ObjectiveTo analyze the occurrence of arrhythmia in patients during the recovery period of anesthesia, in order to take appropriate measures in nursing care to ensure the safety of patients. Method We carried out a retrospective analysis of 18 931 general anesthesia post-operative patients (aged 16-84 years old) transferred to anesthesia recovery from September 2012 to July 2013, and we observed the incidence rate of arrhythmia, and documented the clinical manifestations of the patients. ResultsDuring the anesthesia recovery, out of 18 931 general anesthesia postoperative patients, 269 cases of arrhythmia occurred, and the incidence rate was 1.42%. Twenty minutes after nursing intervention and use of medication, the difference of systolic blood pressure, bradycardic heart rate, and tachycardic heart rate of the patients were statistically better than those beofre the treatment (P＜ 0.05) . ConclusionEarly discovery and analysis of arrhythmia in patients during anesthesia recovery, along with timely provision of analgesic and antiarrhythmic treatment can effectively improve the circulation status of the patients, thus ensure the safety of the patients during anesthesia recovery.
Objective To explore the emergence agitation resulting from postoperative indwelling urethral catheters in patients of thoracic surgery. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 140 patients who were scheduled for thoracic surgery under general anesthesia in West China Hospital from January through April 2014. These patients were divided into two groups including a control group and a trial group with 70 patients in each group. The patients in the control group had indwelled urethral catheter routinely. The catheter removed after the surgery at operation room in the trial group. Intraoperative urinary volume, emergence agitation (EA) occurrence, postoperative urinary retention, and urethral irritation were recorded. Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative urinary retention rate between the control group and the trial group (1.43% vs. 2.86%, P=0.230). However, the urethral irritation rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the trial group (12.86% vs. 0.00%, P=0.012) . And there was a statistical difference in adverse event rate (2.86% vs. 0.00%, P=0.039) between the two groups. There was a significantly higher incidence of urethral irritation in male patients (20.51%, 8/39) than female patients (3.23%, 1/31, P=0.033).The rate of EA in the control group was significantly higher than that in the trial group (28.57% vs. 12.86%, P=0.010). There was a significantly higher EA rate in the patients who had urethral irritation by postoperative indwelling catheters compared with those without indwelling catheters (45.00% vs. 12.86%, P=0.043). Conclusion This study suggests that postoperative EA is a result from urethral irritation than local pain, and the EA rate can be decreased by removal of catheter before anaesthetic recovery.
目的:比较舒芬太尼与芬太尼复合七氟烷麻醉在神经外科手术中对血流动力学、拔管时间、苏醒时间及术后疼痛情况的影响。方法:择期开颅手术患者60例,随机分为舒芬太尼(S)组和芬太尼(F)组,每组30例。将S和F的效能比定为10:l,复合咪唑安定、维库溴胺、异丙酚来进行麻醉诱导;麻醉维持均复合七氟烷。分别记录麻醉前、诱导后、插管时和拔管时血压和心率变化;呼吸恢复、睁眼和拔管时间以及拔管后半小时疼痛评分(VAS评分)。结果:两组麻醉诱导后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)均较诱导前有显著性下降(Plt;0．05)。F组插管及拔管时,血流动力学变化均较S组有显著性升高(Plt;0.05)。S组苏醒期呼吸恢复、睁眼、拔管时间较F组明显缩短;拔管后半小时疼痛评分(VAS评分)S组低于F组。结论:与芬太尼相比,等效剂量的舒芬太尼用于脑外科手术患者麻醉诱导可更有效地减轻全麻诱导气管插管时的心血管反应;在麻醉苏醒期,更有利于呼吸管理及术后镇痛。舒芬太尼在神经外科麻醉中具有很好的临床应用价值。