Objective To understand the latest research progress of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Method The literature on the efficacy of different treatment drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer in recent years both domestically and internationally was retrieved and reviewed. Results There had been many clinical research progress in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, new drugs had emerged, targeted drugs were particularly prominent, and more trials of therapeutic drugs and drug combination treatment regimens were also being carried out. Different treatment methods were applied to patients according to the mutation status of RAS/RAF and the expression of mismatch repair protein, the survival benefit varied greatly. Conclusion Precision medicine is becoming increasingly important, screening patients to choose appropriate treatment modality can further improve survival benefit.
Objective To determine the efficacy of radioisotopes to control metastasic pain in patients with tumor bone metastases and complications due to bone metastases (hypercalcaemia, bone fracture and spinal cord compression). The effectiveness of radioisotopes in relation to patient survival and adverse effects were also assessed. Methods MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005),EMBASE (1966 to April 2005), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2005) and CBMdisc (1979 to April 2005) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were extracted by two reviewers using a designed extraction form. The quality of included RCTs was critically assessed. RevMan 4.2 software was used for data analysis. Results Four RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that small dose of radioisotopes couldn’t control metastatic pain in short term(2 months) with relative risk (RR) 1.13, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 3.76, but large dose can significantly control metastatic pain in medium term(6 month) with RR 1.90, 95％CI 1.23 to 2.92; no evidence was available to assess long term(≥12 months) effects. No study provided data on quality of life, mortality, bone metastatic complications (hypercalcaemia, bone fracture) and analgesic use etc. Leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were secondary effects associated with the administration of radioisotopes. The incidences of leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly greater in patients treated by radioisotopes with RR 8.28, 95％CI 2.24 to 30.67, and RR 3.70, 95％CI 1.59 to 9.04, respectively. Conclusions There is some evidence indicating that large dose of radioisotopes can relieve metastatic bone pain over one to six months, but adverse effects, particularly leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, have also been experienced.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the prognostic value of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in non-metastatic breast cancer patients. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data, CNKI and CBM for collecting cohort studies about the prognostic relevance of CTCs in the peripheral blood of stage I to Ⅲ breast cancer patients from inception to March 20th, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 1 780 patients were eligible for final analyses. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the presence of CTCs was associated with both poor DFS (RR=2.24, 95%CI 1.92 to 2.61, P < 0.000 01) and OS (RR=2.55, 95%CI 1.99 to 3.28, P < 0.000 01). The results of subgroup analysis by detection time of CTCs showed that CTCs detected before and after adjuvant chemotherapy was a statistically significant prognostic factor (P≤0.000 4). ConclusionCTCs is an adverse prognostic factor in non-metastatic breast cancer patients, which is not significantly influenced by adjuvant chemotherapy.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo explore the effect of surgical treatment of metastatic hepatic cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and eight patients with metastatic hepatic cancer received surgical treatment in our department during the past seven years, and their information were analyzed retrospectively in this paper. The ages of these patients ranged from 19 years to 82 years, and 133 of them were male, 75 of them were female. Two of them were complicated with hepatocirrhosis, and 5 with polycystic liver. The metastatic cancer originated from gastrointestinal tract in 121 cases (58.2%), and from other parts of the body in 87 cases (41.8%). One hundred and sixteen of the patients received resection treatment (resection group), and 92 of them received nonresecton treatment (nonresection group). The survival rates of the two groups were compared through Chi square test.ResultsThe 1, 3 and 5year survival rates for all patients were 56.3%,23.1% and 13.0%, respectively. The 1, 3 and 5year survival rates were 74.1%,39.7% and 23.3% in the resection group respectively and 33.7%， 2.2% and 0 in the nonresection group， respectively. Resection group had a higher survival rate than that of the nonresection group (P＜0.05). The main postoperative complications include pulmonary infection (6 cases), subphrenic infection (2 cases), incisional infection (4 cases).ConclusionSurgical resection is an effective treatment method for the patients with metastatic hepatic cancer. Resection should be conducted as long as they could withstand the surgery.
