis 12 months later and achieved fair recovery after performing humeral head replacement. Two cases in group B had frozen and painful shoulder 6 months after operation and achieved fair recovery after functional exercises. One cases in group C had frozen shoulder and poor performance of abduction and upl ifting and achieved improvement after exercises. The rest patients achieved satisfactory curative effects. The incidence of compl ication was 28.6% in group A, 5.4% in group B, and 8.3% in group C. The incidence of complication in group A was significantly higher than that of group B and group C (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P gt; 0.05). Neer scale system was adopted to evaluate the postoperative shoulder function, the excellent and good rate was 66.7% in group A, 78.4% in group B, and 83.3% in group C. The excellent and good rate in group A was significantly less than that of group B and group C (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The senile osteoporotic comminuted proximal humerus fracture treated by surgery can obtain satisfied results. Most patients can use locking plate fixation. Those with poor general condition can use Kirschner wire fixation with tension band or screws, but this method is subject to certain constraints. For some elder patients with humeral head necrosis and humeral head crushed, priority should be given to the use of humeral head replacement.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of suspensory external fixation technique in treatment of proximal humeral fractures.MethodsBetween August 2013 and October 2018, 14 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with suspensory external fixation technique. There were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 55.9 years (range, 43-76 years). There were 10 cases of falling injury and 4 cases of traffic accident injury. Among them, there were 9 cases of Neer type Ⅲ and 5 cases of Neer type Ⅳ. The time from injury to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.6 days). Nine cases were complicated with osteoporosis. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.1±1.2. The effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated by hospital stay, fracture healing time, removal time of external fixator, postoperative complications, VAS score, and Neer score of shoulder joint function.ResultsAll operations were successfully completed, and the hospital stay was 6-14 days, with an average of 9.4 days. All the incisions healed by first intention, and no infection or other complications occurred. All patients were followed up 16-60 months (mean, 35.4 months). X-ray films examination showed that all fractures healed, the healing time was 4-7 months (mean, 4.9 months). The removal time of external fixator was 5-8 months (mean, 6.3 months). VAS scores were 1.5±0.8 at 1 month after operation and 1.0±0.9 at last follow-up, both of which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative score, the differences were significant between different time points (P<0.05). Neer score of shoulder joint function was 75-100 (mean, 91.1); 9 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.9%. During follow-up, there was no adverse events such as acromion impingement, nonunion, or pseudoarthrosis.ConclusionFor proximal humeral fractures, the suspensory external fixation technique is a simple and reliable treatment method that can significantly improve joint function.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of locking plates for Neer 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 77 patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures, who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of locking plates and were followed up more than 12 months between July 2008 and May 2011. There were 39 males and 38 females with an average age of 54.2 years (range, 18-81 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 47 cases, by traffic accident in 16 cases, by falling from height in 4 cases, by sporting in 5 cases, and by other reasons in 5 cases. The time between injury and operation was 2-16 days (mean, 4.5 days). According to Neer classification, there were 54 cases of 3-part fracture and 23 cases of 4-part fracture. The Constant scores, visual analogue score (VAS), and the complications were evaluated during follow-up. Results After operation, healing of incisions by first intention was obtained in 76 cases and healing by second intention in 1 case. All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 18.5 months). At last follow-up, the Constant score was 71.1 ± 11.9; the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 24 cases, fair in 25 cases, and poor in 10 cases with an excellent and good rate of 54.5%. The VAS score was 2.8 ± 2.2. Bone nonunion occurred in 2 cases; the other patients had bone union within 2-6 months (mean, 3.2 months). The complications occurred in 25 cases (32.5%). Revision surgery was performed in 15 patients (19.5%). Conclusion The treatment of Neer 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures remains challenging. Anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and reduced humeral head blood supply disruption may lead to a satisfactory outcome.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effectiveness of proximal humeral internal locking system (Philos) plate for proximal humerus fracture. MethodsThirty-three patients with proximal humerus fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with Philos plate between January 2009 and January 2014. There were 19 males and 14 females, aged 23-89 years (mean, 56.6 years). The left side was involved in 15 cases, and the right side in 18 cases. The injury causes included falling in 20 cases and traffic accident in 13 cases. All cases received X-ray and CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction before operation. According to the Neer classification, 8 cases were rated as two-part fractures, 15 cases as three-part fractures, and 10 cases as four-part fractures. The interval time between injury and surgery was 1-7 days (mean, 3.67 days). Postoperative functional outcome was evaluated using the Constant-Murley score. ResultsInfection and liquefaction occurred in 2 cases respectively, which was cured after corresponding treatment; primary healing of wound was obtained in the other 29 cases. Five patients had shoulder pain. The patients were followed up 11-47 months (mean, 33 months). The mean time of fracture union was 7.5 months (range, 5-9 months) on the X-ray films. Humeral head necrosis occurred in 2 patients with Neer four-part fractures, and internal fixation failure occurred in 3 patients (2 screw broken and 1 plate broken) with four-part fractures (2 cases) and three-part fractures (1 case), which was cured after conservative treatment. At last follow-up, the mean Constant-Murley score was 70.5 (range, 42-90); the results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 21 cases, moderate in 6 cases, and poor in 3 cases. ConclusionSatisfactory results can be expected for proximal humeral fracture by using of the proximal humeral internal locking system plate based on strict indication and early rehabilitation training.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress on intra-articular screw penetration in proximal humeral fracture treated with locking plate. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature about the proximal humeral fracture treated with locking plate was extensively reviewed. The incidence of screw penetration and risk factors were summarized from both primary and secondary screw penetrations, and the reasons of the intra-articular screw penetration and the technical solutions to avoid the penetration were analyzed. ResultsThe incidence of intra-articular screw penetration is about 11%-30%, which includes primary and secondary screw penetrations. The primary screw penetration is related to improper operation, inaccurate measurement, and “Steinmetz solid” effect, which results in inadequate fluoroscopy and blind zone. The secondary screw penetration is related to the loss of reduction and varus, collapse, and necrosis of the humeral head. The risk factors for intra-articular screw penetration include the bone mass density, the fracture type, the quality of fracture reduction, the applied location, number, and length of the plate and screws, and whether medial column buttress is restored. Improved fracture reduction, understanding the geometric distribution of screws, good intraoperative fluoroscopy, and reconstruction of medial column buttress stability are the key points for success. ConclusionThe risk of the intra-articular screw penetration in the proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates is still high. Follow-up studies need to further clarify the cause and mechanism of screw penetration, and the risk factors that lead to screw penetration, in order to effectively prevent the occurrence of this complication.