ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) alone or in combined with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy (intravitreal injection, IVR) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods80 eyes of 72 patients with PCV were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study according to their therapeutic plan. 30 eyes of 28 patients, 28 eyes of 30 patients and 22 eyes of 21 patients were divided into PDT group, ranibizumab 0.5 mg group (IVR group) or the combination group, respectively. The patients with PCV were diagnosed according to clinical symptoms, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescent indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). The baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment was more than 0.05, and there was no retinal fibrosis and scar for all patients. There was no statistical difference of age (F=0.187), gender (χ2=0.423), average BCVA (F=1.120) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (F=0.431) among three groups (P > 0.05). They had not received any treatment before. Patients received verteporfin PDT in PDT group, 3 consecutive monthly IVRs starting day 1 in IVR group, and 3 IVRs after 3 days, 1 month, 2 months of PDT starting day 1 in combination group. Re-treatment was considered 3 months later if the follow up shown no changes in fundus photography, OCT and ICGA. The average follow-up time was 19 months. BCVA at baseline and follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 months was measured, and the proportion of patients with ICGA-assessed complete regression of polyps at month 6 was recorded as primary outcome. The CRT was measured at baseline and 6 months as secondary outcome. ResultsThere were significant difference of BCVA at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months among three groups(F=5.480, 5.249, 3.222, 4.711; P < 0.05). The average BCVA was significantly better at 1, 3, 6, 12 month than that at baseline(t=-6.632, -4.127, -3.904, -4.494; P < 0.05) in combination group, and was significantly better at 3, 6, 12 months than that at baseline (t=-5.636, -3.039, -3.833; P < 0.05) in IVR group. However there was no significant difference of the average BCVA in PDT group between follow-up at 1, 3, 6, l 2 months and baseline (t=1.973, 0.102, -0.100, -0.761; P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with complete regression of polyps at 6 months was higher in PDT (76.7%) or combination group (68.2%) than IVR group (35.7%) (χ2=0.003, 0.025; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups at baseline (P=0.651). The mean CRT decreased in all 3 treatment groups over 6 months (t=5.120, 3.635, 5.253; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups (F=1.293, P > 0.05). ConclusionsThree therapies could effectively decrease CRT. IVR or IVR combined with PDT are both more effective than PDT therapy to improve vision of PCV patients. PDT or PDT combined with IVR was superior to IVR pnly in achieving complete regression of polyps in 6 months in PCV patients.
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab(Lucentis) on exudative age－related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods To analyze retrospectively the clinical data of 56 patients with exudative AMD, which was diagnosed by examination of ETDRS charts, color fundus photograph, fluorescein angiography(FFA) or indocyanine green angiography(ICGA) and optical coherence tomography(OCT), were underwent intravitreal injection Lucentis 0.5 mg. Before the treatment, the ETDRS charts letter of 56 eyes was 25.1; choroidal neovascularization(CNA) was leaky which examined by FFA and ICGA; the average thickness of retina was 303.45 mu;m. Ranibizumab injection therapeutic times were 2.8, the average therapeutic times were 3.1. Follow－up time was 6－12 months (mean 8.7 months). Visual acuity (ETDRS charts letter), retinal thickness, leakage of CNV and operative complications before and after the treatment were analyzed. Results At the end of the follow－up period, the mean letter of ETDRS charts was 38.5, increased 13.4 letters (P＜0.01), the ETDRS charts improved 15 or more letters in 22 eyes (39.3%), decreased more than 15 letters in 2 eyes (3.6%); the foveal thickness on OCT images were 303.45 mu;m before treatment and 191.35 mu;m a fter treatment, decreased significantly (P＜0.00); FFA and/ or ICGA showed CNV complete closure in 12 eyes (21.4%), partial closure in 33 eyes (58.9%), no change in 9 eyes (16.1%) and new CNV in 1 eye (1.8%); Slight complications after operation disappeared during one week. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab for exudative AMD was well tolerated, with an improvement in VA, FFA or ICGA , and OCT. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2008,24:160-163)
The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy represents a landmark in the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, as a new therapy, several problems such as durability of the therapeutic effects, medication side effects, and medication selection have emerged. We should make appoint of improving the therapeutic effect and safety by realizing the limitation of the therapy, monitoring the clinical potential adverse reactions of anti-VEGF agents, and recommending individualized treatment.
Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the key characteristic of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and the effective therapy is intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents based on clinical and basic research. In the meantime the challenge is how to further improve the inhibiting effect for CNV and visual function of anti-VEGF treatment on nAMD. The new strategy and drug delivery devices for anti-VEGF treatment will optimize the clinical scheme. From bench to bedside, the research on targeted treatment of angiogenesis brings the bloom of nAMD medical therapy.
