Objective To analyze the adverse drug reactions (ADR) of Ciwujia injection and the relative influence factors. Methods We searched all clinical studies and ADR reports of Ciwujia injection from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. The relevant information such as the diseases for treatment; menstruum, dosage and compatibility of Ciwujia injection; the age, gender and allergic history of patients; and the category, treatment and prognosis of ADR were collected and analyzed. Results In the 800 clinical studies, only 97 (12.1%) reported 285 ADR cases, 144 ADR reports including 236 ADR cases. Of the ADR cases, the male to female ratio was 1׃1.34, mainly in 40 to 69 years group; The ADR cases mainly including anaphylactic shock and local pain in ADR reports and clinical studies, respectively; 72.3 percent ADR cases were Ⅲ to Ⅳ class, 4 anaphylactic shock cases died; the diseases for treatment of ADR cases mainly were coronary artery heart disease and cerebral infarction; 27 (11.4%) ADR cases had allergic history; The menstruum of Ciwujia injection mainly were 5% glucose, 0.9% NaCl and 10% glucose, drug incompatibility in 36 ADR cases; The usual dosage of Ciwujia injection was 20-60 ml; 196 (83.0%) ADR cases occurred in first time medication, mainly in the early 30 minutes of medication used. Conclusion (1) In both ADR reports and clinical studies of Ciwujia injection, there are some problems of ADR and adverse drug events (AE) were not easily distinguishable, key information of total prescriptions divided by drug persons were lacking, so we can’t calculate the ADR rate, the reporting quality remained to be improved. (2) To support the rational drug use, the basic researches of Ciwujia injection remains to be further studied, especially the dose-finding studies. (3) As one of the most frequently reported ADR of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) injection, high quality ADR monitoring, normative ADR reporting and timely analyzing the ADR reason of Ciwujia injection is extremely urgent.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by piperacillin. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect case reports on ADRs caused by piperacillin from inception to December 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and then a qualitative systematic review was performed. ResultsA total of 168 case reports involving 170 patients were included. The male to female ratio was 1.06∶1, and the median age was 54 year old. The statistical results showed that ADRs caused by piperacillin mostly involved the whole body (n=55), followed by the blood system (n=48), skin and soft tissue system (n=39) and nervous system (n=18). The most frequently reported cases were anaphylactic shock (n=29), followed by drug fever (n=19), rash (n=17) and thrombocytopenia (n=15). The most serious ADRs were anaphylactic shock (n=29) and bullous epidermal necrolysis (n=6). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that ADRs caused by piperacillin mostly involved the whole body and the most serious ADRs are toxic epidermal necrolysis and anaphylactic shock.
Objective To evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) for rejection after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Jun. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Jun. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979 to Jun. 2004). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MMF with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.1.1 software. Results Twenty-Four RCTs comparing MMF (2 g/day or 3 g/day) with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were identified. The digest system morbidity of MMF group was higher than that of AZA group. The incidence of vomiting, bellyache and diarrhea of MMF 3 g/day group was statistical by higher than that of AZA group (P＜0.05). The cytom egalovirus (CMV) infection morbidity of MMF 3 g/day group during 6 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but for MMF 2 g/day group, this difference was only seen during 1 year follow-up. Leukopenia incidence of MMF 3g/day group was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but this difference was not seen in MMF 2 g/day group. Thrombocytopenia incidence of MMF 3 g/day group was lower than AZA group with statistical difference. For skin carcinoma morbidity, no statistical difference was found among MMF 3 g/day, MMF 2 g/day and AZA groups. Conclusions Compared with AZA, MMF represents higher digest system side-effects incidence, higher morbidity of leucopenia and CMV infection and lower incidence of thrombocytopenia. The dose-response relationship of adverse drug reaction is found.
Objective To improve the knowledge of lung injury induced by rituximab. Methods Clinical data of 5 lymphoma patients with lung injury caused by rituximab chemotherapy were analyzed. Results Five patients received chemotherapy including rituximab, and had fever, cough and dyspnea after 3 to 5 chemotherapy cycles. Chest CT showed bilateral diffuse interstitial infiltrates. All 5 cases experienced hypoxemia or respiratory failure. Clinical symptoms were improved 3 to 5 days after the treatment of glucocorticoids, and pulmonary lesions were significantly alleviated 1 to 2 weeks after the treatment. According to the literature, the incidence rate of lung injury caused by rituximab was 0. 03% to 4. 9%, which has increased recently. Conclusions With the comprehensive application of rituximab, lung injury caused by this drug is not rare. The good prognosis depends on early diagnosis and treatment by further recognition of the side effect of rituximab.
