摘要:目的:探讨鼻咽癌放疗后程同步辅以小剂量顺铂增敏的近期疗效,并与常规治疗和后程加速超分割放射治疗进行比较。方法:选取98例Ⅱ～Ⅳ期鼻咽癌患者,随机分为常规治疗组(简称T1组,32例)、后程加速超分割治疗组(简称T2组,32例)和顺铂加后程加速超分割治疗组(简称T3组,34例),并对治疗效果进行比较。 结果:1组鼻咽部肿瘤消除率为75.0%(24／32),颈部淋巴结消除率为87.5%(28/32);T2组鼻咽部肿瘤消除率为87.5%(28／32),颈部淋巴结消除率为84.4%(27/32);T3组鼻咽部肿瘤消除率为97.1%(33／34),颈部淋巴结消除率为91.2%(31/34)。进行两两比较,均为P＜0.05,有统计学意义,疗效:T3 组＞T2 组＞T1组。治疗副作用有增加(P＞0.05),但无统计学意义。 结论:小剂量顺铂加后程加速超分割治疗鼻咽癌,可以达到较常规治疗更好的近期治疗效果。Abstract: Objective: To study the later therapeutic efficacy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in late course accelerated fractionation (LCAF) radiotherapy and low dose cisplatin, at same time compare with conventional fractionation and LCAF. Methods: Ninetyeight cases with stage ⅡⅣ of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomly assigned to three groups: conventional fractionation (T1), LCAF (T2), LCAF and low dose cisplatin (T3). At the end of treatment, therapeutic efficacy was compared with each other. Results: The survey periods was 3 months. Comlete response rate (CR) for groups T1, T2 and T3 was 75.0% (24／32), 87.5% (28／32) and 97.1% (33／34), respectively; the group treated with LCAF and cisplatin had highest effective later therapeutic efficacy than other groups. Lymph node of neck of group T3 got better control, although its side effects were more serious, but no significant difference was found among three group. Conclusion: Combined treatment of LCAF radiotherapy and low dose cisplatin has better later therapeutic efficacy on tumor control in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Objective To observe the influence of cisplan on the expression of B7-H1 in retinoblastoma (RB) cells，and to investigate its mechanism. Methods Human RB cell line HXO-Rb44 cells were treated by 6 different concentrations of cisplan (0.000, 0.375, 0.750, 1.500, 3.000, 6.000 mu;g/ml), and their B7-H1 mRNA expression was determined by the reversetranscription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence quantitative PCR (FQ-PCR); the B7-H1 protein expression was determined by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. HXO-Rb44 cells were treated by 1.5 mu;g/ml cisplan for 0, 15, 30, 60, 120 min, then the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) was detected by Western blot.Results The expression of B7-H1 mRNA and protein in the 0.375, 0.750, 1.500, 3.000, 6.000 mu;g/ml group were significantly higher than that of the blank control group (F=395.478，112.03; P=0.000）. Western blot showed that cisplan (1.5 mu;g/ml) could activate ERK1/2 by increasing its phosphorylation in HXO-Rb44 cells. After cisplan treatment, the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 increased gradually and reached its peak at 30 min, and then went down gradually.Conclusion Cisplan can promote the expression of B7-H1 and activate ERK1/2 in RB cells.
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine compared with cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and China General Library of Biomedical Literature were searched. Literatures related to the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine (nedaplatin group) versus cisplatin combined with gemcitabine (cisplatin group) in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma published from the inception to October 2021 were searched. The quality of included studies was assessed by Cochrane bias assessing tool and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4. Results A total of 10 articles were included covering 914 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the objective remission rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.01, P=0.005), disease control rate (OR=1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.15, P=0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR=2.29, 95%CI 1.25-4.18, P=0.007) of the nedaplatin group were better than those of the cisplatin group. In terms of side effects, the incidence of white blood cell and hemoglobin decline, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea in the nedaplatin group was lower than that in the cisplatin group (P≤0.05). The differences in the platelet decline and liver and kidney damage between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, the short-term efficacy of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine may be better than cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, and the incidence of adverse reactions is lower.
