Objective To summarize research progress of postoperative complications of transilluminated powered phlebectomy in treatment of varicose veins. Method The clinical and scientific research about the treatment of varicose veins with transilluminated powered phlebectomy in recent years were searched and the progress of the postoperative complications were reviewed. Results With the evolution of surgical techniques and the accumulation of experience, a variety of translucent resection of the postoperative complications such as the cellulitis, wound abscess, hematoma, residual vein, nerve damage reduced. Conclusions From current development trend, incidence of complications after transilluminated powered phlebectomy might continue to decline. It has a potential to become a mainstream surgical technique for varicose veins in future.
目的 观察高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2008年4月-2009年4月采用高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗32例大隐静脉曲张患者的临床资料，并与2003年-2008年采用传统手术方法治疗的61例患者进行对照分析。 结果 采用高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗的患者1例伤口感染，1例手术后患肢疼痛，3例手术后3个月局部轻度曲张；其余患者下肢症状减轻或消失，手术后1个月复查时活动均无障碍，无下肢深静脉血栓形成，无下肢深静脉损伤发生。高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗与传统手术方法比较具有切口少、出血量小、手术时间短、恢复快、住院时间短、手术后并发症较少、复发率低等优点。 结论 高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗大隐静脉曲张是一种安全有效的治疗方法，与传统手术比较具有明显优势。
目的 总结单纯性大隐静脉曲张的治疗经验。方法 回顾性分析我院2007年3月至2009年11月期间采用改进高位结扎及剥脱术治疗单纯性大隐静脉曲张65例患者的临床资料。结果 本组患者手术时间45～127 min，平均54 min。住院时间5～8 d，平均6.8 d。所有切口均甲级愈合，肿胀不适、沉重感等症状消失，切口皮下无出血、瘀血、血肿，无皮肤麻木等并发症发生。术后随访2～33个月，平均26.9个月，无一例发生深静脉血栓形成，均按期拆线，效果良好，无复发。结论 改进高位结扎剥脱术治疗单纯性大隐静脉曲张疗效确切。
目的 研究地佐辛＋咪达唑仑在大隐静脉射频闭合术中的镇静作用，并观察其对生命体征的影响以及不良反应的发生情况。方法 选取60例行大隐静脉射频闭合术患者，根据麻醉方式分为芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组和地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组２组，每组30例。分别监测心率（HR）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、平均动脉压（MAP），记录用药后5min和30min的镇静评分、生命体征以及术中不良反应的发生情况。结果 给药后5min和30min的镇静效果评分芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组分别为（2.95±0.14）分和（4.09±0.05）分，地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组分别为（3.16±0.09）分和（4.08±0.08）分，2组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组给药后5min和30min的HR、SpO2及MAP比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与给药前（0min）比较，差异也无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组患者镇静良好，无躁动，均无一例发生呼吸抑制，仅芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组有4例发生呛咳。结论 芬太尼和地佐辛联合咪达唑仑用于大隐静脉射频消融手术患者，镇静效果良好，对生命体征影响小，但地佐辛组无呛咳，不良反应发生率更低。
Objective To investigate the change of vasa vasorum in vessel wall of varicose vein of the lower extre-mity. Methods Thirty-two patients with varicose vein of the lower extremity were collected， in which of 12 patients with simple varicose veins （varicose group）， 9 patients with recurrent varicose veins （recurrent group）， 11 patients withthrombophlebitis of varicose vein （thrombophlebitis group）， 9 patients with normal venous tissue as control group. HE staining was performed to observe the distribution of vasa vasorum and detect the vasa vasorum density. Results The increasing vasa vasorums were observed in the adventitia and media， but few was observed in the intima in the varicose， recurrent， and thrombophlebitis groups. The distribution of vasa vasorum was in the adventitia in the control group. The vasa vasorum densities （/mm2） in the varicose， recurrent， and thrombophlebitis groups （5.65±1.45，6.20±1.73， and 5.94±1.63， respectively） were greater than those in the control group （2.87±0.54）， the difference wasstatistically significant （P＜0.05）， but there was no significant difference of the vasa vasorum density among the varicosevein， recurrent， and thrombophlebitis groups （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Change of vasa vasorum is an important pathol-gical change with the nosogenis of varicose vein of the lower extremity.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficiency of endovenous laser therapy combined with planning sucking operation in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. MethodsTotally 48 patients (60 limbs) were treated from May 2011 to May 2014 in general surgery department of our hospital. The main trunk of great saphenous vein was ablated by endovenous laser treatment; and the varicose veins in calf were resected by planning sucking operation. ResultsAll 48 patients (60 limbs) were cured without recurrent during 6-36 months followed-up. The operative time of each side was 18-43 min, the average operative time was 22.6 min; with 1-3 skin incisions. Hospital stay was 5-8 d, the average hospitalization time was 6.7 d. After operation, the varicose veins and the felling of swelling were disappeared, the pigmentation was reduced or disappeared. Local skin numbness showed in 6 cases and recovered in 3-7 months after operation. Felling of burns appeared in 2 cases, and was healed after treatment. Ankle swelling presented in 5 cases, and released in 6-13 d with related treatment. Different degree of subcutaneous bruising appeared without any hematoma, and recovered in 2-4 weeks. Two cases were lost during the followed-up. ConclusionsEndovenous laser therapy combined with planning sucking operation is safe and effective in the treatment of great saphenous varicose. It is worthy of promotion with minimum damage, less pain, fast recovery, no scars, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay.
