ObjectiveTo compare the clinical recovery and immune response between laparoscopic-assisted and open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 53 patients with advanced gastric cancer from January 2012 to October 2013 were studied prospectively. According to random number table, patients were randomly divided into laparoscopic-assisted group(LA group, n=27) and open operation group(OO group, n=26). Operative time, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, time to resume soft diet, after bed time, postoperative hospital stay, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were compared respectively between the two groups. The changes in CD3, CD4+, CD8+, IgG, IgA, IgM, and CRP were examined respectively by using flow cytometry and immunoturbidimetric assays on the preoperative day 1, and on the postoperative day 1 and 7. ResultsThe operative time was longer significantly in LA group than that in OO group(P < 0.05). The mean blood loss, the first flatus time, after bed time, and postoperative hospital stay in the two groups were all different statistically(P < 0.05), and all were better in LA group. However, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes and the time to resume soft diet were not significantly different in the two groups(P > 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, the CD3, CD4+, and CD8+ significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). On the day 1 after operation, the levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.05). Those immunoglobulin in LA group recovered to close to the level before surgery, but in OO group sustained lower level(P < 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, CRP level significantly increased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Those changes of above index were not significantly different between the LA group and OO group on the day 1 after operation(P > 0.05). All index recovered gradually in the two groups on the day 7 after operation and were better in LA group(P < 0.05, except IgA). ConclusionLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer resulted in a quicker clinical recovery and a lesser depression to the perioperative cellular and humoral immune function.
ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and safety of π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).MethodThe clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TLTG, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTLTG with π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully carried out in all 20 patients. The operative time was (236.0±55.5) min, the π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis time was (25.7±4.8) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (192.0±148.9) mL, the operative incision length was (3.7±0.8) cm. The postoperative pain score was 2.4±1.1, the first flatus time was (3.1±0.9) d, the first postoperative ambulation time was (1.8±0.7) d, the removal time of nasoenteral nutrution tube was (7.4±2.4) d, the liquid diet time was (6.2±1.4) d, the removal time of intraoabdominal drainage tube was (7.8±2.8) d, the postoperative hospital stay was (10.8±3.0) d. There was no death related to the anastomosis in all patients. Two patients developed a little pleural effusion and 1 patient developed lymphatic leakage were cured with conservative treatment. One patient with intraabdominal encapsulated effusion was cured by puncture and drainage treating. There was no postive incisal margin. The length of upper segment of resection form gastric cancer was (2.3±1.7) cm, the maximum tumor diameter was (4.9±2.8) cm, the number of dissected lymph nodes was 27.9±5.6. All patients were followed up 3–15 months. Eight patients underwent endoscopic examination had no obvious anastomosis stenosis and esophageal reflux. Two patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis witnin one year after operation, and the rest had disease-free survival until the end of follow-up.ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study, π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure in treatment of gastric cancer.
With the swift evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery, additional procedures building upon sleeve gastrectomy have consistently surfaced. Recent studies suggest that sleeve gastrectomy with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB) yields superior short-term weight reduction outcomes compared to sleeve gastrectomy alone, with weight loss and glycemic control effects akin to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and without significant complications. As a result, SG-JJB is regarded as a safe and efficacious bariatric procedure, noted for its technical simplicity and reversibility, presenting substantial clinical utility. Nonetheless, high-quality, multicenter, large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are essential to further ascertain its long-term efficacy and safety, and to facilitate its standardized implementation. This article seeks to review the advancements in SG-JJB research, evaluate its effectiveness and safety in managing obesity and associated comorbidities, and explore its future developmental trajectory.
