Objective To comment the diagnosis and treatment the bile leakage from the injuried abnormal minute biliary in our laparosicopic cholecystectomy (LC) practice. Methods Fourteen cases of minute biliary duct injury in 2 050 cases of LC were studied retrospectively. Among them, 6 cases had been found the points of leakage during operation, and the points were treated by titanium nips. In 4 cases even though the bile leakage could be seen, but the points of leakage could not found, and were treated by drainage. Four cases with peritonitis, 1 needed to be explored, and treated with suture ligature, 1 was explored by laparoscopy again, another two cases were treated with multiple hole catheters to drainage of the abdominal cavities through stab wounds. Results All 14 cases recovered. Conclusion Small bile leakage in LC is almost inevitable. It is the best that the bile leakage can be discovered during operation and to be treated. If it is discovered after operation, an open or laparoscopic exploratory laparotomy and adequate drainage would be needed. In the case of small amount of leakage, catheter drainage through stab wound is feasible.
目的 探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查及内镜治疗在腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)术前、术后的应用价值。 方法 对61例拟行LC的患者术前或术后行ERCP检查，发现异常再行内镜治疗。结果 LC术前行ERCP者42例中39例显影，其中37例伴有其他胆管疾病，占94.9%。术后行ERCP者19例均显影，总的插管成功率为95.1%。LC术前或术后42例行EST治疗，4例行EPBD，2例行ERBD，15例行ENBD，另4例在行ERCP检查后改开腹手术，取石成功率为92.9%。结论 诊治性ERCP在LC前、后的应用，对进一步明确诊断、选择手术方式、预防LC的并发症和提高LC的成功率具有重要价值。
目的 探讨小针钳辅助下经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）的可行性及手术要点。方法 回顾性分析2009年3月至2011年10月期间我院使用常规腹腔镜器械实施的30 例小针钳辅助下经脐单孔LC的临床资料。结果 30例手术均获成功，手术时间30～60min （平均45min），术中出血5～100ml （平均30ml），未放置引流管，术后均无胆汁漏、出血、切口感染等并发症发生。结论 利用普通腹腔镜器械行经脐单孔LC是可以安全完成的，具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、疤痕不明显等优点。
目的 结合腹腔镜手术的特点，设计出部分顺逆结合法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)，总结该法的应用体会。方法 介绍部分顺逆结合法LC的方法。在1 250例LC中有255例采用部分顺逆结合法切除胆囊，其中慢性胆囊炎146例，急性、亚急性胆囊炎65例，慢性萎缩性胆囊炎44例。结果 所有患者均获痊愈。术中发现胆囊三角区细小副肝管4例，胆汁渗漏3例，均予妥善处理，无严重并发症发生。结论 该法吸取了开腹顺逆结合法胆囊切除术的优点，又符合腹腔镜手术的特点，适用于胆囊三角解剖结构不清者的手术。该法对发现解剖变异及避免胆管损伤有一定的作用。
From the March of 1993 to the May of 1994, we had performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for 200 patients of the age ranged 19-77 years. In these cases, 12 had previous abdominal surgery; 3 cases had hepatic cysts; 11 cases had stones in the neck of gall bladders. We had successfully performed LC for 190 cases (95%). But we also had some unsuccesful experiences, including accidental injury to the stomach or duodenum, and bleeding from cystic arteris of the gallbladder. Operation (LC) was abandoned in one patient because of severe cardiac arrhyshmia developed during operation, and billiary tract injury was found postoperatively in three patients with no postoperative death. The operative indications and technical problems of LC are discussed in detail and measures in avoiding injury to billiary or GI tract from LC are introduced.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety, cost, and patient satisfaction of ambulatory laparo-scopic cholecystectomy(ALC). MethodsThe clinical data of patients who divided into ALC group(678 cases) and in-patient laparoscopic cholecystectomy(IPLC) group(1 534 cases) in our hospital from April 2011 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, hospitalization time, cost of hospi-talization, rehospitalization rate, and patient satisfaction were analyzed and evaluated. ResultsThere were no significant differences of the operative time, postoperative complication rate, and rehospitalization rate between the 2 groups(P > 0.05). The conversion rate(0.44%), and hospitalization time[(1.2±0.5)d] of the ALC group were significantly lower or shorter than those of IPLC group[3.19%, (4.8±1.3) d], P < 0.05. The direct, indirect health care costs, and the total costs of the ALC group were (6 555.6±738.7), (230.0±48.0), and (8 856.0±636.0) yuan, respec-tively; and lower than those of the IPLC group[(7 863.71, 014.6), (973.0±136.5), and(8 856.0±636.0)yuan], P < 0.05. ConclusionALC is safe and feasible, and could shorten the hospitalization time, lower the medical cost, speed up the bed turnover, and increase the efficiency in the use of health resource.
