目的 探讨实习护士锐器伤发生情况及影响因素，为制订降低实习护士锐器伤政策提供依据。 方法 2012年3月，针对333名临床实习护士进行问卷调查；采用SPSS软件对锐器伤年发生率进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。 结果 共322名实习护士完成调查，锐器伤年发生率50.0%，发生频率为1.3次/人年。最近一次发生锐器伤时，仅6.5%上报登记。单因素分析显示，本科生、学校课程未针对预防锐器伤进行培训，临床实习带教老师未进行预防锐器伤培训的实习护士，其锐器伤发生率更高。在临床实习可能接触患者血液和体液的操作中，带手套的频率越高，锐器伤发生率越低；注射完成后，回套针帽的频率越高，锐器伤发生率越高。多因素分析表明，本科实习护士发生锐器伤的风险高于中专或大专实习护士[OR=4.603，95%CI（2.241，9.443）]；注射完成后，回套针帽频率增加，发生锐器伤的风险增加[OR=1.672，95%CI（1.032，2.729）]。 结论 在教学和临床实践过程中，针对实习护士，尤其是本科实习护士，应进一步加强培训，杜绝回套针帽现象；并进一步健全现有锐器伤上报登记制度。
ObjectiveTo investigate nurses' attitude on the reporting of clinical adverse events and analyze its correlated factors in the Emergency Department. MethodsA total of 130 nurses in a class-3 grade-A hospital were recruited in our study by convenience sampling method during November and December 2014. The Chinese version of Reporting of Clinical Adverse Events Scale was applied to assess nurses' attitude on reporting adverse events. ResultsThe nurses' willingness to report adverse events in the Emergency Department was generally low, and the attitude scores of nurses in the triage zone, rescue zone, monitoring zone and observation zone were respectively 65.62±1.16, 65.49±0.58, 65.06±0.80, and 63.20±0.86, without any significant difference among these zones (P>0.05). The attitude scores of nurses with a seniority of 1-2, 3-5, 6-9, and ≥ 10 years were respectively 67.37±3.27, 64.49±3.98, 63.77±4.82, and 64.30±4.52, with significant differences among these seniority groups (P＜0.05). The attitude scores of nurses with a rank of nurse-in-charge, primary nurse, and nurse were respectively 61.25±4.02, 63.97±4.52, and 65.92±4.02, also with significant differences among these groups (P＜0.05). ConclusionsThe willingness of reporting clinical adverse events in emergency nurses is not high. It is necessary to strengthen the training of nurses on their cognition of adverse events and encourage reporting, thus to create a non-punishment hospital security culture.
Objective To investigate the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in emergency critically ill patients. Methods Critically ill patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University between August 2022 and February 2023 were continuously enrolled. Blood glucose monitoring was performed using CGM system, while blood glucose in the patient’s fingertips was monitored every 4 hours. The correlation and consistency of blood glucose values between CGM system and fingertip glucose detection were compared. Results A total of 52 patients were included, and 1 504 matching blood glucose pairs were formed with fingertip blood glucose values. The overall correlation coefficient was 0.874 (P<0.001), the mean absolute relative difference was 14.50%, and the highest mean absolute relative difference (31.76%) was observed in the hypoglycemic range (<3.9 mmol/L). The percentage of CGM system blood glucose within ±15%, ±20% and ±30% of fingertip blood glucose was 56.65%, 75.56% and 94.75%, respectively. The intra-group correlation coefficient between CGM system blood glucose and fingertip blood glucose was 0.85 on the consistency test, and the Bland-Altman plot showed acceptable clinical accuracy. Conclusions The overall accuracy of the application of CGM system in critically ill patients is reasonable, but the accuracy in the range of low blood glucose values is poor. Whether the auxiliary use of CGM system can improve the blood glucose management of critically ill patients and reduce medical costs needs to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of establishment of chest pain center and optimized process in the diagnostic and treatment progress and short-term prognostic value of acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. MethodsThis was a retrospective study. We included NSTEMI patients admitted in the Emergency Department in our hospital, 41 patients admitted before the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2015) were included as group A (30 males and 11 females at age of 64.7±11.8 years), 42 patients after the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2016) as group B (31 