1The surgical treatment for the recurrent groin herniasEver since the advent of elective surgical intervention for inguinal hernia recurrences have been observed. Indeed, many of the modern surgical techniques for herniorrhaphy were devised specifically to minimize recurrence rates. For many reasons it has been difficult to actually quantify a true recurrence rate for inguinal hernia repair. Surgeons use a variety of anatomic and “tension free” mesh repairs when fixing a symptomatic groin heria. In general the recurrence rates for each type of repair have been reported and vary from 0.5% to 10% in the current literature. One factor contributing to the broad range of recurrence is the duration 0 follow up. While most recurrences are noted within 2 to 5 years of the original repair, patients often do not seek repair of the recurrence for some 10 to 15 years following the original operation. Longterm follow up is necessary to appreciate the outcome of hernia repair.In the early 1970’s Dr L M Nyhus taught me the preperitoneal approach to the repair of groin hernia. Introduced it into my practice at the time initially restriction its use to to the repair of recurrent groin hernia but eventually enlarged the indications to include high risk patients, patients with incarcerated hernia, femoral hernia and when I felt the surgical resident needed instruction in the anatomy of the groin. I have used the preperitoneal approach for the repair of groin hernia over 3 000 times in general and specifically for the repair of recurrent groin hernia in over 750 patients. The results have been most ratifying. For first time recurrent groin hernia repair the recurrence rate for over 90% of patients followed five years was 1.6%.
OBJECTIVE: To explore an effective method to repair the abdominal wall defect. METHODS: From July 1996 to December 2000, 7 cases with abdominal wall defect were repaired by pedicle graft of intestine seromuscular layer and skin graft, among them, intestinal fistula caused by previous injury during operation in 4 cases, abdominal wall defect caused by infection after primary fistulization of colon tumor in 2 cases, abdominal wall invaded by intestinal tumor in 1 case. Exploratory laparotomy was performed under general anesthesia, the infective and edematous tissue around abdominal wall defect was gotten rid off, and the pathologic intestine was removed. A segment of intestine with mesentery was intercepted, and the intestine along the longitudinal axis offside mesentery was cutted, the mucous layer of intestine was scraped. The intestine seromuscular layer was sutured to the margin of abdominal wall defect, and grafted by intermediate split thickness skin. RESULTS: The abdominal wall wound in 6 cases were healed by first intention, but part of grafted skin was necrosed, and it was healed by second skin graft. No intestinal anastomotic leakage was observed in all cases. Followed up 1 to 2 years, there were no abdominal hernia or abdominal internal hernia. All the cases could normally defecate. The nutriture of all cases were improved remarkably. CONCLUSION: Pedicle graft of intestine seromuscular layer is a reliable method to repair abdominal wall defect with low regional tension, abundant blood supply and high successful rate.
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical characteristics, treatment and prevention of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). MethodsA retrospective analysis of 295 cases of AWE from February 2007 to August 2011 in our hospital was performed. ResultsAll of the patients had abdominal operations before and 99% of them had a history of caesarean section. The mean age of the patients was (31.55±4.52) years old. The average size of the mass was (2.66±1.12) cm, significantly larger than the estimation of ultrasonography before operation which was (1.91±0.83) cm (P<0.001). No relapse was discovered five months to three years after the operation. ConclusionIt is easy to diagnose abdominal wall endometriosis through medical history, clinical characteristics, physical signs and ultrasonic assessment. The prevention of AWE is very important. Operation is still the best treatment for AWE.
