ObjectiveTo compare the safety and clinical outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR)through right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT)and conventional median sternotomy. MethodsFrom March 2006 to March 2013, 169 patients underwent isolated AVR in Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Among them, 42 patients received AVR via RAMT (RAMT group)including 30 males and 12 females with their age of 59.31±8.30 years. And 127 patients received AVR via conventional median sternotomy (conventional surgery group)including 89 males and 38 females with their age of 60.02±5.93 years. There were 75 patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS), 42 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR)and 52 patients with AS+AR. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in preoperative clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. All the patients successfully received isolated AVR. 153 patients received mechanical prosthesis and 16 patients received bioprosthetic valves. Fifty-two patients received 21 mm valves, and 117 patients received 23 mm valves. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time of RAMT group were significantly longer than those of conventional surgery group (P < 0.001). But mechanical ventilation time, length of postoperative ICU stay and hospital stay of RAMT group were significantly shorter than those of conventional surgery group (P < 0.001). Postoperative thoracic drainage, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion of RAMT group were significantly less than those of conventional surgery group (P < 0.001). In conventional surgery group, 2 patients underwent reexploration for bleeding and 2 patients had wound infection postoperatively. Two patients died postoperatively, both in conventional surgery group, including 1 patient with low cardiac output syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and another patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis secondary to sternal wound infection. ConclusionCompared with conventional median sternotomy, RAMT is safe and efficacious for patients undergoing isolated AVR with minimal surgical injury, better postoperative recovery and cosmetic outcomes.
ObjectiveTo evaluate early and midterm outcomes of aortic root enlargement (ARE) combined with supra-annular valve implantation for adult patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and small aortic roots (SARs). MethodsFrom January 2007 to July 2011, ARE combined with supra-annular valve implantation was performed for 38 adult patients with AS and SARs in Department of Cardiac Surgery of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. There were 12 males and 26 females with their age of 16-58 (38.6±21.0) years, body weight of 48-78 (58.5±12.0) kg, body height of 153-176 (162.8±12.0) cm and a mean body surface area (BSA) of 1.67±0.32 m2. There were 19 patients with rheumatic AS, 11 patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve and AS, 5 patients with degenerative AS and 3 patients with AS and infective endocarditis. Preopera-tively, 8 patients were in NYHA class Ⅱ, 29 patients were in NYHA class Ⅲ, and 1 patient was in NYHA class Ⅳ. Aortic annular diameter (AAD) was 15-20 (17.6±2.8) mm and trans-aortic pressure gradient was 53-75 (62.8±10.5) mm Hg. ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time was 83-145 (112±29) minutes, and aortic cross-clamping time was 58-116 (87±28) minutes. Intraoperative measurement of AAD was 15-20 (17.3±2.6) mm, AAD after ARE was 20-25 (22.6±2.3) mm. AAD after ARE was 12-17 (14.0±2.6) mm larger than AAD before ARE. Actual size of prosthetic valves was 2-3 sizes larger than predicted size without ARE in all the patients. There was no perioperative death or severe complication including bleeding. Length of ICU stay was 12-41 (26±14) hours, and length of hospital stay was 9-15 (12.5±3.2) days. A total of 37 patients (97.4%) were followed up for over 2 years after discharge. All the patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ. Grade 2/6 systolic murmur was heard in 3 patients. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed significant improvement or complete disappearance of left ventricular hypertrophy in 35 patients, and mild left ventricular hypertrophy in 2 patients. ECG during follow-up didn't show any sign of myocardial ischemia, ventricular arrhythmia or severe atrioventricular block in any patient. ConclusionEarly and midterm outcomes of ARE combined with supra-annular valve implantation for adult patients with AS and SARs are satisfactory, but long-term outcomes of this procedure need further follow-up.
