ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of condom use before and after AIDS behaviour intervention among Chinese unlicensed prostitutes. MethodsDatabases such as PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2014), VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched to collect nationally/internationally-published before-after studies about the effects of condom use before and after aids behaviour intervention among Chinese unlicensed prostitutes up to June 1st, 2014. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. ResultsA total of 26 studies were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:significant differences were found at two points of "use condoms in the latest sex behaviour" (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.82, P<0.05) and "use condoms every time in the latest month" (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.70, P<0.05) before and after intervention. ConclusionAIDS behaviour intervention can significantly promote condom use in Chinese unlicensed prostitutes, which is effective in the prevention of AIDS.
目的 了解艾滋病高发区医务人员血源防护情况以及培训所取得的效果。 方法 采用自行设计的问卷，对凉山州某医院参加培训的职工进行培训前后调查。 结果 培训前89人参加调查，培训后93人参加调查；女性、护士和初级职称者占绝大多数；培训前调查参加者中84.3%接受过预防锐器伤培训，79.8%工作中被锐器刺伤，38.2%报告过职业暴露，95.5%接种过乙肝疫苗；6道知识考核题培训后答对率比培训前均有不同程度的提高，其中4道比较具有统计学上的意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 该院医务人员已具备一定职业防护意识，对一些知识点掌握较好，但培训强化可提高职业暴露报告依从性和预防治疗及时性，更好维护艾滋病高发区医务人员的职业健康。
With the widespread adoption of antiretroviral therapy, vast improvements in the life expectancy of individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were seen, and the liver disease of this population has become a leading cause of mortality. Although liver transplantation is as an effective treatment for end-stage liver disease, it remains in its nascent stage for the patients with HIV/AIDS in China, lacking standardized protocols and substantial clinical experience. Therefore, a “Multicenter expert consensus on perioperative management of liver transplantation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection” was formulated. This expert consensus aims to standardize and optimize the diagnosis and treatment process for liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients, providing systematic guidance for this procedure in China and fostering multidisciplinary collaboration and development in the field. This expert consensus clearly delineates the indications and contraindications for liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients, emphasizing comprehensive preoperative evaluations of both donors and recipients. These evaluations include infection control measures, immune function monitoring, and management of comorbidities. In terms of surgical procedures, strategies to prevent occupational exposure and intraoperative guidelines are outlined. Postoperatively, the focus is on antiviral therapy, individualized immunosuppression management, and vigilant monitoring of complications to ensure patient recovery and long-term survival. The long-term follow-up management prioritizes regular assessments of liver function, immune status, and HIV-related indicators to adjust treatment plans and enhance patient survival rates and quality of life. With the continuous enrichment of clinical experience and the progress of clinical research, this consensus will be continuously updated.
ObjectiveTo translate evidence of "HIV/AIDS Clinical Nursing Practice Guideline" into clinical practice, in order to reduce the incidence and severity of symptoms of AIDS and to improve the quality of life of patients. MethodsWe integrated the best evidence into the HIV/AIDS inpatient unit of a tertiary hospital for infectious disease in Shanghai, China between September 2013 and February 2015. Based on the "Ottawa Model of Research Use", this study was divided into four stages: evaluating the status quo, building the evidence-based strategy, applying evidence-based decision-making, and evaluating results and reflecting. 148 patients were either assigned to an intervention group with HIV/AIDS-related symptom management protocol (n=74), or to a usual care group (n=74) for the duration of their antiretroviral therapy. Then Medical Outcomes Questionnaire (MOS-HIV) were applied to evaluate the life quality after intervention. ResultsMixed-effects regression indicated significant difference between groups across time in total MOS-HIV score. The intervention group increased more than the control group 2.72 points in total MOS-HIV scores per month (P<0.05). ConclusionThe evidence-translation and evidence-based decision-making of "HIV/AIDS Clinical Nursing Practice Guideline" can regulate nurse behavior, raise the quality of clinical care and improve the patients' quality of life.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on improving depression, medication adherence and quality of life in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV). MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2013), Ovid-JBI, PubMed, EMbase, PsycARTICLES, CBM and CNKI to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on improving depression, medication adherence and quality of life in PLHIV from the establishment dates to April 30th 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2. ResultsA total of 17 RCTs were included, involving 2 163 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that CBT significantly improved PLHIV's depression (SMD=-0.26, 95%CI-0.41 to-0.10, P=0.001), and quality of life (SMD=-0.57, 95%CI-1.04 to-0.11, P=0.02) in 6 months. Meanwhile, CBT significantly improved PLHIV's medication adherence (WMD=3.98, 95%CI 1.67 to 6.30, P=0.000 8) in the long term. ConclusionCBT is efficacious in improving PLHIV's depression and quality of life in the short term, and improving medication adherence in the long term, compared to standard care.
Objective To evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of clinical guidelines and consensus for adult AIDS. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were electronically searched and major guideline websites such as GIN, NICE, NGC and Yimaitong were also searched to collect guidelines and consensus for adult AIDS from inception to December 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four reviewers evaluated the methodological and reporting quality of the included guidelines and consensus by using AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT, respectively. Results A total of 17 adult AIDS guidelines and consensus were included. The average scores of AGREE Ⅱ in various domains were 59.48% for scope and purpose, 37.17% for stakeholder involvement, 30.76% for rigor of development, 74.75% for clarity of presentation, 35.54% for applicability, and 50.49% for editorial independence. The items with the highest reporting rate among the RIGHT evaluation items were 1a, 1b and 1c (100.00%), followed by 3 and 4 (94.12%), 13a and 13b (88.24%), 7b and 11a (76.47%), and 5 (64.71%), and the remaining items were all reported below 60%. Results of subgroup analysis showed that the clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence of the guidelines for adult AIDS expressed in AGREE Ⅱ and the average score of RIGHT were higher than those of the consensuses for adult AIDS; the average scores of guidelines and consensuses based on evidence-based medicine in five domains of AGREE Ⅱ (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation and applicability) and RIGHT were higher than those based on expert opinions or reviews. The foreign guidelines and consensus had higher average scores in the six domains of AGREE Ⅱ and the RIGHT score than the domestic guidelines. Conclusion The methodological quality and reporting quality of the published clinical guidelines and consensuses for adult AIDS is low; in particular, there is a certain gap between the national and international guidelines and consensuses. It is suggested that future guideline developers should refer to international standards, such as AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT, formulate high-quality guidelines and promote their application to better regulate the diagnosis and treatment of adult AIDS.