This article reports a patient diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis. After admission, the cardiac multidisciplinary team performed transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) emergently due to its unstable hemodynamics. The procedure was successful, and the initial cardiogram during the operation after TAVR suggested that the stenosis was greatly improved. But gradually the next day bedside echocardiography suggested that the transvalvular pressure difference increased and the prosthetic valve forward blood flow accelerated. Acute valve thrombosis after TAVR was taken into consideration. Warfarin and heparin were administrated for anticoagulation, after which the pressure difference across the valve and the forward blood flow rate of the artificial valve were evenly improved.
Objective To investigate the effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with warfarin functions and blood coagulation system, to provide the reference for clinicians of the selection of AEDs under the combination therapy with warfarin. Methods Analyse the clinical data of the patient with symptomatic epilepsy from the Second Clinical Medical College of Guiyang University of Chinese Medicine on April 1, 2017, whom taking AEDs and warfarin at the same time, clear the drug adverse reactions, and analysed related literature. Results After the treatment with valproate, abnormal blood coagulation, a danger and emergency data appeared, so we stopped using warfarin immediately, and reduce the dosage of valproate gradually, insteadly, we used levetiracetam as antiepileptic therapy. Monitoring blood coagulation function, when it returned to normal, restart warfarin anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions When start antiepileptic treatment in relevant basic diseases of symptomatic epilepsy, for a variety of combination reactions, AEDs can affect the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, so we need to consider the interaction between drugs and avoid adverse reactions.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from inception to July 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 cohort studies involving 4 051 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no differences in the rate of thromboembolic (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.36 to 2.35, P=0.86), ischemic stroke (OR=1.15, 95%CI 0.22 to 6.07, P=0.87), major bleeding (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.66, P=0.61), minor bleeding (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.34, P=0.60) and pericardial tamponade (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.45 to 2.47, P=0.90) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are similar. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of simplified regional citrate anticoagulation in sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED). Methods We prospectively analyzed the patients with acute kidney injury or end stage renal disease in Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from March 2017 to May 2018. All the patients received SLED treatment by Fresenius 4008s ARrTplus through either femoral or internal jugular venous catheter, with each session of SLED treatment lasting for 8 to 10 hours. We pumped in 4% tri-sodium citrate solution through the arterial line at 300 mL/h and citrate infusion was stopped 15 minutes before ending of treatment. The blood flow was 150 mL/min while the calcium-containing dialysate (Ca 1.25 mmol/L) was delivered at 200 mL/min. We recorded peripheral, post filter ionized calcium level, and systemic citrate concentration at 0, 2 and 6 hours, respectively. Results Sixty-two patients underwent 185 sessions of SLED. Three sessions of two patients were discontinued for filter clotting, while the rest 182 SLED sessions (98.4%) were all successfully completed. The systemic citrate concentrations at 2 and 6 hours after beginning were of no statistical difference [(0.82±0.31) vs. (0.86±0.31) mmol/L, P=0.21]. The 0-, 2-, 6-hour peripheral blood ionized calcium levels were (1.12±0.21), (1.09±0.12), and (1.11±0.09) mmol/L, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05), and post filter ionized calcium at 2 and 6 hours after beginning were recorded as (0.35±0.06) and (0.31±0.04) mmol/L. The trans-membrane pressure at 2 and 6 hours after beginning were (106.2±13.8) and (105.3±22.4) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), with no significant difference (P=0.42). At 6 hours after beginning, prothrombin time and activated partial thrombin time were identified to be similar to those before SLED. During SLED treatments, in 4 sessions (2.2%), patients suffered mild metabolic alkalosis, but all of them recovered 4 hours later by themselves. No bleeding complication, thrombocytopenia, cardiac arrhythmia, hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis or hypotension was observed. Conclusion SLED under simplified citrate anticoagulation is safe and effective by using calcium containing dialysate, which achieves satisfying regional anticoagulation effect without interfering systemic clotting function, and provides a new option of anticoagulation for SLED.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of thrombolysis with anticoagulation therapy for patients with acute sub-massive pulmonary thromboembolism. Methods The clinical data of 84 patients with acute sub-massive pulmonary thromboembolism were analyzed retrospectively, mainly focusing on the in-hospital efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and/ or anticoagulation. The efficacy was evaluated based on 6 grades: cured, markedly improved, improved, not changed, deteriorated and died. Results Among the 84 patients,49 patients received thrombolysis and sequential anticoagulation therapy( thrombolysis group) , 35 patients received anticoagulation therapy alone( anticoagulation group) . As compared with the anticoagulation group, the thrombolysis group had higher effective rate( defined as patients who were cured, markedly improved or improved, 81. 6% versus 54. 3%, P = 0. 007) , lower critical event occurrence ( defined as clinical condition deteriorated or died, 2. 0% versus 14. 3% , P = 0. 032) . There was no significant difference in bleeding rates between the two groups ( thrombolysis group 20. 4% versus anticoagulation group 14. 3% , P gt; 0. 05) . No major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage occurred in any of the patients. Conclusions Thrombolysis therapy may be more effective than anticoagulation therapy alone in patients with acute sub-massive pulmonary thromboembolism, and thus warrants further prospective randomized control study in large population.
