ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.MethodsFrom January 2018 to January 2020, 66 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were selected as the research objects. All patients were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty. After operation, they were randomly divided into intervention group and control group by random number table method, with 33 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine rehabilitation intervention after operation, while the intervention group was given core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface at the same time. The vertebral height, shape, stability and gait of the two groups were compared 1 day before operation and 1 day after rehabilitation training.ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender, age, injured vertebral body, course of osteoporosis, years of education and marital status between the two groups (P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra, middle height ratio of the injured vertebra, back convex Cobb angle, track length when eyes were open, track length when eyes were closed, Romberg rate, track length per unit time when eyes were open, track length per unit time when eyes were closed, Romberg rate per unit time, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed, stride length, step frequency or comfortable pace between the two groups (P>0.05). After training, the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra [(79.26±12.15)% vs. (72.26±13.36)%], middle height ratio of the injured vertebra [(82.11±10.26)% vs. (75.64±9.56)%], back convex Cobb angle [(9.87±7.10) vs. (14.41±2.36)°], track length when eyes were closed [(1856.29±457.16) vs. (2358.48±786.45) mm], Romberg rate [(1.32±0.29)% vs. (1.87±0.54)%], track length per unit time when eyes were closed [(33.45±3.26) vs. (41.55±4.69) mm], Romberg rate per unit time [(1.41±0.30)% vs. (1.95±0.77)%], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open [(11.06±1.36) vs. (16.54±2.22) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed [(11.15±0.96) vs. (23.31±3.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open [(12.57±1.84) vs. (15.56±2.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed [(15.69±2.05) vs. (18.96±3.56) mm], stride length [(0.57±0.12) vs. (0.49±0.10) m], step frequency [(1.09±0.29) vs. (0.94±0.20) step/s] and comfortable pace [(0.35±0.12) vs. (0.29±0.10) m/s] of the intervention group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the track length when eyes were open or track length per unit time when eyes were open between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionIn patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures, core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on the basis of conventional rehabilitation interventions after surgery can effectively restore the height and shape of the vertebral body, and improve the stability and gait to a certain extent.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety between percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) with intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC). MethodsBetween January 2010 and December 2013, 68 patients with single OVCF and IVC were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 68 patients, 48 underwent PVP (PVP group) and 20 underwent PKP (PKP group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, disease duration, fracture level, bone mineral density (BMD), visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and preoperative radiological parameters between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The intraoperative incidence of cement leakage, cement volume, and operative time were compared between 2 groups; VAS score was used for evaluation of back pain and ODI for evaluation of dysfunction; the incidence of adjacent vertebral fracture was observed within 2 years. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured on X-ray films; the rate of vertebral compression (CR), reduction rate (RR), progressive height loss (PHL), reduction angle (RA), and progressive angle (PA) were calculated. ResultsThere was no significant difference in cement volume and the incidence of cement leakage between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operative time in PVP group was shorter than that in PKP group, showing significant difference (t=-8.821, P=0.000). The mean follow-up time was 2.4 years (range, 2.0-3.1 years). The VAS scores and ODI were significantly reduced at 1 day, 1 year, and 2 years after operation when compared with preoperative scores (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between different time points after operation in 2 groups (P > 0.05). Adjacent vertebral fracture occurred in 5 cases (10.4%) of PVP group and in 2 cases (10.0%) of PKP group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.003, P=0.963). BMD was significantly increased at 1 year and 2 years after operation when compared with preoperative BMD (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (t=0.463, P=0.642; t=0.465, P=0.646). The X-ray films showed that CR and kyphotic angle were significantly restored at immediate after operation in 2 groups (P < 0.05); but vertebral height and kyphotic angle gradually aggravated with time, showing significant difference between at immediate and at 1 and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in CR and kyphotic angle between 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05). RR, RA, PHL, and PA showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThere is similar clinical and radiological efficacy between PVP and PKP for treatment of OVCF with IVC. Re-collapse could happen after operation, so strict observation and follow-up are needed.
Methods of evidence-based medicine were used to discuss the drug treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. After clinical problems were put forward, we searched for and assessed the evidence. A rational treatment plan for osteoporosis patients with fractures was developed according to the results of systematic reviews and Meta-analysis.