To study the effect of intraperitoneal hyperthermic double distiled water and cis-diamminedichloro-platinum(DDP) perfusion to the peritoneal cancerous ascites,intraperitoneal injection of H22 cancer cells (2×107 tumor cell,each mouse) were performed in LACA mice. Five days after cancer cells injection, intraperitoneal perfusion of simple hypertherrnic (43℃) double distiled water(group Ⅰ) isotonic fluid (group Ⅱ ). DDP (group Ⅲ ), and hypertherrnic double distiles water perfusion combined with DDP (guoup Ⅳ ) were performed .The results showed that cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of LACA mice were seriously damaged, the production of ascites was markedly inhibited and the survival days of LACA mice were prolonged in all groups . .The intraperitoneal hyperthermic double distilled water perfusion with DDP group showed more effective result as compared with the other groups,Only 1 peritoneal implanted dissemination was found after treatment in this group,Basing on the experimental from September 1991 through September 1993,intraperitoneal hyperthermic double distiled water perfusion with DDP was used to treat 32 advanced gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy with satisfactory results.
Objective Non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) cells are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and the outcomes are not always satisfactory. This study was designed to explore the relationship between the content of Ku80 protein of human lung cancer cells and their sensitivity to cisplatin.Methods The lung cancer cells isolated frommalignant pleural effusion samples frompatients with primary lung cancer were cultured in vitro. The sensitivity to cisplatin was tested with the method of CCK-8 expressed as half maximal inhibitory concentration ( IC50 ) . The relative content of Ku80 protein was determined by Western blot. The correlation between sensitivity to cisplatin of lung cancer cells and the relative content of Ku80 protein was analyzed. Results The IC50 of NSCLC group was significantly higher than that of SCLCgroup [ ( 4. 40 ±3. 39) mg/L vs. ( 1. 02 ±0. 54) mg/L, P lt; 0. 001] . The relative content of Ku80 protein of NSCLC group was statistically higher than that of SCLC group [ ( 0. 80 ±0. 45) vs. ( 0. 48 ±0. 25) , P lt;0. 05] . The correlation coefficient between content of Ku80 protein and IC50 was 0. 618 ( P lt; 0. 001) .Conclusions The content of Ku80 protein of NSCLC patients is higher than that of SCLC patients. Itmay be one of the mechanisms contributing to chemotherapeutic resistance of NSCLC. There is a negative relationship between Ku80 protein content of cancer cells and their sensitivity to cisplatin suggesting that the content of Ku80 protein may be served as a candidate index for predicting sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin.
目的:比较常规放射治疗与放射治疗同期合并顺铂(PDD)加卡培他滨(CAP)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的有效性,同时评价此联合方式的安全性。方法:从2003年2月至2005年11月,78例局部晚期鼻咽癌患者(Ⅲ、Ⅳa,92分期)随机分为两组,放化疗组在放疗的第1、4、7周均用PDD+CAP各化疗一周期,PDD:20mg/m2,静脉滴注,连用5天;CAP:1000mg/m2,每天2次,连用14天,休7天;21天为一周期。两组放疗方法相同:鼻咽原发灶采用60Co外照射,颈部淋巴结引流区采用60Co前切线照射加深部X线垂直照射,鼻咽部剂量为65～70 Gy／6.5～7周,颈淋巴结转移灶剂量为65～70 Gy／6.5～7周。结果:放化疗组及单放组治疗结束后3个月鼻咽部肿瘤完全消退率分别为89.7%,69.2%(P﹤0.05)。3年生存率分别为76.9%,53.8%(P﹤0.05)。结论:顺铂加卡培他滨方案联合放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌可改善患者的生存,毒副反应可耐受。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with etoposide versus other platinum combined with etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2013), MEDLINE (Ovid), CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with etoposide (the cisplatin group) versus other platinum combined with etoposide (the control group) for SCLC. The search was up to August 2013. Two reviewers screened literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. And then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 684 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.17, P=0.63), overall response rate (ORR) (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.11, P=0.33), occurrence of leukocytopenia (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.17, P=0.77), decreased hemoglobin (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.61 to 1.31, P=0.56) between the cisplatin group and the control group. Occurrence of thrombocytopenia was lower (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.63, P<0.000 01) while occurrence of nausea and vomiting was higher (RR=1.80, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.31, P<0.000 01) in the cisplatin group. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the clinical efficacy of cisplatin combined with etoposide for SCLC is equal to other platinum combined with etoposide, but it has a certain advantage in decreasing the aggregative rate of platelets, while the gastrointesnial reaction patients should avoid using cisplatin combined with etoposide.
