west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "锤状指" 14 results
  • CHRONIC MALLET FINGER: REPAIR BY TENDON FLAP GRAFT

    Through dissection of 12 fresh finger specimens, the anatomy of the distal part of dorsal aponeurosis and its function was closely observed. A direct reparative procedure of the terminal tendon by using tendon flap graft was deseribed for the treatment of chronic mallet finger deformity. Correction of deformity, restoration of active motion of DIP and avoidance of residual pain were observed in three clinical cases.

    Release date:2016-09-01 11:37 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 双套圈缝合法加镶嵌式腱片移植治疗锤状指

    目的 总结双套圈缝合法加镶嵌式腱片移植治疗锤状指的手术方法及临床效果。 方法 2001 年8 月- 2008 年3 月,收治29 例锤状指患者。男18 例,女11 例;年龄16 ~ 55 岁。左手15 例,右手14 例。其中示指5 例,中指10 例,环指7 例,小指7 例。受伤至手术时间5 h ~ 31 d,平均6.7 d。术中克氏针固定远侧指间关节,肌腱两侧作双套圈缝合,由同侧切取“领奖台”式掌长肌腱片,将腱片两端拉紧后镶嵌于待吻合的肌腱缺损处,与肌腱两断端重叠缝合。 结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无并发症发生。29 例均获随访,随访时间5 ~ 24 个月。肌腱愈合良好,锤状指畸形完全矫正,伤指外形无肿胀,活动无疼痛,不影响工作及生活。根据TAM 系统评定方法:优25 例,良4 例,优良率100%。掌长肌功能无影响。 结论 采用双侧套圈缝合法加镶嵌式腱片移植修复伸指肌腱止点近侧断裂缺损所致锤状指是一种简便、有效的方法。

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Treatment of Wehbe-Schneider typesⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers with one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation with double Kirschner wires

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness of one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation with double Kirschner wires for Wehbe-Schneider types ⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers. Methods Between May 2017 and June 2020, 21 patients with Wehbe-Schneider type ⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers were treated with one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation using double Kirschner wires. There were 15 males and 6 females with an average age of 39.2 years (range, 19-62 years). The causes of injury were sports injury in 9 cases, puncture injury in 7 cases, and sprain in 5 cases. The time from injury to admission was 5-72 hours (mean, 21.0 hours). There were 2 cases of index finger injury, 8 cases of middle finger injury, 9 cases of ring finger injury, and 2 cases of little finger injury. The angle of active dorsiflexion loss of distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) was (40.04±4.02)°. According to the Wehbe-Schneider classification standard, there were 10 cases of typeⅠB and 11 cases of type ⅡB. The Kirschner wire was removed at 6 weeks after operation when X-ray film reexamination showed bony union of the avulsion fracture, and the functional exercise of the affected finger was started. Results The operation time was 35-55 minutes (mean, 43.9 minutes). The length of hospital stay was 2-5 days (mean, 3.4 days). No postoperative complications occurred. All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.8 months). X-ray films reexamination showed that all avulsion fractures achieved bony union after 4-6 weeks (mean, 5.3 weeks). Kirschner wire was removed at 6 weeks after operation. After Kirschner removal, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain during active flexion of the DIPJ was 1-3 (mean, 1.6); the VAS score of pain was 2-5 (mean, 3.1) when the DIPJ was passively flexed to the maximum range of motion. The angle of active dorsiflexion loss of affected finger was (2.14±2.54)°, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative angle (t=52.186, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the active flexion angle between the affected finger (79.52±6.31)° and the corresponding healthy finger (81.90±5.36)° (t=1.319, P=0.195). At 6 months after operation, according to Crawford functional evaluation criteria, the effectiveness was rated as excellent in 11 cases, good in 9, and fair in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 95.24%. Conclusion For Wehbe-Schneider typesⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers, one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation with double Kirschner wires can effectively correct the deformity and has the advantages of simple surgery, no incision, and no influence on the appearance of the affected finger.