Objective To evaluate the effect of total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the treatment of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer. Methods Clinical data of 273 cases of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer who underwent TG and PG in our hospital from Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2010 were reviewed for retrospective analysis. Operation related indexes, 3-year cumulative survival rate, and 5-year cumulative survival rate were compared and evaluated. Results There was no significant difference between TG group and PG group in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay(P > 0.05), but the number of dissected lymph nodes in TG group was obviously more than those of PG group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.000). The postoperative complication rates were 10.3%(12/117)in TG group and 21.8%(34/156) in PG group respectively, which was lower in TG group(χ2=6.353, P < 0.05). The 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were 58.9% and 34.2%, of PG group were 43.4% and 23.6% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates were all lower in PG group(χ2=5.894, P < 0.05;χ2=5.582, P < 0.05). For patients in stage pT4, pN2, and TNMⅢ, whose tumor size were bigger than 3.0 cm, and patients who had accept chemotherapy, the 3-and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were significantly higher than those of PG group(P < 0.05). However, for patients in stage pT2, pT3, pN0, pN1, pN3, TNMⅠ, TNMⅡ, TNMⅣ, whose tumor size were smaller than 3.0 cm, who had not accept chemotherapy, and patients of any pathological type, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates(P > 0.05). Conclusion For the patients who suffered from advanced esophagogastric junction cancer, TG can improve long-term survival rate, and it can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve postoperative quality of life.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the weight loss outcomes, metabolic disease remission, and complications profiles of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) based on a large single-center cohort experience. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted. Clinical data of patients who underwent LSG at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2021 to June 2024 were collected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcomes including percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), metabolic disease remission, and the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed. ResultsA total of 1 568 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally included, including 304 males and 1 264 females. The age at surgery was (31.51±8.01）years old, and the body mass index was (37.26±4.18) kg/m2. At 1 year after surgery, the %TWL was (32.84±6.38)%, and the complete remission rate of diabetes was 96.2% (304/316). Complications within 1 year after surgery: 1 (0.06%) case of postoperative bleeding, 2 (0.13%) cases of gastric leakage, 1 (0.06%) case of vitamin B1 deficiency, and 1 (0.06%) case of unilateral common peroneal nerve entrapment injury. The total complications rate was 0.32% (5/1 568). No mortality was observed. ConclusionsLSG has significant short-term efficacy and higher safety in treatment of obesity and related metabolic diseases. In particular, experiences in aspects such as complications prevention and multidisciplinary follow-up management could provide references for centers in the early stage of development.
ObjectiveTo measure gastric wall thickness in patients with obesity and to investigate the relation between gastric wall thickness and clinicopathologic characteristics. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of the patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from February to August 2023 were collected. The gastric wall thickness of the gastric tissue specimens resected following LSG was measured by a tissue measuring device at 3 predetermined positions (gastric antrum, gastric body, and gastric fundus) at a compressive pressure of 8 g/mm2, and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting the thickness of the gastric wall. ResultsA total of 232 patients were collected in this study, including 49 males and 183 females. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 28.2–61.8 kg/m2 with (38.4±5.3) kg/m2, and the patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 were 82 cases and <40 kg/m2 were 150 cases. The thickness of the gastric wall in the gastric antrum, gastric body, and gastric fundus of 232 patients was (3.04±0.38) mm, (2.26±0.51) mm, and (1.63±0.32) mm, respectively. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric antrum was related to the gender of the patients, that is, the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric antrum was thinner in the females as compared with the males (standard coefficients β=–0.152, t=–2.167, P=0.031), while the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric fundus was related to the BMI of the patients, and the higher BMI, the thicker thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric fundus (standard coefficients β=0.153, t=2.281, P=0.023). ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the thickness of the gastric wall is related to the anatomical position of the gastric wall. During LSG surgery, the size and height of the Staple lines are selected at different anatomical positions of the cutting edge for males and obese patients with higher BMI.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) versus laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for patients with gastric cancer. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched to collect cohort studies about TLTG vs. LATG for gastric cancer from inception to February 28th 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of six cohort studies were included, of which 407 cases were in the TLTG group, and 315 cases were in the LATG group. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with LATG group, patients in TLTG group had shorter operation time (MD=–8.97, 95%CI –16.21 to –1.73, P=0.02), and initial postoperative feeding time (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.57 to –0.03, P=0.03). However, the anastomic time, bleeding volume, the number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, initial flatus time, postoperative hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis were similar between two groups (all P values>0.05)． Conclusions Compared with LATG, TLTG has shorter operation and recovery time for patients with gastric cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery has continued to evolve under the dual imperatives of efficacy and safety. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with transit bipartition (SG-TB), derived from SG, reconstructs a “dual-channel” pathway that preserves the pylorus and proximal small-bowel function, while aiming to achieve metabolic effects comparable to biliopancreatic diversion with fewer severe nutritional complications. In 2025, the first Chinese expert consensus on SG-TB was released, and the inaugural international SG-TB consensus meeting was convened in Europe, reaching preliminary alignment on procedure classification, key technical parameters, and indications/contraindications. Emerging clinical evidence indicates that SG-TB confers advantages in weight reduction, remission of type 2 diabetes, and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and also demonstrates feasibility in revisional surgeries and complex cases. Nevertheless, current studies are predominantly observational, with limited evidence quality and considerable heterogeneity. Stratification of surgical parameters and establishment of reproducible training systems remain unmet needs. Building upon a synthesis of national and international consensus statements and recent clinical advances, this commentary further analyzes the challenges that SG-TB faces in procedural heterogeneity, evidence accumulation, individualized practice, and mechanistic research. This commentary seeks to offer practical reference and research directions for the bariatric community, ultimately supporting the advancement of SG-TB from a promising technique toward standardized and mainstream adoption.