目的总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）中预防胆管损伤的经验。方法回顾分析1995年10月至2002年9月LC2 694例临床资料。结果行LC 2 657例，其中加做肠瘘修补术； 1例坏疽性胆囊炎伴周围粘连致密者行胆囊造瘘术； 3例术中冰冻切片病理检查证实为胆囊癌，开腹行胆囊癌根治术； 1例术中发现胆囊癌晚期，仅行腹腔镜下活检术； 3例因术中出血，24例因炎症致密、胆管结构解剖不清或胆总管结石嵌顿中转开腹； 5例Mirizzi’s综合征Ⅱ型均中转开腹行瘘口修补、T管引流术。有5例因术后并发症行再次手术。无一例出现胆管损伤。结论为降低胆管损伤，术者应根据自身的器械设备、经验，合理掌握手术适应证。在处理炎症致密、胆管结构解剖不清时，可采用顺行、逆行分离结合。使用超声刀解剖，自制推结器结扎或可吸收施夹钳处理胆囊动脉、胆囊管，少用金属钛夹，减少电刀对胆管的直接或间接损伤。坚持以结扎胆囊动脉为先，尽量扩大胆囊三角。如胆管结构解剖不清、出血难止应及时中转开腹。
Objective To explore the nursing effect of using Neiguan acupoint massage combined with chewing gum in patients undergoing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between March 2023 and March 2024. The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group according to a random number table. The control group received routine care, while the intervention group received chewing gum and Neiguan acupoint massage intervention at the P6 acupoint in addition to routine care. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain scores, gastrointestinal function recovery time, medication use, and hospitalization related indicators were compared between the two groups of patients after surgery. Results A total of 298 patients were included. Among them, there were 163 cases in the control group and 135 cases in the intervention group. The incidence of PONV at 0.5 and 2 hours after surgery and the pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The first bowel sounds recovery time, anal exhaust time, and eating time in the intervention group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Twenty-four hours after surgery, the usage rate of analgesic drugs (6.67% vs. 14.11%) and the usage rate of rescue antiemetic drugs (2.96% vs. 8.59%) in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the delayed discharge rate or total cost between the two groups (P>0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (99.26% vs. 93.25%, P<0.05). Conclusions After the combination of Neiguan acupoint massage and chewing gum intervention in patients undergoingin day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the PONV incidence and pain are significantly reduced, gastrointestinal functions recover faster, drug use rate is low, patient nursing satisfaction is high. This method can be promoted and applied.
目的 探讨联合后-前胆囊三角入路在腹腔镜胆囊切除中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析我院2007年1月至2010年1月期间经联合后-前胆囊三角入路解剖胆囊管及胆囊动脉行腹腔镜胆囊切除的240例患者的临床资料。结果 238例患者安全地完成腹腔镜胆囊切除，术中出血4例，均于镜下止血成功； 中转开腹2例。全组无胆管损伤，发生漏胆2例，经引流自愈。结论 联合后-前胆囊三角入路解剖胆囊管及胆囊动脉行腹腔镜胆囊切除是一种安全、容易掌握的手术方法。
ObjectiveTo investigate the importance of nursing observation and intervention for extrahepatic bile duct stones with gallbladder stones treated by electronic duodenoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsFrom July 2011 to February 2014, 157 patients with extrahepatic bile duct stones with gallbladder stones underwent EST and LC at the same time in our department. Combined with the surgery characteristics, we focused on the close observation and nursing of postoperative complications and drainage tubes for patients' timely recovery. ResultsOne patient with duodenal diverticulum papilla did not complete EST and LC surgery, which was then transformed to LC, bile duct incision and choledochoscopy with T tube drainage. All the remaining 156 patients completed endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and LC with a completion rate of 99.36%. Under close observation and careful nursing care, this group of patients did not have duodenum perforation, bile leakage or other complications. No patient died. Seven to thirteen days after hospitalization, all the patients were cured and discharged from the hospital. ConclusionFor patients undergoing EST and LC at the same time, observation and timely intervention are very important in reducing serious complications, improving the quality of surgery, enhancing patients' comfort, and promoting postoperative recovery.