Objective Secondary osteoporosis is very common in patients with primary osteoporosis. Diabetes is a known cause of secondary osteoporosis. While type I diabetes has been clearly linked with diabetic osteoporosis, the effect of type II diabetes on bone health is controversial.Methods In the present study, we investigated the associations between type II diabetes and osteoporosis as well as fractures at different skeletal sites in Women’s Health Initiative participants.Results Common risk factors such as age, race, BMI, HRT use, and the history of fractures were significantly associated with osteoporosis and fractures in this study population. Diabetic women appeared to have a decreased risk of osteoporosis although it no longer remained significant after adjusting for other risk factors (crude HR=0.78, 95%CI 0.61 to 0.99; adjusted HR=0.93, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.19). The impact of diabetes on fractures varied at different body sites. There was a significant increase of risk of hip fracture (HR=2.54, 95%CI 1.14 to 5.66), but not spine fracture (HR=1.71, 95%CI 0.81 to 3.60) and arm fracture (HR=0.92, 95%CI 0.48 to 1.76) among the women with diabetes. Although the overall risk of fractures in diabetic women did not differ significantly from non-diabetic women (HR=1.37, 95%CI 0.89 to 2.09), the difference had a two-fold increase and was statistically significant after 2,000 days (HR=2.01, 95%CI 1.21 to 3.35), indicating a different hazard at different stages of diabetes.Conclusion Our findings suggest that type II diabetes may not be clearly associated with osteoporosis, it increases a site-specific fracture risk at least in the hip. In addition, the overall fracture risk appears to increase in a time-dependent manner.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of Confidence high viscosity bone cement system and postural reduction in treating acute severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Methods Between June 2004 and June2009, 34 patients with acute severe OVCF were treated with Confidence high viscosity bone cement system and postural reduction. There were 14 males and 20 females with an average age of 72.6 years (range, 62-88 years). All patients had single thoracolumbar fracture, including 4 cases of T11, 10 of T12, 15 of L1, 4 of L2, and 1 of L3. The bone density measurement showed that T value was less than —2.5. The time from injury to admission was 2-72 hours. All cases were treated with postural reduction preoperatively. The time of reduction in over-extending position was 7-14 days. All patients were injected unilaterally. The injected volume of high viscosity bone cement was 2-6 mL (mean, 3.2 mL). Results Cement leakage was found in 3 cases (8.8%) during operation, including leakage into intervertebral space in 2 cases and into adjacent paravertebral soft tissue in 1 case. No cl inical symptom was observed and no treatment was pearformed. No pulmonary embolism, infection, nerve injury, or other complications occurred in all patients. All patients were followed up 12-38 months (mean, 18.5 months). Postoperatively, complete pain rel ief was achievedin 31 cases and partial pain refief in 3 cases; no re-fracture or loosening at the interface occurred. At 3 days after operation and last follow-up, the anterior and middle vertebral column height, Cobb angle, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were improved significantly when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05)；and there was no significant difference between 3 days and last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Confidence high viscosity bone cement system and postural reduction can be employed safely in treating acute severe OVCF, which has many merits of high viscosity, long time for injection, and easy-to-control directionally.
Objective To evaluate the effect of remote controlled injection manipulator system (RCIM) assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for the treatment of rupture of posterior vertebral osteoporotic vertebral fracture by comparing with intermittent hand bolus injection of bone cement during operation. Methods Between September 2010 and January 2016, a retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 48 senile patients with single segment rupture of the posterior vertebral osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture undergoing PKP who accorded with the inclusion criteria. Of 48 patients, 22 received intermittent hand bolus injection of bone cement in the control group, and 26 received RCIM assisted bone cement perfusion in the trial group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, duration of disease, causes of injury, implicated vertebral bodies, bone mineral density T value, pain duration, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), relative vertebral body height in the anterior part, and posterior convex Cobb angle between groups (P>0.05). The bone cement perfusion time, the radiation dose of both doctors and patients, and the amount of bone cement injection were recorded; treatment effects were evaluated based on VAS score, posterior convex Cobb angle, relative ver-tebral body height in the anterior part, ratios of bone cement diffusion area and bone cement leakage rate. Results The patients were followed up for 6 months; no complications of toxic effect of bone cement, spinal cord or nerve root injuries, infection and vascular embolization occurred during follow-up period. There was no significant difference in bone cement injection amount and radiation dose of doctors between groups (P>0.05), but bone cement perfusion time, ratios of bone cement diffusion area, and radiation dose of patients were significantly lower in the trial group than the control group (P<0.05). Bone cement leakage was observed in 6 cases of the control group (27.27%) and 2 cases of the trial group (7.69%), showing significant difference between groups (χ2=4.850,P=0.029); no cement leakage into the spinal canal was found in both groups. VAS score, relative vertebral body height in the anterior part, and posterior convex Cobb angle were significantly improved at 3 days and 6 months after operation when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the above indexes between groups at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Satisfactory effectiveness can be achieved by applying RCIM assisted PKP for the treatment of rupture of posterior vertebral osteoporotic vertebral fracture. RCIM can shorten perfusion time, reduce radiation dose, and decrease incidence of bone cement leakage.