ObjectiveTo discuss the influence of early postoperative hemodynamic, postoperative mortality and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events with the phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who had simple aortic valve replacement in our hospital bewteen January 2012 and January 2014. The 89 patients were divided into two groups including a match group (16 females and 48 males with average age of 58.1±10.4 years) and a mismatch group (15 females and 10 males with average age of 65.3±12.8 years). We compared early results between the two groups. ResultsThere is a statistic difference (P < 0.05) in aortic flow velocity, mean pressure gradient, and the maximum pressure gradient between the two groups. The survival rate of the match group is significantly lower than that of the mismatch group (P < 0.05). And there is a statistical difference in adverse cardiovascular event-free incidence between the two groups (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch can affect postoperative hemodynamic and lead to heart failure after surgery. And early mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients are increased due to prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Objective To observe preserving effect on myocytes in porcine aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC). Methods 7 pigs were collected as experimental animals and undertook aortic valve replacement with MECC. Morphological and immunofluorescence intensity changes of right atrial and left ventricular tissues were observed. Results HE staining showed that there were not significant changes and edema or injury of myocytes of right atriums and left ventricles between preoperation and postoperation. Immunofluorescence staining showed complement C3b/c in right atrial myocardial tissues after the operation were a little ber, and innate antibody IgG were a little ber in left ventricular myocardial tissues but similarly weak in right atrial myocardial tissues pre- and post-operation. There was not significant changes in HSPG staining in pre-and post-operative right atrial myocardial tissues, but HSPG were obviously weaker in left ventricular myocardial tissues after the operation. Conclusion MECC is effective on support of porcine aorta valve replacement.
Abstract： Objective To investigate the effects of βreceptor blocker on intraventricular pressure gradient and left ventricle remodeling after valve replacement for critical aortic stenosis. Methods Fifty-six patients with critical aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement surgery from January 2008 to January 2010 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Thirtytwo of them who were followed up were selected to be enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups under the same basis of clinical features. Twelve patients in the experimental group received oral βreceptor blocker (Metoprolol, 6.2525.00 mg once, twice daily). The rest 20 patients in the control group had no βreceptor blocker. The various indicators of ultrasound cardiogram (UCG) shortly after operation (within a week) and long after operation (6-24 months) were compared between the two groups. Results No death occurred in both groups, and chest distress, shortness of breath and other symptoms were obviously alleviated. Although left ventricular endsystolic dimension (LVESD) and left ventricular outflow tract dimension (LVOTD) of both groups increased 6-24 months after operation, compared with the early postoperative period, only the increase of LVOTD in the experimental group showed statistical difference (t=-47.937, P=0.001). In both groups, interventricular septum thickness (IVST), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), filament band velocity of left ventricular outflow tract (V), intraventricular pressure gradient (G) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of the later period after operation were significantly lower than those of the early postoperative period. All these indicators in the experimental group showed significant differences (t=7.781, P=0.001；t=5.749, P=0.001; t=2.637, P=0.023; t=7.167, P=0.001; t=100.061, P0.001), while only V, G， and LVMI showed statistical differences in the control group (t=4.051, P=0.001; t= 4.759, P= 0.001; t=-0.166,P=0.001). EF in the experimental group also indicated significant difference compared with early period after aortic valve replacement (t=-6.621, P=0.001). EF between two groups indicated no significant difference (t=-0.354,P=0.726). But differences between the two groups in LVEDD, IVS, G， and LVMI were all statistically significant in the later period after surgery (t=-2.494, P=0.018; t=-3.434, P=0.002;t=-2.171,P=0.038; t=-2.316, P=0.028). Conclusion β-receptor blocker is a safe and reliable drug for those patients who have undergone aortic valve replacement surgery for critical aortic stenosis, and can decrease significantly the residual intraventricular pressure gradient and accelerate left ventricular cardiac remodeling.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of aortic valve replacement surgery with minimally invasive procedure. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in our hospital between January 2011 and August 2013. The patients undergoing minimally invasive procedure were as a minimally invasive group(30 patients with 18 males and 12 females at age of 60.2±13.4 years). The patients undergoings conventional procedure were as a control group(42 patients with 27 males and 15 females at age of 61.3±14.5 years). The outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsThere was no death and severe complication in both groups. Postoperative echocardiography showed no paravalvular leakage, no valve dysfunction in both groups. There were no significant statistically differences between the two groups in cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic crossclamping time, ventilation time, postoperative left ventricle ejection fraction, the length of ICU stay and hospital stay (P>0.05). Blood transfusion ratio, blood transfusion volume and blood loss volume were lower in the minimally invasive group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The length of incision, chest closure time, operative duration were shorter in the minimally invasive group than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionUpper median sternotomy is a safe and feasible procedure for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery. Compared with conventional aortic valve replacement, its advantages include less surgical trauma, stable sternum, rapid recovery, less blood loss and blood transfusion, and cosmetic outcomes.