Objective To investigate the risk factors and the prevention and cure methods of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Methods From March 2004 to July 2008，twentythree patients with ischemic stroke after mechanical heart valve replacement had been researched(ischemic stroke group). One hundred and twenty patients who had undergone mechanical heart valve replacement were randomly chosen in the same period as control group. Gender, age, the dose of warfarin , anticoagulation intensity(INR), INR review interval, left atrial diameter and heart rhythm were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors of ischemic stroke were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results (1) Patients in ischemic stroke group all discharged from hospital after treatment, and they were followed up for 1 month-3 years after discharged. All the patients’ neurological complications improved obviously, and no recurrent embolism and severe hemorrhage was found. (2) There was no statistical significance between two groups in gender, age and the dose of warfarin（Pgt;0.05）. (3) Nonconditional logistic regression analysis on influence factors showed that atrial fibrillation（P=0.000）, left atrial enlargement（P=0.002）, low anticoagulation intensity（P=0.012） and longtime INR review interval（P=0.047）were the risk factors of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Conclusions (1)The prognosis of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement is better than that of intracranial hemorrhage, and the occurrence of ischemic stroke is related to many risk factors. (2)The influences of risk factors should be minimized in order to avoid ischemic stroke. (3) Early low intensity anticoagulation therapy is safe and effective for patients with ischemic stroke after heart valve replacement.
ObjectiveTo investigate the hotspots and frontiers and to reveal research trends of cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) by visual analysis.MethodsWe explored the distributions, key citations and research trends of articles on cirrhosis with PVT published from 1991 to 2020 by citation analysis, co-word analysis, and burst detection by information visual software CiteSpace.ResultsThe quantity of articles on cirrhosis with PVT had been increasing over time. The management of PVT remained the hotspots, while the efficacy and prognosis of anticoagulation of PVT as well as the risk factors and underlying mechanisms of PVT had been frontiers in recent years.ConclusionsAnticoagulation and risk factors have been hotspots and frontiers in recent years.
In recent years, the field of transcatheter heart valve interventional therapy has developed rapidly. Valvular thrombosis is a rare postoperative complication, which can affect valvular function early or lead to clinical embolic events, and is gradually being valued by surgeons. The clinical manifestations of thrombosis after different types of interventional valve replacement are different. Although anticoagulant therapy is believed to be effective for valve thrombosis, the selection of anticoagulant drugs and the duration of anticoagulation are still controversial. This article reviews the definition, clinical features, prevention and treatment of valve thrombosis after several types of transcatheter heart valve replacement, mainly related to transcatheter aortic valve replacement and transcatheter mitral valve replacement, and aims to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of valve thrombosis after transcatheter heart valve replacement.
Coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding is common in clinical practice. The disease is dangerous and has a high mortality rate. This article will review the risk factors for coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding (including Helicobacter pylori infection, long-term use of antiplatelet drugs and combined anticoagulation drugs), blood transfusion strategies (including hemoglobin transfusion thresholds and platelet transfusion strategies), and the management of antithrombotic drugs after bleeding (including the management of antiplatelet drugs and the management of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet drugs). The purpose is to provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding.
Recent clinical trials showed that dabigatran was superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, however whether it is suitable for the lifelong anticoagulation in patients after heart valve replacement, remains controversial. Many animal experiments showed that dabigatran group was better than heparin and warfarin in the prevention of thrombosis and bleeding complications after valve replacement. Randomized, phaseⅡstudy to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral dabigatran etexilate in patients after heart valve replacement (RE-ALIGN) clinical trial showed that dabigatran wasn't as effective as warfarin in preventing thrombosis, but increases the risk of bleeding. And there are some case reports about thrombosis and bleeding complications after taking dabigatran. At present, the efficacy and safety of dabigatran applying in patients after heart valve replacement still needs further study.