【摘要】目的 总结TriVex 微创刨吸术治疗下肢静脉曲张的近期治疗效果。方法 对52例下肢静脉曲张患者（77条肢体）的曲张浅静脉进行微创刨吸切除，对手术时间、手术切口、住院时间、并发症等进行观察。结果 每条肢体进行微创刨吸切除时间为10～42 min，平均26 min； 手术切口2～9个，平均5.2个。术后卧床1～3 d，住院3～14 d，平均6.5 d 。术后随访5～12个月，无一例复发。结论 TriVex 微创刨吸术是治疗下肢静脉曲张的较理想术式。
目的探讨低分子肝素预防下肢静脉曲张术后深静脉血栓形成的临床效果。 方法将2011年1月至2013年12月期间于笔者所在医院行大隐静脉高位结扎＋分段剥脱术＋腔内激光闭合术的513例下肢静脉曲张患者随机分为2组：低分子肝素组238例，下肢静脉曲张术后采用低分子肝素预防性治疗；对照组275例，术后不采用任何抗凝药物。比较2组患者深静脉血栓形成和并发症发生情况。 结果低分子肝素组发生浸透敷料的出血14例（5.9%），切口出血或皮下血肿25例（10.5%），血小板减少1例（0.4%），肝功能异常2例（0.8%），无深静脉血栓形成发生；对照组发生浸透敷料的出血19例（6.9%），切口出血或皮下血肿27例（9.8%），肝功能异常2例（0.7%），深静脉血栓形成7例（2.5%），无血小板减少发生。2组患者浸透敷料的出血、切口出血或皮下血肿、血小板减少及肝功能异常发生率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但低分子肝素组深静脉血栓形成的发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）。术后获访487例，随访时间为4～12个月，平均10个月。其中低分子肝素组获访225例，对照组获访262例。获访患者随访期间发生下肢静脉曲张复发9例（低分子肝素组4例，对照组5例），隐神经损伤11例（低分子肝素组5例，对照组6例），无远期下肢深静脉血栓形成病例。2组患者的下肢静脉曲张复发率和隐神经损伤发生率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论采用低分子肝素预防下肢静脉曲张术后下肢深静脉血栓形成具有良好的临床效果和安全性，值得临床推广应用。
Objective To evaluate improved effect for deep venous valve function after superficial vein surgery of lower extremity in the intermediate stage. Methods Totally 43 patients (55 limbs) with varicose veins of lower extremity were enrolled to accept surgical management of vein systems in our department from March 2006 to October 2006. All patients were respectively followed up after 6 months and 4 years about the changes of deep venous valve function with color Doppler ultrasonography. Results Thirty-nine patients’ deep venous valve function kept well up to now, and there was no significant difference between the two results. Four patients without proximal saphenous vein ligation recurred, and there was reflux in deep venous. Conclusion Endovenous laser treatment and ablation of varicose veins of lower extremity with deep venous insufficiency could improve deep venous valve function effectively. Proximal great saphenous vein ligation is important for successful operation.