Objective To assess the value of arsenious acid in treatment for metastatic liver cancer and inspect its adverse reaction through comparison between the therapeutic effect of arsenious acid-FOLFOX4 combined chemotherapy and that of single FOLFOX4 chemotherapy. Methods Twenty-six patients with metastatic liver cancer were selected from July 2006 to December 2007 in Huadong Hospital. All the cases were averagely divided into therapy group and control group randomly, arsenious acid combined FOLFOX4 chemotherapy was performed in therapy group and single FOLFOX4 chemotherapy in control group. Results The total of 26 cases completed at least 2 cycles of arsenious acid-FOLFOX4 combined chemotherapy or single FOLFOX4 chemotherapy. During 6-24 months follow-up (median 12.5 months), the average survival time of the therapy group was 242 d, the median survival time was 281 d, and the average survival time of the control group was 227 d, the median survival time was 246 d, there was no statistical difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). Pain: There were 2 cases of complete remission (CR), 5 cases of partial remission (PR), 2 cases of stable disease (SD) in therapy group, the objective effect (CR+PR+SD) was 9 cases. There were 1 case of CR, 3 cases of PR, 2 cases of SD in control group, the objective effect (CR+PR+SD) was 6 cases. Objective efficacy: There were no CR cases in two groups. In therapy group, there were 5 cases of PR, 6 cases of NC, 2 cases of PD, the objective effect (CR+PR) was 5 cases, the benefit (CR+PR+NC) was 11 cases. In control group, there were 2 cases of PR, 4 cases of NC, 7 cases of PD, the objective effect (CR+PR) was 2 cases, the benefit (CR+PR+NC) was 6 cases. There was no significant difference of the objective effect between two groups (Pgt;0.05), but the benefit was significantly different (Plt;0.05). The major toxic reactions were digestive tract side effect, hepatic and hematological toxicity in two groups. Conclusions Arsenious acid-FOLFOX4 combined chemotherapy can lead to good therapeutic effect. Arsenious acid will not increase the adverse reaction of normal chemotherapy.
ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of capacitance combined with irinotecan (CAPIRI) versus fluorouracil combined with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. MethodsDatabases such as Pubmed, Embase, Wanfang data, CNKI, Cochran Library were searched from January 2000 to October 2015. We evaluated the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and then extracted data from them. RevMan 5.2 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. ResultsEight RCTs studies with 1 634 advanced metastatic colorectal cancer patients were included based on our standard. CAPIRI regimen was equal to FOLFIRI regimen in complete response rate [RR=1.17, 95%CI (0.70, 1.96), P=0.56], overall respond rate [RR=0.90, 95%CI (0.79, 1.03), P=0.12], disease control rate [RR=0.93, 95%CI (0.87, 1.00), P=0.06], median progression-free survival [HR=1.00, 95%CI (0.72, 1.37), P=0.99], and median overall survival [HR=0.94, 95%CI (0.63, 1.40), P=0.77]. For safety, higher incidence rate of grade 3/4 vomiting [RR=1.91, 95%CI (1.13, 3.22), P=0.02], diarrhea [RR=2.84, 95%CI (2.22, 3.63), P<0.000 01], hand-foot syndrome [RR=4.55, 95%CI (2.15, 9.61), P<0.000 1] were confirmed for CAPIRI. The two methods had similar toxicities: nausea [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.64, 0.93), P=0.005], fatigue [RR=1.19, 95%CI (0.73, 1.94), P=0.47], febrile neutropenia [RR=1.59, 95%CI (0.89, 2.87), P=0.12], anemia [RR=1.74, 95%CI (0.59, 5.18), P=0.32], and leukopenia [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.64, 0.93), P=0.005]. ConclusionCapecitabine combined with irinotecan treatment for advanced colorectal cancer is effective and its toxicity is acceptable.