Objective To investigate the effect of removing the implanted plate-rod system for scol iosis (PRSS) on maintaining scol iosis curve correction and preserving spinal mobil ity in patients with scol iosis. Methods From June 1998 to February 2002, 119 cases of scol iosis were treated with the implant of PRSS, which was removed 26-68 months later (average46.8 months). Complete follow-up data were obtained in 21 patients, including 6 males and 15 females aged 11-17 years old (average 13.8 years old). The disease course was 9-16 years (average 12.1 years). There were 2 cases of congenital scol iosis and 19 cases of idiopathic scol iosis, which included 5 cases of IA, 2 of IB, 1 of IIA, 2 of IIB, 2 of IIC, 2 of IIIA, 3 of IIIB, and 2 of IVA according to Lenke classification. There were 13 cases of thoracic scol iosis and 8 of thoracolumbar scol iosis. AP view and the lateral and anterior bending view of X-ray films before and at 3 to 6 months after removing PRSS were comparatively analyzed, the coronal and the sagittal Cobb angle were measured, and the height of vertebral body on the concave side and the convex side were measured, so as to know the effect of PRSS on the growth of the vertebral endplates. Results All the implants were removed successfully with an average operation time of 2.5 hours (range 2-4 hours) and a small amount of intraoperative blood loss. Twenty-one cases were followed up for 6-72 months (average 34.4 months). The coronal Cobb angle before and after the removal of PRSS was (20.25 ± 8.25)° and (23.63 ± 8.41)°, respectively, indicating there was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); while the sagittal Cobb angle was (39.44 ± 12.38)° and (49.94 ± 10.42)°, respectively, indicating there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The height of the top vertebral body on the concave side before and after the removal of PRSS was (1.78 ± 0.40) cm and (2.08 ± 0.35) cm, respectively, and there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.01); while the height on the convex side was (2.16 ± 0.47) cm and (2.18 ± 0.35) cm, respectively, indicating no significant difference was evident (P gt; 0.05). All the 21 patients had good prognosis and no major operative compl ication occurred. Conclusion PRSS is an effective instrumentation for the management of scol iosis. After the removal of the PRSS, the correction of scol iosis can be maintained, and the spinal mobil ity can be protected and restored.
目的:观察在青少年脊柱侧凸患者中术前实施综合性呼吸操锻炼的临床效果方法:选取46例伴有不同程度肺功能障碍的青少年脊柱侧弯患者作为研究对象,对其自入院后第一天即开始实施综合性呼吸操锻炼,观察术前肺功能的变化情况及术后肺部并发症的发生情况。结果:锻炼后患者肺活量(VC)、肺容量(TLC)、用力肺活量(FVC)、最大通气量(MVV),等肺功能指标较锻炼前有明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);术后血氧饱和度gt;95%;无肺部并发症发生。结论:入院后即进行综合性呼吸操锻炼能在近期有效改善患者肺功能,提高患者对脊柱矫形手术的耐受力,对预防和减少术后肺部感染以及呼吸功能不全的发生有积极作用。
Patients with severe aortic stenosis will gradually develop symptoms of heart failure. Aortic valve replacement is an effective treatment at present, while transcatheter aortic valve replacement is suitable for high-risk elderly patients. This article reports a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis and severe scoliosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Detailed preoperative evaluation and avoidance of peripheral vascular injury were the characteristics of this case. The patient was an elderly male with severe scoliosis. After fully evaluating the risks and benefits of surgery, a surgical strategy was formulated. The patient was in the supine position to complete the preoperative CT, and then the long sheath was used to pass through the thoracoabdominal aortic angle during the operation. After angiography-assisted adjustment and determination of the optimal release angle, the valve was accurately released, and the operation went smoothly without serious peripheral vascular damage.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of exercise intervention in adolescents with mild to moderate idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of exercise intervention in adolescents with mild to moderate AIS from inception to November 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 638 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that exercise intervention significantly improved the Cobb angle of the spine in patients with AIS (MD=−1.65, 95%CI −2.63 to −0.68, P<0.01), reduced the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) (MD=−0.68, 95%CI −0.96 to −0.40, P<0.01), and increased their forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD=0.63, 95%CI 0.10 to 1.15, P=0.02). However, there was no statistically significant improvement in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) or the ratio of FEV1/FVC between the two groups. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the exercise intervention could improve the Cobb angle of the spine, reduce ATR and enhance FVC. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To introduce operation skill of the spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach for correction of severe rigid scol iosis and to discuss the selection of the indications and the range of fusion and fixation. Methods Between July 1999 and January 2009, 23 patients with severe rigid scol iosis were treated with spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach, including 16 congenital scol iosis, 5 idiopathic scol iosis, and 2 neurofibromatosis scol iosis. There were 11 males and 12 females with a median age of 15 years (range, 8-29 years). Two patients had previous surgery history. The Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis before operation were (85.39 ± 13.51)° and (56.78 ± 17.69)°, respectively. The mean spinal flexibil ity was 14.4% (range, 4.7%-22.5%). The trunk shift was (15.61 ± 4.89) mm. The preoperative CT or MRI showed bony septum in the canal in 2 patients. Results The mean operative time was 241 minutes and the mean blood loss was 1 452 mL. The average fused vertebrae were 10.7 segaments (range, 8-14 segaments). The follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years with an average of 2 years and 6 months. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (38.70 ± 6.51)°, the average correction rate was 54.7%. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (27.78 ± 6.01)°, the average correction rate was 51.0%. The trunk shift was improved to (4.69 ± 1.87) mm, the increased height was 5.2 cm on average (range, 2.8-7.7 cm). The Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (41.57 ± 6.80)° with an average 2.9° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (30.39 ± 5.94)° with an average 2.6° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the trunk shift was (4.78 ± 2.00) mm at the final follow-up. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis and the trunk shift between preoperation and postoperation, between preoperation and last follow-up. Four cases had pedicle fracture, 1 had L1 nerve root injury, 2 had superior mesenteric artery syndrome, 1 had exudates of incision, and 2 had temporary dysfunction of both lower extremity. Conclusion Spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach is a rel iable and safe surgical technique for correcting severe rigid scol iosis. With segmental pedical screw fixation, both the spinal balance and stabil ity can be restored.
