ObjectiveTo discuss related clinical research progress of bone metastasis of breast cancer. MethodThe literatures about bone metastases of breast cancer were researched and reviewed. ResultsAlthough there were so many related researches at home and abroad for bone metastasis of breast cancer,but the specific mechanism was still not fully elucidated.At present,the diagnostic method of bone metastasis of breast cancer included X-ray examination,bone scanning,computer tomography,magnetic resonance imaging,positron tomography,positron emission computed tomography,pathology biopsy,and detection of serum markers.In clinical treatment,the treatment consisted of systemic therapy and local therapy,but there was no uniform standard. ConclusionFor high incidence and serious influence on quality of life,bone metastasis of breast cancer needs to be studied further.
【Abstract】Objective To introduce three methods of creating the animal model of bone metastasis from breast cancer and the advances in the application of these models. Methods The related literatures were collected and reviewed.Results In summary, breast cancer cells injected through left ventricles was commonly used. Breast cancer cells injected into medullary cavity of shaft of femur was simple and effective, but it was very different from the real condition of bone metastasis of patients. The development of animal model created by surgical orthotopic implantation gives the researchs an ideal instrument similar with the condition of patients to research the mechanism of bone metastasis and the treatment. Conclusion Each animal model of bone metastasis from breast cancer has itself usefulness. Our destination is to create the real model of bone metastasis from breast cancer that is very similar with the patients.
ObjectiveTo study the influence of estrogen on zoledronic acid in preventing bone metastasis of breast cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and sixteen breast cancer patients who accepted modified radical mastectomy, chemotherapy, and the prophylaxis of zoledronate acid from January 2006 to December 2009 in this hospital were collected, including luminal A 55 cases, luminal B 63 cases, HER-2 positive 50 cases, triple negative 48 cases. Then these patients were categorized into low estrogen group(n=39) and normal estrogen group(n=177) according to the estrogen level. The patients in the low estrogen group accepted drug induced menopause, in the normal estrogen group didn't accept drug induced menopause. All the patients accepted the therapy of zoledronate acid, then with clinical follow-up for 3-5 years until progressive disease(include neoplasm recurrence, bone metastasis, and other neoplasm metastasis etc.). ResultsThe rate of bone metastasis in the low estrogen group was significantly lower than that in the normal estrogen group (χ2=21.91, P < 0.05). For the patients with luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 positive, and triple negative, the rates of bone metastases in the low estrogen group were significantly lower than those in the normal estrogen group[luminal A:5.13%(2/39) versus 12.43%(22/177), χ2=4.54, P < 0.05;luminal B:7.69%(3/39) versus 13.56%(24/177), χ2=6.04, P < 0.05;HER-2 postive:2.56%(1/39) versus 15.25%(27/177), χ2=3.95, P < 0.05;triple negative:2.56% (1/39) versus 18.08%(32/177), P < 0.05]. The rate of bone metastasis among the different subtype of breast cancer in the low estrogen group was not significant difference(χ2=0.55, P > 0.05). ConclusionsFrom the limited preliminary data, the premenopausal women patients with breast cancer who accepted drug induced menopause afer application of zoledronate acid for preverttion of bone metastasis has a obviously efficacy, and the efficacy has no difference among four molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of zoledronic acid combined with radiotherapy in treating bone metastasis of malignant tumor. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on bone metastasis of malignant tumor from inception to October, 2012. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Twenty nine trials were included involving 2 021 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the radiotherapy alone group, zoledronic acid combined with radiotherapy improved the effectiveness rate of pain relieving at the end of treatment (OR=3.08, 95%CI 2.30 to 4.12, Plt;0.000 01), the effectiveness rate of pain relieving two weeks after treatment (OR=3.39, 95%CI 2.52 to 4.56, Plt;0.000 01), the quality of life (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.66 to 4.52, Plt;0.000 01) and the ability of movement (OR=2.96, 95%CI 2.16 to 4.05, Plt;0.000 01). Zoledronic acid combined with radiotherapy also reduced the incidence of new bone metastasis (OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.45, Plt;0.000 1) and the incidence rate of bone-related events (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.92, P=0.04). The adverse reactions of zoledronic acid combined with radiotherapy such as fever (OR=11.92, 95%CI 6.31 to 22.48, Plt;0.000 01) and hypocalcaemia (OR=8.82, 95%CI 1.61 to 48.36, P=0.01), significantly increased. Conclusion Compared with radiotherapy alone, zoledronic acid combined with radiotherapy can relieve bone metastatic pain, effectively enhance patients’ ability of movement, improve quality of life, and decrease new bone metastasis and the occurrence of bone-related events.