    Release date:2022-05-07 02:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of absorbable anchor combined with Kirschner wire in reconstruction of extension function of old mallet finger

    ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of absorbable anchor combined with Kirschner wire fixation in the reconstruction of extension function of old mallet finger. MethodsBetween January 2020 and January 2022, 23 cases of old mallet fingers were treated. There were 17 males and 6 females with an average age of 42 years (range, 18-70 years). The cause of injury included sports impact injury in 12 cases, sprain in 9 cases, and previous cut injury in 2 cases. The affected finger included index finger in 4 cases, middle finger in 5 cases, ring finger in 9 cases, and little finger in 5 cases. There were 18 patients of tendinous mallet fingers (Doyle type Ⅰ), 5 patients were only small bone fragments avulsion (Wehbe type ⅠA). The time from injury to operation was 45-120 days, with an average of 67 days. The patients were treated with Kirschner wire to fix the distal interphalangeal joint in a mild back extension position after joint release. The insertion of extensor tendon was reconstructed and fixed with absorbable anchors. After 6 weeks, the Kirschner wire was removed, and the patients started joint flexion and extension training. Results The postoperative follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months (mean, 9 months). The wounds healed by first intention without complications such as skin necrosis, wound infection, and nail deformity. The distal interphalangeal joint was not stiff, the joint space was good, and there was no complication such as pain and osteoarthritis. At last follow-up, according to Crawford function evaluation standard, 12 cases were excellent, 9 cases were good, 2 cases were fair, and the good and excellent rate was 91.3%. Conclusion Absorbable anchor combined with Kirschner wire fixation can be used to reconstruct the extension function of old mallet finger, which has the advantages of simple operation and less complications.

    Release date:2023-04-11 09:43 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness comparison of open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation for bony mallet finger

    Objective To compare the effectiveness of open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation for bony mallet fingers. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with bony mallet finger who admitted between May 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 cases were in the open group (treated with open reduction and hook plate fixation) and 35 cases were in the closed group (treated with closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, the affected side, the affected finger, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and Wehbé-Schneider classification (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, time of returning to work, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At 12 months after operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the pain of the injured finger, active flexion range of motion and extension deficit of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) were measured by goniometer, and the effectiveness was assessed by Crawford criteria. Results All patients in the two groups were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 15 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the closed group and the open group (P>0.05). The operation time in the closed group was shorter than that in the open group, and the intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the fracture healing time, and the time of returning to work in the closed group were more than those in the open group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). In the closed group, there were 5 cases of pinning tract infection and 3 cases of small area pressure ulcer skin necrosis on the dorsal side of the finger, which were cured after intensive nursing and dressing change. Local nail depression deformity occurred in 7 cases in the open group, and the deformity disappeared after removal of plate. The incisions of the other patients healed uneventfully without complications such as infection, skin necrosis, exposure of the internal fixation, or nail deformity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of skin necrosis between the two groups (P>0.05), but the differences in the incidence of infection and nail deformity between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score, DIP active flexion range of motion, DIP extension deficiency, or Crawford criteria evaluation between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no DIP osteoarthritis and joint degeneration in both groups. Conclusion Open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation have their own advantages and disadvantages, but both of them have good results in the treatment of bony mallet fingers. Open reduction and hook plate fixation is recommended for young patients with bony mallet fingers who are eager to return to work.

    Release date:2024-08-08 09:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 指背侧双纵形切口微型单孔钩状钢板内固定治疗骨性锤状指

    目的总结指背侧双纵行切口微型单孔钩状钢板内固定治疗骨性锤状指的临床疗效。方法2019 年 1 月—2020 年 3 月,采用末节指背侧双纵行切口微型单孔钩状钢板内固定治疗 26 例骨性锤状指患者。男 20 例,女 6 例;年龄 20~68 岁,平均 43.6 岁。Wehbe 和 Schneider 分型:ⅠA 型 2 例,ⅠB 型 5 例,ⅡA 型 3 例,ⅡB 型 12 例,ⅡC 型 4 例。伤后至手术时间 1~7 d,平均 3.5 d。术后 3 个月按 Crowford 评分标准评定功能。结果26 例患者均获随访,随访时间 3~12 个月,平均 6 个月。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,术后 2 个月骨折获骨性愈合。末次随访时 X 线片示无骨关节炎表现,无远侧指间关节脱位及半脱位。术后 3 个月按 Crowford 评分标准,获优 10 例,良 16 例。结论指背侧双纵形切口微型单孔钩状钢板内固定治疗骨性锤状指,可提供坚强内固定、维持解剖对位、术后早期活动远侧指间关节,术后功能恢复良好。

    Release date:2021-01-29 03:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • PERPENDICULAR PIN TRANSFIXION IN THE TREATMENT OF MALLET FINGERS

    Since 1989, 17 cases ( 18 fingers) of mallet finger underwent surgical repair of the extensor tendons of the fingers combined with postoperative perpendicular pin transfixion. The follow-up was through 3 to 8 months. The results were 13 satisfactory, 4 improved and one failure. The method of pin transfixion was introduced in detail, and the classification of mallet fingers and the principles of treatment were discussed in detail, and the classification of mallet fingers and the principles of treatment were discussed.