Objective To observe the effects of intravitreal injection of conbercept for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Twenty-one patients (40 eyes) with AP-ROP were enrolled in this study. There were 9 males (18 eyes) and 12 females (22 eyes), with the mean gestational age of (28.30±1.79) weeks and the mean birth weight of (1 021.40±316.70) g. All the lesions of 40 eyes were located in posterior zone, with 24 eyes in zone I and 16 eyes in zone II. All the eyes were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg). During follow-up, nonresponders or patients with deterioration were retreated with intravitreal injection of conbercept or photocoagulation; patients with progressive deterioration to stage 4 had received vitrectomy. At the 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks after treatments, the disappearance or decrease of retinal vessel tortuosity and neovascularization, and the growth of the normal retinal vessels toward the peripheral retina were evaluated. Results Thirty-six eyes were cured for only one injection, the cured rate was 90.00%. However, 2 eyes (5.00%) had progressed to stage 4 with contractive retinal detachment, which underwent vitrectomy. Two eyes (5.00%) had received twice injections, whose remaining avascular zone area treated by photocoagulation. No major systemic or ocular complications after injection appeared. All lens remained transparent and no iatrogenic retinal hole was occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of AP-ROP.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
Objective To observe the baseline characteristics and visual outcomes after two years follow-up of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients treated with ranibizumb. Methods Forty-four eyes of 44 patients with exudative AMD were enrolled into this retrospective study, 19 were men and 25 were women. The mean age was 78 years (range 64 – 92 years). All patients were underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study), fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean BCVA was (50.36±14.43) letters, the mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was (291.95±82.19) μm, and the fluorescence leakage area of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was (7.61±5.84) mm2. All patients received three initial intravitreous injection of ranibizumb (IVR) and were retreated with monthly IVR when needed. The mean follow up time was 25.6 months (range 24 – 29 months). On 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, BCVA and OCT were repeated. On 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, FFA and ICGA were repeated. The change of BCVA, CFT and fluorescence leakage area of CNV were observed. The association of baseline characteristics and two year visual outcomes were analyzed. Results On 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, the BCVA were improved significantly (t= −1.89, −3.51, −4.61, −4.04, −5.77, −4.69;P＜0.05), the CFT were decreased significantly (t=1.51, 2.30, 3.40, 3.28, 3.54, 3.88, 3.73;P＜0.05). On 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, the fluorescence leakage area of CNV were reduced significantly (t=2.12, 2.90, 3.51, 4.12, 4.06;P＜0.05). The lower baseline BCVA, the more improved after treatment. The BCVA improvement degree has a negative relationship with baseline BCVA and fluorescence leakage area of CNV (r=0.505, −0.550;P＜0.05), but no correlation with baseline CFT (r=0.210,P＞0.05). Conclusion Two year visual outcomes of exudative AMD patients treated with ranibizumb is negative correlated with baseline BCVA and fluorescence leakage area of CNV, but not correlated with baseline CFT.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of preoperative intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on the operation duration of vitrectomy and postoperative vision for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsA prospective study was carried out with the 90 PDR patients (90 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy. The 90 patients(90 eyes)were assigned to the vitrectomy only group(43 eyes) and the IVR combined with vitrectomy group (47 eyes). The IVR was performed 5-13 days prior to vitrectomy in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. There were 15 eyes with fibrous proliferation PDR (FPDR), 16 eyes with advanced PDR (APDR) without involving the macular and 16 eyes with APDR involving the macular in the vitrectomy only group. There were 14 eyes with FPDR, 15 eyes with APDR without involving the macular and 14 eyes with APDR involving the macular patients in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. All the eyes in the two groups were regularly operated by the same doctor to complete the vitrectomy. The start and end time of vitrectomy were recorded. The average follow-up time was 10 months. The changes of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe duration of operation of the FPDR type (t=-8.300) and the APDR involving the macular type (t=-2.418) in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group was shorter than vitrectomy only group (P < 0.05). The comparison of duration of operation of the APDR without involving the macular type in the two groups has no statistically significant difference (t=-1.685, P > 0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the comparison of BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group and the vitrectomy only group in APDR involving the macular type has no statistically significant difference (t=0.126, P > 0.05). At 3, 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in APDR involving the macular type was significantly better than the BCVA of the vitrectomy only group (t=8.014, 7.808; P < 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in FPDR type (t=3.809, 1.831, 0.600) and APDR without involving the macular type (t=0.003, 1.092, 3.931) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the BCVA in APDR without involving the macular type compared with pre-treatment, the difference was distinctly statistically significant (t=2.940, 4.162, 6.446; P < 0.05); the BCVA in APDR involving the macular type (t=0.953, 1.682, 1.835) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionPreoperative IVR of PDR can shorten the operation duration and improve the BCVA of APDR involving the macular type.