ObjectiveTo construct a nomogram prediction model for pain crisis occurrence based on clinical data of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the aim of providing a scientific basis for clinical decision-making.MethodsA total of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected as the study subjects. Demographic data, disease information, pain severity (assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), psychological status (anxiety and depression assessed using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS, and the Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS), and social support (assessed using the Perceived Social Support Scale, PSSS) were collected. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors influencing pain crisis. The R software was used to visualize the nomogram, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were employed to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the model.ResultsA total of 500 questionnaires were distributed, and 448 qualified questionnaires were collected, with a qualification rate of 89.6%. The patients were divided into a modeling group (n=314) and a validation group (n=134). Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the pain crisis group and the pain-free group in terms of gender, age, education level, PSSS score, bone metastases, pleural metastases, depression and anxiety levels, and antitumor efficacy (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that bone metastasis, PSSS score, age, depression, and anxiety levels were independent factors influencing pain crisis in patients with advanced NSCLC. Based on the results of the multivariate Logistic regression analysis, a nomogram prediction model for pain crisis occurrence in patients with advanced NSCLC was constructed. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the ROC curve in the modeling and validation groups was 0.948 and 0.921, respectively, indicating high discrimination of the model. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test results showed good consistency of the model.ConclusionThis study successfully constructed and validated a nomogram prediction model based on independent factors such as bone metastasis, social support (PSSS score), age, depression, and anxiety levels. This model can objectively and quantitatively predict the risk of pain crisis occurrence in patients with advanced NSCLC, providing a scientific basis for clinical decision-making. It helps identify high-risk patients with pain crisis in advance and optimize pain management strategies, thereby improving patient prognosis and quality of life.
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effects of strontium-89 to prevent bone metastases of lung neoplasms.Methods Thirty patients with bone metastases of lung neoplasms received strontium-89 treatment (89SrCl2) at a dose of 148 MBq through intravenous injection.The analgesic effect was assessed by VAS method and doses or frequency of using analgesic drugs.Other efficacy parameters included changes in the number of osseous lesions and urinary levels of pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline on the day 28 after therapy.Results The total pain relief rate was 73.3%(22/30)，among which 5(16.6%) cases with pain vanished，suggesting significant alleviation of the pain intensity by the treatment(Plt;0.001) on the day 28 after therapy.The number of lesions decreased in 16 cases with effective rate of 53.3%，showing the bone metastases significantly decreased after the therapy (Plt;0.001).The urinary levels of pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline on the day 28 after therapy were (62.48±37.25)nmol/mmol Cr and (13.94±8.66)nmol/mmol Cr，respectively，which were decreased significantly compared to the levels before treatment which were (100.15±48.65)nmol/mmol Cr and (31.25±15.32)nmol/mmol Cr，respectively (both Plt;0.001).Conclusion Strontium-89 is effective to relieve pain and prevent bone lesions in patients with bone metastases of the lung neoplasms.
Objective To introduce the current studies on bone biochemical markers in breast cancer with bone metastasis. Methods The papers in recent 8 years about the application of bone biochemical markers in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer with bone metastasis were reviewed. Results NTX had the best relation with bone metastasis. ICTP was much more worthy than NTX in diagnosis of breast cancer with bone metastasis. Osteogenesis markers were little worthy in diagnosis of breast cancer with bone metastasis. Conclusion Bone biochemical markers can not replace the image exams and biopsy in diagnosing the bone metastasis of breast cancer,but may be one of the factors to get the early diagnosis.