    Release date:2016-09-01 11:40 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • PALMARIS LONGUS TENDON GRAFT FOR TREATMENT OF OLD MALLET FINGER DEFORMITY

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the terminal extensor tendon reconstrution by palmaris longus tendon graft for the treatment of old mallet finger deformity. Methods Between February 2009 and February 2011, 32 patients with old mallet finger deformity were treated with palmaris longus tendon graft. There were 28 males and 4 females with an average age of 32.5 years (range, 22-58 years). The injury causes included sports injury in 26 cases and punctured injury in 6 cases. The index finger was involved in 8 cases, the middle finger in 3 cases, the ring finger in 16 cases, and the little finger in 5 cases. According to the Rockwell’s classification, all patients were classified as type I. The time from injury to operation was 4-16 weeks (mean, 6 weeks). Results Primary healing was obtained in all incisions; no necrosis, infection, or nail bed injury occurred. All patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The patients had no pain or paresthesia of volar finger. According to Patel’s functional assessment system, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case at last follow-up, with an excellent and good rate of 90.6%. Conclusion Reconstruction of the terminal extensor tendon by palmaris longus tendon graft is a reliable method to treat old mallet finger deformity.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF MICRO-ANCHOR REPAIR AND MODIFIED PULL-OUT SUTURE IN TREATMENT OF MALLET FINGERS

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between micro-anchor repair and modified pull-out suture in the treatment of mallet fingers. MethodsBetween June 2010 and March 2011, 33 patients with mallet fingers were treated by micro-anchor repair method (n=18, group A) and by modified pull-out suture method in which the broken tendons were sutured with double metal needle Bunnell’s suture and a knot was tied palmarly (n=15, group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). ResultsThe operation time was (62.5 ± 3.1) minutes in group A and (65.0 ± 4.6) minutes in group B, showing no significant difference (t=1.85, P=0.07). The treatment expense in group A [(8 566.2 ± 135.0) yuan] was significantly higher than that in group B [(5 297.0 ± 183.5) yuan] (t=58.92, P=0.00). Incision infection occurred in 2 cases of group A and 1 case of group B; the other patients obtained healing of incision by first intention. Relapsed mallet finger was observed in 1 case of group B. All patients in 2 groups were followed up 12-21 months. According to the Crawford functional assessment system, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 10 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case at the last follow-up with an excellent and good rate of 83.3% in group A; the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 9 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 86.7% in group B. There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between 2 groups (χ2=0.23, P=0.97). ConclusionBoth micro-anchor repair and modified pull-out suture are simple and effective methods in the treatment of mallet finger. But compared with micro-anchor repair, pull-out suture has lower expense.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:39 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFECTIVENESS OF PART LONG THUMB EXTENSOR TENDON DORSAL ULNAR ARTERY CHIMERIC FLAP FOR REPAIR OF Doyle TYPE Ⅲ MALLET FINGER OF THUMB

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of part long thumb extensor tendon dorsal ulnar artery chimeric flap for repair of Doyle type Ⅲ mallet finger of thumb. MethodsBetween June 2013 and April 2015, 9 cases of Doyle type Ⅲ mallet finger of thumb were treated, which were caused by planer injury. There were 6 males and 3 females, aged from 15 to 65 years (mean, 36 years). The time from injury to operation was 3-8 hours (mean, 5 hours). All cases had interphalangeal joint dorsal skin and soft tissue defects of the thumb; the skin defects ranged from 2.0 cm×1.5 cm to 2.3 cm×2.3 cm; the extensor tendon defect ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 cm in length (mean, 1.0 cm). The part long thumb extensor tendon dorsal ulnar artery chimeric flap of 3.0 cm×2.5 cm to 3.5 cm×3.0 cm in size was used to reconstruct extensor tendon and wound. The donor site was repaired with nasopharyngeal fossa perforating branches pedicled V-Y relay flap. ResultsAll flaps survived completely and incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 4-12 months (mean, 6 months). The flaps had good color, texture, and contour. At 6 months after operation, the two-point discrimination of chimeric flap was 10-12 mm (mean, 11 mm), and two-point discrimination of relay flap was 12-14 mm (mean, 13 mm). The interphalangeal joint flexion of thumb was 0-40°, and the thumb opposition function was normal. ConclusionPart long thumb extensor tendon dorsal ulnar artery chimeric flap can repair the Doyle type Ⅲ mallet finger of thumb, which has no injury to the artery and nerve. At the same time the relay flap can achieve linear healing, so good appearance and function of the thumb can be obtained.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content