Heart valve replacement is the major surgical treatment of severe valvular diseases. Due to the durability and reoperation-free, mechanical valves are widely used. Bioprosthesis valves became popular recently because of long service life and no demand for lifelong anticoagulation. However, how to choose the appropriate prosthetic heart valves, especially the application of bioprosthesis valves for patients at 55 to 65 years is still a major problem. This review focuses on more effective and scientific basis for rational choice of mechanical and bioprosthesis valve.
Abstract:The use of pulmonary autograft was first reported in 1967 by Ross for the treatment of aortic valve disease in adults. Since that time, Ross procedure has been applied to a variety of forms of aortic stenosis and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and mitral valve disease, Ross procedure has undergone several modifications, such as the root replacement method, inclusion cylinder technique, annular reduction, Konno root enlargement procedures and replacement of the mitral valve with a pulmonary autograft （Ross-Kabbani procedure or Ross Ⅱ procedure）. Advantages of Ross procedure in women of childbearing age, children and young adults include freedom from anticoagulation, appropriate sizing, cellular viability with growth potential proportional to somatic growth, acceptable long-term durability, excellent hemodynamic performance and decreased susceptibility to endocarditis. Surgical technical aspects, indications, selection criteria for the Ross procedure and its modifications, their applicability in the surgical management of aortic stenosis, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and mitral valve disease and clinical outcome of Ross procedure are reviewed in this article.
ObjectiveTo investigate long-term outcomes of patients without warfarin anticoagulation after isolated prosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) and evaluate the feasibility of short-term instead of lifelong anticoagulation therapy for low-risk AVR patients. MethodsSeven patients who underwent prosthetic AVR in Guangdong General Hospital between 1996 and 1999 but discontinued warfarin anticoagulation 3 years after surgery were regularly followed up. There were 6 male and 1 female patients with their age of 25-75 (40.0±11.4) years. These patients received warfarin anticoagulation during the first 3 years after surgery but discontinued oral anticoagulant 3 years after surgery (discontinued anticoagulation group). Fifteen patients who underwent prosthetic AVR during the same period and continued warfarin anticoagulation were enrolled as the control group (continuing anticoagulation group). International normalized ratio (INR) was set between 1.8 and 2.5 during warfarin anticoagulation period in both groups. Survival rate and the incidence of severe adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsIn the discontinued anticoagulation group,1 patient was lost during follow-up. No thromboembolic event,death or prosthetic valve thrombosis was observed. All the patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ. In the continuing anticoagulation group,3 patients were lost during follow-up. Eleven patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ and 2 patients were in NYHA class Ⅱ. Severe anticoagulation-related bleeding events occurred in 3 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient died of massive outbreak of vomiting blood,and another patient had sudden death. Ten-year survival rate was 100.0% and 86.7% in the discontinued anticoagulation group and continuing anticoagulation group, respectively. ConclusionFor low-risk patients after isolated prosthetic AVR,short-term warfarin anticoagulation may be acceptable, which means warfarin is administered only in the first 3 years after surgery and discontinued 3 years after surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of different surgical strategies for moderate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on patients' prognosis.MethodsA total of 118 AVR patients, including 84 males and 34 females, aged 58.1±12.4 years, who were complicated with moderate FMR were retrospectively recruited. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment strategy of mitral valve: a group A (no intervention, n=11), a group B (mitral valve repair, n=51) and a group C (mitral valve replacement, n=56). The primary endpoint was the early and mid-term survival of the patients, and the secondary endpoint was the improvement of FMR.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 29.5 months. Five patients died perioperatively, all of whom were from the group C. Early postoperative FMR improvement rates in the group A and group B were 90.9% and 94.1% (P=0.694). The mid-term mortality in the three groups were 0.0%, 5.9% and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.264), while the incidences of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.0%, 9.8% and 17.7%, respectively (P=0.230). Improvements of FMR in the group A and group B were 100.0% and 94.3% at the mid-term follow-up (P>0.05).ConclusionFor patients receiving AVR with moderate FMR, conservative treatment or concurrent repair of mitral valve may be more reasonable, while mitral valve replacement may increase the incidence of early and mid-term adverse events.