ObjectiveEvaluating the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture (OVCF). MethodsPatients with OVCF were retrospectively analyzed from Feb. 2008 to Feb. 2013 in Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Patients were divided into the PVP group and the PKP group. The VAS, vertebral kyphosis angle, vertebral height and bone cement leakage of both groups were compared, and the SPSS13.0 software was used for data analysis. ResultsA total of 55 patients were included. Of which, 25 patients were in the PVP group and 30 patients were in the PKP group. All patients were followed up from 5 to 20 months, with an average time of 15.5 months. The VAS scores in both groups were all improved after the operation (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between both groups. The vertebral kyphosis angle in both groups were improved after the operation (P<0.05), and the PKP group was better than the PVP group. Six patients in the PVP group occurred the leakage of bone cement, and 4 patients in the PKP group. Five patients in the PVP groups occurred vertebral fracture again, while 7 patients in the PKP group. ConclusionUsing PVP and PKP for the treatment of OVCF can quickly relieve pain and increase the stability of the vertebral body. PKP can restore vertebral body height better and reduce the incidence of cement leakage.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of unilateral puncture percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) through transverse process-pedicle approach (TPA) for the treatment of lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF).MethodsFrom January 2014 to June 2019, a total of 220 OVF patients (321 fractured vertebral bodies) were enrolled, and PKP was performed by unilateral TPA puncture. The distribution of bone cement in vertebral body exceeding the midline of vertebral body was defined as the success of puncture, and the success rates of puncture of different vertebral bodies were recorded. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior and middle heights of the vertebral body, and the local Cobb angle were compared between three time points namely before operation, 1 day after operation, and 6 months after operation. Surgery-related complications were recorded.ResultsThe 220 patients included 57 males and 163 females, with a mean age of (70.3±6.5) years, a mean course of disease of (18.7±17.7) d, and a mean bone mineral density of −3.3±0.6. The success rate of puncture from L1 to L5 was 81.7% (85/104), 95.2% (80/84), 100.0% (69/69), 97.6% (41/42), and 72.7% (16/22), respectively. The mean volume of bone cement injected into the vertebral bodies was (5.8±0.9) mL. Two patients were followed up for less than 6 months because of death or loss to follow-up, and the other 218 patients were followed up for 6-57 months, with an average of (19.6±8.7) months. Before surgery, 1 day after surgery, and 6 months after surgery, the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) of VAS scores was 6 (6, 8), 1 (1, 2), and 2 (1, 2), respectively, with statistically significant differences in all the two-two comparisons (P<0.017). At the three time points, the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) of ODI was 61% (54%, 66%), 26% (22%, 30%), and 25% (24%, 31%), respectively, the mean height of anterior vertebral body was (18.3±2.8), (22.6±3.0), and (22.6±3.1) mm, respectively, the mean height of middle vertebral body was (17.8±2.2), (22.9±2.8), and (22.9±2.7) mm, respectively, the mean local Cobb angle was (19.9±2.6), (14.4±2.8), (14.4±2.8)°, respectively, and the values at 1 day and 6 months after surgery all differed from those before surgery (P<0.017). A total of 32 cases (42 vertebrae) had bone cement leakage, of whom 4 cases had related symptoms. There were 32 re-fractures of the vertebral bodies, including 18 adjacent vertebral body fractures, with an incidence rate of 5.6%. There were 3 vertebral infections after operation, the incidence was 0.9%.ConclusionPatients with OVF of the lumbar spine undergoing unilateral TPA puncture for PKP surgery have a high success rate, definite clinical effect, and satisfactory correction of local deformities.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of adjacent fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).MethodsA total of 2 216 patients who received PVP due to symptomatic OVCF between January 2014 and January 2017 and met the selection criteria were selected as study subjects. The clinical data was collected, including gender, age, height, body mass, history of smoking and drinking, whether the combination of hypertension, diabetes, coronary arteriosclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bone mineral density, the number of fractured vertebrae, the amount of cement injected into single vertebra, the cement leakage, and whether regular exercise after operation, whether regular anti-osteoporosis treatment after operation. Firstly, single factor analysis was performed on the observed indicators to preliminarily screen the influencing factors of adjacent fractures after PVP. Then, logistic regression analysis was carried out for relevant indicators with statistical significance to screen risk factors.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 15.8 months. Among them, 227 patients (10.24%) had adjacent fractures. The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the fracture group and non-fracture group in age, gender, preoperative bone density, history of smoking and drinking, COPD, the number of fractured vertebrae and the amount of bone cement injected into the single vertebra, as well as regular exercise after operation, regular anti-osteoporosis treatment after operation (P<0.05). Further multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the elderly and female, history of smoking, irregular exercise after operation, irregular anti-osteoporosis treatment after operation, low preoperative bone density, large number of fractured vertebrae, and small amount of bone cement injected into the single vertebra were risk factors for adjacent fractures after PVP in OVCF patients (P<0.05).ConclusionThe risk of adjacent fractures after PVP increases in elderly, female patients with low preoperative bone mineral density, large number of fractured vertebrae, and insufficient bone cement injection. The patients need to quit smoking, regular exercise, and anti-osteoporosis treatment after PVP.