ObjectiveTo analyze the pressure change and distribution of the intervertebral disc of upper thoracic spine in vertical pressure and 5° flexion, extension, or lateral bending. MethodsTwelve thoracolumbar spinal specimens were harvested from mini pigs and were divided into 2 groups (n=6). T1, 2, T3, 4, T5, 6, and T7, 8 segments were included in one group, and T2, 3, T4, 5, T6, 7, and T8, 9 segments were included in the other group. The data from both groups represented the complete upper thoracic vertebra data. Biomechanical machine and pressure sensitive film were used to measure the pressure on the vertebral columns under loadings of 100, 150, and 200 N in vertical pressures and 5° flexion, extension, or lateral bending. The pressure change of each intervertebral disc under different loads and in different movement conditions was analyzed. ResultsIn flexion, the anterior annulus pressure of the upper thoracic vertebra increased (P < 0.05), whereas the posterior annulus pressure showed no significant change (P > 0.05) or an increasing trend (P < 0.05). In extension, the anterior annulus pressure of the upper thoracic vertebra decreased (P < 0.05), whereas the posterior annulus pressure decreased (P < 0.05) or had no obvious change (P > 0.05). In lateral bending, the pressure on the concave side of the annulus increased significantly (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe upper thoracic vertebra has unique biomechanical characteristics under different loadings; moreover, the posterior vertebral structure plays an important role in the movement of the upper thoracic vertebral segment and pressure distribution. In lateral bending of the upper thoracic vertebra, the concave side pressure will increase significantly, which suggests that asymmetrical force is an important cause of scoliosis progression. Gravity plays an important role in the progression of scoliosis.
目的 探讨比较色努式脊柱侧弯矫形器佩戴时间及功能锻炼对矫正治疗效果的影响。 方法 将2004年7月－20011年7月收治的126例脊柱侧弯患者，按自愿选择分为试验组和对照组，试验组佩戴色努式脊柱侧弯矫形器18～20 h，功能锻炼＞90 min；对照组佩戴侧弯矫形器23 h，功能锻炼30～60 min。对比两组患者治疗前后的Cobb角、顶椎偏离中线距离（AVT）、顶椎旋转度(AVR)、躯干位移（TS）、脊柱柔韧性及肺功能指标的改善。 结果 经X线检查测定，治疗后两组患者的Cobb角、AVT、AVR、TS均低于治疗前（P＜0.01），且试验组明显低于对照组（P＜0.01）。肺功能指标：试验组治疗后肺活量（VC)、第1秒钟用力呼气容积（FEV1）、用力肺活量（FVC）、肺总量（TLC），等均高于治疗前，残气量（RV）低于治疗前（P＜0.01），对照组治疗后VC、FEV1、FVC、TLC均低于治疗前，RV高于治疗前（P＜0.01），且试验组优于对照组（P＜0.01）。功能位Cobb角：两组患者的功能位主弯Cobb角、代偿弯Cobb角均低于治疗前（P＜0.01），且试验组明显低于对照组（P＜0.01）。 结论 色努式脊柱侧弯矫形器每天佩戴18～20 h，并结合适当的体操疗法，呼吸、肌力训练及麦肯基力学疗法，可使肺功能、腰背部肌力、脊柱柔韧性、身体的协调性、以及平衡能力得到改善，从而达到脊柱侧弯治疗的较好效果。
Objective To investigate the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation in the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Methods The clinical data of 46 patients with AIS who were treated with orthopedics, bone graft fusion, and internal fixation via posterior approach between June 2018 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 22 cases were treated with robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation (robot group) and 24 cases with manual pedicle screw implantation without robot assistance (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, Lenke classification, and preoperative Cobb angle of the main curve, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, pedicle screw implantation time, intraoperative pedicle screw adjustment times, and VAS and JOA scores after operation were recorded. The Cobb angle of the main curve was measured on X-ray film and the spinal correction rate was calculated. The screw position and the accuracy of screw implantation were evaluated on CT images. Results The operation completed successfully in the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss, pedicle screw implantation time, and pedicle screw adjustment times in the robot group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of poor wound healing in the robot group and 2 cases of mild nerve root injury and 2 cases of poor incision healing in the control group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.667). All patients in the two groups were followed up 3-9 months (mean, 6.4 months). The VAS and JOA scores at last follow-up in the two groups were superior to those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the difference of pre- and post-operative scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The imaging review showed that 343 screws were implanted in the robot group and 374 screws in the control group. There were significant differences in pedicle screw implantation classification and accuracy between the two groups (89.5% vs 79.1%)(Z=−3.964, P=0.000; χ2=14.361, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the Cobb angles of the main curve in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.05), and there was significant difference in the difference of pre- and post-operative Cobb angles between the two groups (t=0.999, P=0.323). The spinal correction rateswere 79.82%±5.33% in the robot group and 79.62%±5.58% in the control group, showing no significant difference (t=0.120, P=0.905). Conclusion Compared with manual pedicle screw implantation, robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation in AIS surgery is safer, less invasive, and more accurate.