males and 11 females at age of 64.6±11.8 years), and 38 patients after the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2017) as group C (30 males and 8 females at age of 62.6±10.0 years). The clinical outcomes of the three groups were compared.ResultsThe time from admission to electrocardiogram was 20.0 (17.0, 25.5) min in the group A, 4.0 (2.8, 5.0) min in the group B, and 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) min in the group C (P<0.001). The first doctor's non-electrocardiogram advice time was 13.0 (10.0, 18.0) min, 9.5 (6.8, 15.3) min, and 9.0 (7.0, 12.0) min (P=0.001) in the three groups, respectively. The diagnostic confirmed time was 139.4±48.5 min, 71.1±51.5 min, 63.9±41.9 min (P<0.001). The proportion of patients receiving emergency dual anti-platelet load dose treatment was 53.1%, 70.0%, 100.0% (P=0.001), respectively. The time of receiving emergency dual anti-platelet load dose treatment was 208.0 (72.0, 529.0) min, 259.0 (91.0, 340.0) min, and 125.0 (86.0, 170.0) min (P=0.044) in the three groups, respectively. Emergency percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) start time was 60.9 (42.1, 95.8) hours, 61.3 (43.3, 92.2) hours, 30.5 (2.8, 44.1) hours (P<0.001) in the three groups, respectively. Among them, the moderate risk patients’ PCI starting time was 63.0 (48.1, 94.2) hours, 62.3 (42.1, 116.2) hours, and 40.1 (17.2, 60.4) hours (P>0.05), respectively. The high risk patients’ PCI starting time was 47.9 (23.7, 102.4) hours, 55.2 (44.0, 89.6) hours, 23.2 (1.7, 41.8) hours in the three groups, respectively (P<0.001). The hospitalization time of the patients was 7.0 (5.4, 9.4) days, 5.9 (4.9, 8.7) days, 4.7 (3.1, 6.2) days in the three groups (P<0.001), respectively. The hospitalization time of the moderate risk patients was 6.9 (4.9, 8.8) days, 6.4 (4.9, 8.0) days, 4.8 (3.2, 6.5) days in the three groups (P>0.05), respectively. The hospitalization time of the high risk patients was 7.1 (5.5, 9.9) days, 5.9 (4.6, 9.8) days, and 4.4 (3.0, 6.1) days, respectively (P<0.001). The fatality rate of inpatients was 4.9%, 0.0%, and 0.0%, respectively (P>0.05). The correlation coefficient of hospitalization time, diagnosis confirmed time and PCI starting time was 0.219 and 0.456 (P<0.05), respectively.ConclusionThe establishment and optimized process of chest pain center can accelerate the time of early diagnosis of NSTEMI, which is helpful to obtain stratified and graded standardized treatment for patients according to their conditions, to accelerate the specific treatment process of high risk NSTEMI patients, and shorten the hospitalization time.
With the change of COVID-19, the prevention and control of COVID-19 infection epidemic entered a new stage in December 2022. How to quickly complete the emergency treatment of a large number of patients in a short period of time, and ensure that patients in emergency department can get rapid and effective medical treatment has always been an urgent problem that emergency department need to solve. The Department of Emergency Medicine of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has adopted patient-oriented management measures based on the core idea of the new public management theory, and has achieved remarkable results. Therefore, this article summarizes the workflow and nursing management strategies of the emergency department rescue area of West China Hospital of Sichuan University in dealing with the batch treatment of COVID-19 infected patients, including optimizing and correcting the environment layout of the ward, implementing the “secondary triage” mode in the rescue area, adding an inter-hospital referral platform for critical patients with COVID-19 emergency, building a conventional COVID-19 reserve material repository in the emergency department, setting up a field office for multi-department joint emergency admission service, optimizing emergency transport services for patients with COVID-19, scientific scheduling and reasonable human resource management, and providing humanistic care for employees, in order to provide reference for the management practice of the emergency department.