Using Chinese Materia Medica (CM) as injections is an innovation that is proving effective in extensive clinical use in Mainland China. However, recent reports have focused on adverse reactions, ignoring the considerable successes of these preparations. In order to achieve balance in the media and in the minds of the public, we suggest the first step is to clarify the concepts of and differences between adverse drug reactions (ADR) and adverse events (AE) for all concerned—the public, medical practitioners, government officials, and lawmakers. Second, the State Food and Drug Administration should raise the requirements for Chinese Medicine Injection (CMI) registration and license approval and emphasize the importance of evidence-based CMI development and evidence-based CMI license approval. Thirdly, drug companies and institutions should reinforce basic research about the quality control of herbs and CMI-drug interactions. Fourth, the Government should clarify the legal responsibilities for CMI approval agencies, CMI developers, medical doctors, and patients. Fifth, the medical association and Government should enhance training for health care professionals concerning the usage of CMIs. And finally sixth, State Food and Drug Administration should monitor the content and quality of the directions for use of CMI.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin for metabolic syndrome. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, VIP, and CMAC up to the year of 2007. Handsearches and additional searches were also conducted. Randomized controlled trials of metformin for metabolic syndrome were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.9. Results Six trials involving a total of 2442 patients with metabolic syndrome were included. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the apparent heterogeneity. Metformin, compared with placebo, exhibited more favorable effects in reducing the proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.60), the proportion of patients with low HDL-c (RR 1.61, 95%CI 1.16 to 2.23), wide waist circumference (RR 1.64, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.55), and high FPG (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.17 to 2.05). Metformin was also more effective in improving FPG and insulin sensitivity. The addition of metformin to atenolol plus nitrendipine was superior to atenolol plus nitrendipine alone in reducing the proportion of patients with high TG (RR 5.57, 95%CI 1.56 to 19.84), abdominal obesity (RR 14.47, 95%CI 3.34 to 62.61), and IGT (RR 16.51, 95%CI 6.06 to 45.0). Compared with low-fat diet therapy, metformin was superior in improving FPG, 2-hour postload plasma glucose, and insulin sensitivity. No differences were observed between metformin and acarbose in the reduction of TG and FPG, but metformin was less effective than acarbose in improving 2-hour postload plasma glucose. No adverse drug reactions were reported. Conclusion Metformin has beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of high FPG, IGT, and abdominal obesity. It also proved beneficial in reducing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and increasing insulin sensitivity. The therapeutic effects of metformin on blood pressure, obesity, and lipid profile are uncertain. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin in the treatment of metabolic syndrome due to low methodological quality, small sample size, and limited number of trials. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo develop a standardized dataset for adverse drug reactions (ADR) of Chinese herbal formula granules (CHFG) to regulate the collection content of ADR, promote the standardization and normalization of ADR data collection for CHFG, and facilitate the sharing, integration, and analysis of adverse reaction data. MethodsWe used a combination of literature research, Delphi survey and consensus meeting. ResultsA Delphi survey questionnaire was constructed based on the results of literature research, including 6 domains and 76 items. After the Delphi survey and consensus meeting, a final CHFG adverse reaction dataset was developed, including 6 domains and 75 items. The six domains were patient details, suspected drugs, other treatments/concomitant medications, detailed information on the suspected adverse reaction, possible influencing factors (causes of the suspected adverse reaction), and details of the person reporting the suspected adverse reaction. Compared with the data collected by the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center, this dataset introduced a new domain called "Possible influencing factors", which included several items such as irrational use of CHFG, toxic varieties of Chinese herbal medicine, storage and usage conditions, physical characteristics, processing methods, and patient diet. It also contained the information on Chinese medicine syndromes and other herbs in the prescription, and modified multiple items based on the particularities of formula granules. ConclusionThe development and application of this standardized dataset of ADR for CHFG can facilitate data collection, integration, and analysis, furthermore improve doctors' awareness of prescribing safely and enhance patient medication safety.
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of adverse drug reaction (ADR) caused by 3 kinds of coronavirus disease 2019 drugs, and provide a reference for clinical safe medication. MethodsA total of 33 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to Xiangtan Central Hospital from January 20 to March 5, 2020 were selected as the research objects. The clinical data of patients with ADR during the antiviral process were analyzed retrospectively. The patients’ gender, age, type of medication, combination medication, organs or systems involved, and clinical manifestations were summarized and analyzed. Results A total of 33 patients were enrolled. A total of 21 cases of ADR were reported. The incidence of ADR is higher in patients older than 60 years (80.0%). The most common clinical manifestations are digestive tract symptoms (66.7%). The incidence of ADR is highest in the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir+arbidol+ribavirin (100.0%), followed by the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir+arbidol (85.7%). Abidol and ribavirin each caused 1 case of severe ADR. Conclusion For patients with coronavirus disease 2019, the combination of two or more antiviral drugs should be avoided, and pharmaceutical monitoring should be strengthened for elderly, severe/critical and allergic patients.
A total of 109 varieties of Chinese medicine injections have been approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China, all of which have the potential to induce adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Major ADRs include systemic anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, acute intravascular hemolysis, hepatorenal damage, skin lesion, cardiac damage, respiratory system injury, and gastrointestinal disorders. Contributing factors of ADRs include healthcare workers’ inadequate attention to ADRs of Chinese medicine injections, complex ingredients, allergic uncertainties, and inappropriate drug use in children and the aged. To decrease ADRs resulting from Chinese medicine injections, it is essential to improve the selection of drug indications, delivery of proper dosage regimens, compliance with drug instructions, and selection of solvents for the drugs.
Objective To investigate the method and effect of continuous improvement of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring in a major public hospital’s cooperating branch hospital. Methods PDCA cycle management was used to continuously improve the quality of ADR monitoring. ADR report network platform was established in the fourth quarter of 2014; ADR report specification training for the medical personnel was held in the first quarter of 2015; a examine mechanism was built in the second quarter of 2015. The quality and quantity of ADR monitoring before and after the PDCA cycle management were analyzed. Results ADR report timeliness conform to the requirements increased from 45.5% (from the first to third quarter of 2014) to 98.1% (from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the second quarter of 2015); accurate ADR types checking, normal name writting, and complete process description increased from 68.6%, 65.7%, 8.6% (from January 2014 to Frequency 2015) to 92.9%, 96.4%, 85.7% (from March to June 2015); the quantity of ADR report was obviously improved. Conclusion Learning from public hospital’s experience and considering its own condition in ADR monitoring, cooperating branch hospital utilizes PDCA cycle management which could continuously improve the ADR monitoring.