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the main points of techniques and ranges of fusion in posterior operation ofdegenerated lumbar scol iosis compl icated spinal stenosis. Methods From February 2001 to September 2006, 23 cases with degenerated lumbar scol iosis stenosis were treated by posterior operation. There were 9 males and 14 females, with the average age of 65.3 years (ranging from 52 years to 71 years). The course of the diseases was 4 to 8 years. All patients were presented with severe low back pain. All patients were measured for Cobb angle of curves(17° to 53°), and lordosis angle of lumbar (-20° to -10° 10 cases, -40° to -20° 13 cases). Ten cases in which Cobb angle was smaller than 20° were operated by l imited segmental decompression of spinal canal, posterior intervertebral fusion and short transpedical instrument fixation. For the rest 13 cases in which Cobb angle was bigger than 20° were operated by canal decompression, longer instrument for scol iosis correction, intervertebral fusion and posterior-lateral fusion. The fixation and fusion were located at L4-S1 in 6 cases, L1-5 in 5, L2-5 in 4, L1-S1 in 5, L2-S1 in 2 and T10-S1 in 1. Results There was no patient who died from the operation. Average Cobb angle in coronal plane was 0° to 21° with the average of 15.6°. The lumbar lordosis angle was -48.0° to -18.2° with the average of -36.4°. There were 21 cases (91%) with sciatica and intermittent claudication who were clearly released. There were 20 cases (87%) whose low back pain intensely decreased. Three cases with drop-foot returned to normal activities. During the mean 15-month (6 to 54 months) follow-up for 23 cases, there was no change of corrected results and fusion rate was 100%. Conclusion For degenerated lumbar scol iosis patients, the most important purpose of the treatment is to improve cl inical symptoms through sufficient decompression of neural structures. Lumbar stabil ization reconstruction and benign spinal biomechanics l ine conduce to longterm curative effect. Overall estimate of the cl inical appearances and imageology characters is necessary when the decision, that segments are needed to be fixed and fused should be made. The strategy of the individual ized treatment may be the best choice.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of decompression and short fusion or long fusion for degenerative scoliosis (DS) with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 50 patients with DS who were treated with decompression combined with short fusion or long fusion between January 2015 and May 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into long fusion group (fixed segments>3, 23 cases) and short fusion group (fixed segments≤3, 27 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic title (PT), and sacral slope (SS) between the two groups (P>0.05); however, the VAS score of low back pain, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in long fusion group were significantly higher than those in short fusion group (P<0.05), and the lumbar lordosis (LL) was significantly lower than that in short fusion group (t=2.427, P=0.019). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, hospital stay, and complications were recorded and compared. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes before operation and at last follow-up. X-ray films of the whole spine in standard standing position were taken before operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the spino-pelvic parameters were measured.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the short fusion group were significantly less than those in the long fusion group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (t=0.933, P=0.355). The patients were followed up 12-46 months with an average of 22.3 months. At last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Except for the improvement of VAS score of low back pain (t=8.332, P=0.000), the differences of the improvements of the other scores between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). The Cobb angle, SVA, TLK, and PT significantly decreased, while SS and LL significantly increased in the long fusion group (P<0.05), while the Cobb angle and PT significantly decreased and SS significantly increased in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in spino-pelvic parameters between the two groups at 6 months after operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The improvements of Cobb angle, SVA, LL, PT, and SS in the long fusion group were significantly higher than those in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in both groups. The incidence of complications in the long fusion group was 34.8% (8/23), which was significantly higher than that in the short fusion group [11.1% (3/27)] (χ2=4.056, P=0.034).ConclusionThe DS patients with the Cobb angle of 20-40°can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and improve the spino-pelvic parameters by choosing appropriate fixation levels. Short fusion has less surgical trauma and fewer complications, whereas long fusion has more advantages in enhancing spino-pelvic parameters and relieving low back pain.