This study aims to explore the temporal pattern of DNA breaks induced by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) in cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells. Human ovarian cancer cells A2780 (cisplatin-sensitive subline) and C30 (cisplatin-resistant subline) were exposed to nsEP. Sham exposed groups were shame exposed to nsEP. Cell viability was determined using CCK-8 assay after 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h, respectively, and the percentage of dead cells was calculated. The DNA break was detected with the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay), and the 75th percentiles of TL (tail length), TM (tail moment) and OTM (Olive tail moment) were measured. Cell viability displayed an early decrease and late increase, with the valley value seen at 8 h. Percentages of cell death and comet-formed in A2780 cells were higher than those in C30 cells (P<0.05) at 8 h, respectively. TL, TM and OTM in C30 cells were less than those in A2780 cells (P<0.05). The percentage of comet-formed correlated with that of cell death in either A2780 (r=0.997, P<0.05) or C30 (r=0.998, P<0.05) cells. DNA breaks induced by nsEP in cisplatin-sensitive cells differred from that in resistant cells, and DNA break resulted in fraction of cell death.
Objectives To explore the effects of curcumin and cisplatin on A549 lung cancer cell invasion and metastasis, and explore the influence of the two drugs on matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and E-cadherin protein. Methods MTT assay was performed to detect the effects of curcumin, cisplatin alone and the combination on A549 lung cancer cell proliferation. Transwell assay was performed to detect the effects of curcumin, cisplatin alone and the combination on the invasion and metastasis of lung cancer cells. Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of MMP-9 and E-cadherin. Results The proliferation inhibition of A549 lung cancer cell rate in 5, 10, 20, 40 μmol/L of curcumin was 6.50%±1.06%, 11.70%±0.88%, 22.97%±0.82%, 27.93%±0.94%, respectively. Compared with control group, the proliferation inhibition rates in four different curcumin groups were significantly increased (all P<0.01). The differences in the proliferation inhibition rates among four different curcumin groups were statistically significant (allP<0.05). The proliferation inhibition rates of A549 lung cancer cell in 1, 2, 4 mg/L of cisplatin were 7.12%±0.86%, 20.07%±1.14%, 26.88%±0.51%, respectively. Compared with control group, the proliferation inhibition rates in three different cisplatin groups were significantly increased (allP<0.01). The differences in the proliferation inhibition rates among three different cisplatin groups were statistically significant (allP<0.01). The proliferation inhibition rates of A549 lung cancer cell in curcumin (20 μmol/L) combined with cisplatin (1, 2, 4 mg/L respectively) were 28.37%±0.57%, 39.72%±0.64%, 46.27%±0.86%, respectively. Compared with control group and curcumin or cisplatin used alone, the proliferation inhibition rates of three combined groups were significantly increased (allP<0.01). The invasion inhibition rates of A549 lung cancer cell in curcumin group (20 μmol/L), cisplatin group (2 mg/L) and combined group (curcumin 20 μmol/L plus cisplatin 2 mg/L) were 38.62%±0.23%, 36.52%±0.33%, 63.78%±0.59%, respectively. Compared with control group and curcumin or cisplatin used alone, the invasion inhibition rates of combined group were significantly increased (allP<0.01). The protein grey values for curcumin group (20 μmol/L), cisplatin group (2 mg/L) and combined group (curcumin 20 μmol/L plus cisplatin 2 mg/L) were 0.768±0.047, 0.654±0.104, 0.684±0.008, 0.444±0.104 (MMP-9) and 0.603±0.170, 0.792±0.050, 0.784±0.045, 0.879±0.110 (E-cadherin), respectively. Compared with control group and curcumin or cisplatin used alone, the protein grey values of combined group were significantly different (allP<0.01 orP<0.05). Conclusions Curcumin and cisplatin combination can inhibit the invasion and metastasis of lung cancer A549 cells. Its mechanism may be related to downregulating MMP-9 and upregulating E-cadherin.