目的 探讨胆囊切除术时Luschka胆管损伤的诊断及处理。 方法 回顾性分析2 039例胆囊切除术中26例Luschka胆管损伤的情况。 结果 26例中15例于术中发现胆漏点，行缝扎止漏成功，5例行缝扎失败者和3例未找到胆漏点者，经引流后痊愈。术后发现3例，其中1例经鼻胆管引流治愈； 1例经再手术引流治愈； 1例再手术后发生心肌梗塞死亡。 结论 胆囊切除术时Luschka胆管损伤较难避免，术中发现并及时治疗效果最好； 术后发现应及时行剖腹探查和充分引流。
Objective To summarize the treatment experience for concomitant diseases of other abdominal organs in laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC）. Methods The clinical data of 176 patients with LC and concomitant diseases of other abdominal organs were analyzed retrospectively， including preoperatively diagnosed cases （such as 53 with liver cyst， 15 with choledocholithiasis， 7 with chronic appendicitis， 5 with inguinal hernia， 4 with renal cyst， and 6 with ovarian cyst） and intraoperatively diagnosed cases （such as 72 with abdominal cavity adhesion， 4 with internal fistula between gallbladder and digestive tract， 3 with Mirizzi syndrome， and 7 with unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma）. Results All the operation were successfully completed in 176 patients without severe complications， including 53 cases treated with LC plus fenestration of hepatic cyst， 15 with choledocholithotomy， 7 with appendectomy， 5 with tension free hernia repair， 4 with renal cyst fenestration， 6 with oophorocystectomy， 72 with adhesiolysis， 3 with fistula resection plus intestine neoplasty， 2 with intraoperative cholangiography plus choledocholithotomy， 5 with LC plus gallbladder bed complete burning， and 4 cases treated with conversion to open surgery （1 with intestinal fistula repair， 1 with choledocholithotomy， and 2 with radical resection for gallbladder carcinoma）. Conclusions It is safe and effective to treat gallbladder diseases complicated with other concomitant diseases simultaneously with laparoscopic operation， if the principles of surgical operation are followed and the indications and applicable conditions are strictly followed. And conversion to open surgery is necessary.
Objective To comment the diagnosis and treatment the bile leakage from the injuried abnormal minute biliary in our laparosicopic cholecystectomy (LC) practice. Methods Fourteen cases of minute biliary duct injury in 2 050 cases of LC were studied retrospectively. Among them, 6 cases had been found the points of leakage during operation, and the points were treated by titanium nips. In 4 cases even though the bile leakage could be seen, but the points of leakage could not found, and were treated by drainage. Four cases with peritonitis, 1 needed to be explored, and treated with suture ligature, 1 was explored by laparoscopy again, another two cases were treated with multiple hole catheters to drainage of the abdominal cavities through stab wounds. Results All 14 cases recovered. Conclusion Small bile leakage in LC is almost inevitable. It is the best that the bile leakage can be discovered during operation and to be treated. If it is discovered after operation, an open or laparoscopic exploratory laparotomy and adequate drainage would be needed. In the case of small amount of leakage, catheter drainage through stab wound is feasible.