ObjectiveTo observe the different effect of 23G vitrectomy surgery assisted with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and pan-retina photocoagulation in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treatment. MethodsA total of 60 patients (78 eyes) with severe PDR diagnosed were enrolled and divided into intravitreal injection of Lucentis group (Group A, 22 patients, 28 eyes), pan-retina photocoagulation group (Group B, 18 patients, 20 eyes) and control group (Group C, 20 patients, 30 eyes), all of them received 23G vitreoretinal surgery. The average operation time, iatrogenic hiatus, the use of filler and electric coagulation, postoperative bleeding and best corrected visual acuity in three months were comparatively analyzed among the three groups. ResultsThe operation time in the three group was (67.429±11.243), (77.762±10.435), (106.839±20.724) min respectively, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were statistically significant(t=8.940, 5.928; P < 0.05). Five eyes needed electric coagulation in Group A, 6 eyes in Group B, and 24 eyes in Group C, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant (χ2=19.955, 10.505;P < 0.05). Four eyes used the filler in Group A, 3 eyes in Group B, and 23 eyes in Group C, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant (χ2=18.099, 14.083;P < 0.05). The difference of iatrogenic hiatus and postoperative bleeding was no significance among the three groups (P > 0.05). The best corrected visual acuity of 3 months after surgery in the three group is (0.383±0.122), (0.251±0.067), (0.104±0.044) respectively, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant(t=11.909, 13.616;P < 0.05). ConclusionThe intravitreaI injection of ranibizumab or pan-retina photocoagulation treatment before the vitrectomy surgery is very effective, both of them can shorten the operation time, reduce electric coagulation and use of filler, and improve patients' eyesight.
Objective To observe the effects of dual targets intervention on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in diabetic rat retina. Methods Forty-eight Sprague -Dawley rats were randomly divided into control group (CON1 group) and diabetes mellitus group (DM group). The rats of DM group were induced with streptozotocin injection creating a diabetic model. Retinas were obtained at eight, 10, 12 weeks after DM induction from both groups. CTGF and VEGF mRNA levels were examined by realtime reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Based on the results of above experiments, 60 rats with same conditions were selected. Fifty rats were induced with streptozotocin injection creating a diabetic model, and 10 rats comprised the control group (CON2 group). Then the 50 diabetic rats were randomly divided into ranibizumab and CTGF shRNA dual targets intervention group, ranibizumab singletarget intervention group, CTGF shRNA singletarget intervention group and nonintervention group. Retinas were obtained at one week after intervention from all the groups. CTGF and VEGF mRNA levels were examined by RT-PCR. Results The levels of CTGF mRNA were significantly higher in DM group than that in CON1 group at the 8th weeks after DM induction, and this upregulation was maintained through the 12th week (t=-2.49, -2.67, -2.42;P＜0.05). There was no difference on VEGF mRNA levels between DM group and CON1 group at the 8th weeks after DM induction(t=-0.443,P=0.669). VEGF mRNA levels of DM group started to be significantly elevated over those in the CON1 group at the 10th week, and remained to be higher at the 12th week (t=-2.35, -2.57;P＜0.05). The VEGF mRNA of ranibizumab single-target intervention group was significantly lower than that in non-intervention group (t=-3.44,P=0.014), which was similar to CON2 group (t=-1.37,P＞0.05); however, the CTGF mRNA level was significantly increased as compared to the nonintervention group (t=2.48,P＜0.05). In the CTGF shRNA single-target intervention group, the levels of CTGF and VEGF mRNA were decreased as compared to the non-intervention group (t=0.23, -2.92;P＜0.05). In the ranibizumab and CTGF shRNA dual targets intervention group, the levels of CTGF and VEGF mRNA were decreased as compared to the non-intervention group (t=-6.09, -5.11;P＜0.001), which was similar to CON2 group (t=-1.16, 1.139; P＞0.05). Conclusions Both CTGF and VEGF gene expression are up-regulated in early diabetic rat retina, and the level of CTGF increased earlier than VEGF. Ranibizumab combined with CTGF shRNA could simultaneously reduce the level of CTGF and VEGF mRNA in diabetic rat retina.