ObjectiveTo summarize the method and experience in surgical treatment for mesh infection after prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with mesh infection after ventral hernia repair accepted surgical treatment in our department from June 2007 to May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 10 males and 6 females, the age range from 24 to 73 years with an average 45.2 years. The patients with mesh infection included 11 cases of infection after incisional hernia repair, 4 cases of infection after abdominal wall defects repair caused by abdominal wall tumor resection, 1 mesh infection combine with urinary fistula caused by parastomal hernia of ileal neobladder repaired by using prosthetic patch. Clinical manifestation included mesh exposion, abscess, chronic sinus, and enterocutaneous fistula. All patients accepted local treatment of change dressing by primary operative surgeon, but the wounds didn’t heal about 3 to 24 months. Then the patients performed radical removal of infected mesh and abdominal wall reconstruction. ResultsAll patients accepted affected mesh removal successfully. Five patients performed abdominal wall reconstruction by using components separation technique. Four cases accepted abdominal wall repair by using polypropylene mesh. Five patients performed abdominal wall repair by using human acelluar dermal matrix. One case accepted change dressing and vacuum aspiration on the infected wound surface without reconstruction. And one case closed the wound immediately after infected mesh removal. The postoperative hospitalization time was 9 to 25 d (average 14 d). Thirteen patients recovered with primary wound healing. The other 3 cases recovered with second healing by local change dressing. All patients were followed up from 6 to 34 months (average 22 months), no abdominal wall hernia recurrence occurred. ConclusionsIt is very difficult to deal with mesh infection after prosthetic patch repair of abdominal wall hernia or defect. The surgical treatment should be done according to specific condition of each individual so as to acquire satisfied results.
Objective To compare the effect of small intestinal submucosa(SIS)and polypropylene mesh(PPM) on repairing abdominal wall defects in rats, and toprobe into the feasibility of using SIS to repair the abdominal wall defects. Methods 100 SD rats(50 males and 50 females)were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=50). Their weight ranged from 200 to 250 g.Full thickness abdominal wall defects (2 cm×2 cm) were created by surgery and were repaired with SIS and PPM respectively. At different postoperative time (1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th and 12th week), animals were sacrificed to make histological observation. The tensile strengthand the development of adhesions were measured and observed. Results 95 animals survived and were healthy after surgery. No inflammatory response and obvious immunoreaction were observed in both groups. One week after operation, the tensile strengthof abdominal wall in SIS group (204.30±5.13 mmHg) was lower than that in PPMgroup(240.0±10.0 mmHg) at 1st week(P＜0.05),and there were no difference at 4th, 8th, 12th week. Adhesions were more marked in PPM group thanthat in SIS group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Both SIS and PPM are histologically compatible when used in rats and can maintain sufficient tensile strength. SIS is superior to PPM in regards to tissue compatibility and adhesion formation.
Objective To summarize the cl inical effect of allogenic acellular dermal matrix in repair of abdominal wall hernia and defect. Methods The cl inical data were analyzed retrospectively from 31 patients with abdominal wall hernia and defect repaired by allogenic acellular dermal matrix between March 2007 and November 2009. There were 19 males and 12females with an age range of 10-70 years (median, 42 years), including 6 abdominal wall defects caused by abdominal wall tumor resection, 4 patchs infection after abdominal wall hernia repair using prosthetic mesh, 2 incisional hernia, 1 parastomal hernia, 1 recurrent parastomal hernia receiving mesh repair, 1 mesh infection caused by parastomal hernia repair using prosthetic patch, 3 mesh infection caused by tension free inguina after hernia repair, and 13 inguinal hernia. There were 12 patients with contaminated or infectious wound. The disease duration was from 1 to 34 months (6 months on average). The defect size of abdominal wall ranged from 6 cm × 4 cm to 19 cm × 10 cm. Abdominal wall hernia or defect underwent repair using allogenic acelluar demall matrix. Results Of the 31 patients, 29 patients recovered with primary wound heal ing. Chronic sinus tract occurred in 1 patient and the wound was cured by change dressing. Wound dehiscence and patch exposure occurred in 1 patient, and second heal ing was achieved after change dressing. All the 31 patients were followed up 6-36 months, no abdominal wall hernia or hernia recurrence occurred in other patients except 1 patient who had abdominal bulge. And no foreign body sensation or chronic pain in wound area occurred. Conclusion It is feasible and safe to use allergenic acellular dermal matrix patch for repair of abdominal wall hernia or soft tissue defect, especially in contaminated or infectious wound.