【摘要】目的总结胰岛素泵在糖尿病患者胆囊切除手术中的应用。方法本组42例，随机分为两组，泵治疗组24例、皮下治疗组18例，术前诊断均为糖尿病合并胆囊结石。泵治疗组采用胰岛素泵控制围手术期血糖，皮下治疗组每日3次皮下注射胰岛素控制围手术期血糖。结果全部病例手术过程顺利，泵治疗组术中、术后血糖控制较皮下治疗组血糖控制平稳，尿酮监测均为阴性，伤口全部一期愈合。结论胰岛素泵用于糖尿病患者胆囊切除手术有利于患者顺利渡过围手术期。
目的 探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查及内镜治疗在腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)术前、术后的应用价值。 方法 对61例拟行LC的患者术前或术后行ERCP检查，发现异常再行内镜治疗。结果 LC术前行ERCP者42例中39例显影，其中37例伴有其他胆管疾病，占94.9%。术后行ERCP者19例均显影，总的插管成功率为95.1%。LC术前或术后42例行EST治疗，4例行EPBD，2例行ERBD，15例行ENBD，另4例在行ERCP检查后改开腹手术，取石成功率为92.9%。结论 诊治性ERCP在LC前、后的应用，对进一步明确诊断、选择手术方式、预防LC的并发症和提高LC的成功率具有重要价值。
目的 探讨上腹部手术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的可能性及手术方法与技巧。方法 回顾性分析我院2005～2009年期间对有上腹部手术史行LC的23例患者的临床资料。结果 23例患者中慢性结石性胆囊炎18例，胆囊息肉5例。既往均有上腹部手术史，其中胃大部切除术后19例,胃平滑肌瘤切除术后2例,脾破裂修补术后2例。采用闭合法穿刺建立气腹，分离粘连，暴露胆囊全貌及Calot三角，顺行或逆行切除胆囊。23例中LC成功21例; 因粘连致密，胆囊管无法辨认，中转开腹2例。手术时间45～140 min，平均67 min。全组无明显出血、内脏损伤、胆管损伤、胆汁漏等并发症发生。结论 部分上腹部手术后胆囊良性疾病行LC术可行。
From the March of 1993 to the May of 1994, we had performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for 200 patients of the age ranged 19-77 years. In these cases, 12 had previous abdominal surgery; 3 cases had hepatic cysts; 11 cases had stones in the neck of gall bladders. We had successfully performed LC for 190 cases (95%). But we also had some unsuccesful experiences, including accidental injury to the stomach or duodenum, and bleeding from cystic arteris of the gallbladder. Operation (LC) was abandoned in one patient because of severe cardiac arrhyshmia developed during operation, and billiary tract injury was found postoperatively in three patients with no postoperative death. The operative indications and technical problems of LC are discussed in detail and measures in avoiding injury to billiary or GI tract from LC are introduced.
目的 探讨急诊条件下胆囊结石合并胃恶性肿瘤的诊断与治疗。方法 回顾性分析6例因胆囊结石行胆囊切除、术中意外发现胃恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料及治疗过程。结果 6例患者中5例发现胃癌，1例发现原发性胃恶性淋巴瘤。5例施行胃癌根治术，1例施行全胃切除术，无术后并发症，术后定期化疗，随访6～43个月，至术后随访截止日（2008年12月）均存活。结论 老年胆囊结石患者应注意合并胃恶性肿瘤的可能，胆囊切除术中仔细探查胃及周围器官极为重要，同时施行根治性切除是最佳选择。
Object To evaluate the significance of double common bile duct （DCBD） in hepatobiliary surgery. Metheds The data of diagnosis and treatment of two patients with DCBD in our hospital between Jul. to Dec. 2010 were analyzed retrospective， and the related literatures were reviewed. Results The right hepatic bile duct of DCBD due to mistaking it for cystic duct in 1 case was accidental injuried during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Another example，the DCBD was confirmed by intraoperative exploration and choledochoscopic examination， at the same time with chole-dochal cyst， anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction （APBDJ）， primary hepatolithus， and choledocholith， and then operation was performed. Two cases were typeⅤb of DCBD. A total of 32 English literatures were reviewed. Since the beginning of 1932 English literature had reported 100 cases of DCBD. The type Ⅱand typeⅢwere the most common type of DCBD， and the typeⅤonly 10 cases. There were 27 cases of DCBD in twenty-five Chinese articles from 1994 to 2012. The typeⅤwas the most common type of DCBD. The accessory common bile duct （ACBD） opening in the duod-enum， gastric， and pancreatic duct were the most common. The common complications included stone， APBDJ， choled-ochal cyst， tumor etc. Conclusions DCBD is a very rare anatomic variation of extrahepatic bile duct， often accompanied by calculus of bile duct and common bile duct cyst， APBDJ， and other biliary anatomy abnormality， and potentially carci-nogenic potential. The existence of DCBD may increase the risk of iatrogenic bile duct injury and complexity of biliary operation. In view of this， this abnormality of extrahepatic duct should be paid with close attention during operation.