Objective To observe the anti-adhesion and repair effect of 3 composite patches which composed of polylactide-co-caprolactone (PLC), hyaluronic acid (HA), collagen, and polypropylene (PP) mesh repairing abdominal wall defectin rats under contaminated environment, and to investigate the characteristics of 3 composite patches and the feasibil ity of onestage repair. Methods Ninety-three adult male Wistar rats (weighing 150-250 g) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=31): PP/PLC composite patches (group A), PP/HA/PLC composite patches (group B), and PP/collagen/PLC composite patches (group C). One rat was selected from each group to prepare the contaminated homogenate of the small intestine. The abdominal wall defect models (1 cm in diameter) were established in other rats, and the defects were repaired with 3 composite patches (1.5 cm in diameter) according to grouping method. At 30, 60, and 90 days postoperatively, the adhesions was observed, and the patch and adjacent tissue was harvested for histological observation. Results Six rats died at 10-70 days postoperatively (2 in group A, 3 in group B, and 1 in group C). No wound infection, intestinal obstruction, or hernia occurred in 3 groups. Adhesion was observed between abdominal viscera and the patch, especially intestine, epiploon, and l iver. According to the modified Katada criteria, no significant difference in the adhesion score was found among 3 groups at 30 and 60 days (P gt; 0.05); the adhesion score was significantly lower in group C than in groups A and B at 90 days (P lt; 0.05). The histological results showed that inflammatory cell infiltration, fibroblasts, secreted collagen, and the residual absorbable material were observed around the patch at 30 days in 3groups. Decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, increased fibroblasts and residual PLC were observed at 60 days in 3 groups. At 90 days, the fibroblasts became increasingly mature, collagen deposited, the mesothelium formed gradually, and the residual PLC decreased. Conclusion In contaminated environment, PP/collagen/PLC composite patch is superior to PP/PLC and PP/HA/ PLC composite patches in aspect of abdominal adhesion and inflammatory reaction, and it is more applicable to one-stage repair of rat abdominal wall defect. But it is necessary to further study in the long-term efficacy and the security of the composite patch.
Objective To investigate the improvement effects and mechanisms of composite chitosan (CS) hydrogel on traditional polypropylene (PP) mesh for repairing abdominal wall defects. Methods CS hydrogel was prepared via physical cross-linking and then combined with PP mesh to create a CS hydrogel/PP mesh composite. The internal structure and hydrophilicity of the composite were characterized using macroscopic observation, upright metallographic microscope, scanning electron microscopy, and water contact angle measurements. The performance of the composite (experimental group) in resisting cell adhesion and supporting cell infiltration was assessed through fibroblast (NIH-3T3) infiltration experiments and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) tube formation assays, and simple cells were used as control group. Finally, a bilateral abdominal wall defect model (1.5 cm×1.0 cm) was established in 18 Sprague Dawley rats aged 8-10 weeks, with the composite used on one side (experimental group) and PP mesh on the other side (control group). The effects on promoting wound healing, preventing adhesion, angiogenesis, and anti-inflammation were investigated through macroscopic observation, histological staining (HE and Masson staining), and immunohistochemical staining (CD31, CD68). Results The composite appeared as a pale yellow, transparent solid with a thickness of 2-3 mm, with the PP mesh securely encapsulated within the hydrogel. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the hydrogel contained interconnected pores measuring 100-300 μm, forming a porous structure. Contact angle measurements indicated that CS hydrogel exhibited good hydrophilicity, while PP mesh was highly hydrophobic. In vitro cell culture experiments showed that DAPI staining indicated fewer positive cells in the experimental group after 1 day of culture, while the cells in control group covered the entire well plate. After 3 days of culture, the cells in experimental group were spherical and displayed uneven fluorescence, suggesting that the material could reduce cell adhesion while supporting cell infiltration. HUVECs tube formation experiments demonstrated an increase in cell numbers in experimental group with a trend towards tube formation, while cells in control group were sparsely distributed and showed no migration. In the rat abdominal wall defect repair experiment, results showed that after 1 week post-surgery, the experimental group had tissue and blood vessels infiltrating, and by 4 weeks, the integrity was well restored with significant regeneration of muscle and blood vessels, while the control group exhibited adhesions and incomplete healing. HE staining results indicated weaker cell infiltration in the experimental group, with cell density significantly higher than that of the control group at 2 and 4 weeks post-surgery (P<0.05). Masson staining revealed that collagen fibers in the experimental group were arranged neatly, with significantly increased collagen content at 2 weeks post-surgery (P<0.05), while collagen content was similar in both groups at 4 weeks (P>0.05). Immunohistochemical staining showed that CD31-positive cells were evenly distributed between muscle layers in the experimental group, whereas the control group exhibited notable defects. At 2 weeks after operation, the CD31-positive cell ratio was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05); at 2 and 4 weeks after operation, the CD68-positive cell ratio in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion CS hydrogel has a positive effect on preventing adhesions and promoting wound healing, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic properties during the healing process. This provides a promising strategy to address challenges related to abdominal adhesions and reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of surgical technique and immunosuppressive regimen of abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft transplantation in animals and clinical practice. MethodsThe literature on abdominal wall transplantation at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThis review includes animal and clinical studies. In animal studies, partial or total full-thickness abdominal wall transplantation models have been successfully established by researchers. Also, the use of thoracolumbar nerves has been described as an important method for functional reconstruction and prevention of long-term muscle atrophy in allogeneic abdominal wall transplantation. In clinical studies, researchers have utilized four revascularization techniques to perform abdominal wall transplantation, which has a high survival rate and a low incidence of complications. ConclusionAbdominal wall allotransplantation is a critical reconstructive option for the difficulty closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Realizing the recanalization of the nerve in transplanted abdominal wall to the recipient is very important for the functional recovery of the allograft. The developments of similar research are beneficial for the progress of abdominal wall allotransplantation.
To overcome the disadvantages of the artificial materials, to design pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheet to repair full-thickness abdominal wall defect. Methods The porcine model of full-thickness abdominal wall defect by resecting 10 cm × 7 cm abdominal wall tissue (from skin to peritoneum) in 20 female animals, which were randomizedto jejunum and ileum sheet groups(n=10). Defect of abdominal wall were repaired with pedicled demucosal jejunum/ileum sheet respectively and immediate spl it-thickness free skin grafting. The general condition was observed and the tension strength of the repaired abdominal wall was measured 30 days postoperatively. In another 5 models, defect was repaired with pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheets and immediate spl it-thickness free skin grafting. The histological change and tissue thickness of the pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheet, spl it-thickness free skin graft and the repaired abdominal wall were observed and measured respectively after 30 days of operation. Results The operations were successful and no operative death occurred in all animals. All pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheets primarily healed to the edge of defected abdominal walls. Neither infection nor wound dehiscence occurred. All the spl it-thickness free skin grafting were successful. Regeneration of the intestinal mucosa occurred 4 days to 5 days postoperatively in 3 animals (2 of jejunum sheet group and 1 of ileum sheet group) at the initial stage andwere successfully treated. No postoperative herniation occurred in all animals. The cel iac pressure of herniation of the repaired abdominal wall jejunum/ileum sheet was (24.8 ± 3.4) kPa in jejunum sheet group and (21.3 ± 2.8) kPa in ileum sheet group, and the difference was significant (P lt; 0.01). No rupture of the repaired abdominal wall occurred in jejunum and ileum sheet groups when the cel iac pressure was 40 kPa. Before repairing the abdominal wall defects, there was a l ittle residual mucosal tissue on the surface of all pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheets. At the 30th day after operation, conspicuous hyperplasia and thickening occurred in all parts of tissue of the repaired abdominal walls and the residual mucosal tissue disappeared completely. Conclusion Because of simple operation, satisfactory achievement ratio, good effect, no important compl ication, and no use of expensive prosthetic materials, it is a feasible method to repair the full-thickness abdominal wall defect with pedicled